Manchester City 115 Fraud Charges RESOLVED OUT OF COURT?! 

Nonsense.

@@fhskahfdbskwhfh2970 this is a football channel for football news. Has nothing to do if the team Terry supports is doing well or not. City admitting guilt would make you cry we all know

@@fhskahfdbskwhfh2970 Ok, Mustafa.

⁠@@scotty90Your club performances already make you cry. But Ud have to wait for a court verdict to find out if we cry or not.

@@fhskahfdbskwhfh2970 bro I support Arsenal 😂😂 my club’s performance is not making me cry at all

Fuckin" A!!!!

Settlement might mean a HUGE point deduction

@scotty90 Settlement usually means a fine. Unless I am missing something here.

@@scotty90 settlement outside of court is usually a cash sum

Lost its cred yrs ago

WHY is everybody assuming the settlement will be coming from City? As it stands, they are the ones who will be paid a settlement from the PL for the unproven accusations aimed at them. The fact that you're all assuming it's the club that is guilty based on absolutely nothing is disgusting. And yes, I am repeating this comment on reply to many of you who have made libellous comments about the club and I hope they sue the arse off the lot of you.

Yep, owned by big oil tycoons from the Middle East.

Their**

They should all file a lawsuit on the premise of undermining relegated clubs which lost millions by going down.

They already did that. That's why the PL exists. **PL* If you can't get the name of the league right you don't get an opinion.

Cry

Did you consider that the league can't actually prove guilt?

Cry

The league embarrassed itself when it brought the charges.

​@@blueviper3861Says the former United Fan 🤦🏻‍♂️

​@@blueviper3861 How is this crying? You look more rattled commenting on this than he is posting. Settlement out of court generally denotes that wrongs were committed. The shiekhs will just pay through the nose. Both parties look sus doing this.

​@@jaskiratuppal6935if pl had stonewall evidence it wouldn't take so much time. The problem is uefa had not evidence and the pr has not either!

Not some degree but in totality bro

Just like when Thomas Partey admitted guilt when he settled out of court...

@@michaelnwode3438 they are just fuckin rumours u jealous twat

​@JohnEllis-le9ym his case with your mom is still pending tho 😂

It basically means that neither party is confident enough in their case to attempt a trial. In reality it also casts serious doubt on both parties.

If a settlement is an admision, whats the job of the court? Its a double standard

Just like when Thomas Partey admitted guilt when he settled out of court...

​@@JohnEllis-le9ym it never went to court because it was bs😂😂 we would of got news a long time ago about the situation

@@JohnEllis-le9ym perhaps. But that’s the problem with settlements, you never hear the full story.

Makes no sense. Funny that a settlement instantly implies city are guilty. Have you ever stopped to think a settlement would also imply the PL have got it catastrophically wrong and are now trying to seek some salvation to keep their reputation in tact?

Steal you clow, you bottle it anyway, and for you and the other cliwns out there, how do you know who wants to settle? As a city fan, i dont want us to settle, take them the whoke way, we know the charges are sh1t,yet again you lot assume its us who want to settle, lets just say your right,ok..if the premier leagues bollox charges are solid, and its took them 4 fekkin years, whats to stop the PL saying,no settlement, your bang to rights and your getti g it? Stop looking through your biased eyes and think..you know 2 of the cgarges are a sponsors name printed to big, and the grass length on our pitch..so pathetic

No. Listen to what Borson said-again.

Not true. Innocent people settle all the time to avoid the risk and cost of running a trial

@@ssjjaeds759 not if you have City money!!!! 🤦‍♂️. They average person who doesnt have money does and not if your accused of a crime. If a crime was committed against you then a person may settle. Your confused

@@coachlance7076 I'm a barrister. I think I know what I'm talking about. But have a good day.

