David Daniels… one of my favorite expositors of scripture. The love of the pure Word of God is so apparent. Sometimes you just know who you can trust… you can see truth shining on their face. Bless you , Brother, with the peace of God and the abundance of His providence.
@@michaelcontreras148 Matthew 23:9 KJV [9] And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. Yeah, Jesus didn't found that church lol
I was raised with a New American Standard Bible. When I switched to the King James Version, it was like a whole new world opened up to me. I was getting the “Meat”. Now I won’t read any other version. They have been changed… dumbed down! I talk about the Bible, and people look confused. Because they’ve been taught wrong. Most don’t even read properly. They get confused by punctuation. Our society has gotten dumber! Great video. I’m so glad that you know proper grammar. 👍👏
I see scripture as the important stuff. Books that aren't i just see as history that goes in deph but is not necessary to know. Kind of like a fun fact
@@ToOpen6seven what proof? If anything where there is a "pile" of evidence to support the human claim, there is a mountain of evidence to support that the sons of God in the Old Testament were not human. Here are some Biblical examples. 1. Salvation was not available in the Old Testament. 2. The Spirit was not given to dwell in followers of God until after Christ was glorified. 3. Outside of Adam (man) who was created and not born, no human in the Old Testament is called a son of God. 4. In the Old Testament, no son/s of man/men/mankind are referring to Cainites or unbelievers. 5. The Nephilim who are unclean could not be the offspring of a believer and a nonbeliever. 6. Women are given a word of caution about wearing symbols of authority on them because of the angels. 7. The Hebrew and Greek words for sons of God and daughters of men do not go with the human idea. 8. Calling on the name of the Lord in the Old Testament could not give you salvation. 9. A prophecy cannot come true before it is spoken. 10. The law (first five books of the Bible) are a shadow on the good things to come (the New Testament), not the very things themselves. 11. The Nephilim were not around after the flood. 12. Sacrifices could not wash away sin, only cover sin. 13. Following the law could not bring salvation. 14. Jesus states angels are sons of God and we (believers) will be equal to them. Before Christ's Sacrifice, human followers of God were lower than angels. 15. Cain being the father of the sons and daughters of men and Seth being the father of the sons and daughters of God makes absolutely no sense. 16. Using Cain and Seth to say humans are sons of God in the Old Testament completely neglects Adam and Eve's other children. 17. Sacrifices were used to get right with God in the Old Testament. 18. If salvation was just for the Jews in the Old Testament, then how were there gentiles special to God? 19. Saying the sons of God in the Old Testament are human erases the covenants of God as well as the need for God to send a Priest. 20. People misunderstand the verse Hebrews 1:5 when they use it. 21. Human followers of God can only be adopted children of God because of Christ's Sacrifice. 22. Baptism is also a part of salvation, yet you will never find it in the Old Testament. 23. Angels are not ghosts. They have bodies. 24. Angels have taken human form many times in Scripture. 25. Angels are called spirits in Scripture and God is called the Father of spirits. 26. Angels are called sons of the Mighty in Scripture. 27. Scripture could not be fulfilled if salvation was always available. 28. "the Holy Spirit indicating this, that the way into the Holiest of All was not yet made manifest while the first tabernacle was still standing." 29. No man is justified by the law (Torah, first five books of the Bible) in the sight of God. And if righteousness came from the law, then Christ died in vain. The law is not of faith. If the inheritance is of the law, it is no longer a promise from God. 30. "Before there was faith there was the law" and the law could not give salvation. 31. Jesus states that we (believers) will be equal to the angels, sons of God. Yet how can this be if only humans can be sons of God? Especially since before Christ was glorified, all humans were lower than the angels.
@@tonyf4991 God's has imposed His natural law that all creation reproduces after its own kind and is emphasized 11 times for a reason. Are men and angels the same kind? Hebrews 1:14 says angels are 'ALL' ministering 'spirits', whereas mankind are all mortal flesh... vastly different. ~ John 3:6; “That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." God is the Creator of ALL life and holds together ALL things, angels cannot independently produce life. It is ridiculous to believe that angels can overrule God and his natural law of reproduction. Also, if angels were able to incarnate and actually become men and then marry women and produce offspring, then that would contradict what Paul says to the Greeks in Athens, namely, that every person that has ever lived came from Adam, totally refuting and debunking the Greek mythology of humans having relations with the gods and producing hybrid offspring such as Hercules. From 'one man' he made ALL the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands. Acts 17:26
Wow, I can't fully articulate how much I enjoyed and how much I appreciate your scholarly study and explanation of this text! I have battled for years with the interpretation and implications of the "sons of God" account in Genesis. Many debates have I engaged in; many moments of critical analysis and doubting. This video was really great. Thanks!
So where do Giants and Nephilim come from? Even today, people who see angels say they are 7-9 feet in stature. Also, we don't know what all God did to the Earth which brought about the flood. Scientifically, if there was a much more vast atmosphere it's vast amounts of hydrogen and oxygen as scientists presume, and the continents were closer together as both history and the Bible States before God divided the continents, and if our magnetic field was much stronger, it is totally not outside the realm of possibility that godly Man had an electric resonance which was similar enough to that of angels that they could interact with them. It is scientifically possible that God powered down the core of the Earth to reduce that resonance, electromagnetic field, and gravity which in turn caused such turbulence in the atmosphere as the Earth expanded that the hydrogen and oxygen became mixed, formed water, and literally poured down out of the sky like fountains. Therefore, creating a barrier between humans which now resonate at a lower frequency and the angels which resonate at a higher frequency.
Robert Lipscob - I assure you that fallen angels are NOT the sons of almighty God since he NEVER called angels his sons & daughters anywhere in the bible.
@@mishkakasalapiy3222 Judaism and Christianity have different beliefs, moses the author of gen while paul the author of hebrew, so many calls of an angels in ancient times, in the first place they do not believe in Jesus the only begotten son of God..
