Тёмный

Most Insane Cargo Plane Ever - Boeing Resource Carrier One 

Found And Explained
Подписаться 680 тыс.
Просмотров 328 тыс.
50% 1

www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com/
We now have a discord: / discord
& Patreon: / foundandexplained
With a wingspan of 500 feet, 12 engines, 56 wheels and a carrying capacity of 2,3 million pounds - this plane was five times more powerful than an Antonov An-225 and could be listed as the most insane cargo plane ever designed. But it would never be built.
When the US government opened up northern Alaska to the oil industry, there was a question of how to get the resources from the far icy north down the refineries in the south. Boeing realized that air transportation would be the solution for this stranded oil and that earlier engineers had overlooked two very important factors.
Firstly, that the oil wouldn't have to go from Alaska to California, but rather it could go from Alaska to the shipping lanes near the Canadian border, traveling the rest of the way by boat.
Another mistake was basing the sortie times on commercial operations, like the Boeing 747. As the plane wouldn't be transporting passengers, but instead crude oil, it could fly at any time of the day - performing up to 18 sorties in a rolling 24 hour cycle.
To begin, they started with the Boeing 747. Turning one into a oil transport wouldn't be hard, and inital designs showed that it could do it. The plane would turn its wing fuel tanks into oil tanks, as it didn't need the fuel for the short-range. Boeing presented this 747 idea but as the plane made a profit of one dollar per barrel, the companies were not interested.
In 1970, Canada looked into opening up the arctic archipelago as part of the great plains project, for resource mining and extraction. Any railway would need to be built over frozen tundra and a pipeline would be considered extremely expensive.
The team opening up the region became aware of Boeing's recent 747 oil tanker proposal and got in touch to see if they could use the same principle to carry mined ore rather than oil. This one design changed spurred Boeing to create a completely new aircraft, one that was up to the job and would be called the resource carrier. It would have other nicknames, such as the brute Lifter, or the Flying Pipeline!
Oil would be loaded in gigantic pods fitted to the side of the plane's massive 500 foot or 150-meter wingspan. This would allow quick turn arounds, as the pods could be loaded off the plane, installed, and then flown to the destination. On arrival, the pods would be deposited onto existing train cars, and the plane would return with the empty pods.
To spread the heavy load out on the wings, the plane would need eight sets of landing gears. However, this had a problem for when the plane would turn on the ground, limiting a swept wing. This means that the plane would use a straight wing. This means a slower speed of Mach 0.7. But this was a fair compromise, as the flights would be short and the engineers could focus on a low-speed high-lift wing design.
This would mean that the plane would have a short-range, fully loaded of 1,000 miles, 1,610 km respectively. The plane would weigh around 985,000 pounds (447,000 kg), or double the weight of an An-225.
The Canadian plains project also had one more request - that the aircraft use a gas fuel as opposed to jet fuel. It would have a huge fuselage with nothing in it, the heavy cargo was in the pods. These fuel tanks would carry as natural gas, which could also now be transported in the same tanks.
The team believed that a fleet of 50 aircraft would be required for the project, with 15 of the aircraft being used as spares to ensure 24-hour service. At then $72 million, $439 million today, a pop, this was not a cheap operation. For oil, this would mean 86 cents per barrel - a good dollar difference from the previous 747 proposals.
To achieve the required sortie rate needed to make the "flying pipeline" concept work, Boeing designed an airport around the aircraft. This featured three parallel runways that would operate at the same time. Aircraft landed on the two outer runways and then taxied along with large operational aprons at either end of the runways. Here they dropped their cargo pods onto trains and picked up empty ones for the return flight.
A huge advantage of this proposal was that the planes could be reconfigured. From transporting oil, gas, ore, and more, they could be moved at a moment's notices throughout the region and would mean new areas could be exploited.
So why was it never built?
In 1972, Boeing who had already put in 500,000 into the project presented the final design. The Canadians took it to the oil firms, confident they could get the $15 million needed to build a small-scale demonstration model.
Then in 1973, the oil crisis struck. The Boeing resource carrier was no longer profitable, and all design plans for it were totally abandoned - bringing the end to the insane journey of what could have been the world's biggest cargo aircraft.

