Most Controversial Finds In American History 

Get the book Lies my teacher told me. It's all in there

ya. Keep learning though. This guy has obvious bias and hasn't dug deep enough to learn the really amazing stuff. The study of history is, to me, one of the most fascinating things that life has to offer. Just don't put all your faith in "the experts" they don't always have the answers. Who knows, you may even be the one to re-discover something we forgot ages ago.

Leif the lucky’s real name is leif erickson

I'M NORWEGIAN!!!

I'm Welsh I completely (not) understand what this means since my ancestors were Vikings:p

OMG Spongebob was ahead of the game

I am from Iceland

Hinga Dinga Durgen to you too!

You love Wrestling?

@@TsikoMania no

As a Norwegian, I need to correct your spelling of his name, his name is Leif Eiriksson(Leif Eíriksson in Old Norse)

Ok. I will make this reply on it history

Me 2

History mate

Huh what is history?

​@@jeskoae I have some question too a

I live in Oklahoma! I'll have to give these a visit!

And they're ALL gullible, anti-intellectual infants.

And both is BS.

​@@desperadox7565 and no one asked you, people can Believe what they want

@@tiffanycalhoun4877 And who asked you? But like everybody else you can believe as much absurdities as you want. Even in Santa Claus.

@@tiffanycalhoun4877 yeah, people can keep believing that releasing millions of tons of carbon into the atmosphere will never have any effect on the planet whatsoever! Leave people alone. Science is evil!…. I’m being sarcastic if you can’t tell.

You love wrestling?

Do you love wrestling?

Vikings may have been Nephilim ?? (Gen 6.1. giants)

You love wrestling?

@@TsikoMania kinda especially watching

@@wamboieverlynewanjiru240 then you might wanna check me out

The CIA are still at it. Notice any recent brainwashing going on?

In Morehead Minnesota there's an ancient Norse chapel by the river walk. It was said to have been built in the early 1500s using the parts of a sailing ship. It's been restored many times.

Anyone who was born in the Americas is a Native American. It's becoming more common for people to use the phrase 'First Nations' when speaking of the people who lived in the Americas before Columbus discovered them.

That's a good point because, by that reasoning, I'm a native American because I was born here (and some of my ancestry here goes back nearly 500 years).

If you wanna use that logic, there are no indigenous humans except Africans since humans evolved in Africa. The humans who became what we call native Americans arrived in North America around 60 thousand years ago according to science. There is a difference between a recent immigrant and an indigenous American. It’s the same reason white people get to say they are “European” ie german, English, Norwegian. The phenotype developed in a certain region.

I heard that the truth was that it was his brother who impregnated the slave during some visits, not Jefferson.

Leif didn’t destroy the native Americans. So I definitely respect Leif. Canada 🇨🇦 is NORTH AMERICA im United States American 🇺🇸

@@angelacooper8973 yes Canada is part of The North American continent, that was sarcasm, and No he did not "destroy" the Native Americans, but why was that? Was it because the Vikings are known to have been sweet love thy neighbors type people? Wasn't it the Vikings that discovered both Greenland and Iceland? They told other people about the but they "accidently" mixed them up, they told everyone, this island is beautiful, we called it Greenland because it is so nice the entire thing is covered in plants it would be a wonderful place to live, knowing that those people would set out to find their new home in this wonderful Greenland, but when they got there they would find a place inhospitable to human life and they would be stuck there because their food stores etc would be depleted, they would most likely all die. But just Incase that didn't kill them they also named Iceland for it's terrible climate where it is frozen wasteland all year around, when in actuality it was the nice green place. The Native Americans... No... He did not destroy them because he was greatly out numbered. But wait did Columbus "destroy" the native Americans? Yes? Er wait a second... No he didn't either. You can argue how the "colonizers" did this and that, but plain simple truth, the natives would steal land, people, food whatever from each other and from the colonists, it just turned out in the end of things the colonists won the final battles, but like Americans have done with every war we have won, we feel bad and spend more money making things better for those we conquered, the Indians have always been able to join our society, but they have always claimed a level of victimhood, instead of just getting on with life. I am also an American, United States of America, American. And saying that is super awkward, to say I am American implies USA, other it would be Canadian or Mexican, etc.

They also referred to Greenland/Baffin Island area as Marklund.

Rumor is the natives turned Viking dead into trophies.

Exactly, great way to demonstrate great apologetics man

The Bible did mention Dinosaurs in Revelations

Yeah, the Bible never mentioned ALL KINDS of things. Because the people who made up its stories didn't know about anything beyond like a 15 mile radius around wherever they happened to be at any time.

I don't remember where, but a few years ago I was watching something about old scrolls that were found. The show said that there were 32 original books, but only 4 were included in the bible. So a lot was left out due to some person or group making that decision. It sure makes me wonder what was left out.