Robert Lipscob to make that argument is to say that God is so cruel that He would give His angels the physical equipment to rape mortal women. It would also make Jeshua a liar when He told the Sadducees that in the resurrection, they are “like the angels of God” (Matthew 21:30)
@@OneTrueVikingbard angels can take on physical forms as shown throughout the Bible , you have to realize that these are beings can enter in an out of this dimension, and when they do, they take on a form that can operate or translate properly with whatever plane their on
The Angels at Sodom and Gomorrah weren’t desired for being Angels in human form. They were two new men there. And the people wanted to sodomize them, because that’s what they did. It had nothing to do with how they looked. Sodomy is anal sex with another man. This is why God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah.
You were speaking about angels as spirits and that they cannot be flesh...Genesis 19 shows they ate...they were seen as men...they were angels. Can you explain that?
he says : how can a spiritual being mate with a physical being. he cant find it anywhere in the bible. ok but God manifested in the flesh...... God ( spirit) manifested in the Flesh ( physical) . this is proof he doesnt understand. but iron sharpens iron
Not only did the angels had physical bodies, the men in the city wanted to have relations with them. Not that they were successful. That pretty much destroys his question if angels can take on human form and mate. The bigger problem is anytime you ask a bible question that only uses human intellect to answer, you are not understanding God by the Holy Spirit. He is asking us to lean on our own understanding to interpret the Bible.
NIce teaching its 3/31/2024. This question was on my mind, who are the Sons of God I was drawn to your video. Thank you. You saying scripture only is what grabbed me.
Thank you. Very clear teaching about what happened, by whom, and what it means. Not many will preach on this subject. Thank you for your courage. Thumbs up.
This video has crippled my belief in mr. Danels following the truth. If he really wanted to believe the king James bible he would believe the word of God says "sons of god" that always describes in the bible Angel's or direct creations of God that are able to be in heaven. And they "came in to the daughter's of men" and had babys. That is the words of the book. Without adding anything from any other source or twisting some blood line or other contrivance.
"And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day." Jude 1:6
Their estate is their position & their presence of being within God's good presence. Yes they left that estate but not their given being so by rebellion they and their human counterparts became the vessels of his wrath(god's justificatory presence)so that God can show the riches of his grace to the vessels of his mercy.
And if you read verse 7 it specifically says theybwent after strange flesh is so clear there was something that happened that God was very much opposed to. Good point this has always been a passage that clears up a lot of missunderstandings in the subject.
@@mikeskrib510 that verse 7 speaks clearly about the people of Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities in the plain but not about angels, the people are those who went after strange flesh (maybe animals or their same gender counterparts) but you can clearly see verse 7 is separate from verse 6.
@@chetanpaulr bro is comparing what the angels did with what the people in Sodom and Gomorrah were doing they were going after flesh that was different from their nature IE animals like you said or same sex. The angel compared to this exaple did the same thing went after strange flesh ie human beings. In context 7 is clarifying what was being talked about in 6 just cuz they are separate verses doesnt mean they are not related to the same topic. Is okay like Daniels said you can beleive whatever you want in the end scripture always wins out.
@@mikeskrib510 ok good scripture always wins and I believe it says that every righteous person in those times got mingled with ungodly people and the fallen entities helped them in bringing up the gaints and nepahlim (the fallen ones) and none remained righteous save Noah , so I believe in scriptures where Jesus says angles do not marry or be given in marriage neither they have that potential so I believe angels some how messed up with the gaints genetics indirectly but not directly by mating with women(because they don't have reproductive systems like us do and some people experience of having some sexual experiences through demonic entities and that doesn't prove they have reproductive parts like us, you know they are demons they can decive everyone by having some of us feel by something they don't have) they somehow managed to mess up the genes of those godly men and ungodly women so that's my view even the word GAINTS do not necessarily mean of size but in terms of knowledge and power and brutality yet I believe some may exist in size also and the word NEPAHLIM refers to the fallen entities not necessarily gaints so we should carefully read and understand the overall picture of what happened. SATAN(Allah aka Hubaal) brags about being "the best of decievers" quote by Allah in Islam, so there you go they like anything except the truth
and God also by his grace and his pure word in the last king James bible gave me the honor of bringing my mother and sister to his saving grace and out of the false catholic church. god bless
Jude 1:6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
It wasn't by having sex with women and causing ones who were half demon and half human to be born. No where in all the Bible is such a teaching ever supported.
@@bobbyadkins6983 The bible does not say "half demon and half human". It does say that the sons of God mated with human women and produced giants. Genesis 6:4 There were GIANTS in the earth in those days; and also after that, WHEN THE SONS OF GOD CAME IN UNTO THE DAUGHTERS OF MEN, and THEY BARE CHILDREN TO THEM, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
I'm often amazed at how vigorously some Christians obsess and defend their stance on Genesis 6. That if you don't hold to their "view" you are little better than a heretic or "poor bible student".
+Mark Hunter Some people love the word of God as their only real defense to the lies in this world and some people don't. If you have a particular argument with someone then argue with them, but please don't be here just to accuse about those things vaguely and apply them to those in the other camp. They would do the same if anyone took the blood out of Col 1:14. David himself said, before he fought the giant (or was he just a "great leader" - according to Daniels) is there not a cause.
+Mark Hunter Yeah well, then sit on the fence. Order some popcorn and boo both teams. What can I say to those who can't handle the meat - drink the milk.
Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them. Job 1 6 KJV ... the sons of God are angels ...
The phrase "Sons of God" has a wider meaning than you want to imply. We are all the Children of God through Christ Jesus our Lord. The Context of this text is limited to the life and experience of the human sons of God. The sons of God in this context are are all human beings.
@@errolhenry9546 The context can not change sons of God, in Jude 6 those sons of God the fallen angels are still sons of God though going to hell. Their origin as first created by God will never change, they were sons of God only in this limited, specific sense.