Опубликовано:

 

23 фев 2021

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 466   
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
Check out what I've dubbed: The most hated plane: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-s1xq6pb5DNM.html
@itstomatogear6806
@itstomatogear6806 3 года назад
Yo
@matt309
@matt309 3 года назад
Amogsus
@cptcool-__-7501
@cptcool-__-7501 3 года назад
just use a bv 238 prefect for the job bruv
@itsmeayan1728
@itsmeayan1728 3 года назад
you are the best in aviation animation
@river_salmon
@river_salmon 2 года назад
Wait, that isn't Concordski
@RidinDirtyRollinBurnouts
@RidinDirtyRollinBurnouts 3 года назад
Love how at 0:12 when the plane splits, the guy falls and hangs on for dear life. Your animator has a lot of fun with these
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
I the animator - if you look a little later in the video when the same shot appears... maybe listen very carefully
@RidinDirtyRollinBurnouts
@RidinDirtyRollinBurnouts 3 года назад
@@FoundAndExplained awesome! Thank you for making these cool videos, I am a big fan of this presentation style of content
@skibootdier9488
@skibootdier9488 3 года назад
You sir have AMAZING OBSERVATIONAL SKILLS!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@iron60bitch62
@iron60bitch62 3 года назад
I went back and looked thank you that was very funny
@turbine_doctor
@turbine_doctor 2 года назад
@@FoundAndExplained Well done!
@emaheiwa8174
@emaheiwa8174 3 года назад
Family day at the office and kids get to help design a plane
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
It totally looks like it was designed in crayon!
@craigrmeyer
@craigrmeyer 3 года назад
@@FoundAndExplained When quantity drops to less than 100 or so, you gotta cut corners like crazy to make a plane buildable at all. Simple repeating geometries, etc.
@eladentopistevo
@eladentopistevo 3 года назад
hahahahahahahahaahahahahha xD
@firozosman
@firozosman 3 года назад
@@FoundAndExplained and you figured if you made a cgi video about it, enough morons would click. C'mon.
@futurepilot821
@futurepilot821 3 года назад
@@firozosman Well bud, welcome to the Morons club then.
@AfroMan187
@AfroMan187 3 года назад
I can't tell if an oil spill at 35,000 feet would be better or worse than an oil spill in the middle of the pacific
@refrweerf
@refrweerf 3 года назад
35000 ft, Because oil would probably be evaporated by the time it hits surface.
@elmikeomysterio5496
@elmikeomysterio5496 3 года назад
Yes. It would be better in some ways and worse in others.
@elmikeomysterio5496
@elmikeomysterio5496 3 года назад
@@refrweerf that's not how oil works. The evaporation temperature of oil is really high. It would just rain down similar to if it was water, but in bigger drops. It probably wouldn't even "vaporize" (basically turn to a mist of tiny droplets) due to temperature and viscosity.
@agentv1240
@agentv1240 3 года назад
Firework fun time!
@JohnSmith-ox3gy
@JohnSmith-ox3gy 3 года назад
@@elmikeomysterio5496 Sounds far worse. 0_o
@crazzzi4u68
@crazzzi4u68 3 года назад
This has to be the most American thing I've ever heard of
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
It would transport natural gas, and use the natural gas as a fuel source
@orangegherkin3420
@orangegherkin3420 3 года назад
I bet it eats liquidised burgers instead of avgas when its fuel is low.
@fred6319
@fred6319 3 года назад
@@FoundAndExplained that would make the oil embargo and high jet fuel prices irrelevant
@scottlowther9967
@scottlowther9967 3 года назад
No... it *would* be the Most American Thing EVAR if Boeing had designed a gunship variant. Fill one of the pods with a bank of GAU-8A 30mm Gatling guns and a few 5-inch naval guns and install a few hundred Maverick missiles int he other pods... and now it sounds like a party.
@b.griffin317
@b.griffin317 3 года назад
@@fred6319 my guess is the irrelevent thing referenced is the ore transport mission out of northern cananda. that is more sensitive to oil-prices.
@riliryrimaddyvia9630
@riliryrimaddyvia9630 3 года назад
Of course a napkin, all great ideas are thought about on the go.
@abuBrachiosaurus
@abuBrachiosaurus 3 года назад
I mean, the rough draft for Harry Potter was written on toilet paper in a coffee shop so...
