Masters of the Air Clip - “Battle of Münster” (2024) 

Une pensée pour ton grand père 🙏🇺🇸🇫🇷🇬🇧

I thank your grandfather For his service to this great nation of ours. Truly the best generation in our nation's history. Thanks for sharing your family story with us. God bless America and all those who have fought and are currently fighting for democracy and freedom.

Thanks to him and thank you for telling us his story

Must have been awesome to listen to his stories.

❤

Would love to hear more. My uncle died (Aged 21) when his Lancaster was hit on the return from a Cologn bombing raid in 1943. He is buried in Antwerp. x

Was the wide open sky a reminder of being in the air? Just curious.

It’s hard to tell on the screen but when you see a real B-17 you’ll see that the pilot/copilot are almost sitting shoulder to shoulder. I worked in a war museum so I saw one every day while I was there. Brave men in close quarters.

It’s hard to tell on the screen but when you see a real B-17 you’ll see that the pilot/copilot are almost sitting shoulder to shoulder. I worked in a war museum so I saw one every day while I was there. Brave men in close quarters.

LONG LIVE WAFFEN SS . THEY DO GOOD WORK AGAINST ANGLOSAXONS .

Yeah, but we gotta shoehorn the Red Tails in here somehow.

@@CorePathway Don't know about shoe horn, but give them their due!

@@winstonp.prescott3845 The Red Tails deserve all of the praise for what they did.... but the writers i feel did a disservice to them in this miniseries as they seemed to be 'thrown in' purely as an almost afterthought, just to appease the "inclusivity" crowd.

Yeah, they could've center the whole show around Rosenthal really. But I guess they had to shoehorn pretty boy Elvis and his friend to appease the straight white crowd.

@@The_Curious_Catgiven the amount of material needed to cover and the fact that it was made during COVID really did hamper the production. In both Band of Brothers and the Pacific, there’s a lot less material to try to fit in. Easy Company was active from 1944-45. Not really that long in the grand scheme of things in the war. They took part in D-Day, Market Garden, The Bulge, and then you have the end of the war. The narrative is easily craftable because of the timeline of events. The same is true for the Pacific as well. Yes, the timespan is longer, but 1st Marine Division was only involved in four battles in the Pacific (Guadalcanal, Cape Gloucester, Peleliu, and Okinawa). The division was decimated on Peleliu, which is why it has such a heavy focus in the series and why the 1st Marine Division wasn’t put back into battle until 1945. It’s another easilu craftable narrative. Now, take a look at the combat history of the 100th Bomb Group. From 1943-1945, they went on 306 bombing missions. And given the high attrition rate, crafting any sort of narrative is going to leave out/condense events to make the narrative flow better.

In Russia now is the same situation. Not only in Russia, also in all west state of USSR. Children often dies, when plays. "Echo of the war"

Münsteraner hier! Tatsächlich finden die ständig irgendwas und ich glaube das wird noch weitere 100 Jahre weitergehen, mindestens.

Danke. Thank you for writing any english at all, and for the interesting information. I've travelled for business to Germany many times from the USA and I really enjoy the people and culture. Let us wish for today's enemies to one day be friendly as our countries are. It's hard to imagine after such terrible wars but here we are. Oh yeah - I enjoyed Münster too for an evening. Our equipment supplier took us there for a nice tour with a historical actor and then dinner. Nice city!

@@dunjak111 Thank you, I hope that you do visit the US. In our great distances you will find a lot to see. Next trip is to Germany, then Poland by train, the Baltic states by bus and Finland by ferry. I love the culture and history of Europe and wish more Americans understood why it is so important that we stand with it today. Bis zu besseren Tagen!

There is still a band across France and Belgium where the armies stood stalemated four years. Artillery ammunition duds in the tens of thousands have been removed over the past century & more still turn up.

wow

thanks to people like him, now me and my family can live in a free country 🇵🇱 I really appreciate all those heroes sacrifice.

