Nancy Brophy murder trial: Day 27, morning session | Live stream 

Brilliant rebuttal by Mr. Overstreet. If I were on the defense team, I would have been so humiliated! He exposed them by proving over and over again how they lied their way through this trial. Just as he proved, Nancy Brophy lied about killing her husband. He simply stated the facts as proved by the evidence. All the defense team did was throw out "red herrings" and expected the jurors to believe them. Shame on them. Did they really believe the jurors would fall for their BS? The entire Prosecution team did an outstanding job.

Sincere thanks to Mr. Overstreet and everyone in law enforcement and the Prosecutor's office who have worked so hard for Dan Brophy.

I couldn’t turn away from this trial due to Overstreet’s brilliance and intolerance for BS. Masterful.

That was the most brilliant and most powerfulest rebuttal argument I have ever heard. He just literally destroyed the whole defense. Great job Mr. Overstreet

it's chilling to think that Dan saw her shooting him. i can't imagine how awful it would be to know someone you love is taking your life.

It was such a relief to see the prosecutor put his finger on why the defense attorney was so dodgy!

Shawn Overstreet’s rebuttal destroyed the arrogance of Nancy Brophy and her attorneys Lisa Maxfield and Kristen Winemiller.

The prosecutor's closing was a joy to watch. He delivered it with so much clarity and elegance. Nothing escapes him. The defence on the other hand...

Nathaniel is wearing Dan's bolo tie. The famous bolo tie with the huge turquoise medallion.

Dan’s son proudly wearing a bolo tie today….oh my heart😭❤️

Excellent rebuttal. Mr. Overstreet did a masterful job prosecuting this absolutely wild case.

Bravo, Prosecutor! What an excellent rebuttal (NB looks defeated sitting there) because the prosecutors were "smarter" than NB! Thanks for rewriting NB's narrative - you unraveled all her storylines and lies. Justice for Dan❤

This was masterful! Well done indeed, Mr. Overstreet!

Overstreet is on fire!! Great rebuttal and no reading from notes. Kudos, sir!

Imagine being the supervisor who wrote the email to the juror, watching this livestream…major OOPS😅

I loved it when the desperate defense attorney tried to paint Overstreet as "aggressive" and irrationally arguing, "he has a gun." Those guns were unloaded and secured with zip ties as evidence to be used in court. What a low blow on her part. The Cramp deserved that defense team.

I was sat punching the air and saying yes, yes throughout this rebuttal. Bloody brilliant. I loved some of the adjectives re the defence closing. Ridiculous, distracting, garbage 😆😂 Mr Overstreet, that’s the most satisfying close I’ve ever heard. The defence was ridiculous and it was so satisfying to hear someone brave enough to say it. So glad justice was achieved though I’ve not watched that part yet !

Brilliant rebuttal to the prosecutor he covered it all and laid it out very eloquently... Very smart man thank you... bless you 🙏😇💕

To watch and listen to a first rate legal mind like Mr. Overstreet's dismantle and defeat a lying murderer with her own lies is such a beautiful thing. Justice was served.⚖️

If I'm not mistaken, the Culinary Institute closed down shortly after this happened. This woman ruined so many lives than just Dan's.

I love this prosecutor - very concise & spot on! JUSTICE FOR DAN!

Excellent prosecutor, excellent closing. I was hoping he would add the recording of Nancy telling the cops about Dan having cut his hand on the broken shower door the day before the murder, “He’s had one bad week.” Or something similar. Ugh!

Well done to the prosecution who rested ages ago. PLEASE GUILTY.

"Defense is clearly confused." 👍

Top tier Prosecutor. He unraveled and cut down her lies with precision.

I only hope that the jury is composed of intelligent and rational people that will deliver a swift guilty verdict to NB and justice to Dan's family.

After hearing Overstreet's rebuttal, I think that Nancy did exactly what she adamantly denied doing on cross. She DID park in front of OCI, out of view of the cameras. And she and Dan did say 'hello' to each other. She could do the job quicker that way than sneaking around. She'd just done the same thing several weeks prior, at the same time.

This prosecutor is Stellar!!!! Bravo young man

This guy is the epitome of organized. Amazing prosecutor and speaker.

Wow. That was a great rebuttal closing for Mr. Overstreet. You can tell that he, and his entire team, were so vested in getting justice for Dan Brophy and his family. Hopefully, Dan is now resting in peace or off doing a cooking class in some swanky part of heaven. Peace.

@ Shawn Overstreet Fabulous , A+++ job.

Beautiful closing argument from the prosecutor! Praying for just verdict! Justice for Dan Brophy! Also do not allow her to write book she could benefit from this murder...

