Juror in Johnny Depp-Amber Heard trial speaks out for 1st time about verdict l GMA 

If you watched all of her testimony - that all tracks. My guess is that she believes her own lies and has a hard time understanding why others don’t. Sobriety and therapy will fix him. Not sure what can fix her. The jury got it right.

Agreed. End of conversation I think.

That means the rumors from people who were apparently inside the courtroom in the audience was true. They didn't want to make eye contact with her and loved Camille.

@@Cassandra-..- She has a serious personality disorder or many of them. There is no cure for that and a person can only be helped if they will admit it. Having narcissistic personality disorder precludes her from even admitting that there is anything wrong with her or that she is ever wrong about anything. She'll always insist that she was right and that this was all because JD is paying off everyone. It's too bad that he had to hook up with someone like her. He certainly did nothing to deserve this. Things will only get better for him from this point on. He deserves to have the truth about what happened known and how she managed to destroy his career but he can and will make a comeback. More people than ever are on his side now.

@@Cassandra-..- you’d think if she actually believed herself she would be more believable!

Exactly.

Excellent outline! Thanks 😊

Precisely

And most of the main stream media kept quiet about all this and supported her instead. It’s a disgrace.

Excellent run down of the evidence! Well done!

Correct, just to tarnish JD's name, they twisted the word from the juror

What was is that the juror said? Because that small statement struck me as totally out there. It really seemed like JD was just trying to cope with her abuse, more than anything. If the abuse had gone both ways, we absolutely would have seen it in court.

The jurors should not speak out to the major media anymore. They need to speak out to Darth News or the Umbrella Guy. The major media is not allowing the truth.

Because the media HAS to side on the Me Too side.......no matter what!

Remember, ABC is owned by Disney. The dots aren't hard to connect.

ITS been debunked..

@@reidun-engh8824 Not that I've seen. What I HAVE seen is media twisting things and editing her responses to look more favorable. As in, before and after videos.

A lot of media and outlets are owned by the woke. They tell their people how and what to report. Was reading today an article titled "Amber Heard scores huge win over Johnny Depp after trial" and the article proceeded to just talk how she was still in Aquaman 2 even though a lot of fans called for her removal but even though she remained in the movie her scenes were drastically reduced and cut lol.

@@davec3901 that hasn't been verified as a real juror or not, how do you know that its not a fake account?

This makes Elaine and the rest of that law firm look awful too.

@@davec3901 That's not verified. This is.

It’s been revealed that was not a real juror, the tik tok account you’re referring to. This is however a real juror. It’s been verified by abc.

@@davec3901 are you so dumb..that was a fake person!

@Mom Yep! I agree...

she also "cried" while maintaining eye contact with the jury... like who does that

@@sushienjoyer a toddler?

I think her attorneys instructed that because I saw other witnesses on ambers side, like Dr. Hughes, do the same thing. I think it might be uncommon courtroom etiquette. Same reason why they all stand when the jury walks in and out. At the end of the day, youre appealing to the jury who will decide your fate, so it might be etiquette to address them directly. Please need to think more critically about these things.

@@cartergirl3of3 Yeah some of the lawyers on RU-vid that covered it mentioned it was most likely suggested to her that she do it. However, the lawyers also need to be aware of what works and what doesn’t. If they see the jury isn’t responding well to the clients consistent eye contact, they need to adjust accordingly. Or perhaps they did, but she didn’t listen/got too adjusted to the habit 🤷🏻‍♀️

The juror shouldn’t have spoken out so soon or should have been more cautious. It’s giving Amber ammunition for an appeal. The jury instructions were clear that if they found Johnny to be abusive in one instance, they must find Heard innocent. This juror speaking out and saying they were both abusive is contradictory.

@@fkillah relax. One juror can think that all they want but it has to be unanimous. Even if he believes both were abusers he didnt believe it enough to stall the verdict.

@@fkillah Not really, because the counter claim is really agaisnt johnnys lawyers comments.

Don't believe it. This is suspiciously identical to what the TikTok fraudster had made up, and ABC and other mainstream media has jumped the gun and aired things which aren't exactly true or perfectly vetted and verified either.

@@fkillah ABC is not necessarily representing an honest person who is a real juror, they may be presenting junk just like the TikTok fraud.

Same here

Poor jurors. I would have gone mad listening to all of that shit while she kept staring.

