HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYONE!!! Bring on 2020, it's going to be one hell of a year! We have some exciting things to announce next year, so keep your eyes peeled!
Type this in on amazon, i think these will work better and they agree 4k at 60hz J-Tech Digital HDBaseT 4K@60HZ HDMI Extender 4K@60HZ 4:4:4, HDMI 2.0 Over Single Cable CAT5e/6A up to 230ft (1080P) 131ft(4K) Supports HDMI 2.0 18Gbps, HDR, HDCP 2.2, RS232, Bi-Directional IR
Would be nice if I can leave my pc or laptop in my room and connect it to my tv in the living room wireless. 2nd question is would bluetooth reach that distance? (Edited:) My Logitech K375s and MX Master 2 and Xbox controller reached the distance. Now I'm actually interested in the wireless HDMI if it's any good.
Ever heard of Chromecast ultra? Also your argument about not having to chase an HDMI down your wall with these boxes.....wouldn't you already have the TV's power inside in the wall?
Something about him reminds me of a tech Steve Irwin. I think it’s all the physicality. “If eye sneak up on it, here’s a jumpin’ pixel! Let’s get a bit closah! Oh he’s a sneaky lil’ buggah isn’t he...”
This video is awesome btw. Everything could happen at any moment. This video excited me. Your energy and your home-studio is an awesome and warm place.
Says at the start it's over wifi, it's not, it's wireless. He also talks of 60GHz as if it's 60Gbps - the two are 100% unrelated, this guy is clueless, got bored, left.
Editing this. So I mean, it waouldnt be fair to compare one device you find only off of amazon and make a myth or not video based on that without doing any research into if there are any other devices out there besides that one. Gotta do a comparison to see if its a real myth in this case i think. But i do like your videos.
You've literally bought the exact same device basically but one is from a china seller who had advertised is 4k and at a higher cost lol. EDIT: Basically the 1st one on amazon is the same and was £169 , and you bought from banggood at $289, i thought you would've realised also and it is common with china, they can change USBs to show it can hold 64gb and not hold more than 2gb etc. Can make 720p in 4k technically too... *Just Be Cautious*
4k at 30hz uses roughly the same bandwidth as 1080p at 60hz, this is why HDMI 1.4 spec (older laptops, pcs) support 4K up to 30hz. HDMI 2.0 is required to support 4k over 30hz
Just pointing out, 4k hdmi when transferred over ethernet or wifi is never going to be true 4K as it's roughly 40gbps. You also lose out on HDR and Dolby Vision. Really not worth it at all.
For range sake I would just get a nyrus 1080p wireless hdmi. It has zero latency and it actually can go through wall a fair bit that ive seen(depends on how the house is)
Close to the TV it works but working at 60GHz just a person or a wall that falls the transmission ... the 2.4GHz frequency transmitters are more stable ...
I like the idea, what I got from this video is that it had potential but at the moment it's not currently worth it Would be pretty cool if they where smaller and you could charge the receiver part up. That way you could connect it to a portable/ zen screen monitor ( I want to do that because I'm lazy)
not sure why this comment has 6 likes dci 4k is newer and higher res than UHD DCI 4K is 4096 × 2160, while 4K UHD is 3840 × 2160 see google reference www.hireacamera.com/en-gb/blog/motion/technical-jargon-explained-what-is-the-difference-between-ultra-hd-uhd-and-4k-dci/
It wont, because the 60Ghz Band has limited Range. What Kind of Bitrate u pushing is irrelevant at that point, because it cant establish a connection in the first place.
Do you think this would work with sound? I have an extra xbox one x that I can hook up to my projector but I want to connect my sound system to my projector.
clicked this just to comment a tip.. work on the thumbnails chief! Exciting title can't sell a video with a lifeless thumbnail. Left me thinking meh wireless 4k probably works now what do I wanna watch
I don't understand the premise for this video. 1080p/120 and 2160p/30 is within same HDMI specification - HDMI 1.4. Why is the reviewers premise that it should be so much harder to project 4K/30 compared till 1080p/60? Is he even aware of the HDMI specifications? Is this video a spoof? Did I miss the joke?
Didnt watch the video past the 2nd minute yet so i might take my words back but I felt i need to reply. 1080p is is about 2 million pixels, 4K is about 8 million pixels so 4k/30 compared to 1080p/60 is 2x more bits of information to transfer. 2 times more is not ridiculous but its a lot more, for reference right now we double processing power of consumer cpu's about every 5 years. The video signal going over an HDMI cable needs to be in sync with the graphical processor that sends the data, afair it determines the frequency of updates and expects to have new data in those even intervals if the frequency fits its specification. To allow this wirelessly the receiving device must have at least a small buffer for when a packet gets lost and needs to be sent again etc. so that you dont experience stutter, flickering etc. If the wireless connection isnt able to fill that buffer faster then its being emptied then you're missing the time windows for when the image was supposed to be displayed and end up with a black screen, then some image and black screen again and so on. My point is, the hdmi specification might allow 4k/30fps data to be pulled from the receiver but the wireless connection has to have enough bandwidth to provide that data on the receiving side. Sorry for the terrible explanation, but I dont understand why you're talking about HDMI specification when the discussed problem is sending the raw uncompressed data wirelessly which is a whole different thing from f.e. streaming compressed 4k video from netflix.