The dispute is cleared up in one passage.. GV Hebrews 1:5 For unto which of the Angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day begat I thee? and again, I will be his Father, and he shall be my Son: is that the only scripture you have read in Job??? Key word is 'before' It is mentioned many times before Job men, tribes, etc. in feasts etc coming before God. Making it clear that it is not talking about being in heaven with/before God. Exodus 18:12 And Jethro, Moses' father in law, took a burnt offering and sacrifices for God: and Aaron came, and all the elders of Israel, to eat bread with Moses' father in law before God. Judges 20:26 Then all the children of Israel, and all the people, went up, and came unto the house of God, and wept, and sat there before the Lord, and fasted that day until even, and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings before the Lord. List goes on.... also have you ever bothered looking at the Hebrew definition of angel?? *smh @ the laziness of so many! Just because so many are pushing the '' fallen angel' nonsense it doesn't make it correct! Angel..מֲלְאָךְ mălʼâk, mal-awk'; from an unused root meaning to despatch as a deputy; a messenger; specifically, of God, -- meaning i.e. an angel (also a prophet, priest or teacher):ambassador, angel, king, messenger. this is all pretty simple and some how was all corrupted to something it is not with the '' fallen angels'' nonsense. Nephilim is not in KJV or Geneva etc..but if we look at the Hebrew meaning we find using Strongs concordance giant means- נְפִיל nᵉphîyl, nef-eel'; or נְפִל nᵉphil; from H5307; properly, a feller, i.e. a bully or tyrant: meaning -giant. (which is why Geneva, KJV etc put it bluntly - GIANT and not Nephilim..) look up what a feller is gada` gaw-dah' a primitive root; to fell a tree; generally, to destroy anything:--cut (asunder, in sunder, down, off), hew down. I can't imagine who started this deception of fallen angels having sex with women but who ever did knew exactly what they were doing to cause confusion and discord in Gods word/people.
What the preachers say is that the sons of Seth married de daughters of Cain! But The bible doesn't say that cain have daughters, but lets supposed that Cain had daughters and that if Seth married the daughters of cain, whom did Adams other sons and daughters married? Génesis 5:4. And the days of Adam after he had beggoten Seth were eight hundred years: And HE BEGAT SONS AND DAUGHTERS:
@@shahnazzareen2351 you know what the people who claim that the daughters of men and the son of God were cains daughters and the men were the sons of seth, dont stop for just a minute and asked themselves, where are women name in cains line, and what they over look is that adam had others sons and daughters, so whom did they married to?
David hi. Im saddened and disappointed you did not correct this. Its very easily understood all adams children were created in the image of adam and were called sons of man. Until Jesus Christ died on the cross no man born of adam could be a son of God. As it is a clear understanding that accepting Jesus Christ as our savior we can become sons of God. Showing and proving that prior Jesus Christ dying on the cross no man born of adam could be a son of God period. It would seem a man so bent on his education would want to get this right. And not hold fast to a false doctrine. Especially a doctrine that denies the power of the cross and Christ Jesus. I do pray you fix this error brother. As even a child can clearly see this truth.
Well done. The answer was so obvious and in plain sight. Kudos. Some won't agree quoting Jude or Peter, but those verses speak of angelic rebellion against God not mating with humans, which is just a fanciful idea.
And you will notice the skeletons are between 7-13 ft tall ... these were HUMAN. We still have giants too, look it up on youtube - lots of pictures going back to 1900 and earlier...
Please read the Book of Enoch. It is not extra biblical. In the Book of Jude it is referenced and quoted. Knowledge of the Giants and Nephilim was common to believers at that time.
Did you see what he did there with Gen 6:4? He split one verse into two verses to make the giants come before the mating of the sons of God and the daughters of men. So, is Daniels going to come out with his version of the King James now and is he going to renumber verse 4 with a 4 and a 5, or will he just follow what the new Bibles do and put it in another paragraph with no verse marking? Or will he have to join it in the next verse like the JW's do in their Bible? Can't wait to see how he's going to pull it off.
The phrase "Sons of God" has a wider meaning than you want to imply. We are all the Children of God through Christ Jesus our Lord. The Context of this text is limited to the life and experience of the human sons of God. The sons of God in this context are are all human beings.
Angel..מֲלְאָךְ mălʼâk, mal-awk'; from an unused root meaning to despatch as a deputy; a messenger; specifically, of God, -- meaning i.e. an angel (also a prophet, priest or teacher):ambassador, king, messenger
Dr. Daniels, your teaching on the pattern of the Daughters of Men is interesting and holds some truth, topologically. However, there are some questions you did not answer. You answered who the daughters of men are, but... Who are the giants? Where did the giants come from? Who were the mighty men/men of renown? Why do the words "sons of God" in other books of the Bible seem to denote angels, like they do in Job and Psalms, except for John 1? Finally, is this not the Seth lineage teaching or at least another form of it? Hope you can answer these questions as I find this matter intriguing. God bless :-)
The title 'sons of God' does apply to humans in the Bible: ‘...”You are the sons of the living God.”’ (Hosea 1:10) and ‘”You are the sons of the LORD your God...”’ (Deut. 14:1). Goliath was a giant also, but he has ordinary parents.
@@BRIrwin Except it doesn't say "sons of God" exactly. Note there are extra adjectives ("living", "LORD") in the verses that you quote and if you believe every word is inspired, it indicates a separate group.
Sam Garcia, it does not have to say 'sons of God' exactly. Human languages are not like that. How do you think the two extra words 'the living' alter the meaning in any way? In the NT, Jesus is given the names 'Jesus', 'Christ', 'Lord', 'Jesus Christ', 'Christ Jesus', 'Lord Jesus Christ', etc, but all these names refer to the same person.
@@BRIrwin "Human languages are not like that." Yeah, but the Bible is very specific because it says every word is preserved. "How do you think the two extra words 'the living' alter the meaning in any way?" If you don't believe every word is preserved, then there's no difference. However, the Bible is very clear that each word and each difference, however small, needs to be taken into consideration. (Hebrews 4:12) So, with that in mind: Every instance where "sons of God" appear in those words ONLY and EXACTLY are angels or angelic beings in the Old Testament. Every instance where the phrase has an addition refers to men ONLY. So we see clearly that the Genesis "sons of God" are angels, because we see all others that are exactly said like that are called angels. The only times we see where it diverges is when it talks about men. This is a more literal explanation, and prevents speculation whether these are men or angels, the Bible provides the distinction. " In the NT, Jesus is given the names 'Jesus', 'Christ', 'Lord', 'Jesus Christ', 'Christ Jesus', 'Lord Jesus Christ', etc, but all these names refer to the same person." But it is NOT proven that "sons of God" ONLY refer to ONLY men or ONLY angels. Hence your analogy fails. We have to dig deeper, and the difference in phrasing is what distinguishes them: "sons of God" = angels, "sons of"+(something)+"God" means men.