Even to this day, i mean her last interview... Damn still acting

I felt the same way too! A lawyer asks you a question. You ARE giving your answer to the lawyer! Constantly looking at the jury and giving your answer makes it seem like you are DESPERATE for them to believe whatever you’re saying ESPECIALLY if it’s a LIE!!!! And surely she MUST know that such acting would NOT win over the jury! They are there for the TRUTH, not what you want them to think is the truth🤷‍♀️

Juror explains mutually abusive comment: "They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying," he said. Link on GMA www.goodmorningamerica.com/culture/story/juror-johnny-depp-amber-heard-defamation-trial-speaks-85432281

Hello Kathy how are you doing today.

Good think she’s aware of what we think of her

sore loser for sure, rather than own up to the false narrative she made, she is still trying to find excuses and avoid accountability...the world already saw she is a manipulator, quit with the games

Hello Rosanna how are you doing today.

The jurors will hopefully be protected against AH after 12months. She'll target them to blame someone.

Elaine: “how DARE you. Don’t you know that calling any woman a liar is a setback?” Looool

Thank God!!!

When she broke down crying on the stand, it looked pretty fake and not believable.

Hello, Gorgeous how are you doing today?

hello beautiful lady how are you doing you have a lovely smile can we be friends??☺️☺️

Yes. This juror made it clear that while their judgment was based on the evidence, they also paid attention to the demeanor of both Johnny and Amber. That's exactly what a juror is supposed to do -- use all clues to evaluate whether or not they think a witness is being honest.

@@rowanaforrest9792 Exactly, and they got it right! 👏

Nuances and Little Things CAN be evidence, like the crocodile tears being a Prime Example. That is NOT pure victim behavior of someone who was physically abused and other stuff. Of someone who did no wrong. I know people who went through severe abuse and they NEVER acted like Amber did

Elaine and Rottenborn had no control over her. Especially Elaine. She allowed Amber to talk and talk. Henceforth, it was a train wreck. Lawyers usually tell their clients to be precise and concise. If she needs to descibe an abuse, she can do it in about 6 to 8 sentences. Amber was overexplaining, everything was over. The embellishments, dear God, most had no meaning like the "Johnny convinced the world that he had scissors for fingers" Ludicrous. Savannah should have asked her what she means by "Johnny convinced ....................scissors for fingers". Can you explain? This woman has completely lost her marbles!

@@TheAyanamiRei Exactly! When u are a victim of abuse, u don't taunt, tease, make fun of, chase after and degrade your abuser. U are petrified of setting them off. The person who is the victim, runs and hides and their abuser chases after them and bangs on the door and shouts and carries on. Who was hiding and who was banging on the door? She really looks stupid trying to appeal this. Does she want to embarrass herself again ? I'm going to call it, she suddenly found other pics of her with bruises and black eyes, medical records are mysteriously found in the doctor's files, she takes the correct PTSD test with her doctor to (try) claim the correct test showed PTSD. She got some acting lessons to help her with crying bc we all saw her fake, no tears cry...or perhaps she will put something in her tissue this time that will make her tear. I don't see how she thinks she can appeal this unless she suddenly comes up with new lies. What would possibly change the verdict? 🤦🏻‍♀️🙄

Depp should sue!

*#SI**ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-EdEGPw516mM.htmlесли** порorcoño* 👈

How can I pray for you today, specifically? You were highlighted to me! We are meant to help one another And life is hard so I wanted to encourage you today that having a prayer life can make life more simpler for you. God wants You to solely depend on Him for everything you want and need. Did you ever come to know Jesus as your Lord and Savior? I feel like He is truly knocking on your heart today🕊🙏😊

Hello, Duane how are you doing today?

@@craigscott6443 sure you got the right Duane?

@@duaneraymond4252 that’s okay

@@duaneraymond4252 How are you doing today?

I'm impressed some ppl still say they both were abusive to each other. Why JD? For screaming at her? For holding her down when she was the one hitting him? I've seen with my own eyes couples going at it way harder than that, not physical but my god have those words scarred my mind to this date, and still they're together. Because it's a strong marriage. This was a weak marriage because of AH being a psycho.

Hello Mary, permit me to know you privately.

Mary I've the umbrella guy " ,Tug",

I am suspicious that Amber has bewitched Elaine into adoring her and being therefore oblivious of the truth, which we can all clearly see.

