I agree ... But I believe that many have made the same mistake in his place, knowing that their best friend is innocent. I don't want to defend Nancy, because for me they have to be professionals, but we all know that the police are prejudiced when the victim is one of them, and the only suspect is the boyfriend. Besides, JP had a good reason, to be a victim of George's abuse.
@@Not-Ap I would say confronting someone in a public place is ok, if it's not completely empty, knowing that he is capable of killing ... I think JP is just a victim of whoever killed George, Dean probably, but I don't think the police like it. that Nancy interferes with the investigation.
@@ShadowSoul92 No what I meant was how she was questioning him. It was way to aggressive and impatient. It made her seem like she didn't really care about him (which she didn't) and that does not lend people to opening up. If she been more patient and treated him with the same level empathy and kindness as one her close friendsor family (even it was fake) she may have got more out of him.
@@Not-Ap I know the saying "You catch more flies with honey than vinegar", we all know it. Nancy is impatient because she doesn't think she has time. For example, I don't know if you know the "To Catch a Predator" program, Chris Hansen used a technique similar to Nancy. The problem is, like Nancy, Chris Hansen was aggressive too. Obviously he had evidence to be able to be .. The substance does not change. A person cannot force someone to confess (not even a civilian), because the evidence they would gather would be extorted, and the police could not use it. To get someone to confess you have to be sneaky, have their trust, wait for them to tell you the events. It takes time, Nancy has none ...