Kukis are playing the victim card while the real victims are Meiteis This time also Meiteis are ethnically cleansed from whole of Churachandpur district ,Kangpokpi and Moreh while Thousands of kukis are still living comfortably in the heart of Imphal City in the areas of New Checkon, Langol etc. etc
When victim card is being played up to the hilt with all available theatrics, you are one of the very few person who tries to understand the situation what exactly is happening. We need more of your kind. Sir hats off to you.
Both oral history handed down to us and so also the historical events found on written records clearly tell us; during the Shan kingdom of Pong(Burma), believed to be originally from Thailand, rose to power and rule all over Burma from 12th-16th centuries A.D. In the early 13th century A.D., they came and invaded Nagas and Chins in the Chindwin River valley from upper west Burma i.e. Hukung/Hawkung valley down to Kabaw/Kubow valley. They displaced and scattered Chins and Nagas to different directions. Many Nagas mixed with Chins spread all over Naga Hills. So also many Chins mixed with Nagas scattered down to Chin Hills, Hakha Chin Hills, Rakhine Hills, Chittagong Hills even down to Malays.
Thank you sir Joh aap ne Manipur ka History ke bare mein bilkul sahi bataya hai . I Love my India. I Love Manipur. Long live Manipur. Manipur Emana yaifare.
Meiteis which have a history of more than 6000 years with a kingdom of its own have been reduced to 2nd class citizens in their own land by intruders. The size and influence of Manipur was far beyond the hills of Manipur.But today the very existence of meiteis is in threat and they can not buy land in their own state except in the 10% valley which is open to all community to live.
Bro Abhijit is talking out of his ass. There never was a Manipur Kingdom. There never was a manipuri language. Only a meitei language and meitei Kingdom. The hills were never governed by the Meiteis. They never wanted to associate with the hills be it settling there or whatever. They still call us with that derogatory term HAOS for people in the hills even till today. They do a few campaigns when hills tribes gets out of order back then . But they have never had a real Presence in the hills. Come see Manipur for yourselves. Kukis are as old as Meiteis. Its fckin written in their Chronicle too.
Really? Can you send me the link please. I want cross check the veracity of your claim, if not i will conclude you as a liar. I will check back after a week.
More than 6000 really?? after a couple of years goes by they will say million years of history.... some says 1000, 2000 n some says 3000, but now 6000 what a pity liar they are...
Both oral history handed down to us and so also the historical events found on written records clearly tell us; during the Shan kingdom of Pong(Burma), believed to be originally from Thailand, rose to power and rule all over Burma from 12th-16th centuries A.D. In the early 13th century A.D., they came and invaded Nagas and Chins in the Chindwin River valley from upper west Burma i.e. Hukung/Hawkung valley down to Kabaw/Kubow valley. They displaced and scattered Chins and Nagas to different directions. Many Nagas mixed with Chins spread all over Naga Hills. So also many Chins mixed with Nagas scattered down to Chin Hills, Hakha Chin Hills, Rakhine Hills, Chittagong Hills even down to Malays.
Sri Abhijith Chauda is famous intellectual of one type of face of history. But Unless d history of Manipur is revisited & reconstructed without any political agenda,or biasesd or in an unscientific method we cannot come to d problems solving conclusion.
Well analysis,sir you are the only one who speaks truth about the crisis, also plis address how many ethenic violence they have created and with how many tribes
If valley is for the meitei people( mostly inhabited or first to know) , we never say that this is our area, with laws and thoughts of living together since very long time, we shared. Who doesn't know anything, first prove ur false history to someone who specialise in northeast history. Driven by the idea of our land who doesn't have a proper place of belonging.
@@uzumakinaruto6583 Iam not with Kuki nor with Meiteis but only those people who are near the river Indus with similar culture and religion are known as hindus, whose racial, linguistic, culture are very similar... Now you may call me pro kuki bcoz I don't agree with his story...
@@engtilive6451 Bihar is far from Indus or Sindu River. So, according to you there is no Hindu in Bihar. We refer hindu to all people who follow Hinduism religion.
Kuki didn't take tribe in to their umbrella..kuki are also under umbrella of zo..those who speak similar language like ..kuki chin mizo are all under zo...stupid enough to believe some unproof statement unbeliver meitei people .aske him proof..brainless people..becoz of yur guys fake news..two woment get rape
don't talk about history of before Christ.. there was no lndia before indipendece.. that Bharat is entirely different...so li ve in the presence not in past for the sake of future india..if everyone talk about centuries ago no one belongs to present lndia except animals and ants
That's what I m saying too Manipur have got independence even before india and after British we manipuri are still living like slaves for india just doing whatever they want just f this country this world this media these people I hate them all
Going by his argument, the tribes living in Andaman and Nicobar islands are not the original inhabitants because they don't have any written script or history.
