My "Best" Favorite Russian Deck in Broken Arrow 

(cept it BS)

They shoot one at a time terms shoot 2, then shoot another 2 quickly after and have cannons and can take more damage.

@@NoiceGuy honestly i think you're overlooking the pros of having 4 separate targets instead of 2, it definitely makes up for each individual sprut not being as tanky or having more firepower

@@ThornEthics You'll figure it out eventually

@@NoiceGuy no, ive given it a try and i definitely prefer 4 tanks over 2 slightly better tanks. expand your horizons my friend

​@@ThornEthics thank you for your service. everyone appreciates you patting their k/ds

the 57mm is 10x better

57 is much more effective against most targets

57mm shreds even sep v3s from behind, which is quite funny in a push xD

Cant wait for all the Boxer and Puma OFV versions xDD

yea its pretty good, it can engage helicopters fairly far without radar and even further with radar on for only 130pts

Imo the derivatsiya is garbage but its cheap and can protect your backline.

Derivatsiya absolutely annihilate helicopters, it's pretty great I find

Cheaper, 57mm go buh buh buh and most cases just as good

1) feel like its cuz of modern battlefield setting. Guided ammo, very precise weaponry and all means the only defense infantry have left is stealth. 2) you can press G to have a sorta range tool for units. The visual stuff works pretty good imo. It even differenciates elevation.

@@TheFlohRiDa Thanks a lot for your input! 1) I actually think because of the modern setting infantry is more important, because tanks have close to none defense, not even stealth (some reduce their heat signature a bit etc.; also, drones and vehicles can have devices to read heat signatures from soldiers, so kind of hardly any one has any stealth, depending on the equipment). And there are already drones in the game. Imho modern conflicts (e.g. Ukraine, Fallujah etc) show, that the boots on the ground are (at least) as important as tanks. That is why I think it is possibly a design decision to focus more on vehicle gameplay. 2) Thanks a lot, I have to try that out! Does that show weapon ranges, too? I only used ALT so far! And it builds up so it takes some time till it can be used.

could just use kamazs from transport if needed and it was a more efficient use of points to get those choppers for support

57mm and tankier.

@@NoiceGuy 57 can the b10 too.

​@@NoiceGuy as others said, both B-15 and T-15 have 57mm guns. B-15 gains bulat HE rockets on top of AT rocket and 57mm while having way weaker armour. But they are also way cheaper at 145 instead of 250.

@@TheFlohRiDa What I am basing my picks off of is gameplay. I have been more successful with the t15s likely because theyre tankier.

B,K,T all have their merits (made decks specializing on all 3, made them work quite well), but on average, T(with armor and hp of Armata, and a massively powerful long 57mm gun) is the specialty of the Ru deck, and they're far more forgiving. Also, importantly, T-14/15s are fast as hell(80), so this isn't an advantage for lighter platforms(wheels are faser ofc, but nowhere near as much as you'd expect).

2 more missiles and easier/faster setup. Strelas miss too much and can't shoot ground units turn radar on for der.

I am going to disagree with you there noiceguy i think the s-300v4 with the 2 giant missiles is way better than the buk, in my opinion, you get it for 130 points it has a 9000m range way bigger than the buk with 6400m (and yes it is whit radar) and I find it the early it can shoot early the plane go down hence protecting the things your back and front lines I have seen way too many buk get killed by arty fire and planes whit bombs couse they are to slow to react to them coming whit there really low range the only thing I can fick it is a drawback is they only have 2 missiles but can easily be accommodated to have 2 and ammo depo on them I usually leave them 3000 supplies and it usually lasts the whole game plus you are saving 100 points as well which is very nice. which means with your current deck you can fit a one buk for 180 points in there if you want to if you drop the kamAZ-6560

In this beta the sosnas loved to miss wasn't worth the points

So LMUR are top attack, long range missles, which the tooltip doesnt even show. They damage and kill any ground units, even sep v3 abrams very reliably. Very fast aim time, shoots on the move, fire and forget, top attack and fast firerate. Its what the javelin wishes it would be. Yeah, the amount of "just feels this way" drags his whole point down sadly. Also the depth missing.

I make a lot of videos and talk to a lot of people I sometimes forget when I do or don't explain certain things. That explanation is more of an attempted shortcut to glassing over most this as "just trust me"

Price performance

@@g3koot100 fully upgraded Sep3 he runs is 390 vs 400 for a T14 no?

idk but they win the fights more often when in cannon range could be the way I use them but they just win

might because the abrams have higher AP values and a faster reload at every price bracket. Armata and the Sep3s are evenly matched in the combat department the abrams has the better AP round tho while the armata is faster and longer engagement range.

Abrams have more pen and armour them armatas or T-90s

Its a fair take though? He did say he might be wrong of course. But are we really not gonna trust the playtester with hundreds of hours against the devs and other play testers Vs Potato Andy with at most 1 week of gametime On what is actual the good shit in a game. Maybe things work right now in potato land because no match making exists and no ladder is around in a game that is just in Open Beta.

Absolutely.

@@richter9485you can say that without acting like a pretentious dick tho. He could have just been like ‘I’ve been a beta tester for around a year now and this is the build I’ve had the most results with instead of stroking his own ego for 5 minutes

Everything that matters backs it up and you can ask the lead dev yourself if you wish.

Whats that