Sky News Digital Editor Jack Houghton says there were “clear and repeated acts of deception” in actor Amber Heard’s testimony against ex-husband Johnny Depp.
@@jenicdarling9425 lol do your own research on the lives of people you don't know, will never know, and who don't care about you at all. How many hours did you spend glued to that shitshow?
we don't have a real media any longer. we just have propaganda distribution. There is no real journalism any longer. Its being attacked continually. Because the evil that wants to rule us all wants nobody to question it.
Exactly...this Amber Heard knows the difference. It is her ego that she is unable to control..or she is just a pathological lyer.and she goes out there and just goes on and on about alleged abuse that never happened!!
@@deathwrow9652 do not forget, it can't cause panic or harm. The shouting fire in a court room quote is specifically you can not falsely shout fire in a crowded theater that causes panic.
The thing that gets me about that claim is that she’s basically saying she should be able to say whatever she wants. Then why can’t Depp do the same? Well then it’s because he’s lying (according to her), but how dare they question her character and whether she is lying? She’s arguing we should just believe her to believe her. Don’t ask questions; look at all these pictures, some of which have been demonstrably shown to be edited and submitted as different photos; everyone else is lying not me, etc. She thinks it’s unfair that people want to look at the facts rather than blindly believe her “free speech.”
I am a woman and a lawyer and I am certainly for women - especially abused women - to have a voice. However, when that voice is used to maliciously lie to defame a former partner or anyone else, that is an entirely different thing. Amber and her lawyers claim that the verdict has done damage to the Me Too movement, but she is the one who has done that, because prior to this case the Me Too claimants who were real victims have been given the benefit of the doubt in the media and elsewhere. Now people may (and should) want to hear actual evidence in a court of law before demonizing and cancelling men. We (men and women) should all be thanking Johnny. Shame on her!
@Deborah Brookes-Mangan "Now people may (and should) want to hear actual evidence in a court of law before demonizing and cancelling men." This should have always been the standard. In fact, I would argue that it was at one point. Movements designed to evade responsibility for one's poor conduct and decisions helped accelerate the demise of our society. I've always held people to the same standards of behavior regardless of gender. For the record, my comments are not about hate towards women, but an expectation of self control and accountability for one's life.
I think Johnny was spared his life for reasons like this. I think he has done so much more to help the innocent then he even realizes. He is unconditionally loved. Continue to shine the light in the darkness. You are needed and you are loved.
And if anything Amber is the one who makes it harder for true victims, the fact that the media refuses to condemn her only proves that they don't ACTUALLY care about victims.
@@h13n12 That is true, but it's more than that. They care about views, but they're also ideologues who push an agenda to further their reach of power and control.
Amen to that, and for the women who still believes her lies is most likely abusers too. And for the male star of Aquaman he better stay clear because She going to need money to pay the 15 million so bad that she going to use or make up another lie against anyone. I bet you she is going to come up with some type of sexual assault sexual-harassment lie lawsuit against him or any other male star
The set back to women is that Amber Heard is being defended by the media. Discrediting actual victims, making real stories that much harder to believe.
Yes, but it also shows that, if you're a man, and IF you have $10 million to spend on lawyers, IF you have years to devote to this, IF you're lucky enough to get an honest judge, and IF you're lucky enough to get an honest jury, you just might be able to show there are consequences for lying.
She is a very manipulative and deceitful person unfortunately she is not a great liar and she will face every legal charges and I'm glad the judge has awarded Johnny $10m in compensation damages plus $5m in punitive damages. She will learn after this. Such a cruel young lady. where are you viewing from?
I am a brit, and a DV survivor. For six solid years I struggled to hide the pain I was in, the bruises on my face and arms and neck. I found that the more people knew about my situation, the more beaten I was. So hiding it became a fundamental part of my everyday life. AND YET, people noticed, my injuries were the type of things that make up just doesn't cover. Often my husband would slap me on the face, both sides instead of punching me because he believed the marks were less visable...but even a hard slap leaves a mark, and family members would beg me to report my husband to the police, because makeup couldn't disguise the red finger marks on my cheeks, and the swollen eyes I had, and the swollen face I would have. I would put concealer on my face but it didn't disguise it enough, even though I tried my best to cover it up for fear of more rape and violence. If she had photos of her bruises, she would have made a far bigger effort to produce them. But she had nothing except a single bruise she suddenly had days and days after going on tv and showing she had nothing, no swelling, nothing, no puffy eyes from crying, no bruises anywhere else. I am afraid the SHE WAS AND IS 100% STILL LYING. Once after she was going out with Elon Musk, they BOTH HAD BRUISES and scratch marks, which despite her makeup, we're very visable. Where were the ones from Johnny Depp? Lier, lier pants on fire Amber Heard, Shame on you! You are a deceitful and narcissistic woman. SHAME ON YOU!
An honest interview, finally an Australian media outlet that has based it on facts and not frivolous Amber Heard rubbish. Well done Sky News Australia.
Isn't it ironic that Fox News is owned by Australia Rupert Murdock and his son's. Fox is know for their lies here in the US. Their host are paid bigly for reporting outrageous lies. Mainly about the democratic party all to get big orange elected. It worked and let's hope he never holds public office again. Now about amber heard. She lied the minute she left the womb and hasn't stopped.
