Natasha Hausdorff, international law attorney and UKLFI Charitable Trust Legal Director, discusses misconceptions about Israel and the law with Rabbi David Ingber of 92NY.
you will be surprised if I tell you that US is the conductor of this choir of anti-Israel Jew-hate, and that no one would even try this lawfare unless it was approved and in some cases, promoted by the US?
Do not go onto Fox Media, the pro terror progressive politicians, universities, college students, professors, administrators never watch that channel. Granted CNN, MSNBC would probably not be welcomed, they’re haters.
Thank you for creating and sharing this video. I recall when I was 7, while waiting to see an orthopaedic specialist, reading a Newsweek magazine highlighting mayoral elections in Palestinian enclaves within Israel. This article covered the terror, torture and murder of moderate Palestinian candidates, and their family members, which recognized the existence of Israel, by groups like the PLFP. I knew even back then, after watching tiny Israel survive the onslaught levelled against them during the 6 Day War, that God was with them. I will always support and defend the legitimacy of the existence of the State of Israel. Am Yisrael Chai.
The brilliant courageous Natasha. What a fantastic talk! Thank you so much! I despise and condemn anyone too scared to hear truth, wisdom and knowledge. I try to share your sense of hope, although it feels quite impossible at the face of so much hatred and such insane malicious blood libels against my people and myself.
Knowledgable, intelligent, brave and beatuful! This woman is our treasure! Based on facts and supported by examples, Natasha's explanation clears out all the smoke around this war.
Natasha appears to delight in being challenged @20:05 with the opportunity to defend her position against someone playing devil's advocate. It's a sure sign that she's well prepared, well informed and confident that truth is on her side of this argument.
Egypt threatening to tear up the peace treaty, when they got the Sinai back for peace, wow definitely wasnt worth giving that back then. Already been disappointed with Egypt for not allowing in refugees, so the civilians could get out of the way from the fighting. and for obviously ignoring the smuggling tunnels into Gaza.
The whole formula of "land for peace" is a self-delusion. Look at the streets of Egypt and Jordan. Look at the gleeful candy parties when that Jordanian murdered Jews. Peace cannot be achieved via a concept of appeasing a bully with one's lunch money. It's not about land, but about religion, and whoever thinks otherwise is perpetuating violence.
land for peace in the middle east doesnt work, unless you mean take land for peace. tribal mentality is a nightmare that israelis have to deal with as a fact of life
Jordan was part from palestina. When britain received the mandate over the region they gave the eastern part of palestina to the Hashemite family from Saudi arabia for they help in first world war. Most jordanian are palestinian
As Natasha noted, Self-Determination is enshrined in international law, and the Palestinians have every right to that. However, the right to self-determination does not confer borders as the Palestinians want those borders to be. As it stand now, they want everything east of the green armistice line. They will need to negotiate any future borders as there is no escaping it as they are trying to do through legal means (lawfare)
Arabs from gaza, Judea, Samaria and East Jerusalem should move in Jordan, which has been created in the breach of British Mandate in 2022 and consists of 75% of the territory which has been intended for Jewish National Home.
Wrong, the Palestinians are Arabs, Arabs already have 21 states. One of them is Jordan, which sits on 75% of the territory of what was used to be called Palestine. Most importantly, the Palestinians already have autonomy, which satisfies the requirement for self-determination. I would add that the way they run their autonomy proves that they do not qualify for self detarmition. Why would anyone want to support another despotic regime, run by barbaric terrorists without any human rights or aspirations for civil developments?
The Arabs don't talk about the jews refugees from Arabs countries that came to Israel after they suffered from pogroms and Humiliation in the Arabs countries and the jews really lived in the Arabs countries for generations not like most of the Arabs that arrived to palestina in the 19th century. The number of the jewish refugees from Arabs countries are 850000 more than the Arabs refugees from palestina. Some examples from pogroms in Arabs countries in 1941 in Iraq the pogrom called the Farhud. In Morocco in 1912 the pogrom in the city of fez called the Trital. In 1948 the pogrom in syria in the city of alapo in Yemen in 1948 in the city of Eden, and in 1948 in Morocco the pogrom in the city of ojda.
Natasha is brilliant as usual. I still wonder how the "Uti Posidetis Juris" come to an end in this case. Natasha mentioned peace agreement, but surely Palestinians can no longer claim all Palestinian territory as described in the partition plan of -48 even though the "snapshot" is from May -48? Large areas taken/retaken in the defensive wars -48, -67 and -73 probably needs to remain Israel territory for security reasons. What does international law say about ganing territory in a defensive war? To me it seems reasonable that the attacker loose territory for every war they start. At least if that is the way the war end. The other option is that the attacker always get the territory back if they loose, which I find preposterous. If a country is attacked I think the desired outcome is that the Attacker loose territory whenever possible. Edit: /retaken
You start from a great misunderstanding: You say that the "Palestinians can no longer claim all Palestinian territory" The only legal Palestinian territory is the land which Israel has given to them through the Oslo Acord. Of course, they now might face a situation where they will lose some of this land, and they will have to learn to live with that or not.
@@lomgaleThan you for the answer. Just a clarification. The "misunderstanding" is the question, not a statement. It's very unclear to me what teritories "palestinians" actually claim or may have a legal right to claim. It was the bit about "Uti Posidetis Juris" and "snapshot from -48" that got me even more confused. As I understand it, if the Arabs had not started the wars there could be negotiations about territory borders as mentioned in the partition plan of -47 to resolve the "Uti Posidetis Juris". As I see it the wars changed that, or at least they should have in my opinion. Arafat proclaimed a palestinian state in -88, some 5 years before the Oslo accords. As territory he proclaimed something like 'anywhere Palestinians reside', which I believe is not in accordance with how states are legaly proclaimed. As you explained they actually had no territory to proclaim a state in. That means they should not be considered a state at all, which would be the most correct interpretation as I understand it. After the Oslo Accords they did have the areas Israel gave them, but still not a definitiv state.
Natasha Hausdorff is intelligent, articulate, charismatic, passionate, and highly knowledgeable in International law. We are so lucky to have her. Am Israel Chai. 💙🤍🇮🇱⚖️👏💪
Natasha as a supporter of Jews, i hate the word settlement and settlers. It's makes no freaking sense. Israelite should stop using that word, it's makes them looks bad, First of all, You cannot be a Native or indigenous of the land of Israel, then also identify yourself as a settlers, You cannot have a settlement on your own indigenous land. Such double claims makes Jews & Israelis looks bad. You cannot called an African American who decided to moved to live in Africa a settler. Google the word settler
You're mistaken. Settlements in Hebrew means cities, towns, villages, and kibbutzim. So, for example, Tel Aviv, London and New York are cities, ערים, but also ישובים, settlements.
@@lomgale I understand that 💯 but You have to understand that people around the world don't see it that way. They understand it in the English translation as foreign occupation, this gives the legitimate reason for Arabs that claims to identify themselves as a Palestinians and unfortunately this is why many fools are against Israel and Jewish people. Words matters. The English Meaning is different from the Hebrew meaning and English is a global language.
12:24 thank you!!! I was only remembering half of the explanation my Dad gave me 20yrs ago. I forgot about the Spanish/S. American aspect/origin. Thanks!!!!!
56:34 Sinai is FULL of empty hotels, ever since ISIS was there tourism has died and it was a very big business in the past, you could easily evacuate dosens of thousands of gazans easily, and the rest could enjoy the lovely red sea, but nope