@@BRIrwin Also this statement "Goliath was a giant also, but he has ordinary parents." is actually not proven anywhere n the Bible. Nowhere in the Bible does it say Goliath had normal parents.
Is 1 Enoch a heathen or pagan book? Peter and Jude didn't think so. In fact, Jude quoted from this book directly, and each clearly allude to the Enochian interpretation of Genesis 6, which has the Sons of God as divine beings (see Jude 6-7).
Angels have Free Will, and I'm Sure if they have A lot More Knowledge then Humans do, since they were created before mankind. It's also hard to believe that they wouldn't know how to mix their DNA with humans and create a Hybrid being.
Paracas, Peru has overwhelming evidence in Juan Navarro museum..... And it also Biblical.... DNA Manipulation is what it is..... Didn't satan tell Eve that she would be like God knowing right from wrong? Not only in Peru but also in megalithic Mexico, Egypt, Baalbek Lebanon etc..... These architectures can't be duplicated now even with all our technological advancements......
@@johndisalvo6283 Scriptures are not clear about it. We can just speculate. We know that before flood situation will repeat. Genetical manipulation with food, animals and man is underway today.
@@holychristian9297 the genesis six narritive properly interpreted is not a "salvation by grace replacement", which is what you referred to withTimothy . The problem caused by those entities is apparent...and supported in and out of scripture.
@william Tolbert The quotation of Enoch in Jude is inspired, but the so-called Book of Enoch is no better that the Gospel of Thomas or the Gospel of Judas. It has no authority.
@@Mcfirefly2 im not in agreement with tom horns view. I mostly disagree with his view, his hyperbole is over the top, im suspicious of his angle overall. The Bible on its own needs no embellishments with regards to gen 6 and its implications..
Job 38:4-7 4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. 5 Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it? 6 Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof; 7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy? So you can see the sons of God were there before Adam
That is is the only place in the bible (Job) that shows this, and if you did a study on it in hebrew, you would find this does not mean angels at all. Any other place in the bible clearly shows that the sons of God were and are God's children. Why people continue to want to believe this false doctrine, which basically says that the Lord God is not all powerful.. is sad. Think this through... I used to believe this nonsense too...until I saw the evidence in the language of the text saying otherwise. The book of Enoch is the book that says the son's of God are fallen angels... (if you believe that book- up to you - I don't).
@@SHEvans I guess we will find out on judgment day but seeing as how what I put as a comment is in The Bible I guess you should assume it is true right ?
Where did the Giants come from? You did not answer the most important question? "GIANTS" you know the six finger and toe fellows, What private parts do Angles have.?.....Ha!. You Do not Know. You make a comment about the Angles and you answer the question with no real answer...Have you seen any angle to verify you answer..? When Jesus compares The ANGLES and Marriage are they the Good Angles or the bad ones. Another thing you cant verify in you mind. Your whole talk was about how mans thoughts became evil, because he went after bad woman. You avoided the whole Giant thing. Angles do not have to have the same private parts to make things happen. What about man today messing with his genetics and animals and blending them. Do you think Angles are smarter then men. By the way Angles can transform themselves did you know that in which you did not talk about. Here is one for you, Genesis 19:3 And he pressed upon them greatly; and they turned in unto him, and entered into his house; and he made them a feast, and did bake unleavened bread, and they did eat. Notice the word "THEY"..................... HUM!......!!! Angles eating Bread, How do you explain Spirit Angles eating mans food. Food for thought. No Pun Indented HA! I like that you defend the KJV but in this you look uneducated on this topic
146 truthstreet Jesus said the angels are neither male nor female, I don’t need to be looking in their pants to see what’s there. And how did the dinosaurs grow so big?
The Bible tells the men if God, The teachers of The Word to avoid foolish and unlearned questions which only genders strife. In Genesis 6: The text don't give where gaints came from, it only states that, there were gaints in the earth in those days. Period... Now I speculate that if people were living for centuries , 500 to 900 years old, i can believe their were gaints, now if you read and study further you will find that there was the sons of Anak, the father of Gaints . Gigantism is not because of falling angels but is physical biological growth.
Has everyone forgotten about Job 1:6 where the sons of God came before God and Satan came also? I have always felt that these were definitely Angels, therefore I have always understood the passage to be talking about Angel's.
@havesomething tosay, May I explain the sons of God in Job, this is often used to promote angel/human hybrids? ~ Job 1:5-7; "When the days of feasting had completed their cycle, Job would send and consecrate them, rising up early in the morning and offering burnt offerings according to the number of them all; for Job said, “Perhaps my sons have sinned and cursed God in their hearts.” Thus Job did continually. Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan also came among them. The LORD said to Satan, “From where do you come?” Then Satan answered the LORD and said, “From roaming about on the earth and walking around on it.” Job and his sons (sons of God) are consecrated presenting their burnt offerings (sacrifices) and themselves before God for forgiveness of sin. Satan was among them (remember the Lord asking where he has come from, and he said Earth). That is just like Satan hanging around the faithful trying to trip them up and accuse them. The next four verses Satan describes Lot's blessings and God's hedge of protection for Lot. So we know Satan was with Lot and sons when they presented themselves before God. This isn't angels presenting themselves to God in heaven.
The following verse is the correct translation of Job 1:6 which the NIV got right. " "One day the ANGELS (not sons of God) came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan also came with them. And here is a verse stating angels are not sons of God and will never be sons of God. Hebrews 1:5 For to which of the angels did God ever say, “You are my Son; today I have become your Father"? Or again, “I will be his Father, and he will be my Son"?
