Just letting you all know, big stuff coming this week! I've got three big announcements to make over the next month, and one I'm extremely excited to tell you all about is coming this week!
I disagree on the notion that Mary in Judas and Jesus is a Teen. When I saw it I remember there being 3 time jumps, kid, teen, and adult. And yes, there absolutely is a massive amount of symbolism in the movie. For example, the Demon Mary changes into at the end with the multi headed dragon is definitely a reference to the Bible character “Red Queen of Babylon” who rode a multi headed dragon, and was “drunk off the blood of saints” so her killing the sheep absolutely fits this description.
I'm not sure I can fathom how comedy needs to take sides to be funny? What side does Monty Python take with its non sequitur humour about spam and vikings in a cafe?
That's also strange to me. The only other time I've seen this sort of adversarial theory of comedy was in Wisecrack's video on conservative comedy and the academic theories surrounding it, talking about humor built on exclusion and reinforcing group dynamics. Very weird. I prefer the theory of comedy based on subverting expectations.
@@FelisImpurrator it definitely sounds like the sort of theory that arrives from a very collectivist mindset that's focused on a few small examples, rather than a general theory that applies to all comedy, MP was the first thing that came to mind, but I can think of 100s of examples for comedy that doesn't involve any kind of political statment or leaning
@@FelisImpurrator I suppose humans like to slot other people into categories, but like come on how can you just write someone's opinion off as tribalistic... especially when it isn't tribalistic
@@relic374 My brother in Christ, do you know what the term means? Tribalism literally refers to the mentality of us versus them, ingroup versus outgroup. By definition, the idea of defining comedy based on choosing a side - picking a group to favor over another - is tribalistic.
Honestly given how the world is going right now too, If Anything Happens I Love You, seems like it's something that would be too heavy to cover. It sounds like a good film, but one that not everyone can handle, and it's completely okay to be someone who can't.
You don't have to apologize for being human. Glad you are doing better, and congratulations again on the partnership. Also, holy hell I can see and agree on why regarding most of those and absolutely yes a gut punch on the journey of grief especially knowing the preventable yet recurring massacres in the States in If Anything Happens I Love You.
I have to admit that I love how you cover movie reviews (even if this isn’t a normal review), it’s refreshing and really entertaining! Thanks for uploading again, you just made my day! Hope you’re doing well!
As a Christian I know Judas and Jesus is supposed to be a retelling of the story but for Christ's Sake. Compared to El arca de Noah and other somewhat adult Christian retellings, they have some creative freedom with the product, and everything at least means something. I like El Arca de Noah's way they portrayed God has hilarious to me. Here it's just... ok I get it. It's the story but with naked sheep. You didn't really spice anything up and not having much dialogue pretty much fully ruins it.
If nobody minds I can summarize Judas and Jesus just to give the rundown, otherwise this comment can be glossed over. Saberspark also begrudgingly covered this short film so there’s that if anyone wants to watch that. In short this is a parody of the betrayal of Jesus where both he and Judas represent good and evil as animals. While Jesus is shown as an honest, lawful, and righteous lamb, Judas is the polar opposite showcasing envy, jealousy, and selfishness; one being order and authoritative for guiding the heard of sheep (literal sheep) while the other follows nature and expresses temptation. The third character, a female goat named Maria Magdalena, is more or less a stand in for women in general. The segment takes place in 3 separate periods in time, elementary school where Maria shows innocence and concerns over the eventual crucifixion of Jesus all while Judas shows interest in her, high school where Judas’s bad boy behavior catches Maria’s attention until his disgusting sexual desire and objectification of Maria drives her away to Jesus, and their middle aged adulthood where the short film starts taking noticeable jabs at both Jesus and Judas. For starters, Jesus has an obsession for keeping things modest like always wearing clothes to cover his nudity, shaming Maria for her body being a distraction (literally covering her up in a tabletop cloth to hide her nudity), and whipping himself as a means of self restraint (I think). Meanwhile Judas is just as envious towards Jesus, sleazy, and luscious for Maria but his opposition towards Jesus shaming her is what attracted Maria’s attention to him. It’s because of Jesus’s teachings of deprivation oneself of desires that Maria retaliates by doing the exact opposite, which is exposing herself in a private room away from Jesus. Finally there’s the Judas wants Maria so he sells out Jesus to see her, they both get caught in the act by Jesus and are scolded by him, Jesus gets arrested and executed by the guards, and Jesus dies for everyone’s sins albeit a little too thrilled knowing he completed his purpose in life which is celebrated by his followers. Ironically said followers don’t follow his teachings and they immediately seek retribution by hanging Judas and celebrate murdering him. The last bit is a long stretch but Maria sees Judas getting hanged and because she more or less makes her own choices while the sheep just follow without thinking, she goes full evil and exacts retribution for Judas by murdering all of the sheep who hang him. Well this went longer than I thought but that’s basically it, two characters who are obviously painted as black and white characters who have their flaws and purpose. One is guidance while the other is nature, the pure vs the ugly, and restraint vs freedom.