Is that a highest medal of all the medals? Wow, awesome, sorry for the lost of your grandfather. Rest in Peace

My dad was Flt engineer (top turret gunner) on B-17 and B-24's he did 33 missions. Hardly ever would talk about it.

@@johnwhalen9499 who cares

Сколько же вам лет?

@@вечныйстранник-е4д I would guess he could be in his 70s maybe 80s? You get old if you live long enough!

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-0uwNotXUoCE.htmlsi=3RlPigc5B9jzUQZM 1943 was 81 years ago, just assuming you where born in 1943 81 or even 1950 you are 74, video shows you flying your dads model, you look to not be anywhere near 81... or 74, you look to be in your 40's, so your born in the 80's , the math doesnt add up, not that it matters... just an observation

Was a Richard Spears on that airplane?

No I'm sorry he wasn't.​@@billydeewilliams9104

Hardcore man.

Did you know that if you go on the 100th foundation website you could look him up in the personnel files. I’ve browsing it and looking up all the real people.

My mother, around 11yo at the time, experienced the raid in a cellar. So we both had a parent on each end of the raid. I do hope your father made it home in good health.

wow

@@ralfklonowski3740 That's really cool.

A brave man.

No a coward

A coward your mother was, thats for sure, not being brave enough to abort such a sh*t like yourself @@sickc-1375

Did he survive?

@@sickc-1375 spoken like a true keyboard warrior.

Is murdering civilians on purpose really that courageous?

Вы очень мудро думаете..

Wow, someone with a respectful, thoughtful and considerate opinion. Rare these times. Thank you.

Americans have nothing but respect for the RAF, then and now.

Haven't watched this series, but if it portrays the Brit bomber crews as cowards that is BS. They were everything BUT cowards. Just look at their losses, and they STILL kept bombing.

@@phil4483 No American thinks the British crews were cowards.

P-51 Mustangs were the game changer in 1944, to Berlin and back. Spitfires could go as far as northern France.

The P-51 came along later in the war and had the range to protect the Bombers.

Catch 22

Great Movie: Memphis Belle… No CGI! I’ve nothing against it…. Just saying.

It was first the p-47 that escorted the b-17's aka the "jugg" it was very well armoured, reliable, good sustain heavy damage still return home and had good fuel range escorting bombers i think even back and forth but..... the p-47 was far less agile and slower then the bf 109 and the focke wulfs around 43 44 so american airforce indeed incorporated the p-51 mustang but this was far later on heavy losses where already sustained due to the fact that even if the bombers had p-47 escorts they where to slow climbed slow and didnt stand a chance against an good bf 109 pilot german airforce was leading for years in technology . Then the p-51 came and later on also fuel tanks that fully covered the journey. The spitfire had the same rolls royce motor with 2000 horse power of rolls but the p51 was still faster, better build aurodynamically. The p-51 was for a while the fastest plane on the earth with a speed of 750km an hour + heavy armament and a fast climber high altitude escort bomber fighter toghether with the p-38 twing engine boom 2x roll royce motor. Wich also escorted a lot of b17 missions countering the bf 110 high altitude fighter. Only after the p51 and especially the p51 red tails black division. bomber missions suffered much less casualties the black division performed the best in defending bomber missions. So after the commisioning of the p51 i think in 44 or 43 correct me if im wrong bombers missions where mainly a mixture of p51-s p47-s and p-38's. But ofcourse spitfires hurricanes, tempests, sea fires, and lot of other british models probably have seen action.

Nein vulfgang… vee have named ze flug afta ein frau garten

@@johnrion3232 Frau garten?

@@johnrion3232 You don't have to "germanise" Wolfgang. It's already a german name.

Actually the B-17 could be quite maneuverable. They only flew straight and level for defense formation and the bomb run. But the planes were new, well maintained and the pilots in the late teens and twenties. So with the bombs gone and no group a good pilot could do everything but loops.

The B17 carried about the same bomb load as a Mosquito, hence very maneuverable in the hands of a skilled pilot once unloaded.