Well the fact is there are only a few, four or five in total. The 115 is made up because they are alleged to have been repeated. A bit like if you get a parking ticket every day for a week it's not one charge, it's 7, and so on. The PL dropped an almighty bollocks by announcing it as 115. They almost certainly have nothing and I assume that they thought they would spook City into admitting something, but you can't prove what didn't happen. Why would the club be spending millions on increasing the stadium size if they were guilty? Why would United poach the main director said to be responsible for most of the deals? If Etihad Airways are to go public, like they have announced, their financial records would then be available for the public to view so it doesn't make sense from their point of view. The owners have an excellent business reputation around the world, why would they risk that and potentially put billions of dollars worth of contracts at risk for the sake of a handful of relatively small and meaningless payments? None of it makes any sense and the PL wouldn't have opted for a private hearing if they had anything substantial. I think they wanted to try to prove to the government that they did not need independent regulation. The mentality of the PL board, who are not lawyers or financial experts, was that they would show the world who is in charge and it's massively backfired on them. Let's also not forget that the PL is effectively the group of clubs in the league, so that's 19 clubs who have been taken to the cleaners and embarrassed by city over the past decade. There are strong rumours that the case was brought by Arsenal, United and Liverpool, the three clubs that would have won more titles had it not been for City's emergence and I know for certain that within all those clubs and United in particular that there are people who are very bitter that City have come along and broken up their little cartel at the top of the league. You can't tell me that they're not bothered, because it's not just the trophies but the hundreds of millions that City have collected in prize money used to be theirs. They can't stop City on the pitch so they're trying to stop them off it. Hey, I don't know any more than anybody else does but it all adds up.

it'd be funny as hell if they actually did that

I doubt the PL are corrupting their own league, although when you see some of the VAR and referring decisions you do wonder. I don't know why City or any of the other 19 put up with it, you would have to ask them. would be funny if City won the title again by default though because nobody else turned up to play. 😂

Be more like a week in court.

and say sorry if there innocent

It has NOTHING to do with court. These are NOT legal proceedings. Not one of you has a clue what you are talking about so crawl back into your holes and shut up.

Yep exactly, then add in all the other clubs who've missed out on CL money, winning titles over the years. Be an absolute disgrace if they're allowed to get away with it without actually beating the case.

@@Amberle73 Then add in all the other clubs like Arsenal who missed out on CL money by failing to qualify for it for 7 years...

@@Amberle73 Get away with what, exactly.

To say you`re on the spot you`re absolutely clueless.

@@brianshockledge3241 Cheating

WE RUN THIS LEAGUE. CRY ABOUT IT

I agree. The league incompetence in carrying charges it cant actually prove to appease the masses.

Wouldn't be surprised as that's what I thought might happen all along, if that's the case what a mockery and something seriously wrong if get away with it

@@Markyy____ Your clubs demise will come and there will be plenty that will be smiling at you and your club.

@@sp4rtavus244 City are innocent. Good luck next season when City are about 30% better🤣5peat is inevitable

They'll definitely lose in court. City have never settled in any case. EVer

City have already told them no chance of settlement because there is no proof of made up charges.

@paulgoodwin2224 if there's no proof of made-up charges...then the charges must be legitimate.

the only settlement will be the EPL paying City millions in damages, they were warned

WHY is everybody assuming the settlement will be coming from City? As it stands, they are the ones who will be paid a settlement from the PL for the unproven accusations aimed at them. The fact that you're all assuming it's the club that is guilty based on absolutely nothing is disgusting. And yes, I am repeating this comment on reply to many of you who have made libellous comments about the club and I hope they sue the arse off the lot of you.

Where is the favouritism.

@@fifty-five6929 Are you blind?

@@fifty-five6929 Billion and millionaires getting to remain in their positions of power and influence. You scratch mine...I scratch yours because we can afford to.

​@@fifty-five6929how can you ask that without feeling like a complete fool?? Why should it take a year or more to investigate City but it takes seconds for teams like Everton and Nottingham Forest get their points deducted within bloody seconds twice this season!!! Get your head out your dirty ass

Stop crying your a little B### I'll let you work out the right word to use before I'll if you are intelligent enough for this but I doubt that you are capable of doing

That won't work. It's Man City's financial leverage that would make the Premier League take that settlement. Luton Town doesn't have the financial leverage to do such a thing.

I've been saying for months, this won't even get into court, the FA have shown themselves for what they are, a bunch of clowns.

And if everybody cheats like City allegedly cheated just to catch up with City but City still keep winning the league and everyone end up like Utd & Chelsea who spent more than City to get worse. Victimpool fans will probably blame a City janitor

WHY is everybody assuming the settlement will be coming from City? As it stands, they are the ones who will be paid a settlement from the PL for the unproven accusations aimed at them. The fact that you're all assuming it's the club that is guilty based on absolutely nothing is disgusting. And yes, I am repeating this comment on reply to many of you who have made libellous comments about the club and I hope they sue the arse off the lot of you.

beginning to sound more and more like they havent

I very much doubt that the PL have breached their own rules. apart from making unfounded accusations against the club which is probably why they will have to pay the club a settlement fee for the damage done to their reputation. Once again, There IS no court case, these are NOT criminal proceedings. The only criminal proceedings that will happen is when the club start suing people for libel, but well done for proving how clueless you all are.

