The mystery behind Satoshi Nakamoto is truly captivating. The more we dig, the more questions arise. The evolution of crypto is an exciting journey we're all a part of.
Just a theory... Craig could be colluding with governments to try and expose who Satoshi really is by baiting out early adopters to give up info and emails like these.
Some will feel just stupid. The irony lies in the fact that while the world population remains unaware of Satoshi Nakamoto's identity, they also participate in a fiat system where the central controllers remain anonymous. This dual lack of transparency highlights the contrast between the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and the opaque structures of traditional fiat currencies.
I dont think btc will just fail and go away . The future of crypto is beyond our imaginations at the moment. The ones that last have real utility and purpose. I dont think any of us have a clue how large the global transformation will be , good or bad , we will all be amazed by how this generation will be affected .
Communications between parties does not necessarily exclude people from presenting their stance on a subject or position, but when interactions occur, those instances leave a trace of time, location, and duration which cannot be denied. This means if someone is not accessible from a point in time and location, then they could not have represented someone or something. The universe always attempts to leave 'information' about itself and it cannot be destroyed or erased.
Maybe Craig Wright's plan is to out Satoshi? The mAil at 5:50 is just one of many clues to Satoshi being one specific inDividuAl. Not a teaM of people. He did have a group of like-minded people who helped to Build And keep BitCoin. Had a lot of worK, a full-time research schedule while simultaneously developing Bitcoin. 😉
It would be so unbelievably easy for Google to stop them. The only possible explanation for why they haven’t is that they are complicit. They’re happy to take the ad revenue and let people who are looking for alternatives to the traditional banking system get scammed.
Correction: COPA took CSW to court, not the other way around. As the emails show, Satoshi was always a big blocker in the way BSV works now with 1 million + tps.
@@CryptoTips Adam Back took the stand as an ‘independent witness’ and failed to mention that he’s on the board of COPA and the CEO of Blockstream. (Oops) Adam Back didn’t invent Proof of Work. It was invented by Cynthia Dwork. The Cypherpunks hate the way Satoshi implemented Proof of Work. They parachuted Adam Back in to break Bitcoin. Adam Back changed the rules of Bitcoin and claimed not to know how Craig Wright plans to scale Bitcoin. Hint: Wright has managed to scale Bitcoin to one million transactions per second. Adam Back capped it at seven transactions per second. (Not seven million. Seven) Adam is a shitty fucking hacker.
if you look at COPA's partners, and understand why it benfits them to keep the blocks small, you'll realise why there's so much vitrol towards this guy. As far as I can tell he hasn't stolen anyones cash, but claims to be Satoshi. Fine. Sam Bankman Fried defrauded cash amounts from people and recieved less vitrol, among many other crypto scammers. This leads me to believe there may be something about Craig that is making these people go apeshit (it can't be claiming Satoshi, that's just lol tbh)
With 120 e-mails, there should be enough data to use AI to match the language of Satoshi with living people. This should be able to expose who Satoshi really is.
Judging by some of the slang terms and spelling of certain words we know that satoshi was most likely Australian… why don’t you just open your eyes and accept reality
“Announcing version 0.3 of Bitcoin, the P2P cryptocurrency! Bitcoin is a digital currency using cryptography and a distributed network to replace the need for a trusted central server. Escape the arbitrary inflation risk of centrally managed currencies!” -Satoshi, 07-06-2010
Craig didn't know about code Satoshi wrote himself to fix a bug when asked by a bsv developer. Craig instructed all bsv employees to STOP calling Bitcoin cryptocurrency. Craig smeared and trashed Adam Beck's name before those documents were made public. Three red flags that prove he isn't Satoshi!
What are the best additions to a $500k portfolio to boost performance? S&P 500 is Up as well as bitcoins and will do better in march 2024 I believe as indicators for profits continue to improve, investors like me believe that “Santa has come early” to the markets
I think you're better off with majority investment in S&P500 and uprising equities cos they always outperform. Alternatively speaking to a certified market strategist can help with pointers on which to acquire
wow massive gains! my partner recently hinted on going same direction.. what did you invest in, and who is your investment advisr please, if you don’t mind me asking? in dire need of asset allocation
🤔 Since we all know Craig Wright was there in the beginning... Why is there not one email between Satoshi and Craig Wright??? Could it be that Craig actually is Satoshi???
I don’t think they are anti-XRP I’ve been watching this couple for a while, and I believe they’re genuine and truly interested helping us succeed. I was just curious that’s all.
If Wright was Satoshi and he wanted to prove it, all he'd have to do is sign a message using Satoshi's private key on any of the 1.1 million bitcoins held in his private wallet.
N akamoto SA toshi. That’s who you are talking about. The NSA started it in 1996. You think some random person would be allowed to start a financial scam?
You only need to use a little logic to debunk such a notion. Ask yourself, would the NSA create something that provides personal sovereignty and freedom? It would have looked very different like that 1996 paper.
@@santiagoferrari1973 Kaspa is okay but it can't do Cash Tokens or NFTs like *BitcoinCash* can. It also uses a different mining algorithm and requires all new mining equipment. *BitcoinCash* has INSTANT 0-confirmation payments, which is faster than Kaspa.
