I’m actually surprised they managed to make it through la source. I personally would’ve put the merc straight into the gravel trap, one of the benefits of having fenders.
From a standing start the F1 car should have passed at least half the field before the start finished line and been in the lead under braking going into the first turn.
It's a tribute to the NASCAR drivers that they refrained from the usual RollerDerby combat "bump and grind" driving they usually do out of deference to the F1 driver. Any one of them could have torn off his front wing with a smack. I love how the F1 driver patiently waited for his openings ... passing on the outside where none other dared go ... and out-accelerated them every time. It was genuine race car versus pretend-a-sedan. Sorry, but there it is.
From what I know about NASCAR on road courses the F1 car would either be a gravel trap or wrecked. "Bumping is Racing," and the F1 car sits so low, the NASCAR would change lines and never know it was there.
Maybe, but how Formula 1 cars handle and how quite better its drivers are.. any dirty defense is actually in slow motion in comparison. NASCAR moments are measured in tenths of a second, Formula 1 goes for hundreds if not thousands. To each its own, oval racing is a real thing... I wouldn’t dare to bring WRC drivers into this discussion: they like motocross have the greatest skills in motor sports, but neither compare to F1 physical
@Rebecca Campbell I can not say 100% F1 drivers are better...Juan Pablo Montoya won more races in CART (10 wins in 40 starts)..went on to F1 (7 wins in 94 starts). He joined NASCAR and won 2 races in 255 starts!! Returned to Indycar racing and won 4 races in 57 starts. He won the 2000 Indy 500 during the CART season cross-over. In 2003, Juan Pablo Montoya and Jeff Gordon switched seats at the Indy Road course. Jeff Gordon was within 0.5 seconds to JPM's time around the Indy Road course in JPM's BMW 2002 car. 'To be fair', I have no idea if JPM really put in a "qualifying lap" or was likely doing a warm-up/shake-down laps in order for J. Gordon to be that close.
@@secretsquirrel6257 bro you’re trying to argue with an F1 fan. Don’t even bother, they’re notorious for having superiority complexes when it comes to their sport.
NASCAR races on “real tracks”... the hardware, that can’t be changed since it wouldn’t be NASCAR One thing I admit about NASCAR is the tire management on ovals, that’s top notch
I doubt that very much. The F1 cars would generate so much downforce on the banking that they would be virtually undrivable. The NASCAR cars were built for Talladega.
@@Jdndndndn-m7r I don't think the cars themselves would have any problems with a banking, possibly needing harder than typical suspension but they have to deal with increased vertical loads through turns like o'rouge anyway. There was an issue on the banking when F1 was racing at Indianapolis in 2005 but that was due to Michelin not being aware that the track surface had been changed, I think it increased the grip between the surface and the tyre therefore increasing the lateral forces on the tyre causing them to fail. At the start of the race all the Michelin tyred cars pulled into the pits at the end of the formation lap leaving only 6 cars (2 Ferrari, 2 Jordans and 2 minardis) to line up on the start grid for the race.
2022-23 FIA rules for Formula 1 chassis makes a big difference than previous iterations. Ground Effect is mandatory, chassis floor is no longer flat... these cars can have the smallest wings and still create enough downforce to stick to any oval better than not only NASCAR but also Indy. The suspension tweak to balance tire loads between the two sides might be possible, but then again I am talking about comparison with Indy as NASCR type GT chassis is several levels below. And still NASCAR is great as it is, one thing which impress me is oval racing tire management... top notch with out doubt. If only they could remove that Bubba W from the sport... that’s the only negative thing: he wasted millions of tax payer dollars (FBI investigation) for that “Jossie Smollett” lie
@@Stonemonkie1 Firstly, Eau Rouge is fast but it's not banked (much) and the cars are only there for a short period. The banks at Talladega (and Daytona) represent almost half of every lap. Finally, there is no comparison to the banking at Indianapolis to that of the NASCAR superspeedways. None.
No sanctioned car. However, Porsche retired their LMP1 race car, the 919 Hybrid Evo and built it outside of any regulations. It became faster than an F1 car. It can probably out-corner an F1 car, too.
@@harveyevangelista5780 I couldn't find quantitative speed comparisons. Where did you read that it cornered faster than a F1? I found that it supposedly produced more downforce than Lewis's 2017 Petronas AMG, and it made more power as well, though it is ~100+ kg heavier. To be clear, I am referring to the 919 after it was retired from racing. I already know no 'sanctioned' vehicle corners faster than an F1, but the Evo 919 isn't sanctioned (anymore). It became a crazy experiment.
Eu quero ver na REAL, F1 x STOCK CAR BRASIL no Autódromo de Jacarepaguá. Kkkkk pra ver os caras jogarem esse carro de brinquedo no guard rail na primeira curva!
Best drivers in the world are F1 drivers, huh? Come to the states, run 500 miles at 200 mph around an oval, knocking bumpers the whole time, then we'll talk.
Le pire des pilotes F1 avec n'importe quelle formule 1 après 1970 aurait fais mieux.... Tous sauf realiste et probant comme ersatz de comparaison a partir d'une licence jeu videos soit disant ''proche de la réalité ''...
I guess Lewis Hamilton is so bad now that even his video game avatar can barely beat a bunch of Nascar drivers. No wonder he can’t even sniff the podium in F1 now.
Im categorical, the halo on the f1 car is ugly, and this mesure of security is totally, absolutly useless for all simulation, at the occurence the official pc games, it only add uglyness.