@@-A-lm5xb I never said anything about the PL breaking their own rules but, sure buddy.

Omg, it’s maddening. They wouldn’t even be in the tithe race if not for the shady refereeing. I’ve seen enough, Premier League is an embarrassment

Another one talking absolute Bollocks

So the prem has chargwd man city 115 times bjt the prems refs also helps man city......How stupid can you be

Cry more you waffling muppet

My God the coping is real all your clubs have spent just as much but you're fckn shit

bye

WHY is everybody assuming the settlement will be coming from City? As it stands, they are the ones who will be paid a settlement from the PL for the unproven accusations aimed at them. The fact that you're all assuming it's the club that is guilty based on absolutely nothing is disgusting. And yes, I am repeating this comment on reply to many of you who have made libellous comments about the club and I hope they sue the arse off the lot of you.

Out of court settlements are not an admission of guilt. It does damage the PL's credibility, although it was damaged more than 20 years ago imo.

@@dragonballfanscantread2383which was about time when i stopped paying any football related fees and just freeloaded. Thanks a lot whales.

Cry

​@@dragonballfanscantread2383Shut up bin dipper

@@blueviper3861 Is that what you said to all the former Man City players who were abused as kid by Barry Bennell in the 80s?

What difference does that make? Everybody play the same teams

​Yeah but some teams get dodgy var decisions and some dont. Ask liverpool when they narrowly lost the league twice. ​@@GermanChickenwing

@@malcolmjacobite Everybody in the league get bad and call calls.. Liverpool lost the league by losing or drawing to teams they don't suppose to

​​@@GermanChickenwingyeah but city rarelyy do, and when they do they kick off, surround the ref and tweet. Then no repercussions. Arteta gets sent off for celebrating.

@@malcolmjacobite City rarely do? This is where you are not being fair

They all know this, but the hate is blinding them.

And why would City agree? So much for all your irrefutable evidence. So much for all of your resources

Only the genuine evidence ever comes out in a court, be stupid if you released it before hand. maybe the settlement being, City won't sue for damages.

@@nichobee Sorry, can you explain? Because so far it's been over a year and the PL, WHO WANTED THE CASE TO BE HEARD IN PRIVATE, have come up with nothing. In fact despite all your hate comments not a single one of you has managed to come up with any proof of anything. Seems odd that you're all soooooo wrapped up in bitter jealousy, so wrapped up in hate that you wouldn't try and do a little digging or investigating yourselves between you all, yet NOT ONE PERSON ANYWHERE has come up with a single shred of evidence that City have done ANYTHING wrong. City say they have irrefutable evidence so it sounds to me like they have nothing to hide, but the PL WANTED THE CASE TO BE HEARD IN PRIVATE. Why can't any of you see a problem with that if they have evidence of any wrongdoing by City? And once again, it's NOT a criminal case and has got NOTHING to do with court, so you should all shut up and stick to what you know - which is nothing at all. Fucking disgrace the lot of you.

Exactly, which is precisely why the PL will most likely have to pay a settlement for the damage that has been done to the clubs reputation. You can see that in this and every other thread about the case online.

U mean a state lol

Cry

Epl embarassed itself when it brought a case it couldn't prove.

WHY is everybody assuming the settlement will be coming from City? As it stands, they are the ones who will be paid a settlement from the PL for the unproven accusations aimed at them. The fact that you're all assuming it's the club that is guilty based on absolutely nothing is disgusting. And yes, I am repeating this comment on reply to many of you who have made libellous comments about the club and I hope they sue the arse off the lot of you.

Cry

League lost credibilty in a case they couldnt prove.

There won't be a settlement out of court because it's not going to court. It's not a criminal case and has nothing to do with court. But once again the comments prove that you lot don't have a clue what you're talking about.

Why do you think a settlement would be a cash settlement? What gives you this idea? Why would a settlement not be a 20 point deduction instead of a double relegation? If city feel they are at risk from a serious punishment like that then a settlement could include huge point deductions

Lol, Mission Failed Mikel popping up again like a bad dose of herpes and asking "Does it mean it's ok to now cheat?" and "Football has now become a corrupt business" after the former Arsenal Chief Executive Raul Sanhelli was convicted of fraud and cheating the books Priceless 🤣

@@JohnEllis-le9ym He was stealing money off Arsenal, city are being accused of injecting the owners money in the club which is against epl rules.

