Bruh, I legit started bobbing my head. This is a banger and on a Mammoth tank cannon level type of bang. I want more, you got a sub and I'm eager to hear more!
Ehm, actually, the Mammoth tank had two rocket pods, one on each side of the turret. Video is basically ruined for not being 100% lore accurate. Unsubscribed, disliked, reported, mailed in an envelope to the FBI, IP grabbed, potatoes thrown off a cliff.
2 месяца назад
Shut it, nerd. Tank cool, Imma go grab Stacy with it. Now, go back into the locker. 😎
Feels more like a Red Alert track to me... I mean it starts a bit like Bigfoot or another RA track and there's the Legally Distinct Mammoth Tank to also point toward Command and Conquer.
Unable to comply, building in progress. Unable to comply, building in progress. Unable to comply, building in progress. Unable to comply, building in progress. Unable to comply, building in progress. Unable to comply, building in progress. Unable to comply, building in progress. Unable to comply, building in progress. Unable to comply, building in progress. Unable to comply, building in progress. Unable to comply, building in progress. unit lost
The mammoth tank is cool but the pedantic impulses win in me. Anyone know if the separate tracks are remotely realistic for a tank design? Also why have two barrels and still a separate missile pod? And why no machine gun?
that's easy bro - more tracks = go faster, two barrels = more shooty, missile pods are for anti air, and don't need a machine gun when you can just run over infantry. I played thousands of hours of C&C I know what I'm talking about, trust me 👌
There was some work on such designs done in the US in the 1950s. Primarily as an attempt at resisting mines, but I think they were also trying to see if they can fit a larger turret that way. Anyway, it turned out out that the drive system for every track still needed to be able to provide half the total force, or it'd be hard to steer. So it'd be at half-power after losing a track, or would need to do a bunch of complex mechanical stuff to compensate. The end result was 8-13% heavier than the conventional design, with worse ground pressure because of the gap. And probably worse mechanical efficiency because of the extra machinery. If you want another weird rabbithole of multi-track vehicles that probably aren't leaving the realm of science fiction, look up "Articulated tanks."
