ACTIONS ALWAYS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS! In my opinion, one can have Freedom of speech but if your actions are harsh, disrespectful & inhumane, there is nothing FUNNY about it, racist or not, no matter what your profession! Thanks for your Point of View... stay honest
I appreciate your perspective, but some of the things that you are presenting as fact are hald truths. For example I don't think you actually looked up Kamala Harris' record as prosecuter/AG/DA. You showed a video of Tulsi Gabbard, not sure why. Anyway, Her record is extensive and as a prosecutor she did her job. Following up with that she instituted programs to help the same people find a path back to the community and reduced recividism. You claimed Trump and Vance "brought attention" to Springfield. No, they said people were eating cats and dogs...which is an outright lie. You quickly said Trump did more for black people. Expound on that. There is much more to discuss.
Thanks for the respectful comment! The point of me bringing these things up about Harris was to show people what they aren’t seeing on a daily. I’ve been able to look through the bs that she says. Trump funded HBCUs as well as opportunity zones during his term. A fact that a lot of us don’t know about, that’s why I said what I said. Again I just want people to look into things they’re not being told. The playing field isn’t leveled. I don’t care to vote for either candidate at this time.
@@POINTOFVIEWBB I have actually explored the numbers on opportunity zones and the money to hbcu's. I was encouraged when Trump announced those policies. However, after his time in office, I examined the numbers and he did not give even 1/3 of the money to the HBCUs that he pledged. In fact he made the process extremely difficult. Biden actually saw that and released more money to HBCUs far greater than Trump did. The opportunity zones were also managed poorly as most of the funding went to white owned companies that pushed gentrification. Hence, why you did not see black communities develop under Trump. Nevertheless, I 100% agree with you that introspection and analysis of candidates must be done. Votes MUST be earned. I can respect that you do not like either choice. I would hope that you continue to use your platform to push for that and encourage candidates from both sides to give attention to the topics important to you. Keep in mind you will probably never find a candidate in line with you on every issue. I guess we have to just decide which ones are important enough to vote for.
Hey I like the way you started your video and you sounded like a man who was very reasonable and would deal with facts and that you don’t speak until you check your sources etc. So I watched - but right away you started with a totally unverified - not properly certified as to any aspect the supposed ABC whistleblower affidavit. Please give me one source of proof that supposed whistle blower sent any kind of notarized affidavit to anyone before the debate. Or anything that proves even ONE point in the redacted versions of supposed pages released to anyone. I think if Speaker Johnston has a real copy he would have at least confirmed the notarized date of the supposed real whistle blower affidavit. Otherwise dude your bias and attempt to amplify a possible lie is obvious and makes you look foolish. Personally I too like to fact check before I take a stance but I have very serious doubts that you did. Now I will admit I could care less about that because my reasons for not voting for Trump is because my serious fact checking for years and the common sense that the only person on the planet that Trump has never said the hint of a bad word or nickname about is Putin. Because I believe Trump is owned by Putin. Trump is weak and would hand Ukraine over to Putin and kiss his ass while doing it. Trump alienated our allies and aligns himself with our proven enemies. It is obvious. You want some facts? Read the actual Muller report - It’s a real thing it is verified and it did not exonerate Trump it exposed him. Muller said if not for the rules that you can’t charge a sitting president he would have. He clearly stated in the hearing before congress that once Trump was out of office he could be charged with the evidence proven in his report. This is just one thing I can name and clearly show verifiable sources for at least 20 other criminal and traitorous actions of Trump. So Kamala is not just a choice - She is the only candidate a reasonable honest person could say is capable of leading the most powerful country in the world and who must stand against the likes of Russia, China, and his love note swapping rocket man. Yes you can have your point of view but you should be honest about your lack of actual fact checking.
One last comment - I really like a lot of what you say about motivation and self confidence and much more. But you have no good sources for your lame fact checking presented. I LOOKED!!!! Your smart - please do better.