@johnslaughter2685
@johnslaughter2685 3 года назад
Trickledown economics would like to have a word...
@shawnnaquin70
@shawnnaquin70 3 года назад
Not all ideas written on napkins turn out well (my now wife's phone number)
@olafvanrijnsbergen1177
@olafvanrijnsbergen1177 3 года назад
Napkins are the worst though. On the back of coasters is where the real shit happens
@craigrmeyer
@craigrmeyer 3 года назад
OK quick. 1: The Imperial Japanese were about to try a flying tanker to get Indonesian oil to Japan in 1945, after their shipping was all sunk. 2: Oil tanker SUBMARINES were also seriously considered to get the oil from Nome (or wherever), southward under the ice, back up to the ice-free surface, and then to wherever it could be handed over to regular tankers. THAT was NOT crazy and probably could have worked TBH.
@Vatharian
@Vatharian 3 года назад
Germans had tanker submarines, I believe they called them sea cows. They ware basically skinny u-boots with huge tanks attached to their sides.
@FortuitusVideo
@FortuitusVideo 3 года назад
The Russians had a proposal to turn their Akula class boomers into arctic transports. Sadly, the submarines are now just wasting away.
@COIcultist
@COIcultist 3 года назад
@@Vatharian Milch cows. They carried food as well as fuel for the submarines. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_XIV_submarine.
@Vatharian
@Vatharian 3 года назад
@@COIcultist Thank you for direct link!
@COIcultist
@COIcultist 3 года назад
@@Vatharian Not at all. If I can, I try to substantiate what I am saying because I could just be spouting rubbish. Strangely some people do.
@joshaby8795
@joshaby8795 3 года назад
This brings a whole new meaning to THICC
@michaellemasters7173
@michaellemasters7173 3 года назад
This 100% looks like one of the Wunderwaffe designs that would’ve come out of Germany in 1944
@LEGIONCABAL
@LEGIONCABAL 3 года назад
SO OUR WUNDERWAFFEN NEED A LOT OF FUEL AND WE DONT HAVE FUEL SO WHAT IF WE MADE A WUNDERLUFTWAFFE THATS 100 TIMES BIGGER THAN ANY OF OUR CURRENT PLANES SO THEN WE HAVE UNLIMITED FUEL Yeah sounds like desperate Hitler near the end of the war
@VioletWyvern
@VioletWyvern 3 года назад
Normal Viewers: *See this prototype plane...* Nah...I just browsing... Kerbal Space Program Players: Challenge accepted
@leonmic2146
@leonmic2146 3 года назад
Hahaha, True. I'm already made it tho. 😂
@gabrielb9010
@gabrielb9010 3 года назад
This is one of the most amazing conceps i've ever seen,this plane could be' comparable to the CL-1201
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
Yet it was far more real! I wish they just made a prototype.
@bencarpendale
@bencarpendale 3 года назад
Boeing's just like that I guess
@lukefreeman828
@lukefreeman828 3 года назад
Just googled that... Jesus Christ 😂
@bencarpendale
@bencarpendale 3 года назад
airbus: *makes planes while putting thought into it* boeing: "make it THICC, I'll give you half a million, oh it doesn't work, MAKE IT THICKER"
@Bendigo1
@Bendigo1 3 года назад
Airbus: make it expensive. Nobody buys them. Airbus: make it expensiveer.
@Papa_Swish
@Papa_Swish 3 года назад
It looks like everyone's attempt to build their first giant plane in a sandbox game. More Wing, more engine, more plane.
@darsharjunrao9057
@darsharjunrao9057 3 года назад
Haha
@Wedgetail14
@Wedgetail14 2 года назад
Imagine an accident involving a fully-loaded one. That would be as spectacular as it would be catastrophic!
@ericlotze7724
@ericlotze7724 3 года назад
I read the wikipedia page on this a while back, and LOVED IT. Glad it finally has a video on it !
@TigerChamp99
@TigerChamp99 3 года назад
You should make a video about Boeing 707 and Douglas DC-8 in the future
@codywright2840
@codywright2840 3 года назад
Never heard of this plane before. It’s always fascinating to learn about never built airplanes of the past
@rishabhgoyal726
@rishabhgoyal726 3 года назад
At 6:22 , there's a great fun thing. When you just the plane in half, the 1 crew member out of 2 right behind the cockpit started hanging 😂. Great attention to detail 👌
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
You caught it!
