Mortal Kombat 4 (PlayStation vs Nintendo 64) Side by Side Comparison - Dual Longplay 

and no wavy plygons on N64. Sub zero jitters during his finishing pose on psx

Also the N64 rain direction is fixed to the camera.

almost the same, n64 win on loading, and in some fighters the smoothing helps, the endings and the extras the PS1 version. I played this game a lot, I played at a high level with other people who were also enthusiasts.

N64 controller though.

@@Clay3613 I thought about this too, but at the time it was what it was. PSX made a standard with its more universal controller, but if you were a 64 user: it was the norm. Consider that the superior form of this game was on Dreamcast, who also had a slightly less strange but still quirky controller with the world's hardest d-pad and finger cutting triggers!

In hindsight, are the FMVs really a plus?

@@SomeOrangeCat They're nice to have. That's about it.

You took the words right out of my mind. 💯agree with you

@@SomeOrangeCat it's the best part.

You are wrong dude!🙄🤦‍♂️Think again...

You are wrong about "smooth" N64 d pad. It spoils quickly in fighting games.

Both d pads were/are awful for fighting games but the N64 one was worse imo, has a really 'dead' feel to it. The Saturn had the only decent stock pad for fighters in this gen

@@jaramilloedwin27 it was still a great controller for fighting games. Would have been perfect if capcom release their games on the n64

The N64 version doesn't have better textures than the PSX version, the N64 version has lower resolution textures (just look the ground at 6:45) the difference is that N64 uses a linear filter that softens the pixels and gives it the appearance of look better (but blurry)

@@kubratodason719 thanks for your comment.

the better version in my opinion it's "Mortal Kombat Gold" in Dreamcast

@@doom666 I can't argue with that. But only if it is the red printed disk with the "hot new" label on the cover.

Concordo, esse jogo recebe muitas críticas anacrônicas. Na época a molecada gostava, pelo menos aqui na quebrada.

Exatamente, falei isso num vídeo sobre o game em outro canal, na minha época quando saiu era febre nas locadoras, tanto Ps1 e N64, revistas nas bancas...Muitos que criticam nem são da época

Mais ou menos. O exagero atual é gente insinuando que é um jogo ruim, o que claramente não é. Na época o pessoal jogava nos consoles por brincadeira. Mesmo lá muitos já criticavam os gráficos. A febre mesmo era Tekken 3, que tinha gráficos bem melhores que qualquer outro jogo de luta 3D até o momento (e foi lançado antes do MK4).

Só a galera do N64 curtiu esse jogo já que não tinha quase nada pra jogar. Quem no PS1 tinha Bloody Roar, Tekken, Bushido Blade, Dead or Alive, Street Fighter Ex, Rival School... O MK4 é um lixo perto de qualquer um desse, desculpe.

@@rodrigomomo4850 Pro N64 o MK4 era um super game de luta

lighting in this version dont react in any char as ps1 and n64 did.

I see different goro icons never noticed that.

The N64 version actually uses the original arcade endings. Since it features the in-game models acting everything out, instead of a FMV sequence.

Can't forget the audio and controls. Ps1 controls were better and the ps1 actually had a dedicated sound chip.

Dreamcast game MK Gold has worse lighting effects, fireballs dont react on any chars, N64 and PS1 did.

@@angrymobsters1599 And yet the N64 version was still able to preserve and output many of the same sound effects and music as the arcade original in spite of that

Totally agree.

N64 doesn't render more polygons, on the contrary, but it has an advantage it supports main models with a higher average of polygons than the ps1 maybe due the cpu but in stages they are less since the N64 makes bigger polygons, besides the frame rate is almost always below the fixed 30fps, so multiplying the polygons by the fps the result in drawn polygons will be lower than the PS1.

I stand corrected.

@Delinquent Road Runner it can run double the account of polygons ps1 can run

The N64 is closer to the arcade than the PSX version and preferred by tournament guys out of all the home ports of this game, PSX it's alright but freezes, has annoying load times and doesn't look as good graphically as N64 (even with Nintendo's limitations on 3rd party) the PSX looks more pixelated and choppy at times. Both have the mo cap video endings, just different tech were uses on PSX where the N64 used the same as arcade.