If i were you, id show up on Mick Jaggers doorstep and say "Dad, im home!!" lol... Your like a younger, better looking version of Mick lol.. Love your vids man!!
Wired or cluttered mess??? What the hell are you talking about dude? This thing uses USB + HDMI cable + has a huge large box!!! No way in hell is this less "cluttered" - on the contra it has more cables+box compared to 1 hdmi wired cable. The only thing I see here is that if you really can't have wired connection to another room - then you have no choice but to use this - otherwise - it sucks !
Like 1 dude comments on topic. Everyone else says either "Happy New Year" or competes to be the biggest fan. 😂😂😂 I think I will wait until the tech is a little more mainstream. Maybe one day it will be integrated into our TVs and entertainment devices like the current 1080 limitation. I hate cable management, so this would be perfect for me.
Yeah, 60Hz, I don't think 30 meters is legit. There were some works being done for wireless VR that were doing to use 60Hz (Wireless AD) they only could promise same room/open room coverage. That is pretty cool though.
Bit different to VR mate. As it's essentially two screens and it needs to be at a higher refresh rate than 60Hz as it will cause motion sickness very quickly.
You have no idea how to transfer data efficiently 4K can easily be transmitted at 15-20mbps if it's encoded correctly. You run a wisp and you don't seem to have a basic understanding of RF energies and RF radiation, at 60Ghz be grateful it's very low powered
Nothing he expressed in this video is overtly incorrect. He is not beholden to suggest the solution to the barrier to entry with wireless 4K transmission, but rather just express the facts and that he has. These devices do, in fact operate on 60 GHZ and as such can transmit uncompressed video very well at 1080, but often struggle at 4K due to bandwidth utilization. If 4K could so easily be transmitted we would see a prevalence of these items on the market, but alas.... crickets. Apparently none of the engineers working at these companies have a basic understanding of the technologies either right? For the typical consumer, it is not to be expected to see wired HDMI to be replaced in the immediate future, and those who choose to be first to market, will likely suffer some of the woes expressed in this video. The limitation will almost invariably be that higher bandwidth utilization exacerbated by line of sight or distance. Use of this type of radio frequency solidifies the limitation. If your typical remote is not able to operate the device from a given location, it is likely that these wireless transmitters will suffer a similar failures to communicate. There is always at least one person who tries to denigrate creators by feigning superior intelligence in the comments, but unfortunately, it just doesn't hold water.
@@TheGaggenau again, what's your evidence here? He listed the relevant basics. Any fundamental information the viewer needs to understand the video is conveyed. Everyone likes to talk shit... but at the end of the day, that's all that it is... shit
Excellent review with, possibly, some perceived short-comings contributed by some commenters. I need to connect my TV to an upstairs device ~10 feet directly above. Your evaluation of this device is most helpful. Disregard the comment by riko herlambang. I enjoy your enthusiasm in presenting this review.
Well the 4k standard that's widely adopted is 3840 x 2160p. I mean go look at how many monitors or TVs you can get that is 4096 x 2160. Yep that's right there's hardly any because consumer media is UHD while movie projection industry use True 4K. So not sure why you would even try using True 4K through this. Also i'm pretty sure that HDMI 2.1a has a 48Mbps upper limit and that should be able to handle 4k@60hz and 120hz so not even sure why you said 50 - 100 Mbps in the video. Also what's this shit about carriers using 60Ghz as their backhaul? 60Ghz would show deterioration trying to travel through a piece of paper. So no they don't use this. You honestly chat a load of shit in your videos like most of it is googled or something with you trying to explain stuff you don't actually understand. ANNNNNDDDD another thing. You will find that using that via a USB port on your TV that it will be using 5volts with a max draw of 1amp. That's a whole 5watts of power MAX to play with. Yes that might just be the reciever and the broadcaster will have the same setup i'm sorry but this is enough to power this all on 60Ghz? Bitch what you chatting 5Ghz routers with more power struggle to even make the signal reach across the house unless they have antennas then maybe. This doesn't have any antennas and it's meant to be 60Ghz, yea fucking sure. So clueless.
Unfortunately not surprising, too temperamental and expensive - think cables in walls will still be with us for most of the next decade! Happy new year guys!!