@@joannebutcher860 I believe Amber pledged her payment towards Elaine, hence, Elaine was obligated to sing praises towards Amber.

I don't agree with one of the jurors who said that they were abusive to each other. She is the abusive one! Johnny always tried to get away from the physical confrontation. Being married to an abusive woman, I understand Johhny Depp. I'm not a psychiatrist, but this is what an abusive person's attitude is. They blame everything on the victim, making him/her feel responsible for the undesirable situation. In this particular case, the cross-examination exposed AMBER's lies. Kudos to CAMILLE Vásquez for using AMBER HEARD's testimony against her...

@@joannebutcher860 did you not see her IGNORE Amber at the end? No adoration there!! I don’t think Ellen even believed Amber - just wanted the five minutes of fame. She must have coached Amber to do that creepy answer to jury think. Did her about as much good as that ghastly gurning Psychiatrist.

@@raulcitraro Just listening to her taunting made my hand itch.

What the jury saw was a fake woman crying fake and telling private things about marriage, to win something that a poor guy in 30 years of career has never been accused of 😥.

Thank you!!

For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”

Unfortunately they twisted this jurors words again to make Johnny the abusive one. Look at the complete sentence of juror in The umbrella guy’s channel

I don't agree with one of the jurors who said that they were abusive/aggressive to each other. She was the aggressor! Johnny always tried to get away from the physical confrontation. Being married to an abusive woman, I understand Johhny Depp. I'm not a psychiatrist, but this is what an abusive person's attitude is. They blame everything on the victim, making him/her feel responsible for the undesirable situation. In this particular case, the cross-examination exposed AMBER's lies. Kudos to CAMILLE Vásquez for using AMBER HEARD's testimony against her...

@@terriyaadams the Umbrella Guy always say the truth he back checks is Information about is story he us fare from being the biggest Depp supporters platform 👍

@@BG-hz8fh Indeed, she didn't. CAMILLE VáSQUEZ showed sharp powers of judgment by using AH's own testimony against her.

Well done!

And they brought it in the court room too lol 😂 all those hashtags 🤦‍♀️

"how could they not?" she's a narcissist so she can't imagine a world where someone isn't obsessed with followers and broadcasting pics of their breakfast. She can't even fathom not immediately looking at your phone every 2 seconds to see if anyone like your post or if you have new followers. The reality is there are tons of people that are pretty much unplugged and could easily not look at social media for 2 months! For me personally, I only need it to communicate with some friends and family but I wouldn't care if I never went on tiktok

“Others who had it made a point not to talk about it.” Not talking about it and not looking at it are two different things.

For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”

Yo

What she is doing is exactly what a borderline psychopathic narcissist does... all the time. That's how you can tell what she is. Trust me, I've been in Johnny's place. Got PTSD and still in therapy 10+ yrs out. These people are straight from the devil himself. This will affect Johnny for the rest of his life. After surviving them, you are forever changed, scarred, deep emotional scars. A psychological wounding. Mine stalked me for 3 1/2 yrs straight and still does intermittently to this day. They become obsessed with you. They're like herpes. They never go away. Amber is already doing it now, saying she's still in love with him and with this interview of hers. Just like 'someone' else that can't stop obsessing about being 'wronged'.

Hey! Did you know God is three in one!? The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit! Bless him! Jesus died for our sins, rose from the dead, and gives salvation to everyone who believes in him and follows his commandants! Have a blessed day, everyone!! ❤

God heals depression, anxiety, suicidal thoughts, EVERYTHING, God literally heals my physical pain when I ask Him! Trust in God to heal ALL! He is your creator! Lean not on man, you'll never be healed. Know that there is power in the name Jesus Christ! His name casts out demons and heals! People are bothered by his name, for the world hates the truth and wants to continue living sinfully!!

@@nancywutzke5392 .. Spot on 👍👍

@@Call_Upon_YAH Jesus, doesn't just heal your depression, anxiety, or whatever just like that. that's not realistic. I have believed in God for most of my life and he 1. has not healed my depression (I have asked him to). 2. He sure as HELL doesn't heal your anxiety (I've asked that one too) and 3. that might work for you baby boo, but, don't tell everyone else that. Jesus picks and chooses who he wants to help. That's all and that's final. God Bless and have a good day! And, before you ream me and say I am not a true Christian for believing that he can heal with a snap of his fingers. 1. I am a true Christian and 2. don't try to use the No True Scotsman Fallacy with me. Because I ain't having it!