Shame they blew it in the end! "A toxic relationship that went both ways"??? Every ****** time a woman gets abused and she does some vile thing back, it's because of 'reactive violence' and excused (and right so). In Johnny's case, his reactive violence is suddenly 'mutual toxicity'. Imagine being in a relationship with a narcissistic borderliner histrionic for years, one like Amber, who taunts you all day long, hits you, swears at you, belittles you and shits in your bed and tell me you wouldn't retaliate some day!
@@arturama8581 What's wrong the truth hurts??? Look up the Memphis 3 that Depp got out of prison after they confessed to raping and murdering 3 little boys!!! That's the kind of scum your hero Depp likes!!! They even got matching tattoos! Isn't that nice??? I don't know what turned you into a dishonest person but you should pray and ask God to change your heart!!!
How can a society set "women" back...when they can't even define what a woman is. We live in a world where Johnny Depp could easily claim to be a woman and the media would back him up. THAT is lying...and yes there will be consequences.
AMEN!!! I absolutely 💯 agree!! She was caught lying on so many things she said, & all her movie like detailed "trauma" she had was absolutely BS!!!! Her own recordings, pictures & lies is eventually what doomed her from the start. To sit there & call "victim" when SHE was the one hitting, chasing him room to room & crapping in his bed?!??! Her lies are what destroyed her, NOT Johnny. Her being a fake & a phoney is what has hurt the women who really have been abused. This trial definitely shows that lies will come back to bite you & that men can just as easily be abused. Had he beaten her as badly as she insisted & "fake cried" about w NO tears, w the huge rings he wears, seemingly all the time as she even said, she would have HAD to have medical attention, wounds to photograph etc & there were none!! Even when she said her feet were cut & that he penetrated her w a BOTTLE?!?!!? And she takes a picture of the stupid mirror!??!!? And basically being "bittke raped" & she didn't seek medical attention or press any charges & stay w him. Even after thst she was basically chasing, begging & fighting to stay w him. If she was as abused & afraid of him as she said, she would NEVER say all the horrible, insulting, provoking things she said in the recordings. And to give someone you fear hurting you a huge knife?!?!! I don't think so. I am NOT saying Johnny never lost his temoer, threw a fit etc, but he definitely proved that deforemation was what Amber was guilty of. She said it herself on the stand "thats why I wrote the op-ed bc I know his power" why say thst if it was NOT supposed to be about Johnny???
I mean imagine seeing a woman lie and somehow interpreting that as representative of an entire gender... And yes some wackos actually think like that but you can't base the entire justice system on the reaction of those people
It was a fair trial and a fair jury. Amber Heard just doesn't want to face that her plan to frame Johnny didn't work. And she's not a spoke person for women.
@@fandomking8939 actually she is an ambassador for DV they solicited her when she brought forth charges against Johnny Depp and of course we know the charges were bogus and they're stupid if they don't drop her. I believe she made all of this up with the makeup and allegations of abuse to advance herself as a domestic violence victim to shine in the Spotlight of how wonderful she was let's not forget she is a narcissist; they are like that they'll accuse you of what they're doing.
Everyone is talking about how this trial will affect women who are actually abused but nobody is even thinking about the countless men who have gone through this same scenario. Instead of being so biased, think on how this case has shed light on another real issue. The issue of false claims towards good men that have resulted in shattered lives. Tunnel vision is not good for you.
More evidence that Both Women and Men prefer Women. The answer is Not to stop believing women, but to STOP assuming men are lying until proven innocent
i don't know where you live, but where I live, women go badly beaten to a police station and have to go back home to their aggressors and wait for a restraining order to be done. woman is abused every 3 minutes here. the amount of men who actually have their lives "shattered" is basically nonexistent compared to the women who suffer violence.
@@AllieLima No one can force to send them back to their abusers They go back themselves These are same types of women who gets men arrested who try to help them when they get beaten by their bf in public.
@Jon Randough the police usually tells them to return home. there are shelters in big cities and most of them have no vacancy. also, they'd have to leave their children, that's what happens most of the time. it's usual that they already live with close relatives and don't have a friend who can afford to help. you have to understand, Brazil had half it's population currently in risk of hunger and +10% bellow the poverty line.
Agree!! Also, many, many actual victims of abuse are angry with her and her lies, because her actions put into question the legitimate abuse they experienced. It's the Me Too movement and the ACLU who lost some political clout and some of the media, who lost credibility, who are the angriest.
I think a lot of the "I Stand with Amber Heard" views were people trying to view the morons that support her and not necessarily Heard supporters themselves. Anyone who HONESTLY stands against violence against women shouldn't see Heard's defeat as a "Women's defeat as a whole." That's insane. What they should do is see Amber Heard as a manipulative monster who wants to look like a hero and trying to capitalize on others' pain.
it is a women's defeat as a whole because, and i've seen it happen already, A LOT of people will use her as an example of why (real) victims shouldn't be believed. it's not a loss because she lost its a loss because of what she's done.
