MS760 Personal Airliner "Paris Jet" 

yep, C-41 sir!

Add that this hour won't be enough to reach take off speed... In France we call them lungs, they take a lot of air.

Dave Riley Proper old school motoring... it is indeed a "time machine": Back to 1950! :-)

That and those triangle type inlets just scream inefficiency! Priced the same as a new middle to upper-class home the cost to buy isn't that bad comparatively speaking, but the costs to operate and maintain this will probably be a deal killer for most.

Dave Riley You told it all!

@@jetaddicted don't understand your comment. Clarify?

+Shabang probably best not to encourage the "Starbucks to go" crowd when you feel like pulling a couple of barrel rolls over your friend's house.

Cool 👍 You forgot the link 😉

+David Parker Especially when it is extolling the virtues of a French design from the 1950's - a very elegant time in aviation history - no respect for heritage.

Then don't watch it.

Let me see what I can get outraged at today... 😂😂😂

Lmfao idk why i thought this was so funny

I got a headache and feel like vomiting watching the intro, without stepping in the plane.

Turbomeca Marbore, a radial simple stage compressor, also burns oil and other stuffs(like your money), the retrofit was only in the cockpit, they didn't changed the engines... And yes the PW 610, or 617 like the Embraer's Phenom 100 would be nice, maybe even the Williams FJ33...

russotragik Any of those small fans would be a good fit; problem is their cost greatly exceeds the value of the airframe.

dieselyeti Wow you're right. Just did some research. Cruise speed 290kts and fuel burn is 130GPH. That's less than 3 MPG not counting the taxi and takeoff fuel.

dboy4ever That fuel burn isn't OUTRAGEOUS when considering the fuel burn of a twinjet. Something like a Cessna I will burn north of 160GPH, a new Citation Mustang or Embraer Phenom will burn in the neighborhood of 100-120GPH. While the Citation I is a small cabin class business jet and the Mustang and Phenom are 6 place aircraft including pilot where the Paris Jet is only 4, but you have to look at the time between development. The Paris Jet was developed in the early 50s when turbines were still in their infancy. Nearly 20 years elapsed between the development of the Paris Jet's engines and the JT15s that power the Citation I. Another 35 years until the release of the PW600 in the Citation Mustang. Of course fuel burns are going to be higher, but they're actually quite reasonable still.

dboy4ever Eclipse says 60gph in cruise. Not sure where that 130gph figure came from.

+Dan Kelly Υep, for those who can afford a toy like this....

+Dan Kelly Who cares - it's a really good commercial and, let's face it, there aren't many comparative planes on the market that can offer what this offers. The only thing they leave out is the cost! (and if you have to ask, you can't afford it).

Exige000 Have you ever used critical thinking to analyse that "if you have to ask, you can't afford it"? Even a billionaire needs to ask how much things cost or they might spend a ridiculous amount of money for something. If he starts to buy something and the person serving him says, "That will be $10,000,000" then it would have saved time if he had just asked the cost in the first place.

+Dan Kelly You clearly never heard the old Rolls Royce slogan from the 1920's ............and, although I'm not a billionaire, I frequently don't ask the cost of something I know I can afford and really want (not a private jet, I hasten to add) - after all, when you need a nice present for your girlfriend, you aren't going to walk away if you're on a promise!

Exige000 Certainly I heard that slogan, and I heard it used probably hundreds of times in movies and TV shows. However it is not meant to be taken literally. You used it literally.

Well it did first fly in 1954 as a jet trainer but lost out to the fouga Magister to get the french goverment contract

+Boris Chang Not quite - that was the early 1940's, whereas this is a design from 10 years later, but your point is well made. a design from more than 60 years ago, when the entire history of aviation is only 115 years is a pretty daunting thought. Just shows how much progress has been made in leaps and bounds.

That's 10 times the cost of this. But thanks for playing.

the website does not seem to come up but I found a Facebook page on them. facebook.com/MS760/

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

They used these during the Vietnam war.

😂

This converted jet trainer isn't capable of breaking the sound barrier. Thanks for the comment tho....

+Dan Frederiksen Turbojet and Turbofan engines always are. There are numerous single and twin engine turboprop planes that seat 5-6 people with nearly double the range and comparable speed.

+fromkentucky nah, turbofan should be a lot more efficient.

Dan Frederiksen 4-6 seat Turboprops between 900 and 1200shp can generally cruise between 300 and 350mph burning 40-60gph. Turbofans of similar size and output will generally burn twice that, turbojets burn 3-4 times as much.

My PC 12 may not do aerobatics but beats the hell outta this. This is a toy, not transportation. And I can take my PC almost anywhere.

what is a PC 12

Dahyu Patel df

a PC-12 is made by PILATUS it is a turbo prop aircraft

Was going to say the same, there are a variety of turbo-prop ACs which can do everything this does, better, more efficiently, and looking a hell of a lot sexier while doing it. PC12 is just one.

Stop with the apples and oranges. Anyone in the game for one of these probably has several bug smashers already.

I'm going to well actually you, there's at least ONE F-4 (B model, it was up for sale a few years ago) and a few F-104's around 10 or so years ago when you made the comment lol.

Your aviation culture is pretty limited and one-sided

One ugly jet!

Roger Tycholiz Yeah, Who does demand this jet? Too poor equipments as business jet.

高橋優介 because it is.