Тёмный

Naomi Klein: No Is Not Enough (Bristol Festival of Ideas) 

Bristol Ideas
Подписаться 3,3 тыс.
Просмотров 12 тыс.
50% 1

Around the world, Naomi Klein argues, shock political tactics are being used to generate crisis after crisis, designed to force through policies that will destroy people, the welfare and regulatory state, the environment, the economy and security. For Klein extremism isn’t a freak event but a toxic cocktail of our times of which Donald Trump is part. ‘Trump, extreme as he is,’ Klein argues, ‘is not an aberration but the logical extension of the worst and most dangerous trends of the past half-century. He is the personification of the merger of humans and corporations - a one-man megabrand with wife and children as spin-off brands.’
Naomi Klein proposes her ‘toolkit for shock-resistance’ to reject the Trump megabrand, reclaim the populist argument, counter rising chaos and divisiveness at home and abroad and help build a fairer society and more sustainable world.
She speaks about her book "No Is Not Enough: Defeating the New Shock Politics" and answers questions from a Bristol audience. In conversation with Andrew Kelly.
Festival of Ideas is presented by Bristol Ideas. Find out more: www.bristolide...

Опубликовано:

 

7 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 19   
@DavidWilliamsaz
@DavidWilliamsaz 7 лет назад
The list of Western leftists who once sang the Venezuelan government’s praises is long, and Naomi Klein figures near the top. In 2004, she signed a petition headlined, “We would vote for Hugo Chavez.” Three years later, she lauded Venezuela as a place where “citizens had renewed their faith in the power of democracy to improve their lives.” In her 2007 book, “The Shock Doctrine,” she portrayed capitalism as a sort of global conspiracy that instigates financial crises and exploits poor countries in the wake of natural disasters. But Klein declared that Venezuela had been rendered immune to the “shocks” administered by free market fundamentalists thanks to Chavez’s “21st Century Socialism,” which had created “a zone of relative economic calm and predictability.” Chavez’s untimely death from cancer in 2013 saw an outpouring of grief from the global left. The caudillo “demonstrated that it is possible to resist the neo-liberal dogma that holds sway over much of humanity,” wrote British journalist Owen Jones. “I mourn a great hero to the majority of his people,” said Oliver Stone, who would go on to replace Chavez with Vladimir Putin as the object of his twisted affection. Most of Chavismo’s earlier adherents have maintained a conspicuous silence in the face of the Venezuelan calamity. Those who do speak up, rather than apologize for getting things so wrong, blame collapsing oil prices for the country’s fate. Yet the decline in the value of petroleum has not led to rioting on the streets of Oslo. The tragedy of Venezuela is the predictable result of what happens when a strongman wages, in Chavez’s own words, “economic war on the bourgeoisie owners,” cracks down on media, prints money with reckless abandon and implements all manner of harebrained socialist schemes. Socialist economic policies - price controls, factory nationalizations, government takeovers of food distribution and the like - have real human costs. Eighty percent of Venezuelan bakeries don’t have flour. Eleven percent of children under 5 are malnourished, infant mortality has increased by 30% and maternal mortality is up 66%. The Maduro regime has met protests against its misrule with violence. More than 100 people have died in anti-government demonstrations and thousands have been arrested. Loyal police officers are rewarded with rolls of toilet paper. www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-kirchick-venezuela-pundits-20170802-story,amp.html
@bluegold21
@bluegold21 7 лет назад
My mother has just had new carpets put down. The strip of metal that makes the join through doorways is for the most part free of lettering. Except between the kitchen and hallway. Upon that strip is the companies insignia. I asked my mother what she thought about this free advertising within her home. She said that it did not matter. I told her that she was not paid for this advertising within her home and yet she still did not care. Her apathy to marketing is the norm as people don't want to make a fuss about something which would take too much emotional effort to change and might "annoy" ( the man-metaphor ) the system. Does anyone know the law on such marketing within the home?..UK.
@shamrockshore6308
@shamrockshore6308 7 лет назад
+bluegold21 Regards company advertising within your mother's home, I'm not aware of any precedent challenge in law, but I think you may have a threshold case. Personally speaking, I believe there should be no logo :-)
@earlgrey3660
@earlgrey3660 7 лет назад
Bristol Parkway station!!!!!!!!! I feel genuinely sorry for her. Nobody should have to use that dirt hole monstrosity. Apologies Naomi, from a Brit person...
@mr.timjohnston546
@mr.timjohnston546 4 года назад
And who wouldn't welcome just a lovely creature
@Thaddeus28
@Thaddeus28 2 года назад
Pablem
@englishmuffin4640
@englishmuffin4640 7 лет назад
Klein's weakness is on growth as it appears a couple of times in this conference, where she seems to be incapable of explaining the contradiction between pro-regulation and anti-growth "in the long run"-- how much is ok to sacrifice?
@gabriel38g
@gabriel38g 7 лет назад
Pro-regulation is not anti-growth. Your argument is based on a false assumption.
@englishmuffin4640
@englishmuffin4640 7 лет назад
Pro-regulation assumes its place unchallenged by market forces, if not the uncertainty of the future, when the consequences threaten growth, short or long.
@gabriel38g
@gabriel38g 7 лет назад
So regulation that ensures safe drinking water is anti-growth? Regulation to make sure that a bottle of aspirin is in fact aspirin is challenged by market forces? this isn't stifling growth. it's ensuring safety and a fair marketplace. 'Anti-regulation' is just Rich jerks who want to pollute and commit fraud.
@englishmuffin4640
@englishmuffin4640 7 лет назад
If businesses attempt to pollute, in a free market, they will be subject to the same competition that everyone signs up to and lose customers, outcompeted by competitors. But my question is how do regulators draw the line? Regulation only begets more regulations because regulators do not create market-- at the end of the day it's their job to regulate isn't it.
@gabriel38g
@gabriel38g 7 лет назад
It's amazing how somehow the free market is supposed to solve everything and nothing ever gets solved. Tax cheats keep cheating, water keeps getting polluted, people keep getting defrauded and the only answer the market provides is more de-regulation. I got an answer, start throwing polluters in jail. Instead of regulating markets, criminalize them. Put people in jails and shut down businesses that don't comply. No more fines, only jail. That's where you draw the line. Free markets don't exist anywhere but your imagination and a textbook written by a chump economics professor.
@Thaddeus28
@Thaddeus28 2 года назад
Naomi is full of criticisms but empty of ideas...
Далее
Аруси Точики ❤️❤️❤️
00:13
Просмотров 389 тыс.
IT'S MY LIFE + WATER  #drumcover
00:14
Просмотров 15 млн
Naomi Klein, "No Is Not Enough"
58:50
Просмотров 39 тыс.
Naomi Klein and Joseph Stiglitz on Economic Power
1:02:19
Modern Times: Camille Paglia & Jordan B Peterson
1:42:48
Sir Roger Scruton: How to Be a Conservative
44:46
Просмотров 1,5 млн
Naomi Klein: Big Tech's Pandemic Shock Doctrine
59:43
NAOMI KLEIN'S KEYNOTE "THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING"
1:05:54
Аруси Точики ❤️❤️❤️
00:13
Просмотров 389 тыс.