having something like this in my workspace would be amazing, but i think i'd not get much work done because i'd be constantly just watching the plants!
If you add ceramic coating to the inside of the glass, you'll have a clearer view through the glass at all times. It will only need to be re-applied every 6-12 months, depending.
Great build! I was wondering if it wouldn't be better to have the misting system to create mist only at the vegetation level since it wouldn't create water droplets in the glass.
Very beautiful end result! However, I want to know why you used soil and sand when you could have just used lava rocks and lava gravel since moss and ferns grow well in lava rocks alone. Also, why did you you use a misting system that gets the glass wet when it seems a fogger would have watered it well without the wet glass.
Boy I hope they have an RO system hooked up to their mister, otherwise that is going to look terrible in no time with mineral stains... yup, I've made that mistake once.
This is my concern as well. Hard water leaves calcium deposits. You would need a squeegee with a long handle so not to step on the scape and leave footprints. That being said, it is beautiful. I'd like to see a 1 year update.
안녕하세요. 집 앞 마당에 이끼정원을 만들기 위해 몇년째 고생중인 초보 가드너에요. 환경은 양지인데 나무를 심어서 약간의 나무 그늘을 만들어준 정도입니다. 흙은 검은 화산토로 마운드를 만들어놓은 상태입니다. 다름이 아니라 벌써 세 번째 이끼 정원 조성에 실패해 왜 자꾸 이끼들이 죽는지 나름의 분석을 하다보니 혹시 배수 문제인가 싶은 생각이 듭니다.(양지라 습이 부족한가해서 자동 미스트 관수 시스템도 설치했는데 시간이 지나니 관수 시스템 주변 이끼가 먼저 죽어 나갑니다) 저는 매번 검은 흙위에 동네 과수원에서 뜯어온 양지이끼를 그대로 붙였는데요. 작업하시는 것 보면 이끼 올리기 전에 마사토를 굉장히 두껍게 까는것처럼 보입니다. 배수를 위한 것인지 궁금합니다. 맞다면 시중에서 파는 '초미립' 마사토를 사서 두껍게 깔고 그 위에 이끼를 식재하면 괜찮을까요? 생각하기로는 마사토 위에는 활착이 잘 안되서 이끼가 떠있을것 같은 우려가 되는데요. 배수 문제 없이 양지이끼를 잘 활착시키는 방법이 궁금합니다.. ㅠㅠ
@@JustAnotherAsianGuy2 If they want it inside, then they can have it inside. Whether they like it or not is up to them, not you. You can not judge when you have no participation in this whatsoever and most likely have no experience building terrariums that big, much less outside. You can have a moss garden outside, but conditions are different. They are not making the garden for themselves, meaning they will not be able to provide the care it needs for outside. You can control most of the variables inside, meaning the client will have an easier time maintaining it. Of course you can do it outside, but it’s not optimal. Compare it to a homeless person, a homeless person can live outside for the rest of their life, but is it healthy? No. A terrarium like that would have an even harder time because they can not move by themselves and have to rely on someone to take care of them (exaggerated for the purpose of understanding). Why do you feel the need to critique when you can’t see through the flaws of your own logic?