It was like a horror movie. Those poor guys.

@@leons.kennedy6710 read up on RAF Bomber Command, 45% killed. This series did the Commonwealth crews dirty.

@@goodshipkaraboudjanthey need to make their own shows

Lmao

Those raids significantly shortened the war saving millions of innocent people imprisoned in death and concentration camps. Didn't your grandmother tell you why those brave pilots had to be dragged through half of the world to Europe?

@@trzeciazona9608 Most of these bombing raids did not save anyone because they targeted inner cities and not military installations. The attacks only killed hundreds of thousands of civilians, including tens of thousands of women and thousands of children. But I'm sure that won't interest you either.

@@vidright you realize that you repeat nazi propaganda? All those bombings saved millions of people and significantly shortened the war. It is well established historical fact. Regarding your question, I pity those killed in the death camps, not their opressors and those opressors' families. You where not victims, but the main cause of this madness.

@@vidright you well realize that you repeat the same old lie and deny well established historical facts? BTW I pity those imprisoned in camps, not their opressors and those opressors' families. You where not victims but the main cause of this madness, and never try to argue otherwise.

Splendid

Un gran actor sin duda.un gran piloto le debemos mucho todos.hizo muy buenas películas 🎥 como muchos actores famosos por lo visto también lucho en la segunda guerra mundial..

@@marianovaliente2103 Including Jimmy Stewart.

Many of the actors in the Great Escape were in the service including Steve McQueen. Excellent movie.

James garner was also in a bomber during ww2

Some Pilots were only 19!

If they were that old, many were underage.

Teens

@@dan3535351 A few were teenagers. But most were in their mid-to-late 20s.

Many of the captains were only 21

Hold my beer!

Physics: "Nah, you really can't... It just happens when the CGI artists have no idea how physics work." Also Physics: "In reality, that B-17 would have oversped and broken up in mid-air or got caught by that German fighter with his vastly tighter turning circle."

War Thunder: reality can be whatever I want

In other words... not very realistic. I'll be giving this one a miss.

That is one of the problems with modern day film series, they feel the need to exaggerate the capabilities of everything at the expense of reality, read the autobiographies of the men that flew these missions and you will understand.

I mean, it is though.

​@TheAmericanKid94 it could be so much worse. This project started as "The Mighty Eighth" movie. That trailer had some rough effects. We got off lucky with this one

I'll be real, your joke is funny af, but I'd like to boomer out here for a second and offer context some might not be thinking of... So, I remember watching these types of movies/shows back in highschool (2011-2015) and understanding it took guts, but the full gravity of what I was watching didn't hit me till I was about 22 and was told by family elders "that guy could and just might have been you, if you were around back then" and that's a wild realization to have, which most don't. They see actors, CGI, and imperfections, and can you blame them? They simply lack the world skills and context that come with being a more mature adult. It's almost better these kids don't have to understand that harsh truth too early, it's basically what these incredibly brave men fought for! Anyways, thanks for coming to my TED Talk, hope you have a blessed one :)

@@michaelgarcia4035 True. To be totally fair CGI for this kind of project is necessary considering there are only 4 flyable B17's in existence. That being said, it could have been better. Also did they have to CGI the desert scenes? Like they couldn't just go to the desert and film? Seemed lazy tbh.

@@TheAmericanKid94 they relied on the CGI screen a lot for background acting rather than going to locations these days. Probably cheaper for them Still doesn't stop me from enjoying the stories

Not as much as was done by Flak and fighters.

Can't remember exactly who said it but there's an interview with a German pilot where he talks about the tactics they used against bombers and how during a pass going through the middle of the formation was the safest place to be because the gunners wouldn't shoot for fear of hitting each other.

you would be surprised ammo casing dropping on another aircraft occured more often than friendly fires

The combat box was designed to minimize that, but with all hell breaking loose it did happen. When you add up all the other things, 50cal friendly fire was almost irrelevant when compared to 88mm flak, 20mm cannon from 109 and 190 or simply other forts blowing up and taking others in the formation with them.