@rishabhgoyal726
@rishabhgoyal726 3 года назад
@@FoundAndExplained 😉 I am quite interested in aircrafts design and information about them. Love your channel ❤️
@Vespuchian
@Vespuchian 3 года назад
Yay, the Spanlifter! I'm looking forward to that one!
@PabloSanchez-qu6ib
@PabloSanchez-qu6ib 3 года назад
Yep. A huge flying machine full of flammable oil. What could ever go wrong?
@TheWium14
@TheWium14 3 года назад
Ever since I found this channel, I have loved coming back and watching more and more, but my favourite ones are the, planes that were never built. Keep up the good work
@catraaufaa_9_viiif323
@catraaufaa_9_viiif323 3 года назад
randomly found this video on recommended, the quality of the video and the explanation you given enlightened me. you deserved more recognition by this kind of effort you put into.
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
Thank you! I hope I deserve your subscription
@dh4913
@dh4913 3 года назад
Imagine your plane is running out of fuel and this thing saved the day
@toastysalmen4642
@toastysalmen4642 3 года назад
This has to be one of the weirdest videos I've ever seen. But leave it to you @found and explained, to make an amazing video on an amazing concept. Keep them up.
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
This comment made me feel warm and fuzzy
@craigrmeyer
@craigrmeyer 3 года назад
Absolutely kickass video! Thank you.
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
Glad you enjoyed it!
@ErnestJay88
@ErnestJay88 3 года назад
RC-1 with that name people will gonna think that plane is Radio Controlled toy.
@dickynurahman2292
@dickynurahman2292 3 года назад
Underrated comment
@rogerwest205
@rogerwest205 3 года назад
Hey "found and explained". I just came across your channel today. Very well done, my friends! I'm subscribed. Keep it up.
@marilynmanson1834
@marilynmanson1834 3 года назад
Love the animated man swinging at 6.23 when the aircraft is shown in cut-away view!
@onair6652
@onair6652 3 года назад
Fascinating, thanks for sharing:)
@robertorafaelvazquezvazque2376
@robertorafaelvazquezvazque2376 3 года назад
Excellent video, never heard about this plane! I can't wait for the supper flying wing! Thank you so much for making all this awesome videos!
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
You are very welcome
@meikleleyvintageaircraftpa6281
@meikleleyvintageaircraftpa6281 3 года назад
Love these videos! Have you considered doing the BAC TSR-2. Its a beautiful aircraft!
@Ruffhouse789
@Ruffhouse789 3 года назад
I'd love to see an episode on the Span Loader you mentioned...and/or the Boeing Pelican ground effect cargo plane proposal.
@zackunger1791
@zackunger1791 3 года назад
This is the literal meaning or “getting high on your own supply”
@samnicholos7892
@samnicholos7892 3 года назад
Great content my friend!
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
Thanks for the visit Hope you would like to subscribe :)
@samnicholos7892
@samnicholos7892 3 года назад
@@FoundAndExplained already did!
@kaiko-san
@kaiko-san 3 года назад
Amazing video!
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
Glad you think so!
@Aaronwhatnow
@Aaronwhatnow 3 года назад
Great video. Just found your channel. Looks like ive got some binging to do
@PaddyPatrone
@PaddyPatrone 3 года назад
RC-1 .... so this is theri first remote controled plane huh? Quite late to the game. I crashed my first on years ago...
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
Boeing is a late bloomer, trying to catch up to its younger brother Airbus.
@abuBrachiosaurus
@abuBrachiosaurus 3 года назад
I just flew my first RC plane today, I also bought my first bit of styrofoam glue today...
@kevorkdedeyan3337
@kevorkdedeyan3337 3 года назад
I love this channel
@jebes909090
@jebes909090 3 года назад
"So how many engines do you want sir?" "Yes"
@Colt45s1911a1
@Colt45s1911a1 3 года назад
I don’t understand how jet fuel costs stopped the last jet if it was planned to be fueled by natural gas not jet fuel???
