Moving back to Full Frame from Medium Format 

Thanks for watching, everybody & be sure to tune in next week for the proper test of the Z7II. In the meantime, print packs are now in my shop. Signed, packed and shipped by me. Also, free shipping 👍thomasheaton.co.uk/shop/

There are no bad cameras and can all do the job. I love my Nikons but they’re not for everyone however really pleased for Nikon and the Z system that’s finding it’s feet. I especially love the lenses and my 70-200 2.8s

I use all 3 main brands- I prefer certain sensors and lenses for very particular work. For landscapes, architecture and low light, I reach for my Nikon Z7 and S lenses for the ergonomics and the lens resolution and contrast. I prefer the RAW files from the Nikon for that kind of work. All of the camera systems today are all really excellent- you can’t go wrong with any of them. It’s all about finding a system that is a pleasure to use and gets you motivated to create.

Interesing change ! As a landscape/studiophotographer I see no real difference between current models from any manufacturer. Its just which do you want to use, ergonomics etc... Image quality is on par on every pro-full frame camera - what comes to landscapephotography. Interesting to hear your future experiences. I did compare side-by-side GFX100R to A7r4. Yes, lot more pixels (to print) but end-customer will not notice the difference. As you said; only the photographer can enjoy the pixels!

I was an early adopter to the Z system, and I continue to be blow away by the glass they've been putting out for it. The convenience of the 24-120mm is hard to beat when you can only carry 1 lens somewhere. I wish I could afford that 100-400. It is one spectacular piece of glass. I just picked up the 105mm/2.8 macro, and I just can't stop using it.

I've been doing travel and landscape with the Nikon Z7II for about a year now. I've had the 24-120 for several months and rarely took it off my camera on my recent trip to Europe. I love that lens. I went back and forth for months between the Fuji 50R and the Z7II and I'm happy with my choice. I hope you will be as well. I heard you on an interview when you spoke about possibly changing to the Nikon and was surprised. Good luck. The 20mm is a killer lens too.

It never ends. I love my Pentax cameras. K1, K5 and even the K10 D, they all put out sharp images and take a wide variety of lens that swap about.

Many thanks for the exhibition shout-out, Tom. So pleased you enjoyed it! We have prints from a 24mp A7ii and they've rendered beautifully. Anyway, you know my feelings on the subject - I've had the same camera for almost 5 years 😁

That 24-120 is one of the finest lenses of its type. Christopher Frost did a great review of it and it has great sharpness throughout it’s focal range. All you need to do is add the 14-24mm and you’ve got yourself a great setup 👍🏼

I think you’re on point here. I shoot the Canon R5 with among other lenses the RF 100-500. It’s a phenomenal set up and I’m happy with it coming from the Nikon d850, however, the dynamic range isn’t quite as good. So for you, the Nikon is a good choice. I went with the R5 because the autofocus is much better for wildlife than anything Nikon has on offer except the huge and expensive Z9. The Bird Eye AF on the canon is extraordinarily. But for just landscape, I would have gone with the Z7ii. Enjoy!

You are spot on Thomas, you can’t spend your life comparing our lives to others or we will never be happy! Enjoy the new Nikon!!

cant wait to see how this goes for you brother! thanks for keeping us up to date on how and what your shooting. def helps quell some of the Gear Chasing

I made exactly the same move, well almost, GFX 50s & r to a Z7 / Z7II. The 24/120 is the best lens I have ever used and the image quality of the Z7 vs the GFX is so close that in practical terms you won’t be seeing the difference. Nice one Thomas

Yes, when it comes to hiking in the mountains, as you often do, saving weight is important. That's why I like my a7c, because it's very light and easy to fit in a backpack. Of course some people need higher resolution, but 24 mpx is enough for me. I think you'll be really happy with your choice of the z7 II. Great resolution, amazing dynamic range and that 24-120 lens seems like an amazingly versatile lens. One lens to do 80% of the work.

A person can know all the technicalities but without an eye for composition they will always struggle to achieve what you seem to be able to with ease. You are an inspiration....thank you.

I just upgraded from my Nikon D600 to the Z5. Both great cameras but the modern technology, features and ergonomics of the Z series has been wonderful for helping me get great images much more easily. Ease of use can produce more great images in the long run than higher quality equipment.

