Muslim rulers of South Asia 

very informative, and nicely sourced.

Mughals were mainly a cross breed between Turks and Mongols, They latter married the Indian population and their Indian gene started to dominate their DNA, thus their Mongolian features started to disappear, you can observe this evolution in Mughal art work. The Mughals latter had to change their caste/zaat because of the British genocide against them, They changed their caste according to their occupation like, Mochi, Lohari, Halwai, etc. Mughal caste however still found in Pak, mostly lahore

its good that anyone know in pakistan about history i appreciate you

@thephilosopherkartik at first they used persian as their court language but later adopted Hindustani (later known as Urdu)

@telecalcu turks from central Asia (Uzbeks, Turkmens etc.) are the same breed as Mongolians. They look the same. The main difference is that Mongolians are mainly Bhudist & Shmanic and speak Mongolic languages while central asian turks are Muslim and speak Turkic languages which are directly related to Mongolic languages. Both are part of the Altaic familly.

@reaper76475 you are right but this is mostly about the foreign central asian rulers, not so much about the south asian ones.

@papasmurfXXX finally you got it right :) but i don't know about the Hazaras being part white. Uyghurs are a mix of Turanians and Nordic Tocharians. Btw where have you been haven't seen you in a while :)

ottomans were mostly anatolian with some Turanoid genes. The reason for blonde hair and nordic features found in some east turkestanis is because of mixing with the descedents of tocharians ancient indo-Europeans who arrived in western China. The Tocharians had R1B markers which are typical nordic genes.

PROUD TO BE AN TURK !

People who claim them selves to be from Mughal descents are very well Mughals, I do not see any reason to doubt their lineage.

@PakistaniShaheen Whatever, I am just happy that we are Muslims and followers of true Prophet (PBUH). We are first Muslims and then Pakistnis. I hope that you will not disagree In Taza khudaon man bara sab se watan hai, Jo pairhan uska hai wo mazhab ka kafan hai, Nazzara-e-dareena Zamane ko dikhade, Ae Mustafvi, KHAAK man is but ko mila de.

thank you. But i also don't believe they were "Hindus" before that since "Hinduism" and "India" are British inventions.

They didn't adopt Urdu as their national language. The court language of the Mughals was Persian for most of the period of their reign; Urdu did not gain popularity as a language of the aristocracy until around the time of Bahadur Shah Zafar; and even then Urdu was seen as an 'unsophisticated vernacular' and most nobles and the elite preferred elucidating exclusively in Persian. That's from my sources, maybe I'm wrong. No offence meant.

@PakistaniShaheen south pakistani mixed with south west pakistani and south east pakistani, genes come from all direction, like mixing on boarders and spill overs

tell that to the Indians, they think it was because of Muhammed Bin-Qasim, the Arab conqueror

@PakistaniShaheen not the video, i mean the comments saying the Mughals are Turk, or Pashtun, not Mongol. In truth the Mughals were the grandsons of both Uzbek Turks and Mongols... but it doesnt matter. There are Pakistanis saying that they are from Arabs instead of Indians who converted to Islam, but why is the descendant of an Arab better than a Indian convert?

Who was syed khawerzam shah .... Please reply I don't think he was Mughal also he had syed with his name

Where did you find these songs?

@slimshadythe2nd Pakistanis are neither Indian converts to islam nor Arab. India is a name given by the British. Before British rule, most of modern India and Pakistan have been separate. But I agree no one is necessarily better than others. I'm also tired of hearing we are Mughals or Arabs or Indians. Why can't we Pakistanis just be ourselves?

WE ARE ALL TURK-MONGOL-GREEK-PERSIAN-arab MIX

british created "hinduism" by usign the term for various cults in the region. It's not a religion, just a british misconception

@PakistaniShaheen they are mixed with use north pakistani, and north pakistani mixed with south pakistani

it's what the mughals spoke and sang, so you're laughing at them...

@papasmurfXXX interesting find

Sorry to say, I don't think that u have done any research on Mughals or urdu. Further i can show many Pathans from north, living in punjab, who look like same as punjabis. and the brown person changes its colour very quickly according to climate.

@ilikebeubz WRONG they are Dardic people NOT GREEK

@LordLebu no they are dardic people of northenr Pakistan....nuristanis are not found in Pakistan except for immigrants

@muhammadbasit1 prove to me the mughals were not originally altaic and looked like Pathans or Kalash

maybe you dont look eastern turanoid, but everyone in north pakistan look this way

these people are nuristanis, they are the descendants of aryans. and they became muslims only after 18th century.

It was not called Pakistan but it was not called Hind either

@safiullahtariq I am Pakistani fist and always shall be before anything else!

yes because tocharians were nordic types and many pashtuns look nordic uyghurs=tocharians + Turanoids

actually u shouşld Change the Name as Turk Rulers of South Asia. Gaznevids,Temur and Babür Han etc. All of Them Turk.

THOSE PICS YOU SHOW of whites, they of GREEK DECENT from alexander army

@slimshadythe2nd how so?

@akingkhan99 yeah anything you don't like; it becomes "Indian propaganda" If you believe Pakistanis are Turkic/Mongolian you probably never saw a real Pakistani before lol

tuva podcast

I dunno where did u read or hear such misconception maybe from some illiterate person (who wouldnt be able to see this video) who never attended any school.its simple history lesson which we studied in our schools

@PakistaniShaheen what kind of evidense u want? suppose i provide u some pics of pathans, who looks like punjabi. you will not going to accept it. then how will i prove it. i m not going to provide u pics with dna report.

@muhammadbasit1 give some evidence to support your claims

A myth disproved on and on again

@YUSKHAN yes everything was assghan right? next thing you'll claim prophet muhammed was assghan. What else are you assghanis capable of except cleaning our toilets and claiming everything to be ass-ghan?

indians are Africans...

what u want?

@muhammadbasit1 prove otherwise if you can

LOL THEY ARE TURKS

if all humans dont have any big difference why are you selectively viewing videos on Pakistan? obviously any culture that is ancient you want to claim as "indian" instead of just human. you claim Bhudda to be indian when he was from Nepal instea dof just "human" whenever something must be "indian" it must be exclusively "indian" if it's distinct in the case of Pakistan it should be simply human. Pathetic