Did you know Steve he still uses your billiard ball experiment as a proof that his theory is correct, totally ignoring the skidding and yet other times putting great import on angular momentum! You could not make it up, thanks Steve.
Gary son the end is near. On your last legs still swinging full force. It's almost admirable. Maybe it's time to go plant some radishes and leave the "physics" alone forever. Enjoy what time you have left on this earth. Take a hike literally.
I'm surprised that the scale showed exactly a 3:1 mass ratio. Because the larger ball seems to leave with slighly higher velocity. Not that it matters much.
Fantastic work once again Ian! There is literally nothing else you can do to improve it. All the excuses that will be made from now on and all the accusations that you are 'enigineering' it, are just signs of totall desperation. They have zero evidence on their side that proves it only bounces back with 1/4 the velocity. They only have "it doesn't make sense therefore it's not reality" Again, why the hell don't they do this themselves if they keep claiming you're faking it and you're making tons of flaws? This simple experiment doesn't require thousands of dollars and can be done at home anywhere.
Spot on Mate! We know what will happen don't we, of course he will bask in the credit having pointed out all these fatal flaws. None of which have made a significant differance to the result. Thankyou.
@@Ian.Gostling Same thing that's been happening all along, he gives a bunch of excuses but they turn out to be irrelevant (or outright illogical). Because it's all coming from the psychological aspect of needing to be right, with little basis in reality. He's completely hopeless.
If Newton himself returned from the dead and told Drafty he was wrong, Drafty would tell Newton he misunderstood his own theory and was in on a conspirarcy to prevent the "truth" coming out. Then he would go on a rant to him about the Eddington experiment "400 times better resolution from space Issac you lying, cheating, (insert swearing rant)". But he will never, ever lift a finger to do the experiments because as Ian proved yet again, they won't come out Drafty's way.
Hi there Ian, I've found one of the P30 lites going on ebay for £20 starting bid, so could be a potential bargain buy, 100% feedback seller too. I've tried sharing the link to you but as per usual it doesn't let it post. 😊
You simply can not do any more in regards to this demonstration Ian. Has it made a huge difference to the results, not enough for Goofy and his death cult followers. Excellent calculations on working out the masses too mate. I know this has been showing the conservation of momentum but its also interesting in terms of energy. If we think of the initial 1 mass coming in, in terms of having say 4 units of energy which achieves 2 velocity, after collision it has given away 3 units of energy to the 3 mass and now has one unit of energy and achieves half the original velocity, so if we now wanted the one mass to achieve twice the velocity, would we need to double the energy or would we need to quadruple the energy for it to achieve twice the velocity, the second collision answers that one.👍😊
Did Ian give the height yet somewhere? He gave the volumes of thr balls the other day, so we can calculate mgh. After the first collision, the small ball goes one quarter of the height, thus the big ball is supposed to posess three quarters of the energy, then. The density of one steel ball bearing is 7.8 g/cm. 1 Joule equals 1 Nm = 1 kg·m²/s²
Per cm cubed btw. Type the following in the Google browser bar: But change that (3 mm) into the measured radius (half the measured diameter). Or (7.5/2 mm) for a 7.5 mm radius for example. 7800 kg/m^3 * 4/3 * pi * (3 mm)^3 in kg? Use the answer (in kg thus) in the equation mgh to find the (potential energy from gravity in) Joules. g = 9.8 m/s²
@@_John_Sean_Walker I seem to remember the heights at 2 inch and 8 inches but that was a few videos back now when I think about it, so not entirely sure on the heights. 🤔👍