@@gramps5157 I will trust the accuracy of the Hebrew 'bene-ha-Elohim' (sons of God), in which you are correct that they are NEVER angels. It is evident that the NIV Bible goes straight to the LXX which is the Greek interpretation of the Hebrew text that was written hundreds of years after the Hebrew. The problem is the LXX has decided 'bene-ha-Elohim' are angels, but it literally means bene (sons) ha (the) Elohim (God). The NIV and NLT both prefer the LXX for their Bibles over the trusted Hebrew, and many people consider these translations as paraphrases. Job 38: 6-7; is another example of the LXX missing the symbolic meaning of this passage by inserting 'angels' into this verse. ~ Job 38:6-7; Or who ‘LAID’ its 'CORNERSTONE'? 'WHEN' the morning stars sang together and all the 'sons of God' SHOUTED FOR JOY? ~ What is the 'cornerstone' or who is the ‘cornerstone’? JESUS ~ 'WHEN' was the 'cornerstone' laid? AT PENTECOST WHEN THE CHURCH BEGAN. ~ Isaiah 28:16; "Therefore thus says the Lord GOD, “Behold, I am 'LAYING' in Zion a stone, a tested stone, A costly ‘CORNERSTONE’ for the foundation, firmly placed. He who believes in it will not be disturbed." ~ Zachariah 10:3-4; "For the LORD of hosts has visited His flock, the house of Judah and will make them like His majestic horse in battle. From them 'WILL COME' the ‘CORNERSTONE’. ~ Who are the morning stars? ANGELS ~ Revelation 1:20; “As for the mystery of the seven stars which you saw in My right hand, and the seven golden lampstands: the seven ‘STARS ARE ANGELS’ of the seven churches, and the seven lampstands are the seven churches." ~ Who are the sons of God? GODLY MEN The Bible uses the term 'shout(ed) for joy' 64 times referring to Godly people, there is 1 time a reference to nature (the trees, fields etc.), it NEVER refers to angels 'shout, shouted or shouting for joy.'
OK David Daniels I'll give one thing you are getting people to think about this topic. Genesis 6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. Question 1: Why is the word " in " used when the sons of God came in unto Question 2: Why is the words " the same " used the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. OK the Giants where created HOW? " when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men" Why the word " in " David Daniels
I disagree on this topic. You mentioned having to imply what the text is saying, but I think you are doing the same. Consider . . . First, the Sons of God is only used in the Genesis 6 passage, with the exception of the NT passages when believers in Christ are called sons of God. It is never used again (that I can recall, anyway) when speaking of Israel or any other people, if that is who it is supposed to be speaking of in Genesis 6. God calls Israel His people, but not His sons. If it was specifically referencing a group of people, it would beg the question as to why God wiped them out in the flood, but saved Noah and his family because he was "perfect". Since there are none righteous, and all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God, it couldn't have meant that Noah was in perfect obedience. And if Noah and his family were the only ones to survive the flood, how did the Giants come back on the scene and end up dwelling in Canaan? Remember that Israel encountered the Giants. The Giants did not spring up from Israel's harlotry with pagans. It also begs the question as to how Goliath attained Six fingers and six toes, and the Giants were not viewed as offspring of mere humans, but as gods. Even Egypt has historical documentation of a time when they claim the gods lived among us. And does "Nephilim" not mean "fallen ones"? Also consider the Titans of Greek mythology. Their mothers were human, but their fathers were gods. Referencing this may or may not be a stretch , but that idea had to come from somewhere, as well as the increasing idea that ancient civilizations with a vast technological knowledge either had lived here before, or had visited here. There are just too many Eerie similarities for all of this not to somehow have a possibility of tying together. Second, it says Daughters of men, not Daughters of pagan men. There is a clear differentiation between sons of God and Daughters of men in Genesis 6 that is not used in the other instances you spoke of. This is partly why I say you're implying it into the other situations. Third, Israel mingling with the daughters of pagans did not bring about Giants in the land, and the Giants were specifically mentioned within the context of Genesis 6, and the "also after that" statement seems to play out when Israel encountered the Anunnaki, Zamzummim, Og of Bashan, etc. at the Promised Land, prompting the 10 spies to reference themselves as being grasshoppers in the sight of those dwelling in Canaan. Fourth, the Sons of God are mentioned again in Job when it refrences the angels.
Does Al this really matter that much? Consider this, nomatter what, all the corrupted people got drowned right ? So where did the evil come from after the flood ? This needs to be the question. Remember only Noah and his family were saved.
@@peterocha7341 there's more to it than that. When it says that Noah was just and perfect in his generation, it didn't mean that he was without sin since all mankind is corrupt down to their very core by sin. But it all does, in fact, matter because it is evidence that God rightfully judges sin and is only withholding His final judgment because of Grace, but that His long-suffering will not last forever. He's giving man every last chance to repent before the final judgement takes place. At that point, there will be no Second Chances.
Ok first, if Noah were corrupted by those (son's of God) regardless of who they are. He wouldn't have been able to preserve the uncorrupted seed that was to bring in the seed of Christ., Ok evil came back through Noah's son Ham. And through him Cannon got cursed. And through cannon came Nimrod. And it says that Nimrod was the first to become a giant on Earth after the flood. I suppose it means in a fallen state like that, he is corrupted but also he's a nephillim / a giant.
your videos have been a great blessing to me. I just wish some people could could disagree without being disagreeable. thankyou please keep up the good work.
Mark 9:50 King James Version 50 Salt is good: but if the salt have lost his saltness, wherewith will ye season it? Have salt in yourselves, and have peace one with another.
@@debbiemartin2026 [Totally LOST] scribes and pharisees, that's how I see what IS today's professing "church" leaders and their followers on a world wide scale who lead themselves & their blind followers into the ditch. Sad news: the entire church has lost its savor, good for NOTHING but to be trampled on by men.
@@debbiemartin2026 Don't get hung up by the rapture nonsense.. there is more to life than living in fear that you might not make it. (We are supposed to live in perfect peace and blessed assurance in Christ.) There IS a catching away but we really have no idea when that is, or could the catching away be something that's outside of time and space. Nevertheless, remain simple & unobstructed in your child like faith & walk, and please walk away from the doctrines of men including the rapture doctrine which has many bound to the devil, a damnable heresy which is promoted by money loving wolves in sheep's clothing and by "spiritual" imbeciles. I have left the church life, I have no fear of doing that or even any guilt. I believe God has shown me that THIS very generation of what is called the church are what Psalms refers to as the dissemblers. Namely, it's all pretence! And don't listen to anyone no matter how "holy" that person appears to be if they say "we are a bible believing church". Big deal! Even the devils believe and THEY even tremble, but very few and rare indeed are there any humans who tremble.