@craigrmeyer
@craigrmeyer 3 года назад
Dude you nailed it. The LNG was local, domestic, and had no other way to ship besides the plane anyway. So the “oil crisis” excuse doesn’t really apply here does it? Thanks for the brains there, really.
@zelikgil9254
@zelikgil9254 3 года назад
Thank you for pointing this out. It also would have negated the dependence on oil from those arab nations during the fuel crisis, and mitigated it's effects.
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
You have to keep in mind of the time no planes were flying with natural gas. Plus this plan was also designed for the mining operations not just the oil industry. So in terms of transporting I know this was possibly the least efficient way to do it
@hassanalbolkiah127
@hassanalbolkiah127 3 года назад
Oil is used interchangeably with both crude oil, and natural gas (both are Petrochemicals)
@craigrmeyer
@craigrmeyer 3 года назад
@@hassanalbolkiah127 Now way man. Gas and oil aren't interchangeable at all. Gas is always cheaper, even on the open market. And if you get it from some far-remote site that has no other access to the market at all then it's at a deep discount, obviously.
@MarkBarrett
@MarkBarrett Год назад
Holy crap! The Boeing RC-1 would have been INSANELY big!
@wafflehorse1423
@wafflehorse1423 3 года назад
Dad designs super cargo transport kid: accidentally draws on blue print so the kid re draws it from his memory
@oxcart4172
@oxcart4172 3 года назад
This could mean that the stratolaunch turns out to be useful after all!
@mikemathews9277
@mikemathews9277 3 года назад
Structural integrity of the Airframe over a few flights of this aircraft without any loads would have to be investigated but under a so called normal load would be very bad day.
@VictorGuimaraesHeine
@VictorGuimaraesHeine 3 года назад
Very mustard like episode. I like it.
@ninjamilk5812
@ninjamilk5812 3 года назад
Yay new vid
@christianharris4800
@christianharris4800 3 года назад
I'd love it if you could do a video on the Boeing Pelican Ultra. This one really reminded me of it.
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
It’s highly recommended
@gregcampwriter
@gregcampwriter 3 года назад
It's interesting that an oil shortage stopped development of a plane that was meant to transport oil. I would think that this would have made transport costs more tolerable.
@K-Effect
@K-Effect 3 года назад
At 1:32 The guy on the right with the brimmed hat, has he ever put earplugs in before?
@AubriGryphon
@AubriGryphon 3 года назад
I didn't get any earplugs! They just gave me some gum...
@GabrielOrosco2500
@GabrielOrosco2500 3 года назад
You could make a vídeo about the Aerocon Wingship!
@Ryan-pw9uy
@Ryan-pw9uy 3 года назад
Yooo this is like a second Mustard channel
@aurorajones8481
@aurorajones8481 3 года назад
Awesome vid! Thanks for that. Now that fuel is a lot cheaper than the spike in the 70's i have to think stuff like this will make a come back. I mean we are working on several variants of the SST so there is hope. In addition to the lower fuel prices we are working on bio fuels so thats a plus.
@gothicalpha
@gothicalpha 3 года назад
The fact that these grandiose idea are a thing of the past HURTS
@cefb8923
@cefb8923 3 года назад
How do the pods detatch from the wing? The pod has a fairing around it I'm guessing?
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
I was trying to figure out the same thing. I’m not sure, I imagine it’s actually two halves that come off. As the wing is not hollow
@cyrusso
@cyrusso 3 года назад
Please do a video on Boeing Pelican! or Aerocon Dash 1.6 wingship, which might be the biggest plane/ground effect vehicle ever designed :)
@TheAutism_Man
@TheAutism_Man Год назад
how does the rest of the wing stay on if the pods get fully removed?
@autisminseconds8787
@autisminseconds8787 3 года назад
NICE
@skybanner9
@skybanner9 3 года назад
Found And Explained: Something I don't understand or might have misunderstood from the video - wasn't the engines on the RC-1 supposed to be powered by natural gas? If so, the 1973 OPEC embargo should have accelerated the project, not cancel it.
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
Yes I totally understand this logic. I’ll have to look into it to find the exact reason, but you have to remember at the time this was still just an idea on the plane wasn’t really in existence. No plane at the time was powered by natural gas and I assume that any plane was construct it would have to use petrol first.