The tohsinden games were obsolete by the time this came out and they honestly were to slow paced and movement was awful. Tobal was cool earlier on but Ehrgeiz was better even though it's similiar. Soul edge aged gracefully throughout it's span. Great pace, graphics solid movement and controls, solid replay value too. Mk4 was still a solid pickup for more hectic bloody fast paced combat just like you said though there was more options for better or for worse.

@@angrymobsters1599 I think Toshinden gets a bad wrap. I played the sequel recently, and it’s a fun little game. I mean it has blocky graphics that aged as well as any other game of the era… poorly, but personally I prefer it to Tekken and Tekken 2 that is basically more boring characters fighting on a mode 7 plain. Tekken is also a fun game, but it’s also different. At the time it was one of the first 3D fighters not trying to be realistic and had fireballs in it. I think people are exaggerating the narrative of it being early and not very good.

​@@sloppynyuszi I agree with you that this was on top the heap for fighting games on N64. I didn't own a N64 (until much much later) as I was a fighting game fanatic and PS1 had the best variety of games overall, especially fighting games - for the generation at least. I remember when the Saturn was released, before the PlayStation but we got the PlayStation because it still had better titles and it looked and played way better and more fighting games. People that love Saturns are fanboys and it's hilarious how much they go on about how much better was than PlayStation. But I don't live in Japan or didn't import from there so Saturn was out of the question - because Japan had the cream of the crop for Saturns software and hardware. What turned me off about Saturn was the colour palette always looked less than the PlayStation and N64, like heaps of colours were missing. The hardware couldn't do transparent textures either, most arcades of the time couldn't either but the vast colour palette of arcade hardware made up for it.

pode fechar os comentários!!

Acabou com a disputa CD do tio do camelo wins!!!

Stonks!!! 🤘🏽

Apaga essa merda que dá tempo.

@EL TROOPER TEKKEN the cartridge have played a major role in terms of no loading times. even if the the ps1 was the more powerful it probably at the time still gonna have loading times, data must be read from the CD in order to render everything as it should, and I heard the CD Rom on the ps1 is a bit slow in the reading department.

It even looks better than the games that came after it artistically. The ps2 era of MK had a good look but mk 9 and up has a bland look and feel to them. This also feels the tightest cause it legits feels like MK 3 but it 3d

Correct. The arcade version used the in-game character models for the ending sequences, just like the N64 version. The PS1, Dreamcast (and I think the PC) versions had the fully rendered CG endings.

é uma mulher.

Opa, muito obrigado

not, dreamcast version fireballs lighting dont react on any char as ps1, n64 and arcade did.

@@Mister-Cool, eu tenho Mortal Kombat 4 Gold,também conhecido como MK Gold para Dreamcast aqui meu chapa! ✌😁👍

@@Mister-Cool, não há problemas em se fazer essa comparação, até para verificar se há alguma evolução e melhorias gráficas...

tem um quesito em que ele perde, acredita ? as porcarias das magias não emitem luzem e nem reagem no boneco do qual saiu e nem no boneco que vai receber coisa que no n64 e ps1 fazem. e sim sou fã de Mk4 e MK Gold e concordo contigo nada impede uma comparação.

Mortal Kombat 4 was released in 1997 and the ports came out in 1998, That was in no way "early",. not when other companies had already or were already embracing 3D and trying to get their games into the next dimension, including Street Fighter. Mortal Kombat was never "gritty, realistic"

Was a very early release in the N64’s life so I’m not surprised they got better later with MK4

I don't remember anyone thinking SFA3 was a great fighting game. What I remember was it being criticized for being a meter happy unbalanced mess with lousy music and odd new characters. The fighting game crowd where I lived hated it and preferred SFA2. I didn't like it at first apart from playing Cody and Guy but the more I learned the game the more I grew to like it. Thrill Kill was never gonna be a threat to MK. Play the Wu-Tang game. It's fun, but it's not nearly as good as MK4 or even Bloody Roar. Once the violence and 90s shock value stuff was removed it was an above average console fighter.

It might do, or close enough 60fps. I had it on PS1 back in the day. The graphics were okay, good enough, got the job done. But I kept playing it as I was more surprised at how fun it is to play and the frame pacing is quite well done, at least it doesn't load mid gameplay. Only before fights and after when a fatality occurs.

Sobre as texturas ainda acho melhor o bilinear filtering do Nintendo 64, são mais cores do que a versão de PlayStation, mas a versão do console da Sony tá bem competente... ✌️😎👍

Fala isso porque nunca de ter visto ao vivo a versão do mk4 de arcade!