I think everything you said was spot on. Most modern pro or semi-pro cameras are pretty much on part with each other, but the lenses, that is a different story. I've used the Sony a7riii the last few years for landscapes and really have enjoyed the results. But again it's the lenses that make such a huge difference. Even regarding print size, when stitching images (if done correctly), can produce huge file sizes for super large prints (if anyone ever wanted one). Plus, merging photos together helps a lot with sharpness in the foreground and background. And 99 times out of 100, no-one is going to notice the difference anyway. When you consider the history making images of the past, their cameras were nowhere near ours, yet have stood the test of time.

Welcome to the world of Z7 landscape photography. I’ve been using the Z7 (mark 1) for a couple of years now, having shifted from Fuji XT-2 and I absolutely love it. I doubt that you will be disappointed. I have the 14-30 f4, 24-70 f2.8. & 105mm f2.8 Z macro. The 24-120 wasn’t available when I got my Nikon, but I’d be tempted by it today.

You honestly can't go wrong with Z7II, R5, A7R4 for landscape photography. Differences are relatively minor. Image quality are all top notch. It really comes down to which lens system speaks to your needs/wants more and what you can afford obviously.

24-120 S is hard to beat. I personally think it’s the best zoom on the market for general walk around and landscapes. After finishing the video I’m surprised you didn’t find the lens to be superbly sharp. It’s definitely sharper than the 100-400 and as sharp as any lens I’ve used. Instead of focusing on the lighthouse I’m wondering if results would have improved in foreground by shifting the focus point closer using a hyperfocal focus technique.

Thomas, love your content! I couldn’t justify the cost moving to the Z system as photography is only a hobby for me. I’m still using my D700. Have had it since new. Love the film quality look and colours of the images, always have. Prints at A3+ no problems. Just have to make sure the composition is right as you can’t crop that much. With the battery grip it’s also a good workout, built like a tank. Keep the great content coming, especially the infrared stuff. Cheers from down under.

Every camera system today is fantastic, in their own ways. I have been using the Z cameras since the beginning of the ecosystem. For landscapes, the Z7II and 24-120f4 S lens are a fantastic travel combo. That lens is a beauty. An amazingly useful range and great image quality. Those Fujifilm medium format cameras are gorgeous too.

great vid Thomas as usual! Im still using the d850 and perfectly happy with it, however if money was no object there's something about the hue of a medium format image, and the photos you have taken with it shown in your vids have been stunning

Thomas I’ll be honest I don’t think it matters what camera you get as your skill and expertise means you could make a Normal pic into an amazing pic no matter what camera or lens combo. I always think reviews, ease of use and how excited it makes you feel using it. I’ve tested a few cameras in my time and if they don’t meet that criteria there gone. I hope you enjoy using your new gear and can’t wait to see what amazing pics you capture👍

Did somebody say Nikon?

I bought an XT-4 with 16-80mm f4. This gives great focal length coverage in a pretty small package. The lens is plenty sharp for me and I can happily go on day hikes with just that and get 95% of the shots I would want to take. I print at 12x18 inches without any issue and could probably go up to an A2 size print if I wanted. Sure there's other options out there that are better, but for a single lens kit that costs around $2300 total, I'm happy.

It really comes down to what you enjoy more. This is what I have found. I have recently gone back to a simple old fuji xpro 1 just because I have more fun using it. Love your work!

I'm super excited to see how you go with the Nikon Z7 II, I currently shoot on an original Z6 and have been thinking of upgrading. Regarding the lens results, if you can deal with the slight gap in focal length, definitely give the 24-70 2.8 a try instead, the image quality is fantastic 👌

Tom I have the Z7ii and have been super happy with it, image quality with the 14-24 2.8 and 24-70 2.8 is incredible. The 14-24 2.8 is ridiculously light, worth a look.

As a Z7 and 24-120 owner I can say from personal experience on what a great combo that is, especially for those long days out in the hills. Remember to put those Nikon files through Pure Raw as well. Camera aside, no such thing as a bad camera these days so get the setup that suits you best. 👍

I recently wrote that larger resolution is simply for the benefit of the photographer. A decent photo when viewed on a large computet screen can look incredible. Take the 5d classic. Under 13MPs and produces amazing images. Never understand the need for huge resolution unless the photographer needs massive cropping and you'd have to wonder why it couldn't be captured in camera initially?!?

Congratulations Thomas Heaton. The Nikon Z7II is an amazing camera for landscape photography. I use the NIkon Z7II and Z6II with 20mm f/1.8, 24-70mm f/4 and 100-400mm Z lenses.