😂😂😂 history or agenda ? You are insulting IQ of avg Indian. FYI all of them speak sinotibetian and come from somewhere else. When bengal powers expanded, meitei king with previous attack upto central burma became smaller and that's how converted to hindu fold by king to which many opposed so king allowed them to folliw both practices. Meiteis took help of brits by the way when they were captured by burmese ........Read more
Jutha meitei history batane ke liye kitna Paisa Mila? Only not kuki Meitei are also in Myanmar (kabow velley) meitei are mostly come from this valley to imphal valley.history nahi malum he to chup chap baitho...
Every Tribe's have their own history and indegenous settlements,so bringing the Meitei's history alone to undermined the Hills people's is not fair and not acceptable at all. Meitei's cannot bring their history point alone and start behaving as if everything belongs to them is a bit foolish and senseless where none will accept. History clearly tells us that Meitei's belong to Valley land and the Tribals in Hills area,so why only now this issue is burning now as the Meeteis populations is overgrowing where they want Tribal land now badly and so planting various issue and situation to threatened Tribals to run away from their own indegenous land ?..No that will never work infact any Tribal communities will never give an even inch of their land to Meitei's whatsoever. Any policy or ideas that threaten Tribals land will sternly oppose by Tribal people,so its no worth trying by Meiteis as it will never work. Everyone knows how Meitei's group are trying every possible way using all state machineries as if it belong to them inorder to threatened and silent Kuki community to achieved their goal but it ain't working. One's should deal and discuss problems as human and not as superior human to consider others as less human,if such situation arises nothing good outcome will come up and so Meitei's must learned that and must behave to respect others too...
Yeh theory kahase laya hai bhai 😂😂😂😂😂😂 Zaroor Prof Bimol ne apna theory bana ke viswas karliya hai. Asli kahani niche dekho 👇😂😂 MANIPUR HISTORY YESTERDAY AND TODAY: FLASHBACK by Palki Sharma. Vatsu Meru asks, "How far is this FlashBack on Manipur is correct?" I have been expecting someone to reply the query, but none has come forward till now. With much hesitation, I give a reply here as below based on history. 1. Palki Sharma is correct, except when she said, "10% land in Manipur belongs to Meiteis and 90% to Kukis" missing to mention the name of the Nagas. Anyway, we all know that 90% land belongs to Nagas, Kukis and other tribal people. The rest, what she has said: about names, dates, the historical facts etc. are excellent and correct. 2. "Meitei Chronicles claim that their kingdom started from 33 A.D." but she said, "it is not 100% reliable". She also said, "it is a mixture of myth and history." She is right. It's all myths and illusions. 3. Both oral history handed down to us and so also the historical events found on written records clearly tell us; during the Shan kingdom of Pong(Burma), believed to be originally from Thailand, rose to power and rule all over Burma from 12th-16th centuries A.D. In the early 13th century A.D., they came and invaded Nagas and Chins in the Chindwin River valley from upper west Burma i.e. Hukung/Hawkung valley down to Kabaw/Kubow valley. They displaced and scattered Chins and Nagas to different directions. Many Nagas mixed with Chins spread all over Naga Hills. So also many Chins mixed with Nagas scattered down to Chin Hills, Hakha Chin Hills, Rakhine Hills, Chittagong Hills even down to Malays. 4. During this very period, one Mekri-Naga from Chindwin River Valley with two sons namely: (1) Meyitei (Meitei), seems to be a descendant of Mekri Naga and (2) Lahüpa (Lahoopa) seems to be a descendant of Runio (Mhaphrü/Tangkhul) Naga came up along in the big group to Khesora and sojourned here. Khesomi tradition claims, both Meyitei and Lahüpa were born and brought up at Khesora. 5. Both Meiteis and Tangkhuls are Naga tribes in Chindwin River valley in Burma. But as there is no road, development, communication, water supply, electricity, or school; our people miserably suffer and remain inaccessible and unknown to the outside world or even to us the closest neighbouring Nagas even today. 6. We do not know how many of them came from Chindwin River valley to Khesora. Tradition says, several thousands came and raised 700-1000 houses at Khesora. Khesomi village is a small village which stands on the hill-side difficult to contain such big population. So, as per the oral story, from Khesora, native Cheveo Kheso (younger brother of Vadeo) led the first group to Chukitong, Lotha area most probably sometime in 1256-1258 A.D. And the second bigger group went to Makhel under the leadership of the great warrior Vadeo Kheso (elder brother of Cheveo). Mekri and the two sons followed Vadeo's group to Makhel/Mekhrora. And so, Makhel is also called Mekriba/Mekrira means Mekri's settled place. Sir Edward Gait in his book "A History of Assam" writes, "The Ahoms called Meitei-Manipuris "Makheli", the Kacharis call them "Maqli", while the old Assamese name for it is "Maqlau" which are all corrupted pronunciation of Makhel." 