Mind Blowing Facts About Black Holes 

Black holes merge by emitting gravitational waves that bring them closer until their event horizons unite, forming a larger black hole.

Massive black holes at the edge of the universe likely formed from the rapid collapse of dense matter in the early universe, growing quickly through mergers and accreting material over billions of years, even if miniature black holes also existed right after the Big Bang.

​ @edislatube Where's the evidence for this? According to observations of stars forming in our own galaxy they emerge out from a dense cloud of gas that condensed into the star. The moment the star begins radiating solar winds and pressure gas surrounding the star is forced away, preventing the star from growing any further. You're saying the star formation phase is skipped entirely and the cloud of gas condenses directly into a black hole more massive than the one in the core of our own galaxy, estimates claiming it took tens of billions of years to form? Stars take billions of years for them to collapse under their own weight to become small black holes, then billions upon billions of more years of accretion for them to become supermassive black holes. There is another reason why the black holes at the edge of the observable universe are so massive. I proposed it in several books before the JWST was launched. I've studied the theories and laws of physics for more than 20 years. in the first year I found inconsistencies between general relativity, quantum field theory, James Maxwell's equations and even special relativity. General relativity is unable to merge with quantum field theory for a good reason. After I realized what was missing from general relativity and then revised it to include the action causing gravity the theory took a 180° turn. In the book called SECRET UNIVERSE : GRAVITY by RON KEMP, on page 48 I wrote quote, "The JWST, James Webb Space Telescope will discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope can see, further than 13.8 billion light-years away." I published the book a year before the first CEERS survey was released. I accurately predicted the JWST would find old, massive galaxies in the early universe. I know exactly why the galaxies are massive, contain supermassive black holes weighing billions of solar masses. Scientists speculate that the black holes are massive because they formed rapidly in the early universe. I however predicted them using my interpretations of the theories and laws of physics. I know exactly why they are massive and old. I could spend hours explaining everything from what's missing in the theories and laws of physics, which leads to all the incorrect interpretation made by scientists, age of the universe, big bang, cosmic inflation, speed of light, cold CMB, general relativity's look-back time, Hubble constant, and the LCDM model used to explain how the universe evolved. But I already covered everything in the books I published before the JWST was launched. I tried to convince NASA employees in 2010 that they were wrong about space-time being woven together, how telescopes can't see into the past and more. They were steadfast on their opinions and interpretations of the science and refused to even consider what I had to say. The more I tried to convince them their interpretations were wrong, the more they fought me. I was just feeding their cognitive dissonance. I gave up and eventually decided to put my many years of research and interpretations into a series of 6 books. Then published them a year before the first CEERS survey was released. What I discovered over the many years of research was completely unexpected, extremely controversial. I discovered Einstein's look-back time was wrong. Telescopes can not measure a galaxy in the past when we're moving away from them FTL. General relativity doesn't apply to them. In fact the light information because the galaxy is moving away from us FTL, while we're contained within it's light cone, relativistic effects occur to the light information upon measuring. Weird effects. We see the distant galaxies not as they looked in the past, but how they look today, in our relative frame of time and space. So galaxies look old, fully mature, some larger and brighter than our own galaxy but at the edge of the observable universe. The laws of physics and theories don't need to be overhauled. Simply put, it's the interpretations of the science which needs to be revisited. They're simply misinterpreted the science incorrectly. They assumed because light takes time to travel that the telescope would act like a time machine. But that interpretation is incorrect. The light information happens in a quantum instant when the observer or telescope is contained inside the light cone "EM field of light" being measured. This instant transfer of light information happens at any distance per the predictions made by the quantum entanglement of light. Telescopes can no more see into the past than microscopes can see into the future. Thus explaining why there are old, not young but old, massive galaxies, some containing supermassive black holes larger than the one in the core of our own galaxy, while located at the edge of the observable universe. I knew this is what the James Webb telescope would find and NASA employees would not listen or accept my interpretations of the science. They hung onto the idea that telescopes were looking into the past, but that's an incorrect interpretation of the science. The root of the problem can be traced back to the interpretation of look-back time. Telescopes cannot see into the past. Astronomers had everyone but me convinced that telescopes are looking back in time when they can't. Time is relative to the observer. Hence why Einstein came up with his theories of relativity. Because time is relative to the observer. Because the telescope becomes the observer and looks at a galaxy 14 billion light years away it sees the galaxy as it looks today, not how it looked in the past. Light information happens in a quantum instant, regardless of distance when the telescope or observer is contained inside the light cone of the body being measured. Dirac claimed the light information happens in an instant because the EM field collapses upon measuring, conveying the information in an instant. James Maxwell gave the value for the speed of light information the infinity symbol because the action happened in an instant at any distance. Quantum field theory called it quantum entanglement of light. Einstein called it spooky action at a distance because it happened instantly, regardless of distance. He knew quantum entanglement refuted his look-back time, thus why the interpretation was spooky to him. He wouldn't accept the idea of quantum entanglement of light because it indicated light information could be conveyed in an instant, traveling faster than the speed of light. He assumed nothing could travel faster than light. Yet the instant action at any distance of quantum entanglement proved him wrong. The old massive galaxies at the edge of the observable universe proved astronomers wrong. Telescopes cannot look into the past no more than microscopes can look into the future. Time is relative only to the observer, not distant galaxies. So the telescope, because it's the observer measures distant galaxies as they look today. Not how they looked in the past. The solution was simple and predictable. In my books I cover other topics too, gravitational waves, what causes them, what to expect from future detectors, black holes, origin of comets, Earth's water, why the sun's corona is millions of degrees hotter than it's surface, why Saturn's rings are younger than Saturn, why the Hubble constant is not a constant but an average, and so much more.