I honestly expected the final results to be printed and compared side by side :)

An interesting video Tom, I think we are spoilt for choice when it comes to the choice of camera and gear we can get nowadays. I have a similar setup with the Z7, GFZ100S (and the X-T3) and I enjoy shooting with each system immensely. Each has their advantages but to be honest, there's not might between them. In the end, I often make my selection on which one I'm going to shoot based less on the technical photography side and more to do with the factors like access to the location and how long I'm going to spend in the field. Enjoy your trip mate and enjoy the Z7ii! 👍

Looking forward to the journey. Thanks 🙏

So cool that you and Sean Tucker just hang out!

I love my Z6, I'm not a full-time photographer but have done the odd gig here or there, and take landscapes to print for my own home decoration - it works a treat. I don't even use native Z glass, but the power of the Z-mount, and all of the fantastic manual focus aids in the Z series cameras have is second-to-none. Plus, with the Z6 I can still shoot amazing looking 4K when I want to make a YT video with the same camera!

I have been a Nikon shooter forever, I have transitioned from F to Z, firstly z6 and z7, currently z6ii and z9. I have also concentrated on the faster glass 14-24 2.8, 24-70 2.8 and 70-200 2.8 which suits my style of shooting. I nearly turned to the dark side (Sony) as the z9 was delayed, but glad I waited. At the end of the day you should choose the gear that suits your style and budget. You carry your gear on your back, so weight is a major consideration.If you haven't already committed to the z7ii, theres always the Zx just around the corner.

This is exciting! I'm a Nikon shooter, so it'd great to see shooting with a system I'm familiar with. Hope it works out for you!

You'll get great results no matter what system you use because you have a great eye and are a terrific photographer. That said, I do think the Fuji GFX system has that extra magic to it when everything goes right. Then again, your back is your back.

Nikon does have some amazing lenses for landscape photographers looking to pack light! Your 24-120 as well as the 24-70/4 and the 14-30/4 are great glass and weigh so little and are so small. All Nikon needs now is a compact 70-200 f/4. Myself, I am looking to switch over to a Z6II or Z5 with the 24-70 and 14-30/4's from my DSLR kit.

I do love the convenience of my 24-120 (f-mount). The Z7.2 would be a no brainer for me as I've got easily adaptable Nikon glass already.

Another great video Thomas, keep it up ! Love your photos!

Hi, You are the best Photographer on RU-vid and elsewhere by a country mile, so we are all hanging on your every word for the results and comparison between the two systems, and also looking forward to your Scotland trip, regards, Colin.

For practical reasons I love my Nikon Z6 with the Z 24-120mm F4.0 lens for landscape photography. Yes it's a compromise in image quality, but when I am on a hiking tour in our Swiss Alps where every gram of weight is of importance I seldom miss a promising shooting opportunity because I do not have to change lenses. Maybe I will upgrade to the Z7II in the near future, or to a forthcoming Z8 or Z6III. But for many applications even 24 MP are enough. Somtimes I also take the Z 14-30mm F4.0 with me for great scenic compositions, but 24-120mm covers over 80% of motifs in my landscape photography. If you combine your Z7II with the best prime Nikkors you will narrow the gap to medium format.

I don't have a penny of my own and never put a hand on any of these cameras.But nowadays all cameras are amazing, I am sure that the differences between them would be barely noticeable when printed, which is the way to properly enjoy a good photo.

I love all your videos no matter what you do! I think I know why as well, because you tell the truth about what your doing. You come across as someone who really likes and enjoys sharing your knowledge and who freely admits that you don't know everything. You are humble and talented, funny and enthusiastic!! You are AWESOME!! je

Also, I would love a talk between you and Sean Tucker!

Don't forget to switch the 2-second timer back on! Every time you cycle the camera on and off the timer turns off when you turn the camera back on. This is my biggest gripe about a Nikon camera for landscape photography. In other areas, the timer is better than Canon. On your new Nikon, there are 2-second, 5-second, 10-second, and 20-second timer options available and you can set the camera to make from 1 to 9 shots when the time expires. Sweet!

Interesting to see you transition back to full frame. I switched from full frame to the Fuji X-T4 2 years ago mainly to cut weight for backpacking. I think your right on the sensor size only being an issue for pixel peeping photographers. Unless you’re doing mural-sized prints. I’ll be interested in seeing how you feel about your new rig after your trip.