​@@SavorySmegmathe Bible refers to various monsters that could have been dinosaurs. Leviathan and Behemoth. It also says the earth is round and 'hangs upon nothing'.

Columbus gets shit on because he was historically a POS. Look into his journals. And yes, someone else would have done it if he hadn’t. So he’s worthless imo

Also looks a lot like those seeds that fly like half-helicopters

@@wolfiemuse Yeah true, was also thinking that genes and genetics don't always work as they should, like how some humans and animals have been born with extra digits or limbs (polydactylism), so it could also be that the Quimbaya people unknowingly used a creature or plant etc that perhaps had some kind of deformity or least something different than usual about it.

LICENSE, NOT LICENCE.

Arggggh!

Lmao. I thought that too.

Right, I promptly unsubscribed and told RU-vid not “do not recommend channel.” I used to enjoy watching this channel until i heard this. I will never watch another video from them again.

Aww what a shame

Nna na na na Na na na na Hey hey hey Goodbye😂😂😂

if your religion is thinking the Earth is roughly 6.000 years old and that humans co-existed with dinosaurs, and that Noah's Ark and the flood actually happened, then Be Amazed rightfully so makes fun of you idiots. if you don't like being made fun of, don't watch this channel's videos!

You're soft, if you're a real Christian man up and take those like they're nothing. Our religious is strong enough to withstand a small little mock, you don't have to worry about going to what? Crumbled into dust just from small little jokes?

Very well put! I commend you !

@@user-kk4xg7fb7h Thank you. I try. But I can't take all of the credit, if any. A lot of the credit has to go to Jehovah God and Jesus Christ, and the Bible which was inspired by them. It was written in such a way that people have to put it together like a puzzle, and a person really needs to think it through. The Bible doesn't spell everything out. One example of this is Adam and Eve. Most people don't realize that the human race comes out of Adam and Eve. The most simplest conclusion is that the human race is one big family. But, even science states the same conclusion, but people have still been killing their families for centuries. Which most people don't think things through. The Bible has everything that is needed for an accurate knowledge of God. But God created everything, including science, and history. We wouldn't have history or science without him, never mind life. So, while reading the Bible, I studied history and science. Because of it I'm able to see a bigger or complete picture. Science is amazing, but scientist don't always look at everything. Most of the time because they could never find all of the evidence. But in the Bible it shows a pattern of selfishness, greed, arrogance, even ignorance that stems from Adam and Eve, and it carries on and on. If you look at only the science and history there is no hope. At least with the Bible, Jehovah God and Jesus Christ, there is hope for something better. The human race united behind God's guidance, everlasting life, with truth, peace, and prosperity for the human family. Either way, you should thank God more than me. I just stumbled upon this, the same way that the scientist stumbled upon the science.

Some animals he was allowed more of.. yes more than two.. sheep he had more of.. others you will have to check yourself..

@@garyalf2322 I'll take your word for it.

?

This is what Ana Graciela Blackwelder does, she has changed my life.

After raising up to 60k trading with her, I bought a new house and car here in the US and also paid for my son’s (Oscar) surgery. Glory to God.shalom.

I know Ana Graciela Blackwelder, and I have also had success...

@@FredrickJones338Absolutely! I have heard stories of people who started with little or no knowledge but managed to emerge victorious thanks to Ana Graciela Blackwelder.

@@FredrickJones338Wow, that’s inspiring. How can I contact Ana Graciela Blackwelder?

Your statement is entirely incorrect and a logical fallacy. DNA evidence *is* used every day to determine fatherhood and are regularly exceeding 99% certainty. They provide a near perfect tell of biological relatives. Mistakes come from when humans get involved and accidentally test the same sample twice or don’t have enough of a sample to test. Where did you hear this from?

@@wolfiemuse "They provide a near perfect tell of biological relatives." Exactly. DNA can tell if people are related but in Jefferson's case it can only tell whether someone in his paternal line fathered Hemmings children. My sentence " DNA evidence can prove who did not father a child but cannot prove who actually did" came from the Science article about the Jefferson/Hemmings DNA test (written in 1999) from which I quoted. I just didn't include it in the excerpt I showed. Since the Jefferson/Hemmings test and article(s) were done in 1998/1999, DNA analysis has improved, however not enough to establish that Jefferson himself fathered Hemmings children as he has no known direct male descendants to test. In 1998 his uncle's DNA was used which only showed that one of 7 other Jefferson males could have been Eston Hemmings father. Quote from another article, a PBS Frontline documentary : "If Thomas Jefferson were exhumed for Y chromosome DNA testing it would only confirm that he carried the same Y chromosome as the other 7 Jeffersons in question.". In other words, every single known Jefferson male would have to be exhumed and have viable DNA extracted and tested against Hemmings to tell which one plausibly was the father. Even if that were to happen - which is most unlikely - the DNA would, in all probability, be too degraded to prove anything definitively.

Isn't there two people that narrates?