I read less than .5%

Its more that they need to mark the position if any parachutes are seen, for rescue missions, but yes relief also.

@@HeartFeltGesture What? Rescue missions were not a thing. They wanted to see if their buddies had survived.

@@noneofyourbusiness9489 "They wanted to see if their buddies had survived." Yes, to make note of their position at the time of any parachute sightings, for POSSIBLE rescue, no body knows if will or can be done but you record the bloody information at the time in the eternal hope that you can tey to save everyone so you do your best even if its hopeless, so you take note of the position and radio in the situation and pray to whatever makes sense to you that all ends well....

@@HeartFeltGesture You're historically ignorant. What rescue? You think they were deploying SAR helicopters in WW2? If you went down in German occupied territory, your only hope was local resistance groups. There was nothing the allies could do for you.

@@noneofyourbusiness9489 There were a couple of sleeper cells posing as farmers in a nearby village, they had made a radio out of dung and some odd n ends, they heard the call with the coordinates and took in the injured pilot, and made him hot beef soup with hunks of sourdough and butter.

Yea, you're onto something here, e.g. during one of the Schweinfurth raids the Luftwaffe would lose around 20 to 40 fighters to all causes. So kills by bomber defensive machine guns were not exactly rare, but occurred much less than the show would have viewers believe. Over all, despite the suspiciously many, suspiciously enthusiastic reviews, I think the show is, very much like 'The Pacific' was, very badly written.

Yep, the reality is, the "Flying Fortress" concept failed. Not that it wasn't a successful bomber, but the idea of them being able to defend themselves against fighters just didn't pan out. After horrendous losses on the Schweinfurt raids, the Air Force suspended daylight bombing until long range fighter escorts became available.

I only counted 8 German planes hit in this episode with what looked like half going down in flames, compared to the 25 confirmed to have been lost in the actual raid. In the episodes prior only 1 was hit in the opening of episode 1 and one smoking I the latter half, while in episode 2 only one was shot down and in episode 3 I counted 6 hit compared to 25-27 lost in the August 17 raid.

Rare on a per-sortie basis maybe, but they routinely flew 500+ bombers per mission, several times per month - shooting down 20-40 per mission when you have 500 plus aircraft shooting at them is quite believable. The real problem is that each enemy fighter would have gunners from several bombers shooting at it, all claiming it when the first puffs of smoke appeared.

It was not rare, but very difficult. Command thought it would be easy, and could not addmit that simply putting a gun at every corner would not make a bomber invinceable. How wrong they were. I read that some (?) crews shared each kill. Gen. Adolf Galland said that attacking a heavy bomber was very risky, and his method was to dive into the firmation from above. Only the top turret had a shot, but difficult one ,and it was the widest view of the bomber . He did say rookie German fighter pilots did not do well with his method, and collided alot. Mission accomplished.

I read many autobiographies and that sounds right, they would occasionally see one go down but had no idea if they had anything to do with it!

Never forget!

It's on display at the National Museum of the US Air Force. Dayton. Its fully restored although probably not flyable. Anyone who likes aircraft should get to that museum at least once.

wore the tape out of that film

One of my favourite movies. Anyone know where it can be found today?

Grew up watching it with my dad, love that film and all the history surrounding these brave soldiers.

Those raids significantly shortened the war saving millions of innocent people imprisoned by the Germans in death and concentration camps.

what an asshole.

Yep, I think I'd have kept very quiet about that if it were me.

It didn't go down like this....this is very hollywooded up

What was it like @@ironnads7975

​@@ironnads7975 it is an accurate depiction. This shows the Air Raid on Muenster on the 10 Oktober 1943. The 100th Bombardment Group was a part of. They started with 13 B17 in England. 12 were shot down. Only one came back. The bloody Hundred lost 177 Airplanes during the war, so the whole unit was destroyed several times. The 8th USAAF lost over 5100 Airplanes during the war more than 26000 of their airmen were killed in action.