7. From Makhel, Mekri and the two sons: Meitei and Lahüpa all three of them went down to Maram. As the younger brother, Lahüpa chose to stay at Maram; Mekri and his son Meitei with their group further went down to Mekriba/Mekrira (Mekri's settled place) i.e. today's Imphal valley. They had occupied all these lands virgin, they are the true aborigines and they are the real Meiteis. Tradition says, their brother-Naga warriors dropped them down to Chin-Mei-Rong range. The word "Chin-Mei-Rong" indicates Chins, Meiteis and Rongmeis were mixed together, they went down to Imphal valley. Both Makhel and Imphal valley are called Mekriba/Mekrira. 8. When carefully calculated, they reached Imphal valley sometime in and around 1260's A.D. It is not ancient history. It is only a history of early medieval period. How can they claim that their kingdom started from 33 A.D.? It's an attempt to build a kingdom and a nation on falsehood. After four centuries and a half of their arrival in Imphal valley, and after a number of kings; it was Meidingu Pamheiba (s/o Pitambar Charairongba), a Naga Chief, who was the greatest king to build Meitei kingdom calling it Kangleipak in 1714 A.D. The name "Manipur" (Sanskrit for abode of jewels) emerged for the first time in its history in 1717 during Maharaja Pamheiba. However, in common language "Mani" means "small" and "pur" means "town". Manipur means small town. Manipuri(s) means dwellers of small town in those days. 9. Maharaja Meidingu Pamheiba embraced Vaishnavanism or called Sanamahism, a reformed religion against Saktism brought by two Bengali Hindu preachers: (1) Sarker Deb and (2) Madhab Deb from Cachar in 18th century. And Maharaja Pamheiba enforced it in his kingdom as the official/state religion to bind the subjects to strengthen his newly established kingdom as those days Christianity was not yet known to NorthEast Frontier people. He adopted a Hindu name for himself called "Gharib Nawaz" which means "patron/saviour of the poor". He was a people's Raja. Sir Edward Gait in his book titled "A history of Assam" writes, "Gharib Nawaz was the most able king and he could conquer the whole Burma; but for an unknown reason, he was assassinated in 1747 at the instigation of his own son, Ughat Sha alias Kakilal Thaba." The kingdom built up by Maharaja Pamheiba (1725-1747), speedily collapsed. 10. Then, a ring-leader named Santis Goswami and his gang came from Sylhet(present day Bangladesh), subdued the valley and they played lot of spoilage and dirty games on the Meitei girls giving births to countless offsprings and converting them to Hinduism. In addition to that, many Meitei girls pushed their own freedom beyond the limit in loose marriages with non-Meiteis like Bengali Hindus, Mughal soldiers(Pangals), Marawaris etc. against the wishes of their own culture which would later on bring troubles in their ancestral land. Naren Kumar, a researcher writes, "They enjoyed the Meitei girls letting them giving births of mixed Bengali blood changing their surnames as Kumar, Sharma, Singh.... Devi, Kumari etc." It had made some parts of their history infamous. They began to learn Bengali letters and scripts. Chronicles of Kangleipak began to be written by the Bengali Hindu priests from 19th century A.D., but they wrote it with a lot of manipulations. They insisted to build a Chronicles on Hinduism, and to bury and hide that Meiteis were a people came down from Naga origin which has created confusion. Perhaps, they did this with a thinking that the later generations after them would never come to know their true history again. Meiteis, with their temptation to embrace the position of Brahmin or upper class in Hindu caste-system, they were brainwashed to look their brother-Nagas on the hills as lower caste and they look different. Since then and for quite a number of years, they feel shy to utter that "they are Nagas" and they don't mind to deny that "they are Nagas". They tried to avoid their true root of history by building a new kingdom on falsehood. What a dishonesty? I am not against any religion. I strongly believe in the freedom of religion. But if they wanted to build a kingdom on Hinduism, why should they attempted to make true Nagas as non-Nagas or to completely wipe away Nagas' existence? Since then, within 300 years, Meiteis have lost themselves/their roots as a tribe, and they have become non-tribal. Is that the way to write a Chronicle or history?
