I’m six years older than Mike and don’t do any PEDs or TRT but have trained consistently since age 15, so I feel qualified to say that even though Mike is geared the gills it’s an impressive feat to look that good at 46 (these photos are from 2015) BUT he’s not the only one to ever do it. Al Beckles comes to mind. He came in second to Haney at the ‘85 Olympia at age 55. I’ll bet he’d trade that for Mike’s hairline though!😆
@@spencermaiers8322 It's not about the weight or size, just the proportions. A good back makes or breaks you on stage. They're both huge by non-BB standards anyway, in most pro sports athletes their height are 200lbs max, usually below that.
You've got to give Mike credit where it is due for staying in shape for so long, never chunking out, always lifting heavy, then cutting right up every now and then. Calum, gets in great shape so quick, the guy has obviously worked super hard to get to the point where he can bounce back quick if he has had a set back. I suppose he's had a few crazy chick dramas over the years, she probably has a voodoo doll and sticking it in his leg and bicep, the nutjob.
Holy shit maybe mike is natural looking at these comparisons. I mean calum hardly dieted for shows like this and basically ate cereal and protein bars. If you watch generation iron 2 you see what i mean. But Mike lives and breathes bodybuilding, and calun still pretty much schools him in every shot, even the aide chest mike looks like he has a bit more density but calum looks bigger overall. Youd think if he was sauced to the gills he would be dominating calum here.
Structurally, both these guys have issues. Poor V tapers. Both are actually very similar, in that they have great Instagram or beach bods, but at the top levels of bodybuilding their genes hold them back.
I tried Mike’s goose eggs’ diet and boy oh boy all it did is give me gas big times but the tren he is taking gave me his size so he is right goose eggs and tren all day baby