⁠@@Folgeantrag The numbers might be matching but this is everything but a “accurate depiction” 110% Hollywood 😂

​@@yorgonosch7225 You can read about "Royal Flush" if you're unconvinced, but it did actually happen. You can also read about "Old 666", I believe it went through similar circumstances against around 17 Zeros.

😂😂😂nö denn die Engländer wollten den Krieg oder warum ist Churchill auf Hitlers Gesuch nicht eingegangen, das Churchill zwischen Polen und dem Dritten Reich nicht vermitteln wollte ?? England, Polen, Frankreich und die USA sind am Krieg genauso schuldig eigentlich die Schuldigen !

CGI overkill. Ruined.

Y'all are yapping. CGI? Really? What did you expect? 100 real pilots piloting 100 real ww2 airplanes? The way the scenes are portrayed is from the crew's perspective. It makes perfect sense.

They didnt even respect the laws of physics in some scenes..

Yeh I don't think I will be watching this series at all ....I prefer Menphis belle or battle of Britain

@@popu_85 I know! somehow, while flying at 200+mph you are surrounded by debris floating as if it was in water, not in air and bound by gravity, and somehow keeping up with the B-17 and not disappearing in the rear as the plane propelled forward at speed. Idiotic.

It may not be accurate but they probably wanted to dramatise it to show just how good a pilot Robert Rosenthal was.

Probably somewhat dramatized for effect, but the events did actually happen: it took the combined strength of Rosenthal and Lewis to get the B-17 to make manuvers so severe that the waist gunners were just barely holding on. Intetsting of note is DeBlasio (tail gunner) apparently scoring six kills during the defense, though they were never confirmed on account of no witnesses being present to confirm any kills, and that this was stated in a letter DeBlasio wrote to Rosenthal post-war; the 8th claimed 105 kills while the Germans only listed 25 losses, so it's theoretically possibly those six might've been his, though he and the other gunners certainly did their bit. "Royal Flush" (along with "Old 666", a bomber in a similar bind) was an interesting bomber to read up on, and I would recommend further reading since that'll do more justice to the story than a RU-vid comment section.

BoB was live action

Spiers running through the German lines at Foy was pretty unbelievable too. Sometimes mad things happen.

Somebody doesn’t play war thunderrrrrrr…

exactly, too many big aircraft parts "floating" and falling down.. B-17s didn't explode just in a few cases in air fighting

Photographic evidence shows that engines separated from the bomber, in a fireball, were still running. Here on YT, look up Nike missile B-17 test.

It's called artistic license. The director is trying to convey the moment of horror, seeing bits of bombers falling all around you.

​@@bmused55Whatever you call it, it looked ridiculous

@@wakka4211 I'm guessing you don't know the meaning of the word drama, or expect every film to be a staid documentary.

@@rikk319 you aren't supposed to change the laws of physics to make something dramatic. It looks absolutely ridiculous. Tons of the CGI in this show was completely ridiculous in the way planes moved. It was awful

Charles Bronson was a gunner on a B29. Being on a B17 was cold. Your oxygen mask would freeze up do to the cold, if one of your buddies was seriously wounded somebody had to make sure is mask didn't freeze up. You shot your guns in short burst to prevent over heating of the barrel. You had only one minute to take your glove off if you changed out your barrel. After that your hand was too cold to do any work. The top gunner had to be careful no to shoot the tail off the plane. If he did the pilot had to use the engine thrust of each wing to guide back to England. It was important to keep communication open and not hog the radio. When you got back to base bring out the two inch hose.

Don't confuse Münster with Munster. They are two different places. Münster is in Westphalia, Munster in the Lüneburg Heath. There is a military training area there. I assume you were there.

The answer is in the first episode: "I didn't know what to say." Even among themselves, it was extraordinarily difficult to describe what it was like to fight the war.