Satoshi uses "wasn't" where "weren't" is gramatical. This is a clue to his identity. It suggests he is younger than 60, and that he did not focus on literature in his education.
@@libation14221Everyone involved is a male. Why would you assume that Satoshi was any different from the core group of Uber-nerds involved in that techie sphere?
The mystery in how Craig wright is capable of sustaining this absolute insane claim for so many years and get so much media exposure about it is absolutely mind bending to me. Someone. Pleeeeease. Explain it to me. I’m going mad. I can’t find the answer. 🤬😭
@@14lou I hope you realise that being the most honest actor in the Bitcoin space is a low, low bar. Craig Wright believes he is Satoshi Nakamoto. Everyone else believes that Bitcoin was meant to financially liberate the masses. Out of those two, Craig Wright's belief is more plausible.
@@yam2050 Wrong. Bitcoin can never be centralized even if they hold all the bitcoin. They still can't control it or make decisions about the blockchain. However, if they ever do hold all the bitcoin, all the miners have to do is turn off all their equipment and stop mining/validating and bitcoin becomes worthless overnight.
For someone who is from the early homebrew scene. You wouldn't believe the amount of talent that is there! Also unfortunately how much of it gets stolen by big companies! I'm looking at you Apple and the jailbreaking community!
You've said all this before. What's new? Your points are all good though, especially about energy consumption. No one should be griping about that in relation to Bitcoin.
The fact that Satoshi thought "maybe" the word "cryptocurrency" could be used for bitcoin doesn't mean that he was convinced. "Crypto" will, for me, always be a lower order of things. Bitcoin NOT Crypto. Otherwise, good job. Like the lighting btw, looks great.
Something i dont hear spoke to often is that satoshi went by satoshi knowing that the smallest part of a bitcoin token is called a satoshi and thats how satoshi thought of himself as well...just a small portion of something much bigger than himself ❤
Obviously they were who named the smallest part of a Bitcoin Satoshi in the first place but that in itself was the nod to the mindset Satoshi had on the subject ❤
@@CarlArriazaThis is correct, the original white paper Satoshi authored in 2008 did not name it, but just said it could be divided into one hundred millionth of a bitcoin. The Satoshi unit name happened after it was released.
Not much was revealed, all of his views on Bitcoin where clear that way long time ago. It is newbies and rather sheepish maxis that never knew this. Big Blockers pointed out anything many years prior to these new mail coming out, which really just repeat what he said in forums publicly.
No, black rock is a custodian for thousands of individuals. This exaggerated notion of BlackRock controlling hundreds of thousands of Bitcoin will never work.
Why does everyone ignore the fact that homeland security has said they interviewed the four Satoshis in San Fransisco? How can we have institutions investing in ETF's which include an asset that no one knows who the founders are? Of course, they know who Satoshi is, give me a break.
@@ElectronicHypnoticSomething is not becoming a commodity based on a hype. Bitcoin has failed the white paper. It has become an expensive monster for the rich. Do you really think those banksters did not know about the end of the current money system?
clearly, as per his comment, Satoshi wasn't comfortable with the enormous energy consumption of a mature Bitcoin, it was only less bad - less inefficient - than the existing system. It is evident from his writing that, in the unclear nascent beginning, if he had been able to see a more efficient way to secure the distributed network he would have chosen the most energy efficient secure way to do so. Now, fifteen years later, with huge numbers of hyper intelligent designers having participated, many more efficient and more secure designs have been embodied and proven in the newer, improved networks. Many of these are many magnitudes more energy efficient than Bitcoin. And more secure too.
He clearly didnt expect it to be mined on anything other than a home PC. However with the invention of ASICs that's not an option anymore. An ASIC resistant chain can stay even more decentraized and individual miner "friendly" than BTC. You can still mine it, but the odds of solving a block are beyond astronomical. Also at this point there's NOT a more secure network than Bitcoin, period.
It will be interesting as to where the miners are going to go after the halving as more work less money, they will end up on BSV for their profits. No mention here about teranode and it tps record, they will find out that BSV is cheaper,faster and greener 😎
Len Sassaman was Satoshi IMHO, he used some technology that he learned in Belgium, and sadly commited suIcIde, that's why Satoshi disappeared forever... When he died his face got printed in one block.
Imagine the most abstracted of red pills where Satoshi Nakamoto was actually AGI created by a genius AI/ML professor who prompted their AGI to create the best decentralised Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
@@xxoxiaGood catch. I'm Canadian and if I'm writing something that will largely be read by Americans I spell it labor, on purpose. That said, I spell it both ways, depending on the audience, but you're 100% correct that no American would spell it labour. They're cheap with their letters. 😂
Life is but a computer simulation. Focus on yourself, positive thinking and good habits and watch how you rewrite the code to produce the best life ever for yourself.
Some say Radiant is BSV without the baggage 🧳 🤔 Either way, BTC is certainly not going to handle mass adoption, it is utter crap from a use case perspective.