Amber supporters recognised parts of her story. They were true, but they were Kate James story she was acting out. She went wrong in trying to up the ante and in fill facts with no real grip on reality. Her accounts were cinematic huge violence with tiny bruises that do not mar beauty.
@@AllieLima It's a win, as finally the truth got out. REAL victims can finally try to fight in court, and those who claimed abuse whilst they have not been abused can also get taken to court. I would view this as a win and not a loss.
@@ashmazr3539 So, the fact that abusive rich men will use this case to prevent their victims from being believed, or escaping, that's a 'win'? The authorities, in the US anyway, will now say 'He's rich, he's well-known, he can't possibly be abusive, look at Johnny Depp'.
@@AllieLima no - this will instead be viewed as a reason to ask an accuser for more evidence - which is actually supposed to be the ideal so as to avoid punishing the wrong person
Her words “I wanted nothing” after lying about donating all that money will always grate me. I really hope this women gets the correct punishment for all her lies because she’s clearly relentless and won’t stop otherwise.
She should go to jail because she ruined his career and cost him so much money, time and energy. Oooon the other hand why marry such a toxic person to begin with is a mystery to me. Especially someone like him - he could have gotten any woman he wanted.
@@roserevancroix2308 Yeah I agree. Although he did say she wasn’t Like this to begin with. As with a lot Of abusive partners, they are often fine or act relatively normal at the beginning or even the first year before signs of trouble start to show. He was very unfortunate to have fallen for this toxic women.
She's 'over' career wise I hope. She has caused so much suffering for her friends and family. I don't believe she will have any kind of punishment. I think she'll continue to live her life as a 'rich' woman and will rely on her rich friends. I would like to hear her friends - Rocky P., Josh, Io, others - make comments as they reflect on Amber's past behaviors. They were 'suckers' too in the way that Amber uses EVERY person in her life as a 'sucker/shill' for her purposes.
Thus guy is from the media. Not all women tell the truth. Every allegation needs proof otherwise we will be doing injustice to women who are abused. Some media outlets should be ashamed of believing that all women needs to be believed no matter what. As a woman, Amber is a freaking liar who could not prove her accusations against Depp.
same thing with "racism" claims. people on the left expect people to think ONE way. if not then they lose their "black card" ... women who side with a man in a court case are "traitors to their sex" in the minds of the ppl who work at the NYT or MSNBC etc ..
You have done a bloody good job on giving a clear explanation of the Depp Vs Heard trail and result and shown exactly what a toxic and malicious liar Heard is. Also, you have shown up the bias of the main media to the result and how they still support Heard even though she was found guilty by a jury.of maliciously defaming Johnny. Depp. Well done 👍
there has to be a setback for women, women need to be put in their place so that truth holds more power than claims ,#metoo is the reason this thing happened ,,she not only lied,she also became a "spokeswomen" for abused women,, only a crazy power-shift can give women the gal to do that. and the fact that she won 2 million is a showing that its still there,, if you lie in court, you should ONLY LOSE
Sadly most women do. That's why they're getting so salty over the verdict -- it's taking their right to falsely accuse a man without evidence and win by default away from them.
@@angleisthebest really? "most"? It's 21st Century. Not "most" women believed Amber's lies. I am a woman myself and I know many women who supported and believed Depp. To claim that "most" women lies is false and accusatory. Maybe "some" but not "most".
I'd take it a step further and pin it on personal agenda rather than misogyny or misandry. Buzzwords like these are more often than not used as scapegoats for shady personal agendas.
Johnny Depp is a woman and likes to have sex with young boys♀️ Need proof... there is a NAMBLA tattoo on "his" arm along with his best friend, transgendered deceiver, Marilyn Manson 🙏💯☦️
After watching this whole trial and seeing the evidence I can 100% say that Amber Heard was the abuser in the relationship. She lied about being abused and she’s the one that hurts real victims. I’m tired of seeing the media spin this as a horrible loss for women but in reality it’s a huge win for all true victims of dv. She should be in prison for what she’s done.
So, the fact that no woman, whose abuser is rich, or well known, either in the media, or the community, will be believed, or taken seriously, that's fine with you is it? the authorities will be thinking 'He's rich, he's well known, couldn't possibly be abusive, look at Johnny Depp'.
@@tardislady9546 Justice was served in this case. Would you prefer a man’s life be permanently destroyed by his abusive ex-wife due to a pack of lies? Defamation cases are notoriously difficult to win, in order to prove that her statements were false he had to prove that he never abused her, and on top of that that her statements were intentionally malicious and caused harm to his career and reputation. Being rich or a man does not automatically equate with being an abuser and it certainly doesn’t shield a person from being abused. She severed his finger, stubbed a cigarette out on his face, slammed a door into his head, threw a can of mineral spirits into his face, punched him in the face repeatedly (including his left eye in which he’s legally blind), threw pots, pans, vases and cans at him, shat in his bed, verbally and emotionally abused him. Then she blackmailed and extorted him out of $7 million by falsely accusing him of abuse and then lied that she’d donated the money to sick & dying children because she didn’t want the world to think she was a gold digger which she absolutely is. Then she defamed him 2 and a half years after the divorce because she wanted to destroy his career. Then perjured herself on the stand on 2 different continents (3 if you include her illegally smuggling dogs into Australia). Defending the indefensible is not going to help anybody in future. Amber Heard is a liar and an abuser, she is the person you should be angry about. She has slapped every DV survivor in the face with her actions. Johnny Depp was her victim and has finally cleared his name. He should be commended for highlighting the very important issue of DV against men and the stigma and gender bias that is ingrained in society against men coming forward. He should not have to fall on his sword for every actual male abuser when he is an innocent man.