@@BG-hz8fh At first I thought you were talking about the juror and I got defensive! Phew! Yes, comments like that "legal expert's" just make it seem like 1) they didn't actually watch the trial, and 2) hitting their pre-planned talking points is more important to them than the truth. The truth is the REAL victim of abuse in this case just finally got his name cleared in a court of law thanks to these long-suffering jurors who actually listened to the facts and made reasonable inferences about the credibility of the witnesses. THANK GOD FOR GOOD JURORS!

Hey! Did you know God is three in one!? The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit! Bless him! Jesus died for our sins, rose from the dead, and gives salvation to everyone who believes in him and follows his commandants! Have a blessed day, everyone!! ❤

God heals depression, anxiety, suicidal thoughts, EVERYTHING, God literally heals my physical pain when I ask Him! Trust in God to heal ALL! He is your creator! Lean not on man, you'll never be healed. Know that there is power in the name Jesus Christ! His name casts out demons and heals! People are bothered by his name, for the world hates the truth and wants to continue living sinfully!!

💯💯💯 Also the fact that they had to sit through so many video depos. That would be so exhausting!

ATurd is such a dumbass. Look at this evidence of her dumbass: ru-vid.comTeE-XhcI-yE?feature=share

Juror’s actual statement portion they butchered: For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Hahaha. I’ve watched many trials but never, have I seen such a horrible liar.

😂😂😂😭😭😭💯💯💯🙌🙌🙌

🤣 🤣 🤣 OOh god your on point with that one 😂😂

From the Police to the Jury, everyone is liar but not slAmber Turd...lmao!

In some countries when you're on the stand and the lawyers are questioning you. Your response has to be towards the judge. But I did have a giggle or two when she was answering while looking at the jury as if they were having coffee with her at a cafe lmaooo

I love how they said it made them feel uncomfortable lol. It would have creeped me out too.

your attorneys tell you to look at the jurors

Please read the article if you haven’t already…the media kept out very important information and also spun the truth…aka…blatantly lied about the jurors actual statements…took things way out of context during the video they shared with the world. If you’d like to see an honest and thorough breakdown of the article head on over to That Umbrella Guys Channel 💯

@@Juliette_4 She was doing it too much. Otherwise they wouldn’t have been made uncomfortable. She gave off the impression that she was trying to sell it to the jury. It looked to forced. Nothing about her testimony came off as looking natural. I’ve never seen anyone direct all the answers to the jury as if ignoring the lawyer. Even Camille Vasquez once asked her to direct her answers to her. It came off looking worse for her as if she was almost intimidated by Camille Vasquez not a good look for someone who is trying to prove there innocence.

Source? Would really appreciate it

The interview transcript is online. Multiple articles hace the original quotes. They are misrepresenting the words.

@@ashwinashu4825 You can check the RollingStones article. the quotes are accurate.

Thank you very much

For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”

NotMe2day0 seconds ago I also like how the jurorist pointed how how she could be so upset and 2 seconds later ice cold. FYI- PTSD does not work like that.

Ugh, not every little thing should be solved by a lawsuit. Thats "America" thinking for you.

Nah, I don't think they really have grounds to sue for that. But Johnny could very easily take her back to court for defamation AGAIN - she literally posted a defamatory tweet 10 minutes after she got out of court.

@@cartergirl3of3 except its not, shes actively still out there trying to hurt the careers of the jurors, Depp, Depps legal team, an more through more Defamation claims. Thats literally free game, Im sorry but to see you say this when someones really trying to hurt so many peoples careers while also still shouting the MeToo movement, of which btw was the most sexist group ever created, is absolutely appalling an you should be ashamed of yourself.

@@Carts45 i dont even know what youre saying. First of all i hate metoo and never supported it. Second, the woman was just globally humiliated. Everyone hates her. Her career is ruined. No one believes a word she says. Juat because she tweets some nonsense and someone gets their little feelings hurt doesnt mean we have to throw people into the ring AGAIN. People need to know whatbto take a win, or lose, and move on without trying to get money from every single little upset they have.