Great watch Tom. I’m sure you will be very happy with your decision. I use the Sony a7riv on the other hand and absolutely love it lol 😂

Another great video as always. I migrated from Nikon F to Nikon Z early on and have loved the images that I've created with them. The bodies and the glass keep getting better and better. A recent trip to Yellowstone National Park was my first time with both the 24-120 & 100-400 with me with my Z bodies, and they gave stellar performance. As you stated, it's about the images more than the gear. As other commenters have stated, the differences in cameras nowadays are minor. No wrong choices when it comes to art!

I look forward to your results. I've shot Nikon since the early 80's and I'm currently looking at the Z7ii to upgrade my D750. Your style is perfect for this as scientific charts are great and all, but at the end of the day I just want a print that looks good and that is more about shooting technique and subject matter. I'm sure you could give Art Wolfe or Galen Rowell (RIP) an entry level camera and they would come back with fantastic images. Again, great video and take care.

I think you will notice the difference during the transition, but once you stop comparing the two you'll stop noticing it. Switching to a system that makes you more willing and motivated to shoot is always going to be better than a technically superior one.

Very interesting, down-to-earth point of view. I was interested in moving from my 7-year-old D750 to the gfx system, but a few arguments pushed me towards the Z7II. I already had a 100-400 tamron and a 35mm SIGMA that I could adapt. I did swap my old 50mm 1.8 and my macro lens for the Z versions as it was needed for my studio work and they improve sufficiently my process and the image quality. The in-body long exposure capabilities of the camera are also a very welcomed addition as it saves me space in my bag. The timelapse modes are fantastic. And finally, it allowed me to move from my beloved, yet very heavy, old 14-24mm to the new 400g lighter version than can take circular 112mm filters that I can snap on and off with a magnetic ring. And the image quality is amazing, especially in the corners. The absence of wide-angle lenses on the GFX and the weight made it truly difficult to consider in the end. Finally, the price of the Z7II body compared to the R5, and the A1 is to be considered.

I'm So happy that you came back to full frame, through Nikon Z, Tom. I wish you the best and I hope you will enjoy as much as I enjoy my Nikon Z. You got the best lens combo for landscape. Z 24-120 and Z 100-400. I'm following you for a long time, not for your gear but for your style, but I'm glad that you choose Nikon. I really love the way you do photography. (Despite the brand of your gear) I like to travel with you through your videos. Thank Tom for taking us with you during your photo journey. Bonjour de France. Karl.

As a GFX100S user - I do find the lack of zoom length a little limiting at times - but I don't think I can compromise image quality - you're right, it's peerless. Just get stronger 😅

Canon r5 you can’t beat it the image quality is second to none imo. Plus with the latest firmware update you can film all modes including 8k with no overheating. Best bang for the buck out there.

Thanks for this fella. I’ve just upgraded to Z7II from D750 & am blown away by the upgrade.

You are spot on with this one Thomas. Even if there is a comparable difference, the viewer will never know unless they have the alternative to compare it with. Then, as you said, in most online and printed publications it would be very difficult to see the difference anyway. I am not a gear nerd either, but I know what I like in my gear and that is, I need to be confident and capable of using it to get the desired result. Keep ikt simple and enjoy the art. Cheers and thanks once again for the video and content.

I have done a similar move, some time ago, from Canon FF to m43, and I now walk around with an E-M1mk2 and 12-100 (i.e. 24-200 eq) and some times also a G9 with a 100-400 (200-800 eq). Fun to use, great stabilization on both kits (lens and bodies are of the same brand, although cross compatible), very versatile and light. The IQ loss is there, but it doesn't make much of a difference for me: if I do everything right and do not surrender to lazyness, I like the results. The high res modes (80mp) are very good and print really large, whenever the subject allows you to use them. Oh, and yes, do some video with Sean :-)

First thing that i thought was you switch because of speed (fps, focusing, changing settings etc), also depth of field, but i was completely wrong 😁(one major difference between these cameras regarding image quality is iso handling, other stats are basically same but honestly i think in your hands does not matter how camera you use, your photos will be one of the best at any conditions 👍).

Thank you Thomas, as a coincidence, I'm studying a Certificate in Photography course and our subject this month is gear. As my teacher says horses for courses. Love the print packs, what a good idea. Looking forward to the Scotland trip.