@@tardislady9546 why would she be believed if she was lying constantly 😂😂😂 people like you no matter what will say the most ridiculous things. Your trapped in your on bullshit beliefs. Get help
@@tardislady9546 Only an idiot would have belived the stories she told , Guess you are showing how dumb you are. Had she been hit or decked in the face multiple times with his heavy rings on , she would have had that pretty , smug facecut to heck. Had she been raped with a broken bottle because of the way the vagina is filled with tiny, thin blood vesssels, she would have had internal bleeding and may have bleed out.. actually she most likely would have bled out.. had she cut her feet on the broken bottles , there would have been bloody footprints all over the floor and she would not have been walking around in high heels when his doctorm security and nurse showed up, Admit reality or continue to prove you are either a man hater or a psycho just like AH
oh yes “normally this kind of injury (getting repeatedly punched in the face while attacker wears metal rings on all fingers) isn’t as bad as you’d imagine” Like the Jury has a collective IQ of 5
Rather disillusioned about the credibility of most traditional US media. I used to think being part of America would be awesome. Now knowing that America has its relativistic morality being believed as progress, ironclad gun law resulting in countless innocent deaths and its political circus, I’m glad I’m not part of America and would want as minimal influence from the states as possible for my children.
Seriously. All the articles coming out using blatant misinformation during the trial are obviously just examples of a vendetta against Depp for daring to sue a paper. Everything in the British trial points to nepotistic bs and powerful people in that sphere covering for eachother.
Yes, we should not allow this deceitful, evil woman just get away from her evil deeds. The media that still lifts her up must be shut down cause their irresponsible actions are unethical
Her ego isnt going to allow her to do that. People keep calling her a liar, but I think she really believes most of her statements. Shes basically living on a different planet with different rules. One where she gets what she wants easily and never gets challenged on her behavior b/c shes gorgeous.
Her lawyer goes around saying that “women will need a recording” of the actual beating to be believed. Johnny has audio tapes of her apologising for beating him, and yet it’s not enough to be believed if you’re a man
She had a phone, ipad, taking pictures of Johnny but she couldn't turn it around to take pictures of her injuries. She had her friends and sister staying at the penthouses. She could have called them to take pictures and take her to the doctor. That's what i did. When he was away, i called my frens. As a survivor of dv, when victims are recounting their experiences, I can feel their sadness, hurt, pain. I felt none of it when Amber testified. I try to imagine how the abuse occurred as she narrated them. From point A to point B. Then, back to point A. From point A to point C. Back to point B. And then to point Z!! At the end of the rigmarole, I couldn't even remember what really happened.
@@voguehaven5154 they don't NEED a recording - there can be other evidence, like DNA evidence, medical documents about injuries, witnesses, character witnesses etc. there doesn't need to be a video of a rape or a beating to convict someone. but there has to be some evidence in some form otherwise the state has not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the crime occured. Sometimes people have done crimes but haven't been convicted because the state didn't meet the burden of proof. Which is the states fault.
yes its frightening. I hope, there will be not such extreme vulture- media in future. Let us educate our children to be careful in believing the media. Anyway this is another example, how AH is corrupting everything around her, sister,friends, spouse, lawyers, media, etc. She is like a terrible tsumami destroying all what gets in her way
She defied the "very powerful man" to take it to court and get folks to believe him. Again she is victim because he finally did that after all her smearing. Unbelieveable gall and mockery of others.
I agree. But, cognitive bias and cognitive dissonance are something we all have to contend with. It's something I struggled with going through Heard's testimony. I wanted to give her a fair shot, and I did at first, but eventually I saw so many red flags that I couldn't take anything she said as the truth. To be fair, I tried to pick apart Johnny's testimony and evidence as well. She would have done so much better if she hadn't lied so much and tried very obvious manipulation tactics. I think a humble and truthful testimony would have had a better outcome for her, whether she won the case's or not.
YES! THANKYOU! They have absolutely perverted and destroyed the hard work of previous generations of feminism and made it a dirty word. They attack OTHER women who dare disagree with their hateful rhetoric. It's sick.
Just look at Jodi Arias, that's who Amber reminds me of. She has some of the same behaviors and personality traits that she had. Woman are capable of abusing men and can be violent. Look at what Jodi Arias did to Travis Alexander. Even though she was smaller than him, that didn't stop her from violently murdering him. Good thing Johnny had security then and ultimately got away from her. He's fortunate he only ended up losing a fingertip and not his life.
yeah i hear from few astraulians that they have problems at home with there government though i wonder if there trustworthy for local news or just showing other nations dirty laundry i mean its true in this case but bare that in mind
"If you are a champion of women's rights, the Heard-Depp case should not bother you. It's justice taking place. It doesn't set back women because not all women lie." Very well put! 👏🏻
@@SuperLuckao Hardly, they both had the same amount of court time to present evidence. She was caught admitting to assaulting JD, to verbally abusing(belittling, gaslighting)JD and of course malice and defamation of his character. Not alleged but proven. Her allegations where unfounded. This was an abuse case, and it exposed that.