The whole jury should sue her and her lawyer for saying that they were on social media and they were influenced by him because he is a famous actor,which are all lies

Swampfox taylor It was painfully obvious with the sound on and not watching Amber Heard while she was talking too! I tend to be an overly empathetic person, yet I'm perceptive as well, hence why I found it difficult to listen to her for long, especially in regard to her graphic descriptions of what didn't really happen. 😡

After long days of hearing testimony, is it really a surprise jury members resisted the temptation to consult social media about the case in their personal time at home? I sat on a jury for a 2-week civil case and was desperate to talk to people about anything other than the case.

they could also just delete the app, one click and boom...all gone

@@annt7384 Good point!

I totally agree. My abusive ex also started to throw liquid in my face, just like AH did to JD. I used to run away and try to hide in the bathroom/bedroom anywhere just to get away from him, just like JD did

That is an excellent point ! Why on earth would the drained out jury, go home and watch pieces of the trial on social media?!

Like forever, with a gag and restraining/no contact order!! Would be a blessing to Johnny, and the world!!

Get help . Come out and say she has borderline personality disorder . Open up about the abuse from her father , and cult like upbringing. And say she may have gotten abusive , apologize . Own it.apologize profusely . She might have a slight future . But this is horrifyingly narcissist

For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”

They are absolutely shameful!! Why do we accept this from “news organizations” time to cancel them too. Foreign countries offer up more truth to us than our own countries “news”. For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”

hello beautiful lady how are you doing you have a lovely smile can we be friends??☺️☺️

On Amber's sick mind, all jurors started a whatsapp group as "Defamation Trial Friends", and they sent all funny Tiktok videos to each other during the court. She's really delusional.

👏🏻 you said it perfectly Nina

@@markbrown1539 why are you sending creepy messages to everyone :/

Hey! Did you know God is three in one!? The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit! Bless him! Jesus died for our sins, rose from the dead, and gives salvation to everyone who believes in him and follows his commandants! Have a blessed day, everyone!! ❤

@@BG-hz8fh i did noticed that too they didn't refer to Johnny being fully innocent rather than saying he is more reliable cause the jury seems to consider them both guilty somehow and that's what I can't accept but the least to be thankful for that they saw AH being fake and dishonest even though she is still publickly defended unfortunately by delusionals.... may be more measures needs to be taken by Johnny team for any further defamation...

Especially when they showed the knife/dagger she bought Johnny. Why would a fearful victim gift their abuser that?

@@BG-hz8fh There was more to what he said than what GMA is reporting on here. For instance, I don’t think he ever actually mentioned “mutual abuse”. What he said was that husbands and wives get into arguments and yell at each other. GMA just put their spin on it. That was their take on it, or they left out the husband and wife statement, so it’s out of context. Seems their spin is trying to make it sound like the jury came down with their verdict just because they thought she wasn’t credible due to her bad coaching, and actions on the stand. I highly doubt that those are the sole reasons all seven jurors found for JD. Wonder what else they left out or reported out of context. It will be interesting to see what The jury will say in the future.

@@allimoo-249 Even if they did mention they were both abusive, it still won't change the verdict at all. Because, the jury was not given jury instructions defining abuse or what type of abuse they must believe. Rotternborn tried to pigeonhole them into HIS wide definition of abuse. Whereas Camille said that the jury should determine her claims in context the op-ed born from her claims in the TRO where she accused him of *PHYSICAL* abuse. It's clear that the jury used Camille's definition she presented to them in her rebutal closings and they all agreed that Amber's statement which alluded to physical abuse since that is what she *publically* accused Johnny Depp of in her TRO which was made public was false. The jury can believe which ever lawyer's definition of abuse in that context is since there are no jury instructions stating otherwise. If the jury had to believe only Rotternborn's definition of abuse then when Amber and her team attempted to dismiss Johnny's case mid-trial, it would have been successful but the judge denied it and left it up to the jury to decide what lawyer's definition of abuse they choose to believe. I hope I didn't confuse y'all even more, but look at Camille's rebutal closing argument to further understand

It’s not the complete sentence of the juror. Abc misrepresented his quotes again. Watch theumbrellaguy’s channel you’ll see

She may be doing it thinking that the jurors names will be withheld for a year and can't or won't speak out.