Excellent closing by prosecutor👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

Why was it 2nd degree murder when she so obviously planned it? Overstreet's rebuttal was exactly what a rebuttal should be.

NB helped the state win this case . I believe if she didn’t testify it would of been a hung jury or not guilty. But after she testified I knew she was guilty

This lawyer is amazing. Reminds me of Camille Vasquez, but maybe even better. And it's ironic that they're both prosecuting the most ridiculous criminal who made their job easy without even knowing it, and yet they still knocked it out of the park just for good measure. Masterful performance.

Good job Overstreet 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

Mr Overstreet barely even referred to his notes. He is brilliant, prepared, and on the side of truth ❤

I thought the rebuttal was excellent! Better than the closing argument.

Ms. Overstreet, we are very proud of you and your team. Great job, sir. Coverup and deception will always get you.

Ya know, we got a lot of our points in in Overstreet's closing argument rebuttal! I'm listening to it for the first time now, and we scored! In our discussions, we highlighted so many points, and they were talking points in this rebuttal! I would guess the prosecution team used our comments to gauge how a jury might respond, and what might stand out for them. Almost all the "red herrings" were items we said were confusing (e.g. the waffle iron); Overstreet was heading off these items as "reasonable doubt". Brilliant. Of course, Defense likely picked up our confusion too, and made sure to try to bake it in during their closing, predicting the jury would respond as we did. Big fail. Then, there was the guy who was canning, and we mentioned repeatedly how abhorrent it was to make him a perp and how a majority of PDXers would likely be offended. There were several specific points posters mentioned, including a homeless guy would never be carrying a Glock, and how absurd the cabernet and candle detail was. Overstreet really worked how the jury would be offended at the stereotyping. I tell ya, for their case, we became mock jurors to prepare the real jurors for deliberations. We also discussed how the bunkie wasn't needed to prove the case and what a sympathetic character she was. Prosecution got this, too. This was very gratifying. I have a feeling our discussion really helped this case along.

Great job Mr Overstreet, I hope the jury see through all the smoke n mirrors.

Absolutely brilliant and masterful prosecutor.

A book she will write. The Wrong Defense. But how to publish it?

The defense closing was a disaster.

Wow, Prosecutor Overstreet just crushed the defense with that rebuttal.

I read NB was doing illegal stuff in jail during trial, is this true ?

Verdict reached! In court at 11:40 am.

The prosecution did a phenomenal job. The case was as he said a complex puzzle and Mr. Overstreet an team not only had to breakdown the case details for the jury, he had to do so while trying to work around the defense desperately trying to throw in and distract as he put it, tossing in the kitchen sink for the majority of the trial .... while trying to keep up with the defendant, backed up by her counsel, the inconsistent stories and lies. I've read the defense attorneys are respected in their community. If that's true, this case couldn't have done much for there credibility. In my opinion they looked at ridiculous as Nancy Brophy did. While I realize we all have rights in this country, she was so clearly guilty, the mounds of evidence was overwhelming, if they took the case , they had no choice but to try and distract. Why a reputable attorney(s) would take a case with these circumstances I don't know. The three of them just look like the three stooges. It's not a laughing matter, although they seemed it was, she executed her husband a man who clearly was adored in his community, and did it thinking she would get away with it, and did it for money. As the mother of the victim said she doesn't know what her life will be like, but imagine it wouldn't be pleasant. For Nancy Brophy I certainly agree.

She’s taking so many notes. I bet a book is forthcoming. She probably won’t get it published if the past is an indicator.

Are we on verdict watch here? Or are comments in a different location?

He was so good as the prosecutor! This ending argument left me riveted for an hour+. Great job getting some measure of justice for Dan and his family! Nancy is an evil witch.

That sir was very well done !

Prosecution caught the red herrings and gave it to the jury he did a great job. I predict guilty verdict by 3 pm Pacific time

If you see a stream with the verdict watch, could you please post here?

Is it just me, or does anyone else find Ms Maxfield’s practice of standing, and addressing the trial judge with her hands in her trouser pockets disrespectful? I’m in the U.K., and that would not be tolerated here. It looks so unprofessional, and rude.

The last 2 days of this trial is the only time I have heard clearly and not muffled blah blah blah. No one ever pulled the microphone to them to talk not the lawyers on either side not the judge and not the witness nor were they instructed to.

I say guilty as he11.

Has there been a verdict? I see no verdict watch posted. Are they done for the day?

