I didn't know the fox on the right so I googled the names in the title and found one of Mark Normand's routines and it was awesome. At the end of the routine he said "i'm Kevin Hart"... and it took about five seconds for that to sink into my brain, then I was like LOL WTF. Love y'all's show.
On Hardwick, the company he helped start scrubbed him from their website (Nerdist) and he was asked to step down as panelist host at various upcoming big comic-type conventions, so he has lost opportunities
You have multiple screens in the studio. When you are looking at something on right-hand screen them, use a wide-angle to show the guests. And behind on a screen on the wall show us what they are looking at. Would make much more sense and just looking at a couple of guys looking off-screen.
Terminator1337CoolDude totally agree. Why can’t they just pull up a screen capture of what they’re looking at like literally every single other radio show / podcast can do??
Ray Brito yeah, it made Doug look worse when no one really knows how much overhead he has. I think the other show has a car service bc it's an actual sponsored show Doug happens to host lol
all these names dropped and the only ones i recognized was the guy that looks like Otto's puppet ..... that's the only names i knew were an insane man and his puppet .. i miss Otto. he has the best appearances on the o&a play list
...since Jim has already confirmed to be a Prep user, why doesn’t he invite Princess Alena on the show? Maybe he will marry Jim once he sees its serious?!
DjRawd0g I guess I didn't get it because of the part where they were complaining about doing DLM probono. Right before doug text mark telling him he also did Mark's podcast for free. Then mark felt bad for the next half hour.
Doug is a douche it doesn't surprise me he has to pay his guests to come on the show, hes an asshole and always has a snooty attitude. I would never want to smoke weed with him either hes a poser.
I know Jim didn’t just criticize a woman for talking over a video. That would mean he’s completely unaware of the fact they do it to every single video and interview they do. Not one single video could anyone bring up that either him or Sam so that.
I'm looking forward to the day, when 85-year old Jim Norton finally will have a beer again - because what the hell, the end is near anyway - and then realizes, that he never was an alcoholic, because there are no 18-year old alcoholics; that he was a young douche :P
Going to detox or whatever, because of a court order or something like that, because he did something stupid as a teen and he doesn't want to say what it was would be one thing. But apparently he is going to AA meetings for over 30 years, so he really seems to believe that he is an alcoholic.
There are defintely a few 18-year-old addicts/alcoholics out there in real life (ones with the addict gene who started when they were like 10 and are still years away from having the ability to actually get sober, who end up either dying of an OD/alcohol poising or still being drunks/addicts at 45), but not ones who got sober on their second try, also at age 18. Jim not only supposedly managed to do that but he also putatively has never come close to a relapse in the next 35 years, and he's proceeded to talk about it ever since like getting too drunk a couple times with their teenage suburban friends is the same thing as a 30-year heroin or meth addiction or something. Not only that but his simplistic explanation for how he got sober ("it just got to a point where it was too much man, and I said to myself I just couldn't keep doing this") is not the kind of thing that would be sufficient to convince an actual 18-year-old alcoholic/addict to just never touch a mind-altering substance again for the rest of their life. It sounds a lot more like someone who doesn't actually understand addiction cribbing a line he heard in his one-time court-ordered rehab stint used by people much older (who had been using/drinking long enough to really feel that way) and trying to present it as his own experience in an attempt to add the appearance of legitimacy to his backstory, while simultaneously not realizing that that line wouldn't apply to someone his age at the time. Jim's a fake but do you think the guys who are clearly major drunks at 45 were somehow not capable of qualifying as alcoholics at 18 if they had been doing it for at least 4 or 5 years at that point? They only thing those guys weren't capable of at 18 that they would potentially be at 45 if they really have that addict personality is getting sober for any meaningful period of time. A 45-year-old who's been a drunk for 35 years didn't just have the potential to be an alcoholic one day when he was older at age 18, he definitely would have already fit the bill by any definition.
Of course Jim immediately brings up something contradictory about Chloe Dykstra. Jim has become so contrarian he immediately defends the less popular view. He's a Bee's dick away from becoming a conspiracy theorist. It's really annoying. Sam is even being reasonable.
Jim is the only person I can think of who contradicts himself, with full conviction, so quickly. Here's a great example, around discussion of Peter Fonda: 15:13 I love him! 17:46 Peter Fonda's an ass.
@@NicS_313 ahh damn, I don't check my notifications soon enough, someone else took the spot. What a dumb thing to even think about, but damn I do love seeing those little numbers align such.
