+Joseph Donnelly I agree with all the dumb crap on tv..walking dead, bing bang theory and other garbage this is refreshing..im hooked..watched them before i go to sleep lol.
The 2.3 at one time had a turbo and in a mustang was faster then the 302. I've seen the 2.3 dominate in racing, short track mini stocks, nothing could touch them except another 2.3 powered car.
+alfamonk, compared to the roughly 88hp that the standard NA 2.3L (engineered from the '70s Pinto, you could get a longitudinal RWD version, as opposed to the Tempo/Topaz FWD version as late as the early [early '90s] Fox platform cars, even the base Mustang). In '78 (I know 'cause my dad bought new a '79 200 (3.3L) 90hp I6 Ford Fairmont Futura coupé) if you wanted even "decent" output (the Fairmont weighted 2700-2800 lbs. or so...) you'd had to opt for the same 130hp 302 (4.95L) NA V8 that powered that year's large LTD on any Fairmont/Zephyr). In '80 the 3.3L and the V8 were replaced with a 130hp NA 3.8L V6, also available in the Fox-platformed Mustang, with the NA 2.3L as base (soon afterwards the V8 Mustang came back in GT guise). That was state of UNDERpower in many of that era's family cars...
+alfamonk Right? I remember when these cars were new (I was 22 at the time) I drove a 67 SS 396 Camaro, and would tell people the days of high horsepower factory cars were gone forever! How wrong we were back then, lol. These are the good old days of factory hot rods!!
The 1986 Nissan Stanza station wagon had an optional AWD system. I don't remember when the AWD Mazda 323 went on sale, but there was a version that was also turbocharged. There was a Toyota Tercel variant with AWD. There was a Dodge Colt from back then as well and it had a turbo engine option.
@@flight2k5 If anyone besides automotive journalists wanted a manual transmission, they would be on everything. Who wants to shift? We're going to work not driving on a test track.
That Audi was a wonderful car. Shame the maintenance was such a problem. I had one for a while, I know from experience. I also had a Vanagon. I would have a Vanagon again but now they're priced right out of range.
It's interesting how the definition of "brisk acceleration" has changed over the years. In this video, a 10.3 second 0-60 time is described as brisk. Nowadays, even a car that does 9 seconds will be described as slow.
Pat Goss could provide instruction on the practice of "how to stand perfectly still and not talk" and make it sound like he was telling you something that no one else on the planet knew.
If you only knew how long I have been waiting to see this again.......thank you so very much!!!!! Especially as the former proud owner of 2 '91 Vanagons (the first one was totaled)!!!!!
Everytime I hear this tech guy talking and constantly saying 'hwen' or 'hweels' it reminds me of Stewie form Family Guy and his 'cool hwip'. But it doesn't bother me at all.
I remember this fad of 4 wheel drive cars back in the 80s. Only Subaru really kept it up and made it quite reliable, if not a little thirsty for fuel. Most of the implementations were afterthoughts and had their issues. Tercel had a 4wd option which looked decent its time, but I believe it had no rear diff like the civic, and tended to eat transfer cases.
Probably because it was extremely rare to find one LOL. I've only seen 2 of them, and they were pretty beat up. They also had a diesel engine option, which I have yet to find one, although they do exist as I've found a couple online.
Subaru really carved out a niche for itself in this segment. Really only a necessity in areas where you experience long snowy winters. Thank you for an interesting video. 👍🏻
That all AWD topaz is fucking mint! I would love to have that. I remember seeing them when i was a kid, i was only 12 when that car was new but in my teens you could get a topaz for $100 used. Sure care is slow as balls but the look is ridiculous in a cool wan and with the AWD its sick. Im going to to find one for sale.
@Mason, Audi was using the Monotronic and J tronic electromechanical EFI systems at the time. 1 of them, I can't recall which, used a rubber 'flap' or bladder, inside the the air box that had a sensor attached to it that served as an early version of a MAF sensor. If that bladder or flap, whatever 1 wanted to call it, got jammed or stuck, the engine would suddenly rev and run away with itself, regardless of what 1 did with the accelerator. When it worked, it was a very accurate metering device. When it didn't, well, you know...
Odd, because the 60 minutes episode had to rig the car to knock itself into gear to get it to "accelerate unintentionally". This issue, even if present in the Quattro version, is erroneous since it's a manual.
