ismein kya welldone hai?sc ko hi khatam kar diya jaye agar faisle maanna hi nahin,awaam ka paisa kyon barbaad ho?yeh decide kaun karega ki kaun sa faisla aain ke khilaaf hai?hukumat? phir sc bhi hukumat hi ban jaye aur khud faisle de de
JOURNALIST ARE HIGHLY RESPECTED BUT THEY MUST NOT TRY TO BEHAVE LIKE A JUDGE OR A CHILD AGRIEVED PARTIES MIGHT SUFFER FROM SHAKEE SYSTEM OF SYSTEM OF TRAILS AGRIEVED PARTIES MUST REMAIN VERY VERY ALERT
qazi fae isa super man hai?matiullah jaan bhul gaya hai to koi baat hogi,use pata hoga kisne abduct karwaaya tha,jo ab karwa rahe hain aur jo is hukumat ke support mein hain.
Matiullah jaan is totally compromised. Now matiullah jaan has lost his credibility as journalist. Matiullah jaan should announced that he has joined PTI.
😢اگر الیکشن لڑتے ہوئے دو امیدوار کہیں کہ وہ ایک ہی پارٹی کے امیدوار ہیں اور اس پارٹی کا کوئی با اختیار عہدیدار ہی نہ ہو جو سرٹیفیکیٹ دے سکے کہ فلاں امیدوار ہماری پارٹی کا امیدوار ہے تو الیکشن آفس کسے اس پارٹی کا امیدوار مانے گا اس لئے انہیں آزاد سمجھا جائے گا اور جیتنے والا تین دن کے اندر کسی پارٹی میں شامل سمجھا جائے اس لئے جج صاحبان نے جو سوال کیا تھا کہ الیکشن کمیشن کو کس نے اختیار دیا کہ وہ کسی کو آزاد ڈیکلریشن کر سکے اس کا اختیار اسے آئین اور قانون نے دیا کہ جیتنے والا بعد میں کسی پارٹی میں شامل ہو رہا ہے
pti ne certify kiya tha,lekin ec maanta hi nahin ki pti mein elections hue hain isliye pti ke kisi official ko bhi nahin maanta,poori duniya jaanti hai ki votes pti aur imran khan ke naam par hi padhe hain,isliye aaj pakistan duniya mein mazaak bana hua hai,aise elections to na kabhi dekhe na sune,aur na aisa ec
متیع اللہ جان مکمل بوکھلاہٹ کا شکار ہو چکے تھے ان کو سمجھ جانا چاہیے کہ اکیلے بیٹھ کر وی لوگ کرنا اور کسی کے سامنے دلائل دینا کافی مشکل کام ہوتا ہے اج پتہ چلا ہے کہ متیع اللہ جان صاحب مکمل طور پر عمرانڈو ہو چکے ہیں
کیا جج سپریم ہے یا آئین؟ کیا کوئی جج آئین کے بالکل خلاف فیصلہ کر سکتا ھے؟ اور اگر کرے تو اس کی آئینی حیثیت کیا ھوگی؟ تو کیا آئین کی شق خود بخود معطل نہیں ھوگی۔ کیا جج کوئی آسمانی مخلوق ھے جو ہر صورت مقدم ھوگی۔
What is the qualification a person would require to say if a court order is unconsitutional? In my opinion, only the Supreme Court is so qualified. Not the ECP, not the Parluament either. Parliament does have the power to pass new laws which to override court orders, but even those new laws have to be constititional and again the Supreme Court is the only qualifed authority to rule on that. No way ECP can declare any order unconstititional.
Matiullah Jan ka, ikhtilafi notes se itfaq na karna shaeyad,mazi main Esteblessment se Unain Jo taqeef ponch chuky hain uss ka nateja hai. Pti ore imran khan se Unain ko muhabat nahi per kisi ki nafrat main ajj unn ko 8 judges ke ayaen main ki jany waly tabdeeli nzar nahi atty.
Absar saib Please itni batay karte he Guest KO BT Karne Ka time Diya Karo Ye koi tareeqa nai Matiullah KO bat pori Karne dete U should learn how to host the program to ask questions from guests to answer u but u are after every second interept them to make them disturb
PML-N has so deeply penetrated into the system that there are touts in ll the branches including judiciary. Everybody know that pakistan is on ventilator and these two judges has made a hole in it. Their discerning notes by two judges has provided grounds for ECP , already looking for one, to linger on the SC majority judgement,Sometime a one person action sink the ship. Had Atta Bindyal not ruled the PTI speaker assembly unconstitutional, Khan would have become history as he was at the lowest level of popularity. There would have been fresh election and IK would not have more that 20 seats in NA and few in Punjab and KPK.
A & B both claimed ownership over the disputed toy. The matter was brought before the QAZI for justice who decided the matter on the basis of the possession on toy in favor of the A. The dispute toy later on laid before the appellate forum where QAZI analyzed the all relevant documents and other allied circusmtances. QAZI after examining all relevant documents and circumstance concluded that the toy in question was stolen by A as both disputed parties have failed to produced any evidence to prove their ownership by any mean which during the course of proceeding of the case' it was revealed to the QAZI that the real owner of that toy is PTI' hence QAZI allowed the PTI to have participation in the case and subsequently awarded the toy to the PTI is correct decision.
Mati has got no arguments. People and constitutional institution do not come to court for any unjust, illegal and unconstitutional decision. Quaid e Azam was also of the openion that illegal orders should not be obeyed. Mati do not know principles of interpretation. If law is clear then SC has got no right, power and jorisdiction to interpret it otherwise.
YEAH KIS TARAAH K JUDGES HAIN PLEASE JUDICIARY MUST REVISIT JUDICIAL SYSTEM ESSA LAGDAA HA JUDICIARY IS LIKE A RUBBER NOSE??? K JIS TARAAF NOSE GHOUMANAA CHAIYEAH OUS TARAAF GHOUMAA DAEYAAH JAA SAKAAY IT IS VERY VERY UNFORTUNATE
محترم آپ اختلافی نوٹ بھی کہہ رہے ہیں ۔ اور اعتراض بھی کر رہے ہیں کہ دو ججوں نے فیصلے کے بعد کیوں لکھا ہے۔ اختلافی نوٹ ہمیشہ بعد میں ہی لکھا جاتا ہے۔ تو ہی وہ ختلافی نوٹ کہلاتا ہے۔
عمران وسیم الیکشن کمیشن کو اختیار ہے جوڈیشری کا۔ آپ کو یاد ہوگا کنٹیپمٹ اف الیکشن کمیشن کا کیس چلایا تھا۔ عمران وسیم عبصار عالم سو فی صد صحی کہ رہے ہیں۔