MAKE 3D IMAGES without fancy equipment! (easy stereo photo tutorial)

Подписаться 4,5 тыс.

Просмотров 4,5 тыс.

50% 1

3D images are fascinating to look at and surprisingly easy to make. I'll cover different methods including using only software (like Google Earth, flight simulator and ACC), one camera and a pair of cameras.
Huge thanks to Valerie for modelling in this video - find more of her at / valerie_della_longa
DISCLAIMER: If you buy using the affiliate links below, I may receive a small commission at no additional charge to you. I appreciate your support !
Brian May's book on Stereoscopy: amzn.to/3SliaKB
ViewMaster: amzn.to/3SliaKB

Хобби

Опубликовано:

18 окт 2022

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 25

@gautampatel9056 15 дней назад

Hi nice summary. I have been using stereo photo maker a free software, able to color correct and align images. Output can be in various formats suitable for different devices.

@TourWithMelanie 5 месяцев назад

thank you! this is an excellent description

@FilNenna 5 месяцев назад

Glad you found it useful! 3D images are a lot of fun.

@fronknstine Год назад

Many thanks for this explanation, and for the accompanying examples 🙏. You cover a lot.

@FilNenna Год назад

that's very kind - thanks for the comment!

@ronkeeney1752 3 месяца назад

Two identical action cameras set up identically and attached to a light bar on a handle works reasonably well. I use two older AEE s71 action cams.

@FilNenna 3 месяца назад

Perfect. And you can get the action cameras quite close together if needs be, too. I like it.

@pwolkowicki 2 месяца назад

I used 2 YI action cameras, but they had different WB settings. And they only had Auto WB.

@pwolkowicki 2 месяца назад

I made some 3D pictures and short videos just to test it. My biggest isue is how to comfortably watch them. Crossing eye view works but it's very tiring for eys. I bought a 3D viewer for my phone (those googles you put on and put your phone in) but for some reason it's hard to use them and the effect isn't great. Best for me so far are anaglyphs - best 3d effect, not tiring for my eyes. I did those 3D using 1 camera technique, 2 identical camera (action cameras, but they used to work in slightly different WB) and Samsung NX with 3D lens (45/1.8 3D). Samsung also had some issues with exposing right and left size. And 2 shots were just one after another so no fast moving objects could be found in the scene.

@FilNenna 2 месяца назад

I think that is exactly why stereo goes into and out of fashion so fast. It can strain the eyes, and you need special equipment (sometimes expensive and/or bulky) to do it.

@kukp960 2 месяца назад

@@FilNenna I use two Fuji Instax SQ 6 mounted on a rail side by side, and a thirty years old viewer, which enlarges a bit, and is a bit prismatic, so you won't have to stress your eyes. Works pretty nice, also for children and elderly people, who otherwise would not succeed to view the stereoscopic effect.

@jonz2984 6 месяцев назад

Excellent video, thank you.

@FilNenna 6 месяцев назад

Glad you enjoyed it!

@Mabh838 Год назад

Very clear and simple explanation , thank you for effort

@FilNenna Год назад

You are welcome - glad it was useful!

@heinzhagenbucher4714 Год назад

How cool is this! Got it right away. And I'll try it when I'm out again with a nice subject. Thank you ever so much.

@FilNenna Год назад

Glad you found it useful! Let us know how it goes.

@heinzhagenbucher4714 Год назад

@@FilNenna Will do. But you need to be a bit patienced. 😊

@dunnymonster Год назад

Excellent 👍

@FilNenna Год назад

Thanks for the thumbs up!

@rahummi20 4 месяца назад

Thank you man for that i really love 3d and i did pictures like you showed but my lg 3d tv can't show them right, i can see them with my crossing eyes but my tv can't

@akkashb625 29 дней назад

Very informative!!!! What’s the minimum inch distance required to make a stereoscopic image?

@FilNenna 4 дня назад

Usually, the lower limit is the distance between human eyes - about 2.5 inches. I imagine you could go narrower for macro stereo images, though I don't know too much about that. You'd also be limited by the physical size of your cameras and lenses.