@@JohnEllis-le9ym You're comparing one dodgy individual with a entire club institution ? That's priceless 🤦‍♂

​@@gooner_duke2756 Fraud is fraud whatever the scale of it, plus Citys are alleged charges while Sanhelli and George Graham were both found guilty of it That's priceless 😂

City to rot in league 2 soon, yes will will be there 👋🏾🤣

@@MUFCK7 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@MUFCK7 Still dreaming in your theatre of dreams I see - or should that be theatre of wet dreams?

They’ve clearly got something to hide!

I agree the Premier League are terrified

Premier league is scared of City's innocence!!! Trust me, PL is trying to save face. No evidence and they dont want to look stupid after all

@@Rainer-mr Yes probably...the individuals are because they could easily "have an accident". Where upon...the very few attempting to investigate those accidents will know fine well they could fall foul in the same way, with even less of a commotion caused. Overall, the vast majority will look the other way and carry on because..money begets morals and integrity

@@Tom-dv6ei Ah morals and integrity. 2 words that perfectly delineate the footballing world 😂 You all go on like Man City introduced corruption to football even though we're the only club to not be found guilty of anything 😂

No club is bigger than the league it’s in. What morality allows you to say it’s ok at the expense of all the teams you’re competing against.

@@threeone117 He didn't say it was OK, he said if he had the option to settle out of court he would take it. None of this has anything to do with City because there is no court, it's not a criminal case.

Would be nice, but we all know that won't happen

Who's to say its City asking for a settlement and not the Premier League?

Is the league settling with City or City settling with the league ? CITY have never settled EVER

Yes of course who is seeking the settlement is the most suspect... absolutely agree....my point remains the same about transparency... somebody will look bad if it isn't resolved openly

@@gedmc1960 The rumour going round is that it is the PL who have broached this subject.

Its the Premier league trying to settle.

and yet again... 1. It is NOT a criminal case and has NOTHING to do with court. There is no court case. 2. It has NOTHING to do with the FA 3. You are all assuming it is the club that will be settling. The club have nothing to settle, it is the PL who has made the accusations so it is the PL who will have to make a financial settlement for the damage done to the club's reputation. Still going to protest and revolt? Because the only fans here who should be aggrieved are the City fans who have had to put up with this shite for the past year, and I for one hope it does finish the PL because the current lot in charge want locking up for the damage they have done in what should be the most exciting time EVER for the club and it's followers.

@-A-lm5xb Okay sure, yes, I'm using the word "court" as a figure of speech. You know exactly what I mean though. Yes, it's held by an independent disciplinary commission that will decide the verdict with unlimited powers. Of course both parties would be settling if the independent commission doesn't take place. Why would the PL have to settle for damage done to the clubs reputation if it's never concluded that Man city are actually innocent. Furthermore why the hell would Man city accept a settlement if they have 100% evidence that they have done nothing wrong. It's a win win for them to have the independent disciplinary commission conclude the charges as they would probs get a wack of money for the clubs reputation being damaged and then also the whole world would know they're innocent. Can you not think of one quite obvious reason why Man City wouldn't take this route??? I agree I feel sorry for City fans as they may have to suffer for the idiots in charge of their club, if guilty, but you're acting and talking like you know Man city has done nothing wrong already. I mean you must be a city fan clearly. And yes if the PL doesn't take it to the commission then absolutely there should be protests and revolts as it would stink the entire league out. Protests against the PL and Man City.

@@lezoold9004 Stop talking utter nonsense, The hapless Premier League obviously has no evidence and that’s why they are desperately seeking a way out of the mess that they have created for themselves. These malicious allegations have already been previously thrown out by a proper court of law and only exists because the cartel of American owned clubs demanded it to stifle competition and investment and to protect their position at the top.

@@lezoold9004 It’s perfectly obvious that the hapless Premier League has no evidence to support their malicious allegations and are desperately seeking a way out of the mess they have created for themselves.

There's nothing to get to the bottom of, iff the fa have got any concrete proof of any wrongdoing, get it into court, but they haven't, have they? That's why they're backpedaling, and making themselves look the incompetent fools that they are.

Which is exactly why there is a hearing that will take place on an undisclosed date, and it's in private because the PL wanted it to be heard in private, most likely because they have no evidence and don't want to embarrass themselves in public and are hoping that City will admit to something or give them proof of something. But you can't give proof to somebody if you haven't done anything wrong and there isn't anything to prove, which is probably why the PL are going to have to pay a settlement fee to the club to cover their legal costs etc. and the damage to their reputation over the past year and most likely for many years to come. This settlement thing isn't real by the way, just speculation that's been put out there, most likely happening now because they know City have two huge matches coming up with the final league match and FA Cup final.