She manipulated and abused Johnny, then when she couldn't manipulate the jury, she has decided to try to manipulate the public. It's just sad and she clearly needs psychological help.
Im mad of them for saying they was toxic no he already had a drinking problem and she set him up all the money he had she could have sent him away to rehab a real wife would have she had a plan to live her best life of her 7 million dollars for a 16 month marriage while becoming a bigger star then Johnny so she thought and I'm glad they showed the world we all seen for ourselves she's a liar he only probaly tried to stop her from hitting him
@@sharkarkari7074 I don't believe it was toxic, at least not on Johnny's part, if he were a female standing up to a male that was constantly gaslighting and manipulating people would have much more sympathy. Amber was as much an addict as he was it just so happens she doesn't want to actually admit it! She impeded Johnny's detox when he was trying to get off the drugs and even kept his medication from him. She is an evil, toxic, abusive , gold digging ho
@@guitarboy0211 part of the problem with changing is that you have to be the one who wants to change. No one else can do it for you. Even if therapy, rehab, or any other programs are court ordered, if the person getting sent to them doesn't see the need or desire to change, it won't happen. Even if they do want it to happen, it is a long and painful process usually filled with lots of setbacks and failures before real changes start to take place. My mother struggled most of her life with drug addiction and alcohol abuse. She wanted to quit, but kept slipping up over and over. Sometimes, she would go a pretty long time without slipping up, but she still hung around with people who had no desire to quit that would eventually tempt her or pressure her back off the wagon again and again. Eventually, she died from liver cirrhosis at the age of 49. She was always trying to force her abusive boyfriend to give up drugs and alcohol too, but he had no desire to quit and would only claim that he was going to change after she tossed him out, when he was in jail, or when he needed money or a place to live. She always took him back thinking this time would be different, but it never was. Truth be told, in my mom's situation, they were both abusive to each other and toxic. Neither one was truly 100% to blame for the crap they put each other through. She was better off without him, but that doesn't mean she wasn't abusive to him too. I'm not sure if he was better off without her because I wasn't around him without her being in the picture and it seems like he got into a lot of terrible things whenever they would split off. Much like my mother's toxic relationship, I don't think Johnny is completely exempt from some toxic behaviors, but in their case it seems like Amber was much more manipulative and abusive. What makes matters worse though is now, she's trying to manipulate the public into seeing her as a victim just because she's a woman and trying to bring all this always believe women mantra into the equation.
jada pinkette smith must be sweating pretty hard seeing one of her people get taken down. its time society stops letting toxic people get away with treating people as they please without consequences
@@atanasorama There is a thing called, too much is bad for you. There is nothing bad with showing affection, but you can suffocate others and drain yourself of energy if you over do it. There is nothing wrong with taking responsibility, but again, you can over work yourself and that's not good for anybody. That's a part of why they are called toxic.
Unfortunately that's the way the metoo movement works. As soon as a woman screams abuse the man is fired and loses everything, with no evidence trial or anything but the word of a woman. And that's not what it started as or was meant to be now maybe it can get back on track and help people the way it was supposed to. For women and men.
There is nothing wrong with the concept of believing all women, the problem arises when we believe a person over demonstrable facts & evidence that contradicts their claim.
@@neimansmith9960 "There is nothing wrong with the concept of believing all women" So, by that logic, there's nothing wrong with the concept of believing all men, and would then make both ideas contradictory and completely pointless...
@@Psyrecx He's not smart enough to think of that, that is exactly how these people come about. This is what happens in single mother households, you have these soy boys who think like women.
I kept seeing articles and 'news' outlets making these misogynistic claims posts trial and I couldn't understand the stupidity. Thanks for helping me understand more. These people were already so entrenched in the 'me too' movement and so blindly on Heard's side from the beginning. Now they are doubling down 🤦♂️ I guess I understand it a bit better, but it's still so hard to believe that social movements like 'believe all women' and 'me too' could carry any weight in this day and age.
The media literally is proving her wrong. She wrote “how institutions protect men”….dude they are literally attacking him because he came out as a victim. What a horrible horrible thing to do.
Absolutely. She and the institutions that are rallying behind her are living in an alternative universe. The thing that troubles me is that if this trial had not been televised I would probably have had to rely on the media’s take on the trial to inform my opinion. Televising the trial has taken away the power from mainstream media and shone a bright light on their deception. Whilst I have long been highly skeptical of mainstream media I will be forever grateful for this example of how perverted it is.
This guy is a true journalist. He does his job well and is definitely someone who is more concerned with reporting facts, and truth instead of reporting something untrue. He should be proud of himself. He is a credit to journalists.
@@BioLogicalNerd I agree with you, however Sky News AU have always proved (from what I've seen so far) to be sensible in their coverage, of course I can be wrong. Sky News UK on the other hand have proved to be very much biased to one side. If I do see signs or proof of bias/shilling, I would be openminded to change my opinion depending on the severity. Been watching all sides and almost all news networks just to get both sides of the story. anyhoo, sorry for going on a tangent, have a good day.