Very timely content for me as I am looking at a Nikon mirrorless purchase during the next 3 or 4 months. Great video, thanks.

I thought the small and light aspect was already taken care of by your X-T4. Do you feel that's not up to the job? would have been interesting to add test shots with that camera into the mix. Looking forward to those images from Scotland!

I’m a Canon guy but if I wasn’t, Nikon would be my pick. Love their glass and colors. I shoot RAW regardless but that system just feels right. I had the biggest crush for the D850 for the longest

Great video Thomas. I like the love you show just for the picture and don't argue about all the nearly same cameras. Great stuff

Thanks Thomas..

I use a Sony a7RIII and the FE 24-105/4 as one of my landscape cameras - it’s a nice package similar to your z7ii 24-120 kit. The kit works well but there are better lenses with less range that can provide a bump in quality if that’s important. However as you said it’s unlikely that the extra resolution is what sells an image. The composition and creative eye drive that. The sensor size itself is less important to depth of field than the apparent magnification. By cropping the Nikon you are increasing the apparent focal length reducing depth of field as I understand it. For hiking I’d pick something like what you have selected - or even an apsc or m43 camera. Your images are really quite lovely typically - I look forward to seeing what you do with the Nikon but I suspect two things: 1) you will be second guessing your decision. 2) the quick and easy aspect of less cumbersome gear may not evoke the same level of planning and introspection that goes into the shots with your medium format gear. This may drop the composition excellence if you aren’t careful. That’s not a knock on the gear, that’s a reminder to remain mindful.

The Nikon was a nice choice, great image quality for landscapes. You probably also would have been happy with the mk I version, as long as you but xqd cards

Looking forward to the upcoming series. When I upgraded to the Z7ii from my D750 I was very reluctant to give up my 24-120 for a 24-70. A very high percentage of my shots were in the 71-120 range and the 24-120 was so convenient that I rarely changed lenses. That said, I really like the Z7!

Wow impressive, well done. Thank you for sharing. Keep it up 💞

I’ve been on the Z’s for years now. Don’t overlook the 24-200mm. Yes it’s variable aperture, but for your use, it shouldn’t cause a problem.

My guess is that you will love the range flexibility. I have a similar overlap in a Sony 24-104 f/4 (very sharp through the whole range) + a Sony 100-400 paired with either my A7r III or A7 III. I have been thrilled since I put that combo together. I do have an Sony 85mm f/1.8 (rare portraiture/event) and a Sony 14mm f/1.8 (astro) for specialized situations, but the rest of my lenses largely don't get used anymore and it makes travel so much easier.

Very interesting change. I did the very same thing, coming from the Fuji XT crop camera to my current Sony A7RIV. Second place : Canon R5 and then Nikon Z7II, Fuji GFX as last. Only advice I can give you is: make your own comparison and if you can: compare with Canon and Sony too. Then make your choice.

Landscape photography you did with XT3 was really better than you are doing now, I don't know but it's has a special pleasure for me to watch videos until the end

Why not keep them both. Use the Nikon for hiking and the Fuji out of the van.

I recall Nigel Danson doing a side by side between the Nikon you have now, and the Fuji XT-3, and even printed REALLY big, you could just barely tell the difference in the edges. Which is why I still use the XT-3 for all my photography and haven't gone back to full frame.

Great lesson!, thanks Thomas

Hey Thomas, I totally get the reasons for the switch. Although I have long admired the GFX system, it was the lens selection, weight and overall cost that always made me take a step back. It was never about the quality. I think, like most people who know a little, when you are talking about the higher end cameras of any brand, they are all very good. I myself have just gone back to the Nikon D800 (yes DSLR I know) with the 24-120mm lens and it is very practical and the 36mp sensor is more than enough. I am sure you will love the Z7 II, goes without saying about the quality given the number of other (including yourself) professional photographers already using one. Best of luck. John Pouw, NZ.

I recently went from the Nikon D850 to the Nikon Z7II, and I am extremely pleased with the change. I believe both cameras use the same sensor, but the difference is in the image quality delivered by the Nikkor Z S Line lenses. I believe you will be quite satisfied with the Nikon Z System. I would suggest trying the Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8 S Line lens if you are looking for incredibly sharp images...the 14-24mm, 70-200mm, and 100-400mm S Line lenses deliver incredibly sharp images as well.