Well tough because it's not a criminal case.

Where's the proof shit for brains? there isn't any is there ? otherwise the fa would have taken it all the way , wouldn't they? it's pissed off wankers like you though hasn't it, you had city hung drawn and quartered, with no proof at all.

No, not exactly. UEFA, the European League, took City to court but the case couldn't be proven and was easily overturned on appeal. They were trying to impose a fine without any valid evidence. Notable - but never mentioned anywhere - was the UEFA didn't challenge the appeal or even turn up at the hearing. The only fine was for not providing documentation on time, but it was effectively the equivalent of a parking fine to you or me, nothing major. £6 million, or around US$8 million. The current case is more or less based on that one. The 115 charges is really only about 5 or 6 with the same charges supposedly repeated over time, like if you park in that restricted area today that's one charge, if you're still parked there tomorrow that's another charge, and so on.

It Died In 2003 Mate.

Etihad Emirates Saudia Indeed

@@pulkeandmatuke.israelipunc2033 J3ws

You really believe that? Fergie time, 12 man at Anfield getting ref decisions. Champs league City V Spurs ------ VAR was awful.

Have you considered that the PL want to settle as they have realised their “evidence” isn’t going to cut it! Either side can approach the other to discuss settling.

​@johnsimmonds5876 then every club can leave the premier league because they can't be trusted simple as that

"The Premier League was here before them" No it wasn't. FACTS ignored again. Indeed the first Monday nitht game in the Premier league was City v QPR. A 0-0 bore draw. I was there.

It's best for City, so any settlement will require no admission of guilt and the charges dropped.

A settlement was always going to be the end result.

Wrong. Firstly, that wouldn't happen. Secondly, it's literally never going to court because it's in no way a legal matter.

Yes, exactly. Why did the EPL leave the charges on City's gate in February 2023? Because the EPL were being grilled by the Government the very next day on their running of the EPL. What does that say? The EPL doesn't want the Government prying into how they run their football so City's charges were an attempt at deflection.

Because they didn't win multiple titles. Relatively speaking, they're irrelevant. Imagine the PL has to severely punish and double relegate the team that has been champion so many times... it would make a mockery of their brand. That's why they're scared to act.

-they admitted guilt -court actually had nothing to do with it. It's not a legal matter.

@@kunimitsune177 so why can't the same punishment apply? What's different for Everton and Forest?

Well its not entirely the same, Everton was found guilty in breaching the PL PSR rules which is cheating basically, and they admitted to it. Now with City, the 115 charges are a bit of a tricky thing, you see only 12 of those charges are legitimately connected to cheating. The other 103 are charges related to financials and them telling the PL to go fuck themselves. Now these dont get you in any trouble as they dont really pertain on gaining any advantage at a sporting level. For the PL to punish City they have to prove the breaches on those 12 charges in order get them canned, not the 115.

Have you read the emails? CAS allowed the emails as evidence and concluded they were not evidence of misdeed. They added the comment that UEFA might not have pursued the case, had UEFA had access to evidence provided to CAS.

@@Telssa1only the stuff leaked and that’s irrelevant as I stated if both parties settle and it’s done and dusted there is no proof either way that city did or didn’t do anything.

@@CMWargames I was responding to your assetion that Der Spiegel uncovered discrepancies. They didn't.

not if there innocent

You have already decided a guilty verdict!

If they get of what? 🤔🤔 You can't even spell a three letter word?

Why settle out of court if your innocent!!

Man it football be relaxed arsenal fool

And what if it's the Prem who wanted to settle out of court? 😂

@@Rainer-mrif that’s the case it’s because they already paid off the right people privately

@@Rainer-mr Not a chance in hell their wouldn't need to be a trial all the premier would do is drop the charges City are guilty as hell and they will do all they can to buy their way out.

@@paul8409 That doesn't make sense but okay. We beat UEFA's case and we'll beat this one.

@@Rainer-mr It's not one it's over 100 and everybody knows the only way you'll beat anything is to pay people off as usual.

That is something i have thougt about as well, but if they are found guilty the scenario you are mentioning should be directed at the sheicks who acctually own City and cheated. Found guilty would be so damaging that the EPL should kick out city untill new ownership takes over.