@MrYooper86
@MrYooper86 3 года назад
@@FoundAndExplained And if the 1973 oil crisis was driving UP the price of oil, then that should have made it more profitable to sell oil from Alaska, etc. But I suppose the up-front costs and time delay to develop the RC-1 would have been a cash flow challenge......
@falsehashtags6581
@falsehashtags6581 3 года назад
Ryanair would love this, you could put hexagonal dividers in there and add lie flat hexagonal pods! Slide them in from the back like a cargo plane!
@StealthyAviator
@StealthyAviator 3 года назад
0:00 -> Pause -> Like -> Share, 'cause this is Found and Explained.
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
Dude that is the best thing you could do!
@nickiminajqueen894
@nickiminajqueen894 3 года назад
Can you do a video on the Sukhoi KR-860? I don't know much about it at all but I find the design very interesting and I would like to know more.
@natemcdonagh3760
@natemcdonagh3760 3 года назад
Can you please do a video about the TU-160 ?
@ChosenFate_
@ChosenFate_ Год назад
If the pods get disconnected, how does the outer wing stay up??
@Player-257
@Player-257 3 года назад
1:00 "quick calculation on the back of a napkin" LMAO!!
@nucflashevent
@nucflashevent 2 года назад
I know this idea would be incredibly "pie in the sky", but speaking of how the fuselage would be completely empty, this would be a project tailor made for nuclear propulsion (not that anyone is ever likely to support that, lol). I have no idea if you could ever fit enough of a reactor to support that many engines, *but* even if you needed longer runways and it had a slower overall speed, if you could keep enough of them in the air at any one time, it really wouldn't matter.
@Inpreesme
@Inpreesme 3 года назад
The Rustys with a built this in a heartbeat
@atilllathehun1212
@atilllathehun1212 3 года назад
An absolute fortune to develop, a very small market, twelve! engines....I think this video is as close as that aircraft will ever get to reality. Cool concept though.
@gpz6063
@gpz6063 3 года назад
nice
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
So nice
@DrTomatoSpaghetti
@DrTomatoSpaghetti 2 года назад
this reminds me of something I would make in Kerbal Space Program
@fedomandez
@fedomandez 3 года назад
Even Japan in WW2 studied for a flying tanker. The fuel delivered was less than the fuel consumed
@jimmyharrington2919
@jimmyharrington2919 3 года назад
why do people have to thumbs down i smashed the like button
@notapplicable4567
@notapplicable4567 3 года назад
Some of this stuff that wasnt built should be worth getting rethinking.
@jur4x
@jur4x 3 года назад
This is the most Kerbal plane ever :)
@SalveMonesvol
@SalveMonesvol 2 года назад
World'd largest Molotov Cocktail: You can dispose of old planes in your nearest warzone.
@SirFlukealot
@SirFlukealot 2 года назад
Imagine a passenger config where you get in a pod at a train station, picking up other passengers along a rail route, and then arriving at the airport, still in the pod, attaching to the plane and then taking off. Seamless ground to air transition, no airport parking to deal with.
@manifestman132
@manifestman132 3 года назад
Designing (re visiting/evaluating) a plane off the Fairchild XC 120 and giving it turbo props and rough field capabilities might have been a better idea. Maybe considering a military application for such a plane this might have gone further. Though I have toyed with this idea in high school for a arctic transport I gave Fino Chinese forces ( not sure why they where in an alliance.).
@lordturbomose4982
@lordturbomose4982 3 года назад
Just imagine the amount of chemtrails such a plane could deliver to the atmosphere!
@Fred_the_1996
@Fred_the_1996 3 года назад
*health fumes
@sadiqahmed4143
@sadiqahmed4143 2 года назад
Or Bombs
@claymoreroomba2921
@claymoreroomba2921 2 года назад
@@sadiqahmed4143 imagine a barrage of missiles
@blurglide
@blurglide 3 года назад
When I go on Jeep trips in the mountains of CO, I see many abandoned mines. Transporting raw ore out in donkey carts wasn't economic, so much of the ore-processing was done on site. Transporting more refined resources is much more economic
@m.e.7558
@m.e.7558 2 года назад
on a smaller scale a version of this plane might be a great fire fighter & cargo plane for short trips
@oldschoolman1444
@oldschoolman1444 3 года назад
Now what could possibly go wrong with a flying oil tanker. =)
@JMiskovsky
@JMiskovsky 3 года назад
Hippie: We have done it we haved blocked pipeline. Beoing: Brrrrr
@RuskiWaffle
@RuskiWaffle 3 года назад
Looks like something someone would make in simple planes
@Cruminum
@Cruminum 2 года назад
Some company’s go further than mankind can ever imagine
@mingming9604
@mingming9604 3 года назад
another one to go along with the airborne aircraft carrier. which might need one of these for refueling.....lol.
