Тёмный

Mechanisms of Evolution in the Context of Anthropology 

Professor Dave Explains
Подписаться 3,3 млн
Просмотров 13 тыс.
50% 1

We learned all about evolution over in the biology series. But now it's time to revisit this concept in the context of anthropology. What are the four primary mechanisms of evolution? What are the most important mutations in the hominid lineage that led to the emergence of genus Homo? What can we say about gene flow? Let's dig in!
Script by Erika of Gutsick Gibbon: / gutsickgibbon
Watch the whole Anthropology playlist: bit.ly/ProfDave...
General Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
Organic Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
Biochemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
Biology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBio
Anatomy & Physiology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
Microbiology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
Botany Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
Zoology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveZoo
EMAIL► ProfessorDaveExplains@gmail.com
PATREON► / professordaveexplains
Check out "Is This Wi-Fi Organic?", my book on disarming pseudoscience!
Amazon: amzn.to/2HtNpVH
Bookshop: bit.ly/39cKADM
Barnes and Noble: bit.ly/3pUjmrn
Book Depository: bit.ly/3aOVDlT

Опубликовано:

 

26 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 109   
@NinjaMonkeyPrime
@NinjaMonkeyPrime 7 месяцев назад
Gutsick Gibbon script? Awesome!
@AlbertaGeek
@AlbertaGeek 7 месяцев назад
Erika FTW!
@MossyMozart
@MossyMozart 3 месяца назад
She wrote this whole series. I think she has evolved from needing sleep.
@backalleycqc4790
@backalleycqc4790 7 месяцев назад
I'm waiting for... "Mr Farina! Mr Farina! You're clueless! Take the chalk GO! GO! GO!" It never gets old☺️ Thanks Professor Dave, great explanation!
@kingarth0r
@kingarth0r 7 месяцев назад
That was truly a James Tour moment of all time. Saw it live and it was spectacular.
@Nerd_15
@Nerd_15 7 месяцев назад
NOT CLUELESS
@donchristie420
@donchristie420 7 месяцев назад
😂
@Ohad6712
@Ohad6712 7 месяцев назад
I am fascinated by the strength of single mutations. After studying a lot about ancient hominins, I can understand how the brain size increased and more than multiplied itself in a number of million years thanks to mutations like the ARHGAP11B.
@objective_psychology
@objective_psychology 7 месяцев назад
Yeah and it's amazing how easy it is to make a bigger brain that still works, or adding more kinds of sensory input and cognition. The brain is highly scalable as the neurons just “figure out on their own” what to do with the information
@MossyMozart
@MossyMozart 3 месяца назад
All the luck of the evolutionary draw, no "Genesis" required.
@Spoopy_man
@Spoopy_man 7 месяцев назад
This is exactly what I needed thank you.
@Ohad6712
@Ohad6712 7 месяцев назад
A great day to upload this video. Happy darwin day .
@ordinaryrat
@ordinaryrat 7 месяцев назад
Despite the high labor requirements and production costs, consumer demand for yam is high in certain subregions of Africa, making yam cultivation quite profitable to certain farmers. However its important to remember that bitter yams are not normally eaten except at times of desperation in poor countries and in times of local food scarcity.
@adriani9432
@adriani9432 7 месяцев назад
1.5 million years ago was around the time Homo erectus lived. It was the first hominid to use fire and hunt large game (rather than just scavenge like earlier species). It was also roughly the same size and shape as a modern human, albeit with a considerably smaller brain. Perhaps the C to G substitution was a huge step towards humanity's road to sapience.
@jomaugar
@jomaugar 7 месяцев назад
Great stuff! Thanks!
@MdLd6551
@MdLd6551 7 месяцев назад
Thanks for the video. Btw happy darwin day 🎉🎉
@waelfadlallah8939
@waelfadlallah8939 7 месяцев назад
That was joyfully educational 🙏
@thomasbellerive7382
@thomasbellerive7382 7 месяцев назад
Interesting stuff, thanks again
@kingarth0r
@kingarth0r 7 месяцев назад
Honestly I'm surprised fundamentalists don't defend evolution since it's actually really beautiful how such a simple principle can lead to all kinds of diverse life. You don't have to be religious to appreciate evolution but I think if you are religious you should appreciate it more.
@Incellite
@Incellite 2 месяца назад
Nice explanations Prof. Dave🤗
@Nxck2440
@Nxck2440 7 месяцев назад
Creationists, pay attention, SCIENCE!
