Moral Dilemmas That Will Break Your Brain 

As a child of generations of farmers. 7:20 GMO canola is not resistant to disease, but resistant to a lethal dose of chemical. The other plants die and the gmo lives. Increasing yield. People should know where their food comes from. Glyphosate changed the world

I believe whatever doesn't kill you simply makes you...stranger.

damn last time i was here on this channel it was around 700k. 2.1 million subs well deserved i remember when i first started watching back in high school around 20k subs congrats :D

Diogenes was a vibe. He had that crackhead energy.

this is exactly what I’ve been saying every concept you discussed. Oh my gosh finally

52:46 😂 he’s great! I love the story of him trolling Plato by walking into the lecture with a plucked chicken and declaring: “This is Plato’s man!” as it fit the definition. 😂😂😂

What will the farmers do ? get a different job, people lose their jobs all the time. It's not gonna be easy obviously, but that's what happened with most factory workers too.

Great information, thank you

Ah yes, Dr. John Snow ...he didn't want to he the one who helped discover Germ Theory...but this precisely why we needed him.

Nothing represents more humans trying to play God than what we do to animals by farming them.

Hey! I just wanted to tell you how much you amaze me!! You are truly one of the most intelligent humans out there!! Your videos are amazing!! YOU are amazing!! Hope you are proud of yourself 🙂

I watch your videos because your voice is so monotone it helps me sleep at night

As a guy going blind rn from a condition with no cure, the start of this video, I felt dat 🪦.

The primary reason for GMO is to make them resistant to GLYPHOSATE. The assumption that we do this. To make stronger plants. What is GMO corn? It is corn resistant to glyphosate. That is the reality

I was thinking, as he says average age expentancy was 29 yo in the 1800s, and now at that age most of us still don’t have our own house/family

we will always improve our technology and it will almost certainly lead to our extinction. This will become more and more apparent as our technology advances. In essence I fear we will soon return to fighting in the streets over a loaf of bread and then we will all know that morality is truly relative.

By the psychological definition of a psychopath, Delphi is one of the - developing a moral profile by copying the reactions of others to subject matter. Has anyone noticed this?

I believe morality is subjective to one’s self. We “universally” (with exceptions) perceive certain things as immoral, the real question, is what makes those outlines believe their actions are moral, if it’s purely religious and personal belief, or just something instilled in your brain that is specific to you.

So glad I found this channel

Ha! Jokes on you, I don’t have morals 😀

Can't have moral dilemmas when you're morally bankrupt.🎉

Started off so good... then suddenly it turned into a investment and business building video.

15!28 cheating on a test is a crime?

I will die on this hill. 100% money can buy happiness. You have so much more time and opportunity than someone who’s still working for something 20 steps behind you. If you can’t acknowledge that then that’s on your ego

YOUR CORRECT...So is that 10X Conference with Cardone watch out for that one made for people who have an extra $10,000.

Not another TEMU ad ? Ok I'll watch 😅

Morals= your personal belief system based on experience...ethics=societies laws and belief. Often based on propaganda from the elite. Big difference.

There's more than just equality in the workplace messing with birth rates. Rarely in life is there only one reason for anything. However in stating only one reason doesn't fit your level of objectivity. However it does lead into a rabbit hole So there's that ..

How can i find a crispr doctor??

I’m staying up all night on a school night watching this at 11:45am 😮😅😊

we love you aperture but it’s time to increase your mixing quality

True

Hope your choosing the apple I kno I am

For some people using marijuana is not enjoyable, rather necessary to remain healthy, safe, or even alive. For some people it is a life changing holistic treatment. It has saved lives; the reason why they changed the policy.

5:22 Just because many are doing something, doesn't make that thing good. Many people would be happier if more options were available, not just by being in a different environment. Also, people must be mature with information to even be able to pick the option that best suits them. The modern fight for "rights" does not help with that, even though in the past it did

You broke the first rule of fight club

Bro don’t miss

Personal beliefs and ethics are two entirely different things tho.

Wow so much real stuff

Industrialized farming is completely different than regenerative farming.