I love Chick Tracks, but you need to examine this topic again. There is mountains of evidence that the Bene Elohim ("Sons of God") in Genesis 6, who took human wives, were beings from Heaven. Daniel said in chapter 2 that in the last days, "they" shall mix their seed with the seed of men. That makes total sense when you understand Genesis 6, that there were giants in the earth in those days and after that WHENEVER Bene Elohim came into the daughters of men. The Bene Elohim cannot be human for many reasons, not the least of which is the following scripture that says they sang for joy when God created the earth! "When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?" Job 38:7 And before that in Job 1:6 and 2:1, it says the Bene Elohim presented themselves before God, and Satan came too and presented evidence against Job. I've met Jews who think it was their ancestors in God's Council who ruled the world and who God called gods, but that's just arrogance in my opinion. Then there's Psalm 82 where God stood in the congregation of the mighty and judged among the Elohim, condemning them for how they abused the human race, then he sentenced them to death, saying that now they die like any human. The New Testament scriptures speak of believers becoming son's of God, which is a reference to how we shall be like Jesus when he appears. Well, that hasn't happened yet. Then there's the fact that the Greek word translated "only begotten" in John 3:16 is "monogenes," which is derived from two other words: _monos_ meaning "only, unique" and _genos_ meaning "kind". So, Jesus is the one of a kind Son of God, and that was an important distinction to Jews because God of the Bene Elohim in the Old Testament .
"Daniel said in chapter 2 that in the last days, 'they; shall mix their seed with the seed of men." Yes, I agree because we are told that in the end it shall be again like the days of Noah. Genesis 6 is the days of Noah and the GENE pool of GENEsis had become a cess pool ...
The phrase "Sons of God" has a wider meaning than you want to imply. We are all the Children of God through Christ Jesus our Lord. The Context of this text is limited to the life and experience of the human sons of God. The sons of God in this context are are all human beings. Also Daniel's prophecy seed/decents is used to show a distinction between nations and peoples of humanity. The seed of men in this context are those outside of the Roman/feet of iron i.e. the clay.
@@errolhenry9546, the interpretation that the sons of God in the OT refers to angelic beings was held by everyone until the third century AD when some apostates mocked the church for believing this, then some writer in Egypt countered them by inventing the idea that they were just some guys.
Excellent study and thank you so much for posting it. Years ago I stumbled on this heretical doctrine through a book written in the late 1800's by a man named G.H. Pember...called "Earth's Earliest Ages". I didn't understand quite a few things like studying, etc. and so I was easy prey. I believed this man - until someone pointed out Matthew 22:30. It is absolutely amazing to see the word of God poke a hole in every lie that man can come up with - if we would just be as the Bereans and search the scriptures - a lesson that I had to learn - we would not be in the dark about these things. God bless you David Daniels and all them that love the Lord Jesus Christ in truth.
"Angels of God in heaven." Not angels of God on earth. The ones who disobey God wouldnt follow His will so they arent included in this verse or else it would have said all Gods angels.
@@truthisfreedom8039 "The ones who disobey God wouldnt follow His will so they arent included in this verse or else it would have said all Gods angels." Oh, wow! Nobody's ever heard _that_ "objection" before! Now, whence do you learn that angels are capable of procreation with women? Nowhere in the Bible.
@@djengo77 you mean other than the part where it says the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men? Look at the oldest book 'Job' to get an idea who the sons of God are. Also look every other time that phrase is used in the OT. If it were only men it wouldnt have needed to specify that it was sons of -God- daughters of -men-. Also if they were godly men from seth, why would God have the isrealites kill them all? Why wipe them out in the flood? Why would men and women mating make giants?
@@truthisfreedom8039 You wrote: _"you mean other than the part where it says the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men?"_ Begging the question is not going to help you sell your anti-Bible silliness. You wrote: _"Look at the oldest book 'Job' to get an idea who the sons of God are."_ Please, tell us: _Whom does the book of Job tell us the sons of God are?_ You wrote: _"If it were only men it wouldnt have needed to specify that it was sons of God daughters of -men-."_ Huh? You wrote: _"Also if they were godly men from seth, why would God have the isrealites [sic] kill them all? Why wipe them out in the flood?"_ Huh? What do the Israelites have to do with the events of Genesis 6, 7, and 8? You obviously have no clue what you're talking about, seeing as no Israelites were living on the earth until centuries after the flood. Also, you just contradicted yourself by claiming that the Israelites killed all the people whom, as you also affirm, the flood had already wiped out. You wrote: _"Why would men and women mating make giants?"_ What do you mean by _"giants"?_ Clearly, you either did not watch even so much as five seconds of this video, and are speaking out of inexcusable ignorance, or you are a shameless, lying troll.
Sons of God was a common term to refer to angels (Job 1:6, Job 2:1, Luke 24:35-36) Angels can take on human appearance and behave like physical humans, such as eating and physically touching people (Genesis 19:3, Genesis 19:10 and 16) Demons left their proper domain and went after strange flesh, which is why they are imprisoned currently (Jude 6-7) These imprisoned demons are the spirits that Jesus proclaimed His victory to in prison during His time in the grave. These demons are described as being disobedient during the time God was patient while Noah built the ark (2 Peter 3:18-20) The Nephilim (giants) appear before the Flood (Genesis 6:4) and after the Flood (Number 13:33), which means either Noah was a Nephilim (not likely since Nephilim were evil), or the way to make Nephilim transcended the Flood (demons) Therefore, when Genesis 6 says sons of God took women to be their wives and had wicked, monstrous children, it only makes sense to say demons manifested as human men and had children with women, which is what produced the Nephilim. That’s the only way to explain how they can transcend the Flood.
Hebrews 1:5 For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?
+David Daniels Can i ask you sir if it is your understanding from scripture with discernment from the Holy Spirit that; All the 'SONS' of God are all Human/Mankind ??