She’s going to end up being re-litigated by Depp’s team filing a motion for permanent injunction (they won’t sue again, it doesn’t need to go that route, but filing a injunction would be much better) by the courts if Depp’s team gets fed up enough with these lies and the way she keeps belittling the judge and jury by acting as if she didn’t have a fair trial and that they all lied/were against her going by the narratives she is setting out (ie: “they looked on social media, the gallery was full of fanatical Depp fans, etc.” to imply the Judge didn’t have a control of her court). All this gaslighting she’s trying to do can easily come back and bite her in the ass if she doesn’t watch, because she can easily be ordered by the court now to cease talking about it (which CAN result in criminal charges if she continues if they file an injunction because she’ll have been told by a court of law to stop talking about any of it since she continues to defame). Amber thinks just because she went through the trial and it is now “over” she believes she can just blatantly lie about everyone involved. Judgement-proof as they say. Depp’s team can easily take that interview she did and said “See? This is potential for republishing. She won’t stop. Even when she was proven in a court of law to have defamed our client, she still continues to defame him with even more lies. She’s now trying to lay blame on the jury by claiming they saw social media and didn’t care about the oath.” It’s obvious she’s setting everything up to appeal, but this can easily backfire right in her face.

Jury duty is an anonymous gift to democracy, there is no fame or notoriety for this patriot, thank you for your service.

@@ellakajfasz2569 The jurors names are sealed for a year, but they're allowed to reach out to the media on their own accord.

Yes thanks for stating the obvious juror.

glad she's out of aquaman 2 now i can go see it when it comes out

@@aaronelijahcolyer she's still in it

@@Foxhound94 no she's not they cut her scenes and are recasting her... i just read it yesterday

@@aaronelijahcolyer it's fake dude.. tmz, ABC, CNN all have articles about what's her plan after this movie and they talked about future roles in more DC films

@@Foxhound94 the article I read was from a credible source and if they don't take her out i won't be watching the film as will a lot of others so they better remove her if they don't want the movie to flop

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-6YG157uF8hk.html - I can't believe how this happened!!!

For me his fame had nothing to do with it. I switched for Johnny's side when I'we listened like 5hours of their recordings. I was shocked how AH treated him. It was clear to me she was not the victim here

I was worried if they would buy her lies just bc she is a woman

Why use a prayer for this??? why do you think your God will make time to listen to you, for this??? The jury saw everything. They were in the courtroom. No need for them to go looking anywhere else if they have first hand access.

It wouldn't surprise me she comes out with a comment stating the male juror was just sexist and that he lying about not going to social media,and how as a so called abused victim it hurts her so much that the jurors called her fake tears crocodile tears and blah blah blah

@@blossominglotus2348 I have and I did. I watched the full trial and I read what the juror actually said. It’s sickening that MSM is still trying to spin this in Heard’s favor when Johnny was so clearly victimized for YEARS.

Actually the Juror never said that they were abusive to eachother, he said they were Yelling at eachother. THe reporter switche the word yelling for abuse, This people are rats.

For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”

Thank you! I just commented on this as well.

hmm so where was this printed? I'm interested to know if they verified that this was definitely a juror, cause there's been numerous fakes, so I'd be interested in reading what you're referencing for more info on that. How can these guys say it's an exclusive if it's printed somewhere else? Anyway, can you give me a link or details on how to find the original? & thanks for your comment :)

" So frustrating GMA twisted the Juror’s words"... I'm glad you brought that up. I don't agree with one of the jurors who said that they were abusive/aggressive to each other. She was the aggressor! Johnny always tried to get away from the physical confrontation. Being married to an abusive woman, I understand Johhny Depp. I'm not a psychiatrist, but this is what an abusive person's attitude is. They blame everything on the victim, making him/her feel responsible for the undesirable situation. In this particular case, the cross-examination exposed AMBER's lies. Kudos to CAMILLE Vásquez for using AMBER HEARD's testimony against her...

@@raulcitraro I’m not sure the Juror even said they were abusive/aggressive to each…I think they only said ‘husbands and wives fight’ and GMA changed it to mutually abusive…I have to turn it off at times, it’s soooo crazy and unbelievable to me how easy it is to see the mountains of lies she has told and people she has hurt! Makes me wonder who might be the real puppet master??

Isn’t it strange that AH played a character with last name Vasquez?