Didn't they get murdered by some sort of creature? A dragon, if I'm remembering correctly. And didn't she ride off on the creature's back after the murder was over?
@@GipsyDangerfanit’s likely a reference to the Revelation character described as a “mother of whores and abominations” or something like that, who rides a multi headed dragon. It was likely made to mock the Roman Empire, Promiscuous Women, or Both.
now you mention it, i would like to hear you talk about watership down and/or plague dogs, especially if you can find something to say that hasnt already been said, but even if not.
Technically you just did make a video about all these movies and featured them on your channel, low detail and brief but I find the technical irony rather amusing.
I am a crier when movies get emotional. If anything happens that I can even remotely relate to I will buckle. If anything happens I love you did not only made me cry, it made me wail into my pillow. It is an absolutely beautiful shortmovie, but it plunged a knife so deep in my heart that I ended up barely sleeping that night. What I am trying to say; I completely understand not wanting to review this.
Claiming anything in the last lifetime "created furries" is absurd to the point of a joke when you realise the first statue in history is an anthropomorphic lion man from germany
The very previous video in my Autoplay was RTGame's "playthrough" of The Bible on Steam, so the sheer comedic genius of my feed giving me your video with a R18 Furry Mary Magdalene Animation in the thumbnail is absolutely perfect. Could not have had better timing, LMAO!
@@jakespacepiratee3740 Bible theming, a comedy letsplay of a digital bible into a video that talks about not reviewing a skimpy furry film about the bible/jesus.
3:19 ScreamerClauz credited his daily use of marijuana and previous psilocybin mushroom and LSD experiences for the film's visuals. He also found inspiration with alien conspiracy theories, "religious scare films", and a dream about the devil, which was induced by an overdose of melatonin. In the commentary, he said that much of the film's content was included because it was "weird, funny, or fucked up". ScreamerClauz tried to not make the film's morals feel forced but instead tried to leave its message up to the audience. The film altogether took three years to make, as ScreamerClauz would stop animating for months at a time before starting again.
Jesus and Judas is a film that legitimately squicks me tf out. Like, if you're a Christian it's strait-up blasphemy just of the highest order, and if you're not it's still a case of needlessly gratuitous furry porn. I've only seen small sfw snippets or otherwise censored clips, and secondhand retellings of its more explicit content, and tbh that's more than enough for me. I'm more than happy to not see any more of it, because I'm almost certain seeing it in full would give me permanent psychic damage.
Who cares and who asked? It’s still a very impressive piece of animation, especially since how smooth it is and made with a small team. Frankly Christians will be offended by everything so i don’t factor in their thoughts into play.
@jakespacepiratee3740 It's funny that you say "who asked" then proceed to give your own unsolicited opinion just because I said I didn't want to watch it
@jakespacepiratee3740 And so do I. I don't owe you anything over my opinions of that movie. I don't deserve to be berated because I said it makes me uncomfortable. Kindly fck off
@@4shame I know it's a joke... but it's strange that you're not the only one making it. Like, it's not even a meme just... strange... coincidence? Conspiracy Senses Tingling...
the team america one is weird because the south park guys 'make fun of everyone/all sides' is kinda their thing and are massively popular for it. like yeah they make the middle easterners 'neanderthals' but the americans are literally all just neanderthals too. everyone is turned into a bad stereotype to make fun of its curious how you became one of the few who dont like the 'make fun of all sides' humor category
I hate the fact that I now know what "where the dead go to die" is... I literally read the plot synopsis on Wikipedia... And now my day is ruined. Kinda hate that director... Creative integrity be damned.
5:40 I dunno, talking to furries personally and checking forums and stuff like that about where they found inspiration towards being a furry, not once have I seen this movie brought up, mostly it’s Disney movies like Robin Hood as well as sonic, and a few times I saw people credit sly cooper
I think a nice video could be a comparison between Disney's Fantasia and a movie called Allegro non Troppo. Both musical movies but created for very different reasons
Yeah, I'm plenty open to all kinds of extreme twisted content in fictional media, but that movie just sounds like excessive shock value with zero remote value or substance of any kind from listening to people describe the scenes in the past. My thoughts are, if you're going to have shocking content then you need at least some degree of substance whether as entertainment or as art bare minimum, it really isn't a high bar to have some degree of enjoyability message or basic purpose to your media. Content that exists purely as poorly done shock value with zero contribution otherwise is not content worthwhile existing, it serves no purpose whatsoever.
