The TV cable should be adjusted using a line pressure gauge, if it has the T350, or 700R4 / 4L60, if it used the 4L60E that would have come behind the LT1, the TP sensor would be used, as GM debuted the 4L60E in '94, and did away with the TV cable. It is critical to the life of the trans, and it should downshift, if adjusted correctly.
That universal cable that came with the car just did not work out well or I just could not figure out how to adjust it. The 1993 Camaro TV cable worked much better and the test drive (no in this video) worked well. good kickdown and it holds the shift points higher.
Any thoughts on the afr 180 lt1 heads ? Don’t really want to buy an lt4 intake manifold . Probably going to go 224/230 on the cam or maybe the tick 227/234 cam
Oh yes. My thoughts on the AFR 180 LT1 or any AFR heads (right out of the box) is that they are a very good bang for the buck. The best quality available and best quality assurance. Good flow even for the smallest and lowest price AFR head. I would put them on my engine in my car in a heart beat if I had the time.
@@EllweinEngines ERE124 in my 94 Impala. I only drove the car twice after I put the engine in and the 4l60e went on strike for a rebuild. I’ll get back to normal project car things once I get the trans sorted. I expected this.
How can you tell? Personally I've borescoped the cylinders and it's an aftermarket piston. The timing cover is 94-95 style LT1. The heads are aftermarket AFR. You don't think that maybe the intake was an LT 4 purchase? I have two LT4 intake manifolds but I don't have any LT4 engines. For this car, the block could have started lift as a 1996LT4 but I think it is a 1994 Corvette LT1 block. That's my best guess. Corvette LT1 blocks are as good as Corvette LT4. Corvette LT4 had better crankshaft steel but and awesome GM LT4 heads but this engine has AFR heads (even better) and aftermarket rotating assembly. Cannot call it an LT4 in my opinion just because it has an LT4 intake manifold.