Not every human being is a son of God but only a direct creation by him can be and is a son of God. So both angels and humans can be son's of God It goes like this first every angel is a direct creation of God so by nature they are the son's of God but Satan and his minions rebelled that estate and fallen so they are taken not to be son's of God so they are not but Adam is a direct creation of God in his image but he fell too same as Satan so he too got ridden of that estate and every human being followed after the image of Adam not of God so not every human being is a son of God but we Christians being born again in spirit into God by God for God are a new creation directly by God so we are called son's of God So the term son's of God can mean both human and angleic beings and both can be get ridden of that title if they choose so so by nature becoming the vessels of Gods justificatory presence i.e his wrath so that he can show the riches of his grace to the vessels of his good presence i.e son's of God
Thank you David for helping me to understand this, I followed along with you in the kjv and I believe you've got it correct. Thanks again. PRAISE JESUS!!!
In The Book of Jude, Chapter 6 " And the angels which kept not their first estate,but left their own habitation,he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgement of the great day". I am asking what habitation did these angels leave? And to what other habitation did they go? Please explain...
They left heaven because God cast them out. Lucifer,(Satan)along with 1/3 of the angels led a rebellion, and were cast out. . They can never be allowed back in heaven. Ever. The giants in the earth, men of renown, are like the Rockefellers and and the 1% of the 1%. Hell is the other habitation.
Their own " habitation " is not location or a physical place but it is a moral spiritual condition that is Holiness or holy. A holy God can only create a holy being so when the angels that were under Lucifer ( Satan ) ( one third of the total number of the angels ) followed Satan they sinned or became unholy therefore leaving their original " first estate " .
I like your channel and see that you have a thirst for the wisdom of God. Sir you are deceived on this topic. You should understand that books have been removed from the Bible by the Catholic Church, two of such books are the book of jubilee and the book of Enoch.. both of these books detail the accounts of these events.
Thanks and good teaching. Based on the new testament you are indeed correct. (John, Romans Philippians and 1 John) . I do notice that in the OT (Genesis and Job), "sons of God" are those that "came to present themselves before the LORD and Satan came also among them... AND "shouted for Joy when the morning stars sung together... Do you think perhaps these are references to making sacrifices at the alter and Satan lingered around while they did?And believers HEARD the Angels singing together and "shouted for Joy" accordingly? Thanks
Thank you for this v-log Bro. Daniels! This is something that I have studied and i have literally asked those same questions to which those who believe the angels/women fable cannot answer!! Very good points! God bless! :)
pray for our brothers. there is not much of us. we are all wrong in terms with interpreting the schriptures. dont kick the man down........pick him up!!!!!!
One has to ask what is meant by angels not keeping their “first estate.” Those particular angels will be judged very harshly in the future, for having done this. So it does make me wonder what kind of violation was committed here? And Noah was found perfect in his generations. I’ve heard that that could mean his genes, or seed. I do believe your argument makes a lot of sense, as well. But it’s hard to get past how all of that information about the giants, sons of God, and daughters of men are all in the same passage. That would seem to denote some kind of connection in thought. Gen 6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
The correct interpretation of Genesis 6: 4 There were tyrants in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the children of God came in unto pagan woman, and bare children unto them, the same became powerful men (the elite - think Rothschild), which were of old, men of renown. The giants in the bible were human - 7-13 ft - which we still have by the way. In addition, before the flood there was a lot more greenery - more oxygen all over the earth - oxygen makes things grow TALL. This would be why there were so many more giant's then - plus people lived to around 900 years before the flood.
Sorry you are correct in one sense but not in another! You are looking the issue in a pre- convinced mind and with very little scriptural knowledge Atleast in this area of issue humans and angles are totally different beings "humans are made lower than angles" says psalmist so obviously angels are a little higher than us Atleast until resurrection when we and angles will be alike in being but higher in authority according to Jesus, and Paul's epistle's can also confirm this , so for now angels can only APPEAR in human forms so as to help us to see them and they can't perform the reproductive part because that gift given only to us humans by God even if they eat ,drink they don't do it for themselves or so, that they took human forms so as to survive that will be ridiculously over thinking they only appear to do so not for themselves but for us who are seeing and having conversations finally,they only appear as humans because we are made lower than them in being they have advantage to appear and not appear,but they will not and cannot function as we humans do that final thought case closed
Viewing this in its entirety (before preemptively commenting my thoughts on some replies), the more I am seeing it in Brother Daniels’ view. No doubt that the sons of God could pertain to angels but in Genesis 6:4, giants existed even “before” the sons of God came unto the daughters of men and bore children with them. Hence, Satan will find any wiggle room he can find to have his sons create forgeries based on real biblical names (possibly 1 Enoch) in order to try to deceive the elect. You only have to listen to Daniels’ 20 part series of ancient manuscripts (Codex Sinaiticus etc.) to get a better understanding of that. I am thankful for how thoroughly he was able to break those down. Remarkable. In terms of the Nephilim, I think lately we have heard so much of the possibility of a angel-human union that many of us are having a “tooth fairy effect” if you will, in which it isn’t real but the reward or feeling is, in that we kind of want this to be genuine because it seems so fitting and a bit intriguing due to its mythology-likeness we are so familiar with because of other books and movies etc., but it is not and we should stop fooling ourselves and going after “other books” that attempt to masquerade as one of our own. Stay the course with the KJV.
It astounds me how ignorant people are to believe that Angels came down and mated with humans. Yes, they could take physical form, but they were still, non sexual spiritual beings. I thought it was absurd the first time I heard a Christian say that. People seem to associate The sons of God referring to Angels in Job to the sons of God in Genesis. The sons of God were the seed of Seth. There were other people in the world, these were the men referenced. Cain said whoever sees me will slay me. Who? The men of the world, not the seed of Seth.
How did the "Holy Spirit" impregnant Mary with Jesus? The Holy Spirit is not flesh and bone? Have you read Jude and Peter concerning the angels that fell?
Excellent! Absolutely excellent! I've been teaching this for years, just haven't been able to upload those videos to the internet. Thank you brother Daniels!
