Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Colonies (1642-1671) 

I'll bet you $1,000 we're related.

@@lindakay9552 I bet we are! I have a ton of colonial Massachussets relatives. I only recently started to investigate my mom’s backwoods Vermont family and they’re all from these sea-faring, Puritan, Salem witch trial, King Philip’s War, Mayflower/Great Migration roots. Absolutely not fancy people we associate with “Old New England Families”! More like ‘72 Plymouth Duster than 1492 Plymouth Rock! 😂

Check out Mashuup's neighbor to the north Glooscap

Like. Totally sick. Bruh.

@@Hunter_Nebid Yeah sorry didn’t have time for a nuanced response to the video but wanted to help him out with the algorithm.

@@MarlinWilliams-ts5ul ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ESPQ5qs1azI.htmlsi=qrpvwPFZ71yFHXy6

Wampanoag is the larger socio-geographic name, Pokanoket the more local specific identification. Forms of the term date before the Separatists arrived. Circles within circlesz for example you might be from New York, you are a New Yorker, but in the wider sense you are part of a larger political collective and could also fall under the term American. In the original case this helps differentiate one nation from the collective paramount chiefdomship.

@@theotherstatesofamericahis5212 I will direct you to Roger Williams University publication : First People of the East Bay, which discusses the Pokanoket Tribe, King Phillip and the history of the Pokanoket People in collaboration with the Pokanoket Tribe. Or, perhaps you might want to check out the lecture videos by the Sowams Heritage Area on their website. Wampanoag merely meant Eastern and was never a distinct tribe. Pokanoket was NOT just a local specific identification. It was Pokanoket Nation consisting of about 60 smaller bands and tribes. Just because the tribes that helped the colonists kill their own people got federal recognition, while the ones that fought beside King Philip were punished with enslavement , genocide and dispersement, and like Mashpee glommed on to the name Wampanoag as if they were part of the Confederacy does not change historical fact.

@@user-gf7in8dy1k yes this is covered toward the end of the King Phillips War episode