github.com/airwindows/Meter/r... / airwindows
What's this?
I can measure the hit-record-ness of audio, and rate it by how compelling and attention-getting it is, and also by how commercially successful it's likely to be. Those are NOT the same things, but points along a scale I can define as 'density of ear-catching events', where the 'vibe' of the hit record is determined by how intensely it hammers you with these events.
None of that has anything to do with 'maximum loudness' and in fact loudenating will hurt you, provably, and kills the energy-build whenever it kicks in. The secret is distribution of peak energy.
The events I'm talking about are the combination of PEAK (not RMS, you can safely ignore RMS. Really) energy and slew rate. There's a balance between these things and every known hit record noise, whether it's Steve Perry belting in Journey, or James Brown screaming (not shrieking: when he makes cat noises it's a completely different type of energy) or hard-hit drums mixed just perfectly or Burial hitting the perfect sub-bass or nearly everything in a Mutt Lange mix, nails this balance. It's most easily understood as 'the aura (of peak energy) given off by passionate performance' and it applies across the board, from Count Basie to Ace Of Base. (brief examples of each are given in the video)
The Airwindows Hit Record Meter (or 'Meter' as it'll show up in your DAW) will show this directly. Did you think you 'can't hear peaks'? Doesn't matter, now you can see them. And where you place them is hugely important. You can cram them all up as close to clipping as you can get, and have LOTS of them constantly, to get a sound that's just as attention-getting as any loudenated sound (as squashed sound cannot technically BE any louder than clipping, it can only have more distracting distortion layered on). Or, you can make sure you have some of the peaks crammed up toward clipping and doing their job optimally, while having the 'cloud' of peaks occupy a bigger space that is still constantly in flux.
And doing that consistently scores higher in Billboard chart rankings, and overall SALES, than the hyper-aggressive stuff. But the extreme stuff does get attention very well… and as long as the peaks (and their respective slews) are where you need them, it makes NO DIFFERENCE whether you have high or low RMS loudness and in fact you will do better, get more attention, and sell more records if you have the peaks maxed out and optimal, and the RMS as LOW as you can get it to be without losing the constant peak energy.
You can even target comfort and vibe while still having sparkle and peak energy by aiming for it using this meter.
These are strong claims but you know I've been working on this for literal decades and had the beginnings of this in 'Mastering Tools', which existed before any of my plugins, before 2007. This isn't new, I've just been able to put the work in and I figured it out. You don't even have to use my plugins to make stuff work using this meter: I try to make stuff that'll help, but you could do it with anyone's plugins, or with hardware and tape machines, or indeed with any basic DAW right out of (in the) box. It's all about shaping the peak energy, balancing it with slew, controlling the slew and creating the 'cloud of peaks' at the density you want, with the volume of the peaks constantly varying between whatever amount of 'space' you want (18 dB is a lot, 12 is nice, 6dB is getting on the loud and fatiguing side) and clipping, without actually clipping.
But we're getting ahead of ourselves and I'm not the only person able to tell you how to mix hit records, even classic evergreen ones. It just looks like I'm the first to be able to give you visual reference to what's supposed to be 'inaudible', and that's Meter. For now, try this meter and see if you can recognize the various hit formulas (for instance, vintage southern rock, or 80s, or intense sixties and fifties hits) and explore them a little.
15 июн 2024