I'm surprised to see Murdoch's Sky Australia do a complete 180° on JD coverage after the way they bashed him following Murdoch's The Sun win against Depp.
@Bodziak Doesn't the UK trial judge who tried the case have a son that works for The Sun news agency (i.e., for Murdoch), or something like that? Seems Murdoch likes to play both sides of the fence, lol.
He is absolutely biased against Heard. This is not objective journalism, it is simply a validation of his opinion. BTW, I am not saying that he is wrong. Depp won, justifiably as he was the victim, based on the evidence. Heard repeatedly lied about most everything. However, this guy “reporting” is absolutely telling the story from his personal belief. A true journalist does not express their opinions, either directly or implied. They state facts without being able to tell what they believe. He has failed to do that. FYI-JD fan from way back and never heard of AH until JD married her. Happy to see him vindicated.
Nothing is as damaging to the me2 movement as them insisting on supporting the abuser just because she is a woman... As a human being - that is horrendous. As a woman - it's horrendous. Yuck.
Greetings from Springfield, Missouri. I just subbed just because of how direct and no-no sense he was about it. We need news casters from Australia here in the states. Keep up the good work. Y'all are based, and I love it. 😀
The TMZ testimony was the stuff that proved the malice. It was clear she was releasing information directly to them and orchestrating publicity to damage Johnny's reputation.
And the most hilarious part about that, is that her lawyer accused the TMZ guy of only testifying to seek his 15 minutes of fame, yet she’s the only one making the rounds on TV shows and doing publicity.
And somehow there are people out there believing she wasn’t talking about tipping TMZ off in her 2016 depo. We all saw the same thing. Incredible how some people are too blinded by “tribal narrative” as this journalist said here (love that, by the way) to view it as what it really was. I truly cannot comprehend all of the media support for her
and lied about it/not knowing who held the copyright when she was the ONLY one who couldve given it to them...She even leaked a photo to them that wasnt admissible during this case! Its like she had no control over herself
It sets women back. Whether its based in unjust prejudice or not, it gets people wondering how many female psychopaths go totally unchecked. People are starting to see it's a lot..
I really like this video. I've never seen anyone on any news outlet just be straight up and blunt. Love it! And I like how they're calling out other news outlets on their crap. Preach!!! 🙏🙏🙏
The thing that makes me sad is that there are still people that cannot acknowledge that men can be victims too. The notion that only women can be victims of domestic violence is very false and very dangerous. This was a win for domestic violence victims regardless of their gender. More people will speak up now more than ever because the majority of us saw a fair trial in which a fair decision was made.
This is why the metoo movement is a load of bs. It pushes for the guilty unless proven innocent way of thinking which is extremely biased. Innocent until proven guilty exists because people aren't perfect we make mistakes we miss things the idea was to grant the accused the opportunity to defend themselves from allegations. It's fairly simple to prove whether allegations are true or not whereas defending yourself when the majority believe the accuser without any proof is literally fighting an uphill battle that you have people pouring boiling oil down the sides. It needs to end.
The #MeToo movement is about one woman accusing a man of abuse, and after that other women step up and say, "I was abused by him, too." "So was i!" "Me, too!" "Me, too!" AH had no one stepping up to say, "Me, too" after her allegations against Johnny Depp. You can't have a #MeToo case without the #MeToo
As an American it's sad that I have to go to Sky News Australia to actually get a story with some truth. Forget this trial! I'm talking about real news. But this was damn interesting.
That IS sad. I've blocked The Guardian and The Washington Post on RU-vid. I will continue to avoid their content. WP should've retracted the oped and/or written something in terms of owning their glaring misstep publishing the defamatory article on Depp.
I fractured my nose and my face was so swollen it looked disfigured for days. I had multi colored bruises for a weeks that could not be covered by make-up.
I think there's some good intentions behind those words. I think when a woman says she's being abused to cops and family, she should be believed, separated and protected from the alleged abuser immediately. But it's completely different when the context is a trial.
I haven't been following much about metoo as I always find this type of movement go pear-shaped eventually, so when I started to follow this trial and heard the term "believe all women" I literally go 'what is that?!' It's seriously sound like some brainwashing, cult like slogan to me.
@@lorenaa.6920 but why? You're known liars and manipulators. It's not a new thing. Yall act like we've never seen it before or even experienced it. You do it in relationships (romantic or friendly), at work and in public settings. You'll do anything to get your way, not caring about anyone in your path. All you have to do is start crying, claim your cramping and expect everyone to kneel.
When people think that they can get away with anything...society produces terrible people. What these terrible people call misogyny is really just accountability.
And it was seen as the backbone of her credibility in the UK trial, but the judge seemed determined to give her and The Sun the win regardless of logic, evidence or facts.
When she talks over the interviewer and boldly claims “I wanted nothing”, is was pure evil. At this point no one cares if she didn’t donate to the ACLU but her lack of contribution to a CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL surely condemned some children to their deaths.