I'm sort of upset the AMC Eagle didn 't get tested here! It was probably the most capable off road and the only one you could get leather seats and fake wood, haha. That being said, it was with the Audi in being full time 4x4
dRockOhio at this time AMC developed selectable all wheel drive. Two years before the mighty Ford. And yea where was the AMC vehicle for true comparison. It would have blown the competition away.
wait an actual anti lock disable button that you can turn off when you are braking in a lot of snow and sand? genius by audi sadly something like this wouldn't be on cars today because of safety regulations. because more dummy switches sure helps drivers awareness on the road you know......
damn i thought you were going to review the part time 4x4 gl like my wagon but the gl-10 is awesome too , i have always wanted to see the motor week episode of my car along with the rest of the mid 80s 4x4 cars /vams
+ScottaHemi Absolutely. They were reasonably popular in the snow belt - at least in Canada. Hard to find on dealers' lots though - they usually required a special order. The current Ford Fusion also has an AWD version.
Yes, however pretty rare. They did really well in snow/ice with the standard 2WD front wheel drive. I had a 93 Tempo which was just front wheel drive and it took me through several snowy winters here in Idaho.
I had a '92 Ford Tempo GL 2 door that was not totally rare, but was kind of rare. It wasn't all wheel drive but it did come equiped from the factory with the 3.0 Litre V6 instead of tue 2.3 Litre 4 banger and it was fairly quick.
Yes, I think for only certain models though and I believe only 1 or 2 years. Very rare to find one though as I've found. I had a 93 Ford Tempo, but then they were only offered in a FWD no AWD. My Tempo did just fine in snow/ice though and the 2.3L 4 cylinder and the 3 speed automatic had plenty of power to spin the tires pretty easily if you weren't careful, and I averaged in the mid 30's for fuel economy on the highway with the AC cranked in the middle of July. I did manage to hit 40mpg a couple times but that was driving like a grandma LOL.
Mercury part-time/on demand awd activated by a vacuum actuated dash switch only for dirt roads or payment in bad weather, Subaru full-time with locking center differential that can only be used on slippery surfaces , VW Syncro automatic transfers power with optional driver operated locking differential in the rear, Honda Real Time 4wd automatic transfer power, Audi Quattro automatic with center or aft differential selector. Out of all these 4wd names the Audi is the only one that still exists
I bought a Mercury topaz in 94, brand new... I really likes the car. I drove it for 100,000mi with no problems.. I traded it in, and still regret doing so.. It was caymen green.. Beautiful color
I had a 93 Ford Tempo which was a great car, great fuel economy, comfortable, and pretty low maintenance. Only issue that forced me to get rid of it was I couldn't keep transmission fluid in it, either the transmission pan or transmission casing was warped, no matter what I tried to do to seal it up it kept on leaking. I really miss my Tempo especially when I want to go on longer trips without spending a bundle of money on gas LOL.
Loved the VW Synchro bus the most, and the Audi as usual stood out with its good looks and high performance. It also was a bit overpriced as they usually are.
Why did they call a 100hp engine "High Output"?? Was it the oil crisis that left people with concerns?? Was it the old technology car makers used and couldn't abandon, so they decided to market it for profit?? Or did they really have reliability in mind?? These are the three scenarios I have in mind for car makers using "High Output" engines back then!
Goss talks about a service manual. Those are becoming harder and harder to find for modern cars. I guess were expected to use alldata. Thankfully there’s RU-vid.
VW Vanagon with synchro 4WD is what I wanted. Too bad they’re classics and can’t afford them. You can put in a Subaru 4 or 6 cylinder motor in there to get more punch and reliability over the VWs engine.
Me too, with the exception of the Jeep, which had an option full time and part time option in the same transfer case (Selec-Trac). This would have been my choice although my 96 Jeep GC LTD 4x4 had full time 4WD it did awesome in snow/ice and I was amazed where that thing would go, but it would have been better if I would have waited and found one with the Selec-Trac 4WD system which gave 2WD, 4WD Part TIme, 4WD Full Time, Neutral which is not a gear, however allowed you to shift the transfer case into neutral and put the transmission in park and flat tow them behind an RV, and 4Low.
Didn't expect the Civic to be quite that slow. Almost as slow as the Vanagon and slower than the Tempo! I wonder if they were shifting sloppily. Honestly, I didn't expect the Audi to be as slow as it was either.
A very nice presentation from the '80s. A car Heresy is not a very common aspect. The cars in this video are not present any more. They belong to the car history. But there is an exception: the Syncro Vanagon! A car, (the only one?), with his own Heresy. The Syncro Heresy
A viscous coupling doesn't measure anything tho. All it does is limit slip via fluid. Its basically a permanent link between the front and rear that will lock up when a set of wheels is spinning faster than the other
Still VW could make the Westy Vanagon today with the subaru engine and other updates.The design and lay out is very ergonomic,engine at the rear, all the useable space.It would be a world wide big hit.My 1986 westy is coming up to 400,000k I had the Bostig Ford Zetec conversion.Running well.The old engine designed in 1930s is a antique.