Self-repairing nano-tech.

It was pretty common in 42 and 43 when Germany actually had pilots. A lot of the guys who flew missions for the first two years would have faced hoardes of enemy fighters, but by the time the war was ending German planes in the sky were basically nonexistent. A relative of mine took part in the 8th Air Force's very first bombing mission on July 4 1942. On that mission, the cockpit of his B-17 took a direct hit from a Fw 190's 20mm cannon, killed co pilot and severely injured the pilot. They were shot down a few weeks later by another 190.

Where you are in the formation and where your bomber group may be in the whole bombing raid can pay a huge part. He may have found himself getting quite lucky with his plane not being in the most dangerous positions.

That vet had it easy, must have been late 1944 or sometime in 45 he flew his missions. In 1942 and 1943 the bombers had a rough time as they had no escort. It is also historically accurate that the entire squadron bar one plane was shot down on this mission. 13 entered German airspace only 1 came back. It was that brutal.

​@@bmused55warum brutal ?? Wenn deine Heimat angegriffen wird dann wird Kampf und Verteidigung zur Pflicht... Ich möchte nur an Dresden 45 erinnern oder Hamburg oder Lübeck oder Bremen oder oder wo die Kranken GIs bewusst Brandbomben geworfen haben und so 90% der Städte komplett unbrauchbar wurden.... Umso mehr zeigt es wenn Deutsche in Frieden gelassen werden was daraus erwachsen kann. Kultur, Bildung, Wissen!!!

There are a number of verified accounts of the Luftwaffer putting up 200 and 300 fighters in massed attacks - if you were at the front of the formation you would definitely have seen them!

I agree. Would have thought they’d attempt a more realistic portrayal out of respect to the crews. A real misjudgment. Will be avoiding.

@@stephencarter4304The series is excellent despite the less realistic air battles.

Actually there are records of wounded b-17s "dogfighting" 109s like this. Probably not to this level, obviously. But as far as turning in to cut firing time, chasing and manuvering so non-wounded gunners had a shot. Wounded B-17s were known to do anything to avoid bailing out.

It’s a tv show…. Chill

Wherabo level, detected.

huh, not those that fought in WW1 and then WW2?

Read the autobiographies, it could work against inexperienced pilots, the better ones waited until you ran out of altitude then the game was up, a good bomber pilot would get his crew out before they got too low!

Not even close to realistic

​@@ironnads7975 Likely dramatized, but it was something that actually happened with that individual bomber (though I've heard the scene was actually toned down, so who knows, I guess).

Look up Ole 666 it happened in the pacific

@@ironnads7975You are so wrong lol.

@@idlzrufTrue... but that was a heavily modified bomber that didn't have a full bomb load (it was on a photo recon mission) and was at much lower altitude. To fly a B-17 around like that at high altitude and with a full bomb load goes way past what the air-frame could do.

My great grandpa was a ball turret gunner in a b-17 and I think he was petrified but you have to go on so he did. He went on just 9 missions before being shot down and made an emergency landing over holland. He was rounded up by German soldiers and sent by train to stalag 17 where he spent 20 months. He did not have any psychological issues other than survivors guilt. He always felt bad that he had Red Cross packages to live on and was able to go home when so many had it so much worse. Their generation was absolutely remarkable. These men were so very toughened by a childhood in the Great Depression and a purpose so much bigger than themselves. I don’t think any of us in boomer, x, millennials, etc. will ever understand.

Yes they are but DEADLY too !

@@Sharky2901 yes they must have been. For the airman inside. Tail gunner as well.

They had balls as big as the turrent themselves!

Not if you were in one.

@@fotograf736 Statistically ball turret was one of the safest positions in a b-17. It was more deadly to be a waist gunner

That is one of the problems with modern day film series, they feel the need to exaggerate the capabilities of everything at the expense of reality, read the autobiographies of the men that flew these missions and you will understand.

@@Rick356A Do you have to paste this everywhere.