@@shadow_blaze2317 Because the judge's SON works for the SUN - he was corrupted and wasn't aware that she had NOT donated the monies. The British Judge should come forward and issue a statement of recuse as he should have not been a judge in the case to begin with.
It is definitely biased and the man is using loaded and emotional language. That's not to say that he isn't stating the truth in parts, but to call this unbiased is not accurate.
hell yeah i'm just glad idiots like Chris Hayes isnt the one reporting this but imagine if it was him? LoL idk whats gonna happen i would probably wanna throw my remote at the screen because of all the nonsense coming out of his mouth lol jk
@@ValleysOfRain "that the left now seem to cherish" lmao at those saying he didn't insert bias in it, and that's more just an example of one not directly related to Amber. I agree for the most part, but you're right in saying it's biased.
You know, the truly ironic thing here, is that Amber really is the true representative of the modern feminist movement. She fully and perfectly encapsulates every single toxic aspect that ideology has to offer in the modern day.
Her true colors are shining through. Narcissists don't see things the same way as most do. She seriously needs medical help and to be held accountable so others don't follow suite. People are finally awakening and are thirsty for justice, they are hungry for the truth and they are starting to fight for this. She need to be held accountable so others don do the same.
Who's toxic is depp and he's the absolute scumbag in this story!!! Look up the Memphis 3 and see how depp got 3 murdering pedophiles out of prison even after they confessed!!!
Heard is a liar...she had her "freedom of speech" but nothing allows "freedom to lie" LIAR! I am a DV SA survivor...and I am so happy Johnny had HIS chance to speak and win his name back
Judges who have children on the Executive Board of a company being sued should recuse themselves for fear of conflict of interest. I guess that's not the rule of law in Great Britain.
"I wanted nothing." I'm so glad Johnny won this case. This woman is infuriating. They keep going with this narrative that Amber speaks for real victims. She DOES NOT! This is a setback for liars, not a setback for women.
Indeed... one wonders why all those people keep pushing that narrative then right?... It's almost as if they don't represent women, but rather liars just like they themselves are. XD
Entire women’s organizations have spoken out against Amber so right now it must be a handful of controlling organizations smelling their own farts with the narrative that Amber is the victim.
Both were toxic? I didn't see that. I saw Amber's toxicity destroy a kind, patient man that wasted his love, gifts and money on a cruel and vicious woman.
@batnunt We have media here in Sweden that have Ambers back... They have painted JD up as a monster/addict/abuser for weeks. Now it's a travesty for women...
I don't think it will stop unless they charge her with purgery. Plus, by continuing to insist JD abused her, aren't they still abusing him? Maybe they need to be dragged back in to court again, but this time inclined her female lawyer who is slandering JD, his legal team, the jury, and the judge. 🤔
Thankfully the Judge allowed the camera to come in. Think about all the articles and media coming out in mainstream during the trial and think about if we weren't allowed to actually see the truth ourselves. Johnny would have still won, but basically they would have ran a much more successful campaign of trying to paint it as the good ol boy club protecting him.
Oh its definitely Biased but that doesn't mean it's not correct.. You can see that by the way he brings right and left into it. When the majority of people leaning Left are against Amber.. Hell Johnny Depp himself is left leaning. But he's trying to turn it into a right vs left issue. It's Sky news so it is 100% biased to the right but in this case that doesn't mean he is incorrect.
@@kabiskzor I think it comes off that way because they were focused on what the other outlets weren't saying. Their is clear narrative building going on. Ambers lawyer was parroting talking points in every interview she did yesterday. Also, the female anchor brought up several negative things about Johnny.
@@mariedyitt1395 Oh for sure and I agree with this guys take on it 100% even if he is right wing media and I usually lean to the left. I'm just correcting your statement about it being unbiased discussion. The right wing media is just as biased as the left. And they are all pushing a political narrative. If this didn't fall in with the Sky News Narrative and a mortal wound for the me too movement etc there is no way they would be supporting Depp. That's not a defense for the left wing media taking Ambers side at all and pushing a Narrative. Just the reality of the media as a whole both left and right. As I said though this trial isn't a Left VS right idiology issue . The vast majority of people regardless of what way they lean are all on Johnny's side. And support for Amber has come from both sides too. The Washington post is owned by Murdoch just as sky news is. That's who released the original Op Ed .
I don’t understand why they would blame the jury and the verdict as hurting the me too movement. The one who hurt the me too movement was Amber. Her lies and manipulative opportunistic personality took advantage of hiding behind the me too movement to get attention. They should be really angry at her.
Elaine blamed every one of Johnny Depp's witnesses that they wanted their 15 minutes of fame. And here is Elaine, showing up on National TV getting interviewed for her 15 minutes of fame, oh have the tables have turned. Not only did Amber Heard hit Johnny Depp, but Amber also hit one of her ex's prior to Johnny. Amber should be stripped as her role in the Me Too movement. #cancelAmberHeard
The true DV and SA victims are really angry at Amber Heard. They are disgusted by her. They know Johnnys the victim. For me it’s nothing to do with Johnny being an actor. I have never followed him or been a fan. My first thought when I saw Amber Heard was she’s stunning and within 5 mins of her walking into the court room I knew she was the narcissist. My ex is the male version of her. I now have huge respect and admiration for JD and will follow him from now on. AH is extremely ugly to me now.