@@k-nut7886 There is no punishment harsh enough but sadly aI think it is such a big case with such a ripple effect it will suit all parties to play it down and brush it under the carpet. Can you imagine the financial hit to the premier league if they relegated the best team in the world right now??? The commercial value of having Pep, Haaland, De Bruyne, Foden and so on in the league is huge. Relegating the team would rsult in every player and all the managers anc coaches leaving. You then have the settlements to all the other teams who have been hindered by the cheating. After all that the FA will then have to answer as to why they allowed this to happen and never found the cheating years ago. Nottingham Forest and Everton broke the rules this year and were charged this year. Citys cheating went on for a decade and now is taking years to actually bring forward. Every month that passes more teams are being impacted like Arsenal this season and who ever finishes 5th and misses top 4 due to City being ahead of them and so on.

Horsesh1t, everyone knows why these charges came about, the premier didnt want an independant regulator coming in..they wee told by the govt,get your house in order,TWO DAYS before a govt white was due out? They charged us,coincidence? No..this was the premier league saying look , we have our house i order, its crap, its the PL that has to prove ecerything..as for not cooperating? More horsesh1t,if your accused of a crime, and the police come for you and say, oh,we think you burgled this house, but to ve sure,will you help us prove you did..crap

unless there lawyers told them to be quiet

The PL needs to settlement, cos they can not prove anything. PL is scared of getting sued by City.

not if there innocent

If they've shown enough to you( by you I mean mostly Liverpool & Arsenal fans) how about you turn up to the courts and help the PL with evidence

WHY is everybody assuming the settlement will be coming from City? As it stands, they are the ones who will be paid a settlement from the PL for the unproven accusations aimed at them. The fact that you're all assuming it's the club that is guilty based on absolutely nothing is disgusting. And yes, I am repeating this comment on reply to many of you who have made libellous comments about the club and I hope they sue the arse off the lot of you.

@@DavidRegaL-lw5xz Great comment - but like the PL they have nothing. You cannot prove something that didn't happen.

We’re providing NO evidence of innocence till the charges are proven. They can HATE and CRY forever. Terry and all yall salty rivals, come challenge us on the pitch where our trophies were won 11 v 11. Not in court rooms.

​@fhskahfdbskwhfh2970 back to your mid table. Had to cheat to make your club into something and now claiming oooo 11v11 come at me bro. You're a massive clown.

@@fhskahfdbskwhfh2970yeah no shit your team is good when you do financial doping

​@@fhskahfdbskwhfh2970if you settle out of court means city guilty and premier league can't be trusted so everyone will leave

Settling out of court is to save the premier League of pressing charges with no basis

Cos City said they will drag it out for 10 years, even though they can (apparently) prove their innocence. BS

Facts. Idiots on here dont wanna see it this way however... PL have dropped a royal bollock going after City without sufficient evidence. Idiots.

@@V4n1lla_Rice we’re not providing any evidence of innocence. Y’all should prove we’re guilty. Crazy how rivals also suggest man city players should give up the ball during games and reduce ball possession so as to make games more balanced and interesting. 🤣🤣🤣

@@fhskahfdbskwhfh2970no one needs to prove anything to your cheater club…everyone and their dog knows that city are cheats of the highest order…no wonder that fans of other clubs have 0 respect for any of city’s achievements…

@fhskahfdbskwhfh2970 we don't need to prove it. We know it and so do you. Your treble and fourpeat are forgotten already lmao

Dunno, what would the PL be guilty of? Apart from falsely accusing the club of cheating.

You assume it is City that want to settle out of court. It could easily be the PL who want to do that

I think PL is the entity pushing for settlement in order to save face. This could be another propaganda to further tanish City's integrity. And like you implied, I hope City stick to their gun!!

What's disgraceful? Yet another idiot assuming City are guilty based on absolutely zero, and now assuming it's City and not the PL who will be paying out a settlement sum. How can you say something is disgraceful when you know absolutely NOTHING about the case?

I agree, I think City should take the PL to court for libel rathe than accept a settlement from them.

Yes. W’ll rather win them in court since it’s impossible on the pitch 😂😂😂

Cry more lol

@@blueewasabi go fill you ugly empty stadium 115🤣🖕🖕

@@fhskahfdbskwhfh2970 115

Have shame, how do you support cheating🤢​@@blueewasabi

That doesn’t make them feel better.

Everton (and Forest) admitted guilt. City did not.

@@tonyblakemore3843 Then, why settle out of court if they’re not culpable? Something is definitely fishy 🥲

​@@tonyblakemore3843 well ain't it only fair to investigate this then. If they settle out of court ain't that admitting guilt. Hypocritical just a little dont you think.