11. After Meidingu Pamheiba, a 100 years had passed, his successors were all weak kings. And within a hundred years many unwanted things had been developed. A hundred years after Maharaja Meidingu Pamheiba, Gambhir Singh(Chinglen Nongdren Khomba), s/o Chingthang Khomba (a Naga by origin as revealed by himself to Nagas in 1833 at Kohima) rose to power as a great liberator as Raja of Manipur from 1825-1834 A.D.(i.e. 9 years only) even against the Burmese invasions and devastations. But after the First Anglo-Burmese War, and the Treaty of Yandabo signed on 24th February 1826, Manipur became a protectorate of British Empire. It means Manipur had lost its independence to the British. Gambhir Singh died in 1834. Since then, British ruled India till 1947 and Burma till 1948. After Indian independence, Manipur had agreed to join the Union of India, and the Merger Agreement was signed on 21st September 1949 at Shillong by Kangleipak King (Ningthou), Mr Bodhachandra Singh, Maharaja of Manipur with Shri V P Menon, Advisor to the GOI, Ministry of State, on behalf of the dominion of India for Rs.3 lakhs per year mentioning a land area of 700 sq.km not touching a single inch of the hill area. Thus, the sovereignty and independence of Manipur as a country came to an end. In 1950 and 1951, despite a wise advice and request given to the Meiteis not to reject the Scheduled Tribe(ST) status by the then MP Mr Suisa, but to keep up the Scheduled Tribe(ST) status, they rejected it in 1951 threatening Mr Suisa never to repeat it to them to accept such low caste status again. Manipur became a state of India in 1972. After seven decades, the question of Scheduled Tribe(ST) status has surfaced again and the fight is on. It reminds us all, MP Mr Suisa truly loved Meiteis, and he was not wrong. 12. Runio(elder) and Mekri(younger) were Naga brothers in Chindwin River valley. And as stated above, Mekri's descendants called Meitei Nagas(who became a Hindu sept) and so also Runio's descendants called Mhaphrű/Tangkhul Nagas, are two Naga brother-tribes in Chindwin River valley in Sagaing Division(the biggest state in the whole Burma/Myanmar), Lahe Region and Hakha Chin Hills. Nagas and Chins dominantly occupy the lands between Chindwin River and Irrawaddy River, Hakha Chin Hills and Chin Hills. From here there are 3 Naga MPs come to Burmese Parliament today. It is believed more than 3,500 Naga villages are here in these three states. But as stated above, till today they all continue to miserably suffer without roads, developments, electricity, water supply, school etc., and they remain unexplored, inaccessible and unknown to the outside world. They are in extremely pathetic conditions and in complete darkness. Our people whether Meiteis, Tangkhuls, Chins or other Naga tribes here, they have been suffering endless untold stories under the unscrupulous Burmese misrule. Even today, the Burmese military junta goes on bombing our people in these areas almost everyday. It deeply pains us. 13. As stated above, both present Tangkhuls and Meiteis in Manipur are not the first who originated from here in Manipur itself like the Bilble story of Adam and Eve created by God in Eden Garden. Their ancestors in Chindwin River valley were and are the first. Their true original roots are from Chindwin River valley like many other Naga/Chin tribes. They came to Manipur only late in and around 1260's A.D. History speaks loud and clear on this. It is never my intention to write this piece of note to hurt or malign anyone or any group. For even without me, these plain historical truths will come out sooner or later. There are duplicates who mislead our people into troubles in the land. 14. Instead of fighting here in hatred, jealousy or greed; why not we come together, talk, build up understanding, jointly plan and help our suffering people in Burma/Myanmar? The need is great! We need a strong support from India. A great challenge is lying before us. 15. As seen above, Chins, Meiteis and Nagas are from the same root/stock. Our ancestors committed to be one. We are real brothers and sisters. When you rape a woman among them, you rape your own sister/daughter. When you hate one, you hate your own brother. When you kill them, you kill your own brothers and sisters. You fail your ancestors' covenant. No victory, no glory in it. You disgrace your people and yourself. The more one does it, we are defeated. On the cross Jesus said, "Father! Forgive them for they know not what they do." It reveals ignorance was responsible for Jesus's death. Let each one thinks twice. May there be restraint. "Peace be still." As stated above, it is never intended to hurt anyone. But we need our people to know the truth - truth of our history. But it is said "truth hurts". So fearfully I write this. Share this to all. Zapra Chakhesang, A student of NorthEast Indian History, Kohima, (2023 July 31).
@@vaelock You have already read. Truth hurts! Isn't it? I am not like you people who can go the extent of fabricating your own origin. Kathes (Meiteis) original Homeland is in Burma (Kabaw Valley). Manipur is only 700 sq km that was surrendered to Govt of India and not the Hills. The Kings were only making friends with the Hill tribes. You don't even know our History but calling us with names will only demean you people. We all know the actual history of the Meiteis. How will yourself know when you can easily believe in a propaganda/hearsay. Do some research of your own history then perhaps you won't be able to boast yourself any longer. You are looking for proofs? Lol. Remember you people burn all your history when you burn down the state library in 2001 in protest against the NSCN IM ceasefire extension without Territorial limits. Meiteis burnt the state library so that nobody would even find out the true stories of their beginnings. You can asked your eldest man in your community and you would be surprised to know the Jackal in Shepherd's skin.
@@tuitatiti You people are the one who didn't know facts and history. You are being brainwashed by your militant leader Pramot Sing and Meitei CM Biren Singh