I use basically the same GFX setup, except I throw in the 23mm(incredible lens). I can't imagine a time in landscapes that I do where I'd need to go above maybe 200mm, and with the 100-200 GF lens, it almost gets to that point anyway. Only time I can think of is if I was trying to double as wildlife photos as well

I moved from a Sony A7iii to the Nikon Z7ii about a year ago. It’s been great fun to use so far and helped to take some of my favourite images along with the 14-30,24-120 plus some primes.

I recently found myself in a similar debacle, in the end landed on A7IV coming from Fuji xt4 that my wife took over for video work. I must say, I'm very happy with the switch, I was choosing between Sony and Nikon. Ultimately came down to more lens choices for Sony and an excellent viltrox adapter that allows me to use old Canon lenses flawlessly.

I love to watch these videos where the photographer is switching, jumping around with sensor formats. Why?Because it is pointless. I own full frame and m4/3 and love them both. If I was able to owned a medium format system, I’m pretty sure that I will love that too. Today the big brand names keep working hard on their products to deliver great features and quality, if you know how to use it, you will get great results out of any format!

Just know that with the Z mount you can adapt just about any lens to a Nikon Z body. Although the Z lenses are all superb, you're not limited to the Nikon Z lenses.

You have just gone up in my estimation Tom as I’m an avid Nikon user and have been for years. Glad to have you on board buddy 😂👍

Love the Nikon Z7II. Great camera. The 100-400mm is an excellent lens. I use this for my landscape and portrait photography.

My advice before switching systems: Look at the metadata statistics in Lightroom to find out which focal lengths you are using most. This will help deciding which lenses do you really need. And then choose the camera system with best optics in your focal lengths.

Chris Hau did a great video about 12MP vs 102MP prints. Got a bunch of pro photographers to look at large high quality prints made with shots from a 12MP and 102MP camera - the differences are so subtle. A lot of people place too much significance on MP count.

Thank you Thomas

Thanks for this video. Looking to order a print pack today.

Self deprecation aside, I think you made the right comparisons and points. It really is about the lens in my mind. Of course resolution and sensor size make a difference but all things being equal I do believe it all about the glass. Thanks Tom. @gjbushman

I mean, if you’re really looking to switch back to full frame, you certainly chose the best system for the job. ISO 64 is really such a boon for landscape.

Glad you went with the Nikon Z7II. I've the same camera and it's fantastic for landscape, although I use it for everything. The Nikkor lenses are simply outstanding, I went with the 24-70 f2.8 (my most used lens)

First thing, those images in the opening sequence are absolutely fantabulous. And they are of my favorite subject matter. Especially the grass clump. Second thing is that I have been all through that 35mm, medium format and large format thing years ago and came to the same conclusion that you did. For every advantage gained in increased format size there is a penalty. Usually depth of field and weight. And when I had a gallery exhibit the viewers didn't recognize the difference. But they were taken by the images and made lots of positive comments. The other thing is that for the last 8 or 9 years my two primary lenses have been the 24-120 f/4 and the 80-400 4.5/5.6 with my Nikon D800E and my D850. The two lenses don't get the highest acclaim from the pixel peepers but again my audience doesn't realize that. They love the images. I have a 105mm f/2.8 micro lens but I usually end up using the 80-400 for that work because I don't want to take the time and effort to change lenses. Again, my audience doesn't know. They love the images. Now here is one major difference: when I am shooting migrating warblers in the spring I use a 500mm f/4 lens with the D850. These little birds are so small that all of the images have to be cropped a great deal even when the birds are close. No one even notices that the 8x10 images with a large border are cropped. The 80-400 can't compete in that scenario.

I have gone completely lightweight and never looked back after picking Olympus. Like you say, unless you are printing huge, you just can't tell. This means I can carry landscape, macro, and a 600mm equivalent for birds all in my pack and never have to worry about missing a shot. I really don't think you're going to lose anything with the Z7II, other than maybe envy from other photographers.

Don’t jump just yet man , the r5 is a phenomenal piece of kit !! Great video as usual

Very interesting Thomas, as many of your commenters have said just about anything decent from major manufacturers will deliver satisfying prints for 98% of people, as for the photographer it comes down to weight and personal preferences. As a much older photog these days I’m putting a lot more emphasis on weight than I did in my younger days !! (R5 user) cheers from NZ .

I'm really not sure you can go wrong with modern full frame cameras. I'm sure this will work wonders for you! I'd suspect the hard part is usually just gaining the muscle memory for a new setup.