@@_-Lx-_ Yes, it's pretty much excessive shock schlock, like an edgy 13 year old + under counter snuff / gore movies + garbo 3D animation but not in an endearing PS1 cutscene way + heaping of cringe And when you retell it, you do it with a tired face of SpongeBob meme office worker fish, as if "yeah. that happened. I'm mildly disgusted and disappointed that it exists, but it still can't get an actual emotion of such out of me for some reason"
So, here's a fucked up story about one of the movies you mentioned. I actually watched Team America: World Police as a kid. So, growing up, before my family had cable, I used to watch most of my cartoons from a news channel which showed animated movies from 3:30-4:00, interjected with 30 minutes of news, then resumed from 4:30-5:00. Most of the cartoons they showed were kids cartoons, so I figure that the idea was that that time block was something for the kids. I'm guessing they just assumed that all cartoons are kid-friendly because they clearly didn't do their due diligence in checking to be sure that this was clean. So that's how I ended up watching that fucked up movie as a kid IN PRIMARY SCHOOL. And while most of the movie was forgettable, I distinctly remember the sex scene. In fact, it stuck with me my whole life because of how bizarre it was. I didn't quite know what I was watching but it didn't exactly feel like it was something meant for me as a kid. I really blame whoever was in charge of vetting the movies they showed on that channel.
If anything happens I love you is such...an utterly heartbreaking film, I completely understand why you wouldn't want to make an in depth review to it. I haven't seen any of the other films in this video but oof the racist ones sure aren't subtle huh.
@@4shame Well it's kind of complicated. Personally, I wouldn't call it gratuitous. The scenes of gory ultraviolence and disturbing dream sequences absolutely do have a point. Even the one seemingly random scene of the cat protagonist copulating with an unnamed female cat he randomly runs into and then never mentions again actually does have a narrative point (it's relevant to the villain's plan). Many people still do call the movie gratuitous though, because it's a really dense murder mystery that you'll probably have to watch more than once to understand all the connections, but a lot of people can't even sit through it once.
@@wafflebroz Just looked it up. The only versions I could find on RU-vid are in the original German and with abysmal, unwatchable video quality. Like, it doesn't even matter if it's cut or not, because you can't recognize anything anyway.
Can we keep the Bad movies for Mr Enter and Saber Spark? Does every one have to review every bad thing? Can't a person just review what they enjoy? Why are we stepping out side the genre this guy clearly covers with suggestions? Though some movies on your list do deserve to be talked about for there historic importance but again a lot of these are movies other people cover, so You don't have to. Also I could easily think of a ton of movies that could also go on this list
I don’t like south park’s style of humour, it’s basically just an extremely aggressive form of that ‘enlightened centrist’ bs, combined with “being as offensive as possible is very funny loool!”. It’s nowhere near as clever as the writers and their fans seem to think it is. Being offensive for the sake of being offensive is incredibly lame
I remember watching this movie Me, You, Madness (2021) and it was made by a Donald Trump staffer's wife, but it A) wasn't funny and B) tried to appeal to everyone politically without really saying or doing anything. Like there's this running gag where the main character lists things off while trying to insult Republicans and Democrats but it goes on for too long. I could've gone to med school, earned my medical degree, finished residency and become an actual doctor and this woman would still doing this list 'joke'. Like if you're going to be political, just be political, if I don't like the politics, hopefully there's something else in it that I can enjoy, if not I'm just not going to watch it, and if I agree with the politics, it better be interesting. Like if I know that I'm not going to like a film because of its politics, I just won't watch it, I'm not watching the God's Not Dead, I've seen enough reviews, and I don't care for Christian Nationalism, the film series.
not something i think would be appropriate for you to review, but if you want a movie that *actually* uses sex and nudity to enrich the story in smart and interesting ways rather than being a replacement for the story check out Titane (2021) by Julia Ducournau
Coonskin is actually considered to be Bakshi's best movie and for a lot of black people is a relevant and powerful transgressive masterpiece to the point where a lot of them were shocked to find out that it was made by a white man.
9:12 pretty sure the point is both sides are bad. it would be dumb to choose a side when the sides are sharia and terrorism or American occupation and warmongering. it's strange that you think there needs to be a good guy in political commentary.
Team America World Police, what little pieces of it I've actually seen, was trash on SO MANY levels! I'd need to pick one to really extrapolate. Not the idea that "everyone is evil" or "everyone is wrong", if anything that's like Pixar levels of hero/villain, seriously, look at the "heroes" of the classic Pixar films, it's literally sending the message "everyone is wrong, if not a little evil, and we've just got to deal with that". No, but in that vein, trying to do it as a satire, poking fun at literally everything leaves you without a punchline. Like, you can have comedy without having a "side" per-se, usually by having the comedian make HIMSELF the punchline. (It is not popcorn, it is PROPcorn, I am "prop" comedian) But having a film that tries to present "everyone is evil" as a message... AND trying to make fun of that. I honestly think that would have been a better message in the movie "Joker" where he's up saying "and I'm tired of pretending that it's not". If Joker had gone on to explain how the people thought of those men he'd killed, and then revealed the truth. Revealing that the men that died had been violent and dangerous right before dying, but then also revealing that the audience had passed judgement without that knowledge, making themselves fools and the punchline of their own sick joke. "Everyone is evil, you just don't know it yet, and that's HILARIOUS!" It didn't really hit the nail on the head, that scene. But at least it tried. Unlike Team America World Police.
