Mouse must be next to the internet cable?! - The Setup 

Same! Never knew he was chill like that

of course hes cool, his name is frozen 😎

And he will be working with mr cool on faze

nah it's more dynamic like this

​@@YummyCore not really, he's just awkwardly half squatting next to him most of the time lol.

@@YummyCoreDafuq u talk about

i agree with you but it might just be the method they used to record stretches it

@@1steeeez when recording, it usually does it with the ratio that is being used currently. When rendering the video, there is an option called "maintain aspect ratio" and they just disabled it here to keep the whole video at 16:9.

They should just add note that it’s black bars.

I mean yes, in this example they could leave it with black bars but most of the people using BB while streaming or making videos stretch it on purpose because it looks better and more natural than having two blocks on the sides

Placebe effect. Like back in 2010 players were placing toys over monitör

That was a joke obv.

@@Ruzif good luck charm

Probably worse effect, if both are shielded then ez interference

Depends on the mobo

We have one more video coming up with him ;)

I will never understand players who play on 16:9 with a stretched 4:3 resolution. Why not playing with an actual 16:9 resolution and have more fov? :D

@@kleinkurti CS in general doesn't really need a bigger FOV since the game itself are very linear (Apex or Quake for example the enemies can be on top of you, on mid-air, or far away) 4:3 helps to focus more because less distraction. BB is more centered so people who uses AWP back then really likes BB, Stretched on the other hand makes the enemy model wider than 16:9. This helps players to aim the enemies "easier". Placebo or not at the end it's personal preference, some just couldn't adjust from the old 4:3 days, and some just followed other pros and stick with it.

More like 22 ms

Diff between 400 dpi and 1600 dpi is like 22 ms

Coating on the original Dav3 was hideous, I sent mine back.

Нет, порты 2.0 у меня всегда были сверху (Asus и MSi), а слева от интернет кабеля либо 3.2 Gen1 (обычный голубой), либо 3.2 Gen2. Поэтому зависит от производителя материнки.

@@deimostw ну как бы да, в принципе от модели платы зависит, что я и написал. А ген1/2 к чему? Это вообще не показатель пути работы порта

@@ssss..4610 У Gen2 пропускная способность до 10 Гбит. Точно не знаю почему, но мышка чувствуется медленнее в этом порте, даже беспроводная.

@@deimostw в любой мышке юсб 2.0 донгл, решает путь юсб а не его скорость

Creative SoundBlasterX

From what has been said online it depends on your monitor and GPU, but the general consensus is that GPU scaling is maybe 1ms slower than display scaling. Nothing worth worrying about.

iirc in csgo x16 had higher input lag for some reason

Try playing on 21:9, then you know.

if you're playing cs on 21:9, then that's on you mate

@@Doufun11 i just answered your questions...

lmao you're right sry man

You mean instead USB 2.0 use higher? Do you have proves for that?

creative g6

soundcard

brother, this is the soundblaster G6 external USB Soundcard. google "sound blasterx g6", i have this for years and it's perfect sound for gaming.

Explain how its waste?

@@xlgapelsin6173 with 400dpi your mouse cannot reach polling rate of 4000hz

@@xlgapelsin6173 because at 400dpi you do not saturate the full 4000hz when moving the mouse and therefore don't take advantage of the 4k polling/lower latency and the only difference will be you battery life draining faster lol.

"Controller is for playing games, mouse and keyboard is for typing emails" -controller player

Because you don't have the wire, the mouse moves more easily and more consistently

Thats why they are pro and u are not lol

You don't think that maybe the fact that so many pros use wireless means it's actually plenty good enough for the professional level?

there is not actually a big difference on latency, faster wire mouse is around 0.9ms and wireless around 1.7- 2 ms you are not able to notice that difference

The only wired mouse with faster response times than the top wireless mice (g pro x superlight, deathadder v3 etc) is the Zaunkoenig M2K, which is pretty uncomfortable to use unless you have fingertip grip. Also it has no side buttons so i suspect that's why no pros are using it.