#MRRF2018 

3D printers is always too weak to by a good cnc mill. ;)

I don't think a 3d printer frame can handle the XY resistances a CNC mill needs.

Some times I have the same type of an issue

I have been looking for a brass type brush, I may do as now Silicon wiper* and add brass brush to it, when I have the cash, can you give me a link to buy a brass brush like this, thanking you one for My:- Servo Controlled Wiper Arm Update, working good. Good is So So ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-glQsoDT018A.html Servo driven nozzle wiper arm Still OOZE ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-TltG8CB8cbI.html * Work some times

he is a beta tester for this literal product

Some times I have the same type of an issue

It’s not perfect yet, but it is promising for the future

sky rim I think it's the new E3d Box Box.

Thats exactly what I was thinking kinda. Please tell me the system is purchasable without buying that printer.

Of course, more here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-DRkF-D0fEbQ.html

They said it will be open sourced. They also said it's not a printer, it's a reference platform. You buy the basic kit and add your own choice of electronics and other things.

they will sell just the kinematics and head too, so you can just build your own/add to your existing core XY setup.

E3D showing their new projects. I think its the new big box.

New thing, corexy design.

We'll have to look into that.

The kinematic linkages on this one are handmade so expect much better precision in the machined ones.

it's not even that.... look at the belt pattern/banding on the surface. like the print at 2:04... needs some tweaking elsewhere...probably needs toothed pulleys or flipped belts but those other prints look decent on the table. at least.

Hard to tell from the freeze frame but I'd say that this is a case of the infill structure showing through on the surface. The pattern is the same distance as in the transparent identical part where you can see the infill shine through a bit. Once the testers who threw money at this already (I did) get their hands on it, we will make sure to report back of course.

Other than the tool pick up system everything was pretty much off the shelf items so no excuse for "hand made". This looks like a 1.8Degree stepper motors on 20+ teeth gears with single sheer pulley configuration on belts that are too long showing through to me. This is clearly visible with layer lines they do not align well on top of each other and the other artefacts/waves running through the print that we know are not caused by the duet's drivers. There is clearly more than enough shells/walls there to ensure there is no infill artefacts showing through so you can't blame that, more importantly they are consistently through the print not just at the infill points. I am sure all the BS about weight saving on the main moving part probably made a 20mm/s difference at most, which is hardly worth the cost or effort, the fact they could not even give a speed it will print well at backs this fact otherwise they would be touting that as well. I stand by the statement that a cheap printer, like the $175 Ender 2, seems to be doing a better job. If you are happy to poor $1000 down the drain on something looking that bad in the "sales pitch" (and you know they would of spent a ton of hours tuning the thing) then you must be happy to waste your cash or a fanboy. This is looking like just another 3dprinter fail from E3D like the bigbox. They need to spend a little more time on some of the quality issues in their products at the moment (seized/low quality bearings, rough heat break bores, poorly cut threads etc) rather than d1cking around with half finished 3D printers that won't work out of the box........ For this kinda cash and no electronics or tools it should have 4 point Z access screws for proper auto level, 3 point linear rails to ensure fully constrained movement and the whole case should be carbon fibre with the ability to close in the entire build space in to hold the temperature constant inside. I think it is obvious they are a little lost when they are talking about "production parts manufacturing" on the unit, all the gear an no idea by the looks of it......

The nozzle being 2.0mm would have to use 3mm filament on the same machine that you would be using 1.75mm filament on. Anything more than 1.2mm is more than enough requiring a volcano hotend to get decent performance and consistent melting temperatures. Changing nozzle size while printing and also multi materials in a single part might be the next step in FDM printing where one can include TPU, Nylon, and PLA all in the same part. So combining nozzle switching with filament material switching in the same print for a fully customized part will be the future, until we can start printing metal parts. None of this matters if they cant get the precision better than whats shown in the video there is clearly some problems in the prints. The wire brush solution is the most cheapest and horrible nozzle cleaning idea i have seen. When they said there is only 1 Z axis lead screw i am extremely skeptical that there is precision or stiffness in the frame design.