The cholera outbreak was a result of data visualization. No one could figure it out until they mapped out the sicknesses and they rejected the theory three times before finally shutting off the pump

When he said life isn’t supposed to feel like rollercoaster Me: Nuh uh

You're wrong, even if there were a God, morality would still be subjective. It's true, as an atheist/ moral non-cognitivist I cannot say what is objectively wrong (because it's not truth apt), but neither can a theist. Even if there is a God who dictates morality to us, it is still not stance independent, because a) God is a subject and B) there is no objective non-circular reason why we ought to follow his moral system. Theist use a more practical argument; "if you don't objectivise morality, then you have no basis on which to say one particular action is wrong and another one is right". And I agree to an extent, that you can't really make any argument for why one action is right, and one action is wrong. But that doesn't mean you can't make a judgment about the rightness or wrongness of particular actions. Because I believe moral judgemental are ultimately based in moral intuition, it's a non-rational intuition (I don't mean irrational, nor anti-rational, I mean it's something that is separate from reason). And ultimately if you're going convince somebody not to do something that you believe is wrong, you're going to need more than just an argument. Morality can be accounted for empirically. Accounting for it simply means explaining why it exists. You don’t want us to account for morality, you want us to justify morality. I don’t believe that there can be any ultimate, objective, non-circular justification for morality, even if there is a god who dictates that morality. Even if there is a god who gives us moral prescriptions, what is the objective reason we ought to follow them? Is it because God says to? That is pretty circular. Is it because of some principle that ultimately is not based in God? If there is such a principle, then there can be at least one moral principle which does not depend on a god. The empirical sciences can absolutely tell you it’s wrong by the way I define “wrong”. When I say something is wrong, I mean that I will behave in such a way to oppose it. You can empirically test this by observing my behaviour. I don’t say that anything “ought not exist.” I say slavery is wrong, by which I mean I cannot tolerate it, but I don’t think that saying it “ought not exist” has any objective meaning. Even if you believe that it ought not exist because God says so (which he doesn’t, by the way) that is still circular, because the answer to the question “why ought we do what God says” will in one way or another amount to “because God says so.” Evidence of a metaphysical or theological nature still can’t justify “ought” statements. Even if there is a god that makes prescriptions, it simply does not follow that anyone ought to obey them. This is not a logical inference. Also, if moral statements are contingent upon potential states of affairs, you can’t say that I “ought” to oppose gay marriage, for example, because my conscience won’t allow me to do that. Another argument that theists use in favour of objective morality, is that God created the universe, he laid down certain rules, therefore they are objective. Let's say that there is a god, and he did create the universe with specific rules. Why does that make them objective? If God created the universe, and put rules in that universe, why objectively ought we follow them? Then sometimes they'll say, "well, because if you don't follow them, he'll send you to hell". But then you have to ask, why objectively ought I be concerned with going to hell? Well, because you'll suffer for all of eternity, and I think that doesn't sound very nice, I don't like the idea of that, but why objectively ought I not like the idea of that? Why objectively ought I be concerned about my own suffering? Also, this does not really make morality objective, because what does objective mean? Something is objective if its existence is independent of conscious. Something is subjective if insofar as its existence is dependent on consciousness. Something is objective only insofar as it could continue to exist even if all consciousness in the universe were eliminated. Now if we think of God, as a conscious mind, then morality comes from that consciousness, which is subjective. Why ought we obey God’s commands? “Because one of Gods commands is to obey God’s commands = Because we ought to obey God’s commands!” Which is circular. Even if there were an objective morality, it is not body armour. It achieves nothing. That is just the brutal reality. Fundamentally, every person’s behaviour boils down to doing what they want or don't want to do in the light of consequences they expect to create from their actions, whether those consequences are physical; going to jail, psychological; guilt, spiritual; going to hell. This is a scary thing to realize. That everyone's around us is really just doing whatever they want. It's simply just good fortune that most of the people around us happen to want similar things. This realization does kind of feel like having the floor fall from under you, but that's just the reality of human behaviour. In practice, we are all forward-thinking hedonistic consequentialist. This may not be the right way for humans to behave, it may not be how we should behave, according to any particular moral framework. But this is the only way we can behave. This is just how people are, regardless of your beliefs or religion. This just leads you to Euthyphro's “Trilemma”; Does God command something because it is good or is something good because God commands it? If God, commands something because it is good. He is appealing to a higher standard, which would make the standard of morality external to him. If something is good because God commands it, morality is subject to God’s arbitrary preference, and would make morality subjective. Apologists answer the dilemma with a third option; goodness is God's nature. It's not something he creates or appeals to, it's something he is, therefore not external or subjective. It's not actually a third option at all. The basic Euthyphro problem arises again just in different terms; does God have control over his nature, or does God's nature have control over him? Could God alter his nature if he chose to, or is his nature unalterable? If we choose the first option, God decides his nature and in so doing, he's deciding what is good and what is not, making morality arbitrary and subjective. Based solely on the caprice of how God decides to choose his nature. If we choose the second option; that God has no control over his nature. Set aside the problem that this is problematic for the claim ‘God is Omnipotent’. If we choose that option, then something other than God, is dictating what God's nature is, ultimately making this external force independent from God, and the true ground of morality. God is just the unnecessary arbiter. This is ignoring the fact, that Yahweh committed/ commanded 7 genocides/ infanticide, condoned slavery, rape, homophobia, sexism and racism etc. Not to mention condemns people to eternal suffering for simply, not knowing he exists, despite the fact he knows what it would take to convince and save everyone, and decides not to. And ignoring, that free will is incoherent under any definition. As things are either determined by prior cause (cause and effect), or random (quantum indeterminacy)/ a mixture of both, in either way, we do not control. E.g., He knew everything about Satan and what that specific arrangement of particles (it doesn't matter he's nonmaterial, but whatever he is) called "Satan" would do before he created him, and still decided to make Satan the specific way he was which resulted in him doing exactly what he did. You cannot blame a car for being faulty, if an engineer beforehand purposely created a faulty car, knowing he could have done otherwise. Therefore, God knew and purposely designed Satan to rebel, everything is Gods fault, including evil. God could have altered him so he wouldn't rebel. He's omnipotent so he could have, and omnibenevolent so would have. But he didn't, therefore God wanted Satan to rebel. Therefore, God is responsible for all suffering and is malevolent. And if every variant of Satan was “freely” evil regardless of how you designed him, then God shouldn't have created Satan to begin with. There were angels like Michael Demiurges that knew and did not rebel that he could have replaced him with or just leave blank.