I personally wanted to strangle 60 Minutes Australia! Even recently were bs-ing about her bottle SA when they should have been covering how she is being investigated in AU for perjury!
Not a fan of women. Girlfriends always betrayed me while pretending to be a friend to my face. All things being equal if you had a corporation of all female they would begin to act no different in fact worse than what they accuse men of.
IKR and coming from the two US media outlasts that interviewed Elaine Bredehoft have shocked me. Very surprised CBS and NBC would engage with this woman and give her a forum to continue spreading lies and to belittle the jurors and judge and US justice system.
I was in a same-sex marriage for over a decade, and my ex-wife was abusive in almost all the same ways AH was to JD. It’s hard to explain why I stayed so long, but I got out for good in August of 2017. If we are to believe ALL women, who would be believed in my case, because it can’t be both of us speaking the truth. Also, I think that it is important to remember that men can be, and are, victims of DV as well. It is estimated that 1 out of 10 men are victims of domestic violence, and yet it is grossly underreported. I think that it”s time we say believe all victims. Period. JD and his kids went through hell for 6-years because Amber decided to ride the coattails of the #Metoo movement. It’s important that we not jump to conclusions when the people involved are people we don’t even know.
@@reginaldsmith6949 I don’t mind at all. I had a back surgery in April of 2017 that went very wrong. They cut my left lower iliac artery and I bled to death. They were able to bring me back (obviously…cause I’m typing this). In order to stop the bleeding and graph the artery, they had to cut me from my belly button to my spine. It was a really rough recovery. Long story short, I could barely walk, so I couldn’t get away from her. She tried keeping everyone away. Eventually I went to my parents house on two different occasions just to get some peace. When I went back after the second time of staying at my parents, she stole my pain meds, and she locked me out of the bedroom. I reached my limit. I was in pain. She was screaming at me all the time, telling me what a loser piece of shit I was. It was just too much in the state I was in. So I finally left for good the third time. I never got any of my things back, and she kept my cat and my dog. I didn’t care about the material stuff as much as I did my fur faces, but it was out of my control. I’m still trying to learn to love myself. Half the time I don’t even like myself. The manipulation and gaslighting goes deep. You start to question anything and everything you think you know. I think if the surgery would have gone as it was supposed to, I probably would have stayed. I thought about leaving many times, but never carried it out. Being in the shape I was in, and not being able to get away or handle the verbal and emotional abuse is what did it. So I guess something positive came out of that surgery going so wrong.
@@catwhisperer2736 I'm glad you're in a better place, and on the road to healing properly. Try to be easier on yourself about past experiences, and look for the small victories in every day. Thanks for sharing your story.
"In this sense, women's speech became a lot less free." Let's try that again: "In this sense, women's _lies and playing the innocent victim_ became a lot less free."
Exactly!! If anything JD has brought abuse cases in to an equal standing for men and AH has shown that liars can't get away with it. These things are good in an equal system where as before it was a system of all women should just be believed and the presumption of innocence was not there for men which i personally was bias towards at the start of this trial. This trial has done good for men scared to come forward and as for liars like AH they will think twice before trying to ruin someone's life. This is all good! Don't let team AH try make us think otherwise, this is what they want is people posting that it's a set back, it was progress!
This case also showed how idiot the "believe all women" movement is. Why don't we just decide to believe everyone who owns a Ford truck or everyone who lives in North Carolina? Believe all women is equally as stupid.
Right?? Her making that comment is her right to speak freely... Guess she doesn't understand that you can't go around making false claims about someone to the point it ruined their life!?! Funny thing is she claims Depps lawyers statements ruined her life, but her statements are her speaking freely...etc. She also was the one who started suing for defamation first! She sued Depp and his friend (a comedian) for defamation yrs ago.... She is nothing but a hypocrite!
No one stopped her from speaking freely and openly , as her mouth was not taped and she was not isolated . She spoke but unless the truth is spoken , consequences will follow .
I swear she breathes through her ears as she just does not pause between words, it's an incessant whiny diatribe of "Wha" "Wha" "Why". She's finally learning that while there is free speech, there are consequences when that free speech has malintent.
Thank you for pointing out injustice. Anyone who watched the trial must see that AH was physically abusive to JD and her previous spouse. This was not me, too. This was AH saying ‘ME’. There were a former wife and 3 former girlfriends, one of them for 14 years who all said ‘NOT ME’ about JD. On the other side AH’s wife and former husband both said,’Me, too.’ Anyone who doesn’t believe it, listen to their tapes. They can’t lie.
the me-too movement is an absolute joke at this point lol, "all allegations of abuse must be believed without a trial" like did their mother drop them as a child or something holy shit unbelievable stuff
Defaming and accusing someone that's not true is not freedom of speech. Elaine going on shows blaming the judge, jury, and lack of evidence shows she will never admit to anything. I've known habitual liars and people like her who would lie about the stupidest things like what they ate for breakfast.
Many MSM journalists are angry that the case was televised and the general public were allowed to watch the trial first-hand and not depend on the MSM to present the trial according to their prejudices.