@adryanclay
@adryanclay 7 месяцев назад
"UNLIMITED SCIENCE!"
@uncleanunicorn4571
@uncleanunicorn4571 7 месяцев назад
but... but... mah buleefs!?!?!?
@RyanGhezawi
@RyanGhezawi 7 месяцев назад
But…… but… I have a book (that’s wrong about absolutely everything😢)
@Chikn2532
@Chikn2532 7 месяцев назад
​@RyanGhezawi not gonna speak for the new testament but the old testament is about law and philosophy not science and history so it would be wrong to interpret it that way (that hasnt stopped some particularly ignorant people)
@adryanclay
@adryanclay 7 месяцев назад
@@Chikn2532 We dont care. If young earth creationists or just creationists in general use the Bible (not a peer-reviewed scientific book) to try to claim that things like abiogenesis or evolution are wrong, is just braindead stupid.
@Nivola1953
@Nivola1953 7 месяцев назад
Not really relevant, but I’m fascinated by the Romanesco broccoli (also known as broccolo romanesco, romanesque cauliflower, or simply romanesco). The fractal structure of this variety of cauliflower (not broccoli) is just mesmerising.
@Er.amitmishra
@Er.amitmishra 7 месяцев назад
Just completed your astronomy playlist ❤
@jamiegallier2106
@jamiegallier2106 7 месяцев назад
Noice!
@Er.amitmishra
@Er.amitmishra 7 месяцев назад
@@jamiegallier2106 ☺️
@glennpearson9348
@glennpearson9348 7 месяцев назад
Excellent presentation, Professor Dave. How long until the Creationists and YECers show up to begin their science-denying mumbo jumbo? Someone start the timer.
@lavp365
@lavp365 7 месяцев назад
love your vids! but i hate how upset it makes to know that we have all this knowledge, yet people want to hang on to antiquated beliefs and deny the evidence we do have. keep it up, though, and thank you
@jamiegallier2106
@jamiegallier2106 7 месяцев назад
Same. 💙
@Nxck2440
@Nxck2440 7 месяцев назад
some people will never change. we can only make sure that with each passing generation, less people fall for the lies by educating them. for that, i think we’re winning.
@wakom5865
@wakom5865 7 месяцев назад
thanks proff
@Buy_YouTube_Views_a091
@Buy_YouTube_Views_a091 7 месяцев назад
Watching your videos is like a virtual escape to a happier place. Thank you for that!
@jamiegallier2106
@jamiegallier2106 7 месяцев назад
How funny! I’ve often thought the same thing. *every vid drop is like a gift, more knowledge, my favorite!
@Incellite
@Incellite 2 месяца назад
Same... Watching this brings back nostalgia from my biology class.
@maxdoubt5219
@maxdoubt5219 7 месяцев назад
You should have mentioned the gulop gene & scurvy. 😄
@ungulatemanalpha
@ungulatemanalpha 6 месяцев назад
There's a concept that I saw best explained in the speculative-fiction work Serina that I often think about when it comes to the evolution of intelligence - cognition is a trait, and it's selected for and competed against in the genome just like any other. The specific set of circumstances that led an oversized, overactive brain to be a boon and not a bane to those hominids 1.5 mya could easily have never happened, or it could have happened countless times in countless species. It's a sobering thought.
@gayfruitbasket
@gayfruitbasket 7 месяцев назад
Ngl its crazy how dave's flat earth vids have like 100x the views than his normal teching videos
@jamiegallier2106
@jamiegallier2106 7 месяцев назад
Well, they are pretty entertaining! As primates, it’s still easier for us to gather the community to circle and hoot while an obnoxious member is finally publicly chastened- than it is to sit down and learn concepts. *I can’t remember which I watched first, debunk beatdowns or science explains, but I was hooked, and look forward to each new video.
@jamiegallier2106
@jamiegallier2106 7 месяцев назад
That was great! Awesome collaboration. Would love to see you two stream together again. Erika has been hosting SkepTalk on The Line and I think you’d be a brilliant co-host. Members would be throwing superchats like panties at an Elvis concert. ❤
@secularidiot9052
@secularidiot9052 7 месяцев назад
Dave’s already co-hosted with Aron Ra I believe.
@jamiegallier2106
@jamiegallier2106 7 месяцев назад
@@secularidiot9052 I watched that one, too! Aron hosts over there, and would make for an entertaining show with Dave.