What if the "meat farmer" of the future works in a lab?

Haha if the average person in society does not stop the cycle of exploitation of each other does this really matter haha..... Societal exploitation....person to person does not end we see it will end temporarily when there is nothing for the average person in society has nothing to exploit

Objective universal morality is not difficult, and it always begins with the self, not a group. In essence it is to do unto others what one would have done unto themselves, AND to NOT do unto others what one would NOT have done unto themselves. When speaking of universal objective morality, concepts such as culture, society, government, country and religion have no place in the discussion as they are neither universal, objective or moral.

We have been eating this for some time 😅 years ❤

Do what you gotta do for you.

Polite feedback. Sound quality issues for me, sounds highly compressed

You could ask me what´s right and follow undoubting, I don´t mind.

IT'S not Dilemma...IT'S DILEMNA

lab grown meat requires cattle to be produced. the growth medium is taken from animals. the animals could make more meat than in the lab. nutrient rich broth is the fluid which the animal embryo grows. also the energy required to maintain sanitized conditions are enormous. it will produce MORE green house gasses.

People use 2 breath threw potpourri but it was mainly cause the streets were full of horse sh.t and stank 2 high heaven

I’m a gun rights activist that doesn’t like the constitution. (Figure that one out 😂), but I bring up the change in legal proceedings about marijuana often. It’s a good example of how seriously authority attacks something and then changes their mind about it. Were they wrong before for attacking or are they wrong now for standing down about it?

Wait… when is cheating on a test a crime??? Am I missing something obvious?

holy yap

If a person does nothing is that also playing God. These moral thought experiments have to cut both ways. I'll hop aboard the Batman quote train by saying it's not about what we want it's about what's fair.

Listen only if it comes to torture should you not keep a open mind

Arrested for "playing god"? That is the most vague charge.

These are more like ethical dilemmas rather than moral ones...

Is our water safe with the fluoride and micro plastics???

Religion is unethical. You are simultaneously saying "I don't believe in scientific facts." And "I rather live in a fantasy world than face my own mortality." Religion has only brought pain and suffering to the world. Anyone who tells you otherwise is ignorant or lying. Nearly every major war throughout history has been caused by religious leaders exploiting the masses. My favorite quote is one my father said to me when I was a teenager. He said, "Surely your religion is the right one because if you were born in India, you would still be a Christian." He was implying the concept of proximity. Had a Christian been born in India, they would be just as certain of their faith in Hindu. Thus, your religious beliefs are just a product of where you are born. Christianity,Buddhism,Islamic faiths, and all the other religions are just competing companies trying to recruit you for their own gain.

Anyone else notice alot of Naval wisdom here Good wisdom is wisdom

No matter who you are, there is only one thing to consider. When you're about to cross beyond the void veil... Reflect carefully. "Before I start, I must see my end. Destination known, my mind's journey now begins. Upon my chariot, heart and soul's fate revealed. In time, all points converge, hope's strength resteeled. But to earn final peace at the universe's endless refrain, we must see all in nothingness... before we start again." --Diamond Dragons (Armageddon's Ballad) 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨

There’s no such thing as god so, play away

The biggest moral dilemma is creating a life/having kids. Most people will argue that having kids is the main purpose of life and no life goal should be without kids in it. Then most if not all of those same people will preach about not being selfish and to consider other's before making a decision that will directly involve another person. Yet, when unpacked it becomes apparent that by definition, brining a life into existence is once again by definition, one of the most selfish things a human can do. Ask someone WHY they have or want kids and 99.9% of the time their response will begin with "I want...". A person is quite literally gambling on another person's life (the life to be created) for something that THEY want. It is somewhat of a paradox to a create a life (which is for selfish reasons as mentioned above) juxtaposed with the required SELFLESSNESS to raise that child and to deal with any handicap it was born with due to the selfish act of creating life for ones own wants and desires.