That is one of the problems with modern day film series, they feel the need to exaggerate the capabilities of everything at the expense of reality, read the autobiographies of the men that flew these missions and you will understand.

Starting with the Bf-109F, the fighter carried a 20 mm cannon firing through the propeller shaft. Some versions fired a 15 mm cannon as well. The Bf-109 G-6 carried a 30 mm cannon that fired through the propeller shaft.

You were there? Rosenthal made his B-17 a difficult target by manouvering to the limit of breaking apart. He was lucky and the Germans not. BF 109 had many versions. 1943 could probably be the F1-F2 version with Motorkanone.

f-4 or g-series.

Ill correct your sentence Mark : "Iv never seen a 109 nor have I seen a B17."

@@pietkoster1935 Yeah and just like in the new midway move the Dauntless was able to out maneuver the Zero when the US didn't even possess a fighter that could

The show was in preparation and production since 2013. And - "a crap load of mistakes" - it's not perfect, but they have gone to quite some lengths to get the details mostly right. There are other YT channels that do a much better job than "a crapload of mistakes" in telling us what's not correct. I recommend you look them up.

Due to their weights being lighter. It falls a lot slower

Not even realistic

Great show ​@@ironnads7975

@@ironnads7975so what was it like flying in the daylight campaign 1942-45? …..hello?…anyone?…..🤡

@@guts-141 All objects fall at the same rate. basic physics.

This “clip” is pretty dumb isn’t it

This actually happened and the pilot did get it home.

@@owensteamdo some research. It actually happened. And they got home.

@@bmused55 the single bomber coming home is a well documented fact but it didn’t happen like that. Use your brain it’s Hollywood

@@bmused55 That is one of the problems with modern day film series, they feel the need to exaggerate the capabilities of everything at the expense of reality, read the autobiographies of the men that flew these missions and you will understand. On a 50 machine mission to the U-boat pens in France the formation was attacked by 2 fighters, both of which were shot down, every bomber claimed both kills so they claimed 100 kills in total and no one wanted to back down so they let tem all claim 2! you want to know what the actual numbers shot down? see the German records, those are accurate! take the rest with a big pinch of salt

had to smile at this - everyone else is moaning about this and that, and you drill right down and complain about the cyclic rate of the hand-held guns. Well done!

worth noting during the schweinfurt raid the americans claimed 200 german fighters shot down... they lost 30. Rosenthal's crew might have thought they bagged 3-4 planes... they likely bagged one at most.

Hitler started it, we helped finish it

Во время второй мировой 1941-1945 в СССР погибло 13.6 миллионов гражданских....

死者の数の問題ではないよ

​@@ranpu3261всмысле? А в чём? Всё было не по-настоящему?

​@@Ruslanik09どうしたの？ 頭が痛いの？ 病院で薬貰ってこいよ

En el segundo 0:41 se puede ver que el avión tocó para mí parecer el compartimiento de combustible haci que si el avión pudo explotar por que como el combustible es inflamable con una pequeña chispa se incendia todo

eram avioes da boing

That is one of the problems with modern day film series, they feel the need to exaggerate the capabilities of everything at the expense of reality

Because it is the same level of realism... 🤮

That is one of the problems with modern day film series, they feel the need to exaggerate the capabilities of everything at the expense of reality, read the autobiographies of the men that flew these missions and you will understand.

🪂

Not really

Totally. So hard to ignore.

Goodness me, what did you expect to see, Leutnant Klaus Von Finkel taking a swig of schnapps from his holster flask and throwing the Nazi salute as he zoomed by?!?

Lots of fresh pilots in '43. And it's a historical fact, that they came back alone.

@@patta8388 yeah, I guess sim pilots have a lot more "flight hours" than those poor fellas did...

This event happened, and the B17 made it back to England alone.

@@patta8388 That is one of the problems with modern day film series, they feel the need to exaggerate the capabilities of everything at the expense of reality, read the autobiographies of the men that flew these missions and you will understand.