Martin Heidegger's "Being and Time" (Part 2/8) 

only 5000 likes to cover all of Heidegger's lectures on Kant? brb programming spambots to flood this video.

Thank you David, your deep dive into Being and Time concides with a few other projects out there that is helping me understand Heidegger so I'm following your 8 videos closely. Here are my timestamps for this video: 7:47: Trinity of Being: being, temporality and care 11:10 - historicity (not world history) is the temporal mode of being of Dasein, importance of historicity for human engagement with time and history 14:00 - ungraspability of Kant's noumena vs Heidegger's Dasein 14:38 - Heidegger wants to explore Dasein thru the prism of the everyday mundane, eg hammer, car turn signals 21:16 - Kant ignored the question of being, and failed to account for Dasein as the preliminary ontological analytic of the subjectivity of the subject 24:20 - Heidegger criticizes Kant's perspective on space, time, and the transcendental aesthetic. 32:16 - "phenomena are never appearances, but every appearance is dependent upon phenomena" 39:00 - ontology is possible only as phenomenology 41:50 - We must self-interpret, Dasein is the being concerned with being #2ndDerivative, when we investigate it, we are looking at ourselves as the being concerned with being concerned with being #3rdDerivative 42:22 - phenomenological truth is transcendental, revealing the disclosedness of being and transcending all other beings and determinations.

You’re the man. I hope you achieve the success you deserve. I greatly value your content and appreciate your genuine humility

Commenting so this can be pushed to 5000 others 👍

Interesting to note that those one-word comments are Heidegger's own comments lol super helpful stuff.

Excellent 🎉

Love this series David! I’m curious, why use the Stambaugh translation when it’s a consistent view amongst Heidegger scholars that the MacQuarrie/Robinson translation is far better? I’ve heard some say Stambaugh is more readable, but her rendering of much of Heidegger’s language (particularly his neologisms) is notoriously ineffective.

I hope that, more than his lectures on Kant, you cover What is Called Thinking.

this is saving me in my grad seminar🙏🏻

I really love your channel ❤

thank you for this also audio is a bit quiet

We can still get to 5000 likes