Já eu gostei mais dos gráficos do N64, achei mais coloridos e vibrantes. No PS1 parece que se esqueceram de pagar a conta de luz...rsss. Gráficos muito abaixo do nível do concorrente. O som é melhor no PS1 mesmo, mas se perdesse mesmo sendo em CD podia parar tbm né...kkkkk Sobre os loadings, sem comentários, quebra todo o clima. É até hilário o vídeo do N64 pausado a cada 30 segundos esperando o do PS1 chegar toda vez, tipo a corrida do coelho e da tartaruga...kkkkk Sobre as cutscenes serem melhores no PS1, pra mim é irrelevante, afinal é um jogo de luta. Depois da primeira vez que vc vê já não serve pra nada, eu pulo tudo pra chegar logo na hora de lutar...rsss. Dito isso, pra mim, a versão do N64 ganha a disputa. ✌️😎

Gostei mais dos gráficos do N64, achei mais coloridos e vibrantes. No PS1 parece que se esqueceram de pagar a conta de luz...rsss. O som é melhor no PS1 mesmo, mas se perdesse mesmo sendo em CD podia parar tbm né...kkkkk Sobre os loadings, sem comentários, quebra todo o clima. É até hilário o vídeo do N64 pausado a cada 30 segundos esperando o do PS1 chegar toda vez, tipo a corrida do coelho e da tartaruga...kkkkk Sobre as cutscenes serem melhores no PS1, pra mim é irrelevante, afinal é um jogo de luta. Depois da primeira vez que vc vê já não serve pra nada, eu pulo tudo pra chegar logo na hora de lutar...rsss. Dito isso, pra mim, a versão do N64 ganha a disputa. ✌️😎

Fanboyism would not be part of nostalgia.

@@JIN_0 who's a fanboy?

This is 4, not Trilogy. Also, what extra content?

@@kaihedgie1747 PS1 has more hidden characters. N64 Gold version is the best, but PS1 wins in standard versions.

@@Freshbrood You haven't actually played the N64 version have you? What other hidden characters?

@@kaihedgie1747PS1 is far superior. It has far more movie scenes and Noob is playable from the start.

@@Freshbrood Right then, so you haven't played it....or even the PSX version for that matter, it seems First, it doesn't have "far more movie scenes". All of the endings and the opening were replaced with FMV renditions of the original arcade scenes, which were all rendered in-game, just like the N64 version. Noob Saibot was also never playable from the start in the PSX version; he requires a code to play as, too.

não tem como comparar, no 64 os gráficos são absurdamente melhores.

@@felipeterlecki Com certeza!

Gostei bem mais dos gráficos do N64, achei mais coloridos e vibrantes. No PS1 parece que se esqueceram de pagar a conta de luz...rsss. O som é melhor no PS1 mesmo, mas se perdesse mesmo sendo em CD podia parar tbm né...kkkkk Sobre os loadings, sem comentários, quebra todo o clima. É até hilário o vídeo do N64 pausado a cada 30 segundos esperando o do PS1 chegar toda vez, tipo a corrida do coelho e da tartaruga...kkkkk Sobre as cutscenes serem melhores no PS1, pra mim é irrelevante, afinal é um jogo de luta. Depois da primeira vez que vc vê já não serve pra nada, eu pulo tudo pra chegar logo na hora de lutar...rsss. Dito isso, pra mim, a versão do N64 ganha a disputa. ✌️😎

Eu prefiro o do playstation 1 por causa das cutscenes.

La mayor diferencia esta en que los discos ya no sirven hoy en dia con el mal uso que se les dió y el cartucho si, al final era una inversion a largo plazo! :)

@@JIN_0 meh. La inversión a largo plazo no tiene sentido habiendo emuladores de esos dos sistemas para smartphones. El meollo del asunto es que el costo extra de los cartuchos no los absorbía Nintendo, sino que tenía que ser pagado por el propio cliente. La necedad de Nintendo por los cartuchos le hizo perder la generación, tanto en ventas como en exclusivas. Metal gear Solid y Final Fantasy VII son un ejemplo de ello. Iban a salir en el N64 pero la gran N mantuvo su postura de usar cartuchos y al final se fueron con la competencia y el resto es historia.

I mean Dreamcast