@@MongtoLagula IMHO they are both great and will do the job once you understand how they work. I have had mostly mil scopes so you can say that i am biased as i always choose mil scopes so as not to be confused when shooting👍
Good morning Ms. Lauren. Thank you for the very informative video re. MIL vis-a-vis MOA. It is very succinct and germane, with great ease of exquisite narrative. Your (new?) professorial appearance does enhance the appeal of the subject.
Both work. Both work very well. You have to sit down and think about what you are more comfortable with. If you shoot daily you can get used to either system, but if your shooting is once or twice a week, you are better off picking the system that you are more comfortable with.
I shoot HFT with a mil scope, that has 1/4 mil per click. It's true mil at 10x. So one one click at 100 meters is a 10 millimeter change. At 50 meters it's a 5mm change and at 25 meters a 2,5 mm change. For someone who grew up on metric it's easy to think about.
i bought one from arizona. it was good for 2 years. but today i have a small problem. when the extinguisher is down the pressure gauge goes down. when the extinguisher is full the pressure gauge also goes up a lot. and it is difficult to contact you 😢
So ....what you are trying to say is . A mil is 3.4 moa at 100 yrds . So thats ten clicks on mil and about twelve to thirteen clicks moa . Good information just keep it simple .
@@bulufish8208 she is a good girl just over thinking it and making a good video . All good . I'm just old school and the fewer words the less you could be wrong for and thats simple .lol
The moa problem is with the dial itself and the numbers on it. moa scope is it going to get very confusing after a full Revolution. At 1200 yards I need 14 mils elevation. That an easy go go all the way and stop at 4 after the zero. With moa, I need 47. What am I supose to do after 24? Let me do something some math... 47-25 ... got it all the way around to the next 23. Mils all the way