There is so such things as playing god. We don’t even know if there is even a god. It shouldn’t even be called playing god. It is our responsibility as humans to create better living conditions for ourselves which is why we have the ability to do these things for ourselves. That’s why we are able to do these things. The things we we want to do and are able to do, we do them to the best we can. But there are some things that we will never be able be able to Do and we won’t be able to do. And thats it.

I blame Religion, Ignorance, Capitalism, Culture and Pride for all our problems really as this totally have ruined our collective moral as a species.

The very reson why things happen is because they are allowd to happen. That includes outlandish accusations, FreeWill and "I" told you sos. Human beings do not need any help learnig the hard way, taking reponsibility, selfdeception or wanting to rule the world and one another.

I think your definition of morals is, in fact, the definition of ethics. They are not the same thing.

Am I crazy or is this thumbnail clickbait???

50:50

Lab Grown Meat 💀💀💀

Bro this video is too long 😭 we have work and sturdy to do

And if you're interested in Nihilism, then I invite you to look into Existentialism and then I invite you to look into Absurdism. I know it's a lot of looking into things. Nihilism may be the bottom but it is NOT the end.

So Jon Snow does not know nothing.. he knew about the cholera pump at least

Hi friend

How much money did Mr beast make from his actions.... Don't get me wrong, but is money/likes/views ( no pun intended) the real reason? Is that ethical?

you sound like christian bale

if i ever play god, im going to win.

Seems this is the NEW TO DO. Be a Motivating Positive Helping Person...for $$$ real Motivating Positive Helping, people have been doing it for years, only one who got it right at the start was Jesus...but money grubbers ruined him too for a buck....shit they tortured his ass... World is a giant manipulation game I'm starting to feel and if you don't play well....🤔

Idk why broadcasting your depression in social media is a good idea.. When I'm feeling really really down.. I just suffer in silence

I studied narcissists and gaslighting And keep them the Fuxx out of my life

Why did you start yapping about rich people being sad. Bye

We aren't playing God. God gifted us with a brain to learn. Deciding we are "better" than using God's gift is an insult to ourselves, and I would imagine it's an insult to God too. Astaghfirullah. HARAM

The main problem with EVERY statistic in this video is that the data is calculated in a FALSE way. The average lifespan is a meaningless stat when you average in children dying before age 5 with the adult population of the exact same country. Once you factor out child mortality, if a person lives to 10 years old, in virtually every country on earth for all of human history, the average expected lifespan has always been about 70-80 years (outside of war or natural disasters).

Criticizing NASA’s tiny budget is such a pathetic take lmfao there’s PLENTY of other areas national budget is used for that is infinitely worse than scientific knowledge lol

Playing god ? this god doesn't do shit to help/cure/save people... so can't call it 'playing god'.

Except communism sent me 😂😂😂😂

Lab grown meat is gross

"If God exists, I want him to tell me himself. I don't want to hear it from anybody else - and in case you're wondering, that includes you." - Pat Condell -

This assumes that we males decisions that aren’t gods will. Are we that egotistical as a race to not stop and think that God allows these things to happen? Replace *god* with whatever suits.

No call modern medicine. science. Knowledge

Correction gmos have been around for thousands of years lab gmo are new if your going to talk about it at least get it correct

Maybe we should just have more kids… like rn. It only takes one generation to fix all of this population aging problems.

Remove the commercials, man, sheeez

The idea that something cannot be created from nothing is false. What about a song?

I always found the phrase “playing god” really dumb and nearsighted. Like what ur saying is ur acting in the way god would, but no to rain on the parade of religions worldwide but god doesn’t do anything. It isn’t provably extant nor are “miracles” proven to ever happen and are in fact just a human subject perception of the world and the universe. By saying you play god it makes more sense to me that what you’re actually saying is that you’re playing human.

People who believe in God also believe in science. People who believe in science don't always also believe in God.

We could build buildings that last thousands of years while supposedly using donkey's to carry billions of pounds of stone slabs up to the top of a gothic cathedral without a crane, intricately HAND carved without a drill in just a few years? .. But we're supposed to believe that just 200 years ago people thought diseases were from smelly air and didn't know to use water to bathe for cleanliness?🤣 Sorry history, I don't believe you! Your Lunch Break 🗿