@Ihsaan1c
@Ihsaan1c 7 месяцев назад
Professor Dave reading a script from gutsick gibbon, excellent
@adryanclay
@adryanclay 7 месяцев назад
So? Gutsick and Dave are both grear and educated teachers.
@Ihsaan1c
@Ihsaan1c 7 месяцев назад
@@adryanclay I never said they weren’t. What’s your point?
@adryanclay
@adryanclay 7 месяцев назад
@@Ihsaan1c i thought you were making fun of Dave, sorry.
@Ihsaan1c
@Ihsaan1c 7 месяцев назад
@@adryanclay 👍
@glennpearson9348
@glennpearson9348 7 месяцев назад
You can probably find a more detailed presentation on just about anything Professor Dave's posts somewhere on RU-vid. That's not really the point. When you consider the breadth and depth of Professor Dave's library, this single episode is one of many, many pieces of the puzzle. It's just that, this time, he happens to be discussing something Gutsick Gibbon focuses almost all of her time on.
@pawegorka8589
@pawegorka8589 7 месяцев назад
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Give a man a fishing rod and you will feed him for life Unfortunately, this proverb does not explain what to do with people who, when they see a fishing rod, shout that it is a conspiracy 😅
@pramodsingh7569
@pramodsingh7569 7 месяцев назад
Thanks
@yansakovich
@yansakovich 7 месяцев назад
I am wondering, is the video fragment with Russian shovenistic celebration of the Victory day intentionally put at the end of the video or is it just a coincidence?
@paulhaynes8045
@paulhaynes8045 7 месяцев назад
I was a little surprised to hear the word 'fitness' used (about 4:00), as 'fit' is such a problematic concept for anti-evolutionists (as in the common phrase 'survival of the fittest'). Although this may be a culturally specific problem for English speakers, or even just British English speakers. The word 'fittest' (at least in that culture) is frequently misunderstood to mean that physical fitness (strength, speed, height, etc) is key to evolution. Therefore, members of the population who are physically 'fitter' are more evolutionary 'advanced' (eg the Nazi belief in the tall, blonde stereotype). At least in British culture, this has led to Darwin being appropriated by the political right as 'justification' for their assumptions about people who don't look/act/think like them. Quite simply, they (the 'unfit') aren't worth bothering about because they are not evolutionary 'correct' and they will be weeded out by 'the survival of the fittest'. It is very common in our culture, when arguing about Darwin or evolution to have to correct the other person's misunderstanding of the concept of 'fitness' in evolutionary terms. For instance, by pointing out that an extreme change in our environment (eg global warming) might very well favour the shorter, hairier people - perhaps even those with darker skin! It would have saved a lot of time and aggravation, if Darwin , or his followers, had used a different word!
@Nxck2440
@Nxck2440 7 месяцев назад
Dave/Gutsick Gibbon is probably not concerned with what anti-evolutionists will think. This is an educational series and they probably aren't watching this (or if they are, they're coming in ready to attack it and not listen). Of course the word fitness here refers to suitability to environment, which can be modelled as some moving point on a fitness landscape, with natural selection acting to move the point towards peaks (maximum points) at all times, sort of like stochastic gradient ascent.
@carlosangui7490
@carlosangui7490 7 месяцев назад
"homo neanderthalensis" or "homo sapiens neanderthalensis"? ("maybe homo sapiens antecesor"? so blurry, am i right?)
@Magst3r1
@Magst3r1 7 месяцев назад
We are homo sapiens, homo neanderthalensis are a different spieces within the homo genus
@carlosangui7490
@carlosangui7490 7 месяцев назад
@@Magst3r1 i'm talking about subspecies
@Ohad6712
@Ohad6712 7 месяцев назад
It's a controversy whether to include the beanderthals as a subspecies of homo sapiens or as a different species. Since we could interbreed with them, many consider them as a subspecies - H. S. Neanderthalensis. Personally, I feel it's too arbitrary to humans' decision, and I don't know any good reason to include them as our subspecies and not vice versa.