GMA have been veiled AH supporters throughout...go back and look at the coverage

Everyone mainstream except FOX is biased in favor of the pretty white woman bc metoo. 🙄

@@gigi6997 You are so right, and I will never look at that coverage again! It makes me angry just to think about it! Even now I am utterly disgusted with George S. and his "bothsides" BS. Pending assault charge? Really? A two-minute review shows that case is nothing burger they're just throwing in to look "balanced." Depp WON a DEFAMATION case!! Let the man have his victory lap!!!

Thank you for posting the context for the abuse comment! I smelled a rat in the way they covered it given all the other comments by the juror. Re: not sure why GMA would leave that part out, it's standard media BS. Fan the flames of controversy to get more views, and maybe to try to look less foolish for being SO BIASED against Depp in previous coverage. SO GLAD the jury got it right!!!!!! : - )

No ABC said that the juror said they were abusive to each other - the juror never said that. The statement given to them by the juror is their words - ABC lied about what the juror said for sensationalism

100%. Metoo is a toxic movement that needs to end. It's unacceptable for them to reverse the burden of proof and turn it into "a man is always guilty until he can prove otherwise in a court of law".

Just speaking for myself......It was the video of her injured face that made me think JD is a wife beater.

I always understood you were innocent until actually proven guilty. Doesn't seem to work Like that these days

Thats because as soon as feminism gets involved in ANYTHING it turns toxic

@@lostwoods5687 Allegedly, never proved. And YES..... I watched the trial. Depp admitted on tape that he headbutted her. That was more than enough to prove that he did abuse her, no matter if she abused him or not. That was not what the libel was about. The jury clearly didn't get the assigment right.

That crying without tears is one of the things that sealed the deal for me. There is no one type of abuse victim and not all cry, that wouldn't make me doubt them. People have different reactions to recalling their abuse and facing their abuser. What looks incredibly suspicious is fake crying, trying to look a certain way. Fake crying is a type of lie in itself.

🤣🤣😂🤣😂

The thing is there’s no sign of abuse from Depp, retaliating in defence verbally when you’re being abused by someone is very common but I don’t count that in itself as abusive.

Unpleasant comments, name calling, venting in texts to your friends, I wouldn’t call that abuse.

@@linzi94 I also have a hard time accepting those things as abuse. I think we have all said things in the heat of a moment that we might later regret and that might be construed as abusive. Does that make everyone an abuser? I don't think so. And things you say to your friends in private text are not abusive to the person you're talking about. Geez the things you say when venting to a close confident are always hyperbole. No, I don't actually wish my ex would get shoved off a cliff. Its just things you say.

Right. However, I think the context matters, as it seems like he'd not say such things unprovoked.

I agree with the comments above. Initially, I thought there was mutual abuse, but the more audio I heard of her mocking him, admitting to hitting him, admitting to not giving him space or allowing him to get away when she was being aggressive, the more I realized he was pushed to his very limit and actually exhibited more self control than most people would in those situations. It was not mutual abuse, it was a knee-jerk reaction to consistent and overbearing abuse from AH. Johnny is innocent.

Intelligent?

OJ and Casey are criminal cases, the standard of proof is much higher. Also, OJ and Casey had God-tier lawyers unlike AH.

To be fair, Casey Anthony case was obvious on its face, but that poor babies body hadn't been found for so long it was impossible to prescribe a Murder 1 charge. You just can't make it fit. Yes, the means was homicide, but the method being unknown absolutely killed that case. There has to be evidence. OJ on the other hand...I just don't have any reasons for that one.

I dunno man. You're not supposed to be interperating 'body language' as a juror. The juror claims he wasn't influenced by the massive pro-Depp campaign but hopped immediately onto tiktok to talk about the verdict!? Yah roooight!

@@aigaoliveira3278 it's a low bar these days...anyone with commonsense is deemed intelligent, given the sheer number of people without it.

Hello Kim how are you doing today.

She'll say another person who came out to be part of the Johnny Depp show now that the trial is over.

She will come out with a comment stating the male juror is sexist and how dare the jury said her tears were crocodile tears,and how distraught she is for claiming she was not telling the truth,and she will keep calling them liars

@@Yoyomu205 She accused a female police officer who is a lesbian and gay rights activist of being homophobic, so I wouldn't be surprised of that.