@lolerskates876
@lolerskates876 3 года назад
Would be interesting to see this reimagined with electric planes
@Dragonman343
@Dragonman343 3 года назад
5:55 Alaskan Wilderness or Canadian Northern territory? :P
@mattadams7078
@mattadams7078 3 года назад
Found and explain I have a question and I regularly watch your channel, and half as interesting’s channel. Big nerd on aviation and get lost on RU-vid all the time. Great videos by the way! They answer a lot of questions I’ve had and sometimes you put out a video explain the extract thought I had almost like magic. My question is with in the world of regional jets, why haven’t companies like Gulf Stream created a commercial jet out of their 650 or 700 series? What would a commercial configuration look like and would it be practical? These private business jets brag about being fuel efficient and can travel 7,000 nautical miles as they are referred to being global jets. Often they are as tall as regional jets and span the same dimensions. Companies have designed their own business jets out of their commercial counterparts but some specifications don’t make sense. How can a crj700 for example have less range than the global 7500? I would think that business jets being more elaborate with their interiors can be pretty heavy as well. So what if that was all taken out and set up for passengers? Would this be a valuable options for airlines, especially serving smaller airports?
@randomrazr
@randomrazr 3 года назад
its like a mustard video
@karlthemel2678
@karlthemel2678 2 года назад
Now, that could be turned into the military-strategic aircraft refuelling tanker to beat all refuelling tankers!
@tmwarthunder1016
@tmwarthunder1016 3 года назад
Kerbal Space Program Player: Ferb! I know what we are going to do today!
@adisura9904
@adisura9904 3 года назад
Some really good quality content. A project you can look into. "Hf24 marut" the first asian (Indian) supersonic jet that never was! Again.
@Zackman217
@Zackman217 3 года назад
A giant oil carrier in the skies? Wow.
@AubriGryphon
@AubriGryphon 3 года назад
"Brute Lifter" is a good nickname. My first thought on seeing it was that it's the aircraft version of a Big Dumb Booster.
@xx_insert_cool_username_he6876
@xx_insert_cool_username_he6876 2 года назад
5:01 Newton called He wants his physics back
@sgt.gunslinger1532
@sgt.gunslinger1532 3 года назад
This would be interesting to see in X-plane 11
@DownundaThunda
@DownundaThunda 3 года назад
Honestly, if I ever had the money or the resources, I would start up an aircraft manufacturing company to build concept aircraft that the larger manufacturers scrapped. I would probably only build one of each model, but one is enough to show what these planes would be like in our modern world. I would build a specialised aerodrome which would double as a museum. For the passenger aircraft, (like the SST 2707) I would sell tickets on demonstration flights to give modern aviation enthusiasts the experience of that style of travel.
@comikaze88
@comikaze88 3 года назад
This plane looks like the tutorial plane that you spammed more engines on hoping it works
@CocoaBeachLiving
@CocoaBeachLiving 3 года назад
Cool
@diegosilang4823
@diegosilang4823 3 года назад
How many turbofans can you install? Boeing: Yes.
@antoncasciano8747
@antoncasciano8747 3 года назад
it looks like something i wold design in KSP
Далее
1 класс vs 11 класс  (игрушка)
00:30
Просмотров 1,1 млн
Что за обновление в Tanks Blitz?
1:19:16
72 Missiles At Once! - 747 Cruise Missile Carrier
15:25
This INSANE "WHALE" cargo plane is REAL - But Why?
9:29
747 Pilot Overcontrols Plane
2:44
Просмотров 735 тыс.
Boeing 747-8 performs ultimate rejected takeoff
2:52