@carlosangui7490
@carlosangui7490 7 месяцев назад
@@Ohad6712 that's what i meant, where's the limit when a species start and the former ends? i think there's no limit, it's a gradient, unique for each population in the species
@Ohad6712
@Ohad6712 7 месяцев назад
There is a limit .. I think it goes in accordance with the accepted definition of a species. Species today is a group of organisms that can reproduce together and have fertile offspring. When one species evolves to a point in which it can not interbreed with its ancestor, that's a new species. It can be more easily defined when one ancestor population splits to two or more genetically distinct offspring populations. It really doesn't work in the case of Neanderthals and H. sapiens. We could interbreed with them and produce fertile offspring. We did it a lot. I cannot find any objective reason to include them as our subspecies.@@carlosangui7490
@universeusa
@universeusa 7 месяцев назад
Huh 🤔 Interesting! 🧐 Thanks!
@CesarClouds
@CesarClouds 7 месяцев назад
1:37 Macroevolution observed.
@ThomasMuirAudionaut
@ThomasMuirAudionaut 7 месяцев назад
the 'science stuff' is sweet.
@analternatemultiverse2063
@analternatemultiverse2063 7 месяцев назад
will you eventually do a series on music theory?
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 7 месяцев назад
yep
@keegan6388
@keegan6388 7 месяцев назад
You forgot about the part where an omniscient, all powerful deity made a bunch of organisms he didn't like, and then spent a couple billion years making what he actually wanted. I guess it takes him a few tries to get the hang of the process.
@khushisansar
@khushisansar 7 месяцев назад
Sir we are cetisfing your video ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@lyndafjellman3315
@lyndafjellman3315 7 месяцев назад
I'm sorry, but *cetisfing*? Typo?
@drsatan9617
@drsatan9617 7 месяцев назад
That's not even a word and I agree with you
@ThomasMuirAudionaut
@ThomasMuirAudionaut 7 месяцев назад
simian got wise without even noticing... to this day.
@nishigimasato3992
@nishigimasato3992 7 месяцев назад
New answers in genisis vid. Go clown on em'
@nasonguy
@nasonguy 7 месяцев назад
Hold up… You’re telling me we have actually uplifted mice?!? I’m actually pretty conflicted by that.
@Magst3r1
@Magst3r1 7 месяцев назад
ARHGAP11B... -13910*T... Scientist sure don't want the names to be easy to remember lol
@AlbertaGeek
@AlbertaGeek 7 месяцев назад
What do you mean? It's pronounced exactly how it's spelled.
@juzhang6665
@juzhang6665 7 месяцев назад
All I hear is another slap in the face to creationists😂
@theLowestPointInMyLife
@theLowestPointInMyLife 7 месяцев назад
how does this explain adam and eve tho
@paulhaynes8045
@paulhaynes8045 7 месяцев назад
Adam and Eve are difficult to explain, even for Christians! (At least those who have actually read the Bible.) As there are two contradictory creation stories in Genesis - one of which doesn't have a first man and woman (God just creates people). There's also the problem of them only having two children, both male. And the Bible telling us that one of these sons marries a woman from a nearby town (where did those people come from?!).
@dhavzr23
@dhavzr23 7 месяцев назад
Adam and Eve weren't real
@adryanclay
@adryanclay 7 месяцев назад
It doesn't. Adam and Eve are basically te main characters of the Bible, and the Bible is a fictional story made to create an religion. So Adam and Eve didn't exist in real life, only in the Bible.
@adryanclay
@adryanclay 7 месяцев назад
​@@paulhaynes8045Still, Adam and Eve didn't exist in real life.
@adryanclay
@adryanclay 7 месяцев назад
​@@paulhaynes8045Also because of the hundreds of translations that altered the original story.
@tomcollins3972
@tomcollins3972 5 месяцев назад
complete nonsense.
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 5 месяцев назад
No, science isn’t “nonsense” just because it hurts your feelings, sweetie. Grow up.
@snowmanthegamer4983
@snowmanthegamer4983 7 месяцев назад
Good day! Thanks for the class.
@MyXAHOB
@MyXAHOB 7 месяцев назад
6:50 mother russia россиюшка
Далее
Human Osteology (Axial and Appendicular Skeleton)
9:48
Genus Australopithecus
8:41
Просмотров 31 тыс.
Earthquakes and Seismology in Earth’s Interior
11:30
The Secret to Designing Mysterious Games
29:37
Просмотров 8 тыс.
How Genetics Interacts with Biological Anthropology
6:42
Homo erectus (Sensu Lato and Sensu Stricto)
8:39
Просмотров 29 тыс.
Reacting to iamLucid's Garbage Anti-Evolution Video
1:54:34