@@bonniehowell9206She is sick she accuses anyone of something that they're not plus remember how she accused johnny of being racist while she was on the stand,she just kept throwing out so many lies and being dramatic after dramatic she thought people would believe her about the fake racism claim

For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”

The actual statement also says they did not believe he ever struck her.

@@user-qe6ys1we6q there was plenty of evidence but unfortunately in the USA certain types of evidence can be dismissed. For example the text messages that depps assistant sent to amber stating that he saw Depp strike her on the plane, this single piece of evidence was enough to prove his assistant lied on the stand and would be allowed in the UK.

She claims that she "doesn't blame them" and yet says that they were on social media and being influenced by outside sources. That's blaming the jury, she just doesn't want to look bad.

@@emma-di5ly Exactly, once again making an accusation with no proof

Can they sue her for defamation? 😂

the thing is, there are "con artist liars" that you really believe what they say, but then there are liars that you can see straight through their lying teeth..she is the 2nd one

Yup It was clearly a toxic relationship on both sides only Amber Heard was vindictive and wanted to take down her ex and not own up to her actions. She needs help.

If you saw the trial, you can hear him also yelling and sending horrible text messages. That's verbal abuse. I don't believe he ever hit her though.

In the full article, it's more detailed and says: The jury concluded "they were both abusive to each other" but Heard’s team failed to prove Depp’s abuse was physical."

I believe Johnny never hit her, but I could see him being verbally abusive, but the door absolutely swings both ways. If you're with a person as frustrating as Amber how could you not lash out? It's either leave her or start screaming.

Yeah, I highly disagree with both being abusive, it was clearly her who instigated the escalation of arguments and violence, I feel like saying they were both abusive towards each other is just a people pleasing answer to not have to enter into any arguments.

The most disgusting thing about this entire situation is how corporate political propaganda gleefully sold Amber's narrative for years and actively participated in destroying Depp's reputation and career. Years ago when the entire "journalistic" community began selling the narrative en mass I instinctively knew it had to be a lie. Imagine just how many people who still trust corporate media believed their lies for years

wow you are articulate. you would make a good lawyer

Hello Maria, permit me to know you privately?

Aside from mentioning the bogus assault case pending against Depp. Sigh. Witnesses to the supposed "fight" have already said Depp did nothing wrong, but they just can't let him have an untainted moment of victory. But yes--this was a HUGE step in the right direction!

Thank very much for your good likes and wonderful comments on my page❤️

Hello I've seen quite a handful of your comments on my post and I just wanna go out of my way to those people whose comments Powiedziałeś, że wysłałam zle good wishes encourages me and I hope to bring you guys so much entertainment.

The juror did say they were abusive to each other but said he did not believe Johnny hit her. It's in the clip. I assume he meant Johnny was verbally abusive to her.

Literally. There cannot be two abusers. Especially in a heterosexual relationship. A woman whose being beaten doesn’t stand a chance a against a man. Do you think a fragile skinny pretty lady is matching blows with an older dude. Evidence clearly showed she was an abuser and johnny tried his hardest to escape it and avoid it. Inner frustration is bound to be released by mean words. Thats normal.

If 2 people in a relationship are constantly arguing with one another, saying the meanest things in the moment are they abusing each other. Does it also follow that they are both victims of domestic abuse and perpetrators of DA. The word abuse is being conflated unhelpfully and using the word for being nasty to one another is not best for evaluating DA.

@@sanjx4300 yea true. Not only that, but apparently sending a text to your friend also constitutes DV against her. The scope of that definition is way too wide for some people.

@@jeanespinal2041 I believe everyone has used abusive language to someone, but what she accused JD of doing I believe she was taking what she did him and putting it on JD . I find it appalling what Elaine and AH have done after the trial . I believe Elaine should be disbarred for her wanting 15 minutes of fame. Elaine sounds a lot like AH , put what you’re doing an apply it to the witnesses. Every chance she got she told JD’S witnesses, you wanted to be on national tv . The whole time it was Elaine who couldn’t resist to be on national tv.

@Johnny Depp Content intended to impersonate a person or channel is not allowed on RU-vid. RU-vid also enforces trademark holder rights. When a channel, or content in the channel, causes confusion about the source of goods and services advertised, it may not be allowed. RU-vid may terminate your channel or account for repeated violations of the Community Guidelines or Terms of Service. RU-vid may also terminate your channel or account after a single case of severe abuse, or when the channel is dedicated to a policy violation.