The script Nancy wrote for this trial is a fail, although a best seller for a guilty verdict. Great rebuttal. Her lawyers were the worst I’ve ever seen. So many “red herrings”

Somehow I missed this trial but if I had been the defense during the prosecution’s closing I would have been thinking …. “We Are So Sunk!! “ Yes you where… And she didn’t plan this murder out At All!!!

5:25 the juror’s supervisor joked about Carol Baskin 😅

Wow! What a stellar rebuttal by Attorney Overstreet. Based on 100% facts, unlike the twisted tale that the defense spun. I didn’t think his closing argument could be out done, but it was in this rebuttal. Congratulations to your entire team and staff that took the time, efforts, and countless hours to bring the truth to the jurors. Nancy doesn’t deserve to carry the Brophy name. I hope the look of disbelief on Dan’s face, as he realized that the person he loved and trusted blew his life away, haunts her until she breaths her last breath. Of course it won’t, but I still hope that it will. RIP Chef Daniel Brophy. My heart goes out to you and your family and the many, many friends that lost you on that unspeakable day. Enjoy your retirement Nancy. Now you can lay in bed all day and do absolutely nothing. You’ll get your three square, carbohydrate ladened meals a day. You won’t have to cook for yourself, do your own laundry, or worry about those stupid blackberry bushes ever again.

I'm sure Nancy's attorney asked her not to take the stand. Huge mistake! Her "Memory Hole" just put her in the hole for life.

Guilty AF

Dang can we get s update or something

Now we wait ….

Overstreet manages to have almost a folksy presentation, very effective, considering he's wearing a suit and tie, and must convey a lotta technical, legal information. Keeps the jury engaged. Well done.

Can we also please give mr Overstreet some credit for his ability to rotate around his own hand at 24:35

The way that Nancy Narcissist used to say ‘Mr Overstreet’ like she’s superior when she was on the stand…. Well welcome to rebuttal by Mr Overstreet… Chin up Nancy.

I wish we could see the defense table during this!

I liked the bit Mr. Overstreet pointed out the defence tried to accuse Oscar as being the murderer. He just happened to know his way around the OCI and had the exact same gun as NB and only stole 1 bottle of wine and a candle. I think if it was him he would have 'filled his boots' with goodies and gone off to drink himself into oblivion. Nice try though!!

Guilty!!!!!

Would have been nice to have a verdict watch

whens the sentencing

No verdict yet.

Guilty!!!! I see LIVE.

Anyone guess how long jury will be out? I say less than 2 with lunch included.

The know it all imo didn’t factor surveillance into her murder plot.I don’t believe in coincidence.

"What's suspicious about them; they're walking?"

She bought the gun with an extra slide and she used that lost slide to murder Dan

This Judge is super pro Defence - he is also painfully slow

1:40 Interrupting the judge, great strategy Ms Defense 🙄

No verdict yet...this makes me nervous.

I fell in love with this prosecutor before I even saw how handsome he was - it was just from listening to his voice during cross ❤️

If there are less than 10 votes not guilty is it a mistrial and has to be repeated? The judge said there had to be at least 10 to be not guilty and 12 for guilty .Does anyone know? This seems confusing. I hope we get 12 guilty.

Does anyone know what she gets when she’s found guilty?

How can Nancy afford to pay all those lawyers?

Do you need a number to go drinking? Why do they have bar numbers?

Start 18:00

Poor husband when he shot in the back I bet he thought I hope my wife is safe ( unless she said something an he know it was her shooting him)

This judge is awful

Brilliant rebuttal by the state. However, Mr Overstreet needs a better fitting suit

I hate this case, it has the longest discussions pre trial, blah blah blah

With juries so unpredictable these days even with the evidence overwhelming against Nancy in this case, I wouldn't be surprised with a hung jury or even a not guilty verdict. The prosecutor did a good job today. His closing arguments yesterday was rather confused and disjointed.

This prosecuted is a lier all the way.

I must be the only person out here who believes she's not guilty. I watched every minute of the trial with my husband, we're recently retired, not really knowing anything about this case. We both thought the defense did a stellar job, the prosecution not so much. Then I found all the comments on RU-vid and realized we are severely in the minority. We discussed how our opinion varies so greatly from everyone else maybe we are ignorant. Lol 😆 🤣🤣🤣 It will be interesting to hear the verdict. Now I have to find a new trial for us to follow!! 🙃

Not guilty.🙏🏻

I don't believe the Prosecution proved their case beyond a reasonable doubt. She may have done it. I just don't believe they proved it to the level that is needed in US courts. I watched the entire trial. I couldn't convict her.

Not guilty. Not enough concrete evidence. I think her lawyers covered it well.