According to this view, the ‘sons of God’ of verses 2 and 4 are fallen angels, which have taken the form of masculine human-like creatures. These angels married women of the human race (either Cainites or Sethites) and the resulting offspring were the Nephilim. The Nephilim were giants with physical superiority and therefore established themselves as men of renown for their physical prowess and military might. This race of half human creatures was wiped out by the flood, along with mankind in general, who were sinners in their own right (verse 6:11,12). My basic presupposition in approaching our text is that we should let the Bible define its own terms. If biblical definitions are not to be found then we must look at the language and culture of contemporary peoples. But the Bible does define the term ‘the sons of God’ for us. Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, Satan also came among them (Job 1:6). Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan came among them to present himself before the Lord (Job 2:1). When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy? (Job 38:7, cf. Psalm 89:6; Daniel 3:25). Scholars who reject this view readily acknowledge the fact that the precise term is clearly defined in Scripture.87 The reason for rejecting the fallen angel interpretation is that such a view is said to be in violation of both reason and Scripture. The primary passage which is said to be problematical is that found in Matthew’s gospel, where our Lord said, “You are mistaken, not understanding the Scriptures, or the power of God. For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven” (Matthew 22:29-30). We are told that here our Lord said that angels are sexless, but is this really true? Jesus compared men in heaven to angels in heaven. Neither men nor angels are said to be sexless in heaven but we are told that in heaven there will be no marriage. There are no female angels with whom angels can generate offspring. Angels were never told to ‘be fruitful and multiply’ as was man. When we find angels described in the book of Genesis, it is clear that they can assume a human-like form, and that their sex is masculine. The writer to the Hebrews mentions that angels can be entertained without man’s knowing it (Hebrews 13:2). Surely angels must be convincingly like men. The homosexual men of Sodom were very capable of judging sexuality. They were attracted by the ‘male’ angels who came to destroy the city (cf. Genesis 19:1ff, especially verse 5). In the New Testament, two passages seem to refer to this incident in Genesis 6, and to support the angel view: For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but cast them into hell and committed them to pits of darkness, reserved for judgment; (II Peter 2:4). And angels who did not keep their own domain, but abandoned their proper abode, He has kept in eternal bonds under darkness for the judgment of the great day (Jude 6). These verses would indicate that some of the angels who fell with Satan were not content with their ‘proper abode’ and therefore began to live among men (and women) as men. God’s judgment upon them was to place them in bonds88 so that they can no longer promote Satan’s purposes on earth as do the unbound fallen angels who continue to do his bidding. The result of the union between fallen angels and women is rather clearly implied to be the Nephilim. While word studies have produced numerous suggestions for the meaning of this term, the biblical definition of this word comes from its only other instance in Scripture, Numbers 13:33: There also we saw the Nephilim (the sons of Anak are part of the Nephilim); and we became like grasshoppers in our own sight, and so we were in their sight. I therefore understand the Nephilim to be a race of super-humans who are the product of this angelic invasion of the earth. This view not only conforms to the biblical use of the expression ‘sons of God,’ it also best fits the context of the passage. The effects of the fall were seen in the godly offspring of Cain (chapter 4). While Cain and his descendants were ‘in Satan’s pocket,’ Satan knew from God’s words in Genesis 3:15 that through the seed of the woman God was going to bring forth a Messiah who would destroy him. We do not know that the entire line of Seth was God-fearing. In fact we would assume otherwise. Noah and his immediate family alone seem to be righteous at the time of the flood. Genesis 6 describes a desperate attempt on the part of Satan to attack the godly remnant that is named in chapter 5. So long as a righteous seed is preserved, God’s promise of salvation hangs over the head of Satan, threatening of his impending doom. The daughters of men were not raped or seduced as such. They simply chose their husbands on the same basis that the angels selected them-physical appeal. Now if you were an eligible woman in those days, who would you choose? Would you select a handsome, muscle-bulging specimen of a man, who had a reputation for his strength and accomplishments, or what seemed to be in comparison a ninety-pound weakling? Women looked for the hope of being the mother of the Savior. Who would be the most likely father of such a child? Would it not be a ‘mighty man of renown,’ who would also be able to boast of immortality? Some of the godly Sethites did live to be nearly 1000 years old, but the Nephilim did not die, if they were angels. And so the new race began.
So if GOD bound these angels in hell, why is these last days as was in the days of Noa? Good bound them supposedly so they could not mate with woman, how can the Bible possibly compare the last days as in the days of Noah? This does not make sense to me. Did GOD unbind them?
Yes! "Because every conspiracy is simply a step in the outward manifestation of lucifers determined rebellion towards God as executed by his human agents..." The phrase “god of this world” (or “god of this age”) indicates that Satan is the major influence on the ideals, opinions, goals, hopes and views of the majority of people. His influence also encompasses the world’s philosophies, education, and commerce. The thoughts, ideas, speculations and false religions of the world are under his control and have sprung from his lies and deceptions. Satan is also called the "prince of the power of the air" in Ephesians 2:2. He is the "ruler of this world" in John 12:31. These titles and many more signify Satan’s capabilities. To say, for example, that Satan is the "prince of the power of the air" is to signify that in some way he rules over the world and the people in it. This is not to say that he rules the world completely; God is still sovereign. But it does mean that God, in His infinite wisdom, has allowed Satan to operate in this world within the boundaries God has set for him. When the Bible says Satan has power over the world, we must remember that God has given him domain over unbelievers only. Believers are no longer under the rule of Satan (Colossians 1:13). Unbelievers, on the other hand, are caught "in the snare of the devil" (2 Timothy 2:26), lie in the "power of the evil one" (1 John 5:19), and are in bondage to Satan (Ephesians 2:2). So, when the Bible says that Satan is the "god of this world," it is not saying that he has ultimate authority. It is conveying the idea that Satan rules over the unbelieving world in a specific way. In 2 Corinthians 4:4, the unbeliever follows Satan's agenda: "The god of this world has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ." Satan's scheme includes promoting false philosophies in the world-philosophies that blind the unbeliever to the truth of the Gospel. Satan’s philosophies are the fortresses in which people are imprisoned, and they must be set free by Christ. An example of one such false philosophy is the belief that man can earn God's favor by a certain act or acts. In almost every false religion, meriting God’s favor or earning eternal life is a predominant theme. Earning salvation by works, however, is contrary to biblical revelation. Man cannot work to earn God's favor; eternal life is a free gift (see Ephesians 2:8-9). And that free gift is available through Jesus Christ and Him alone (John 3:16; 14:6). You may ask why mankind does not simply receive the free gift of salvation (John 1:12). The answer is that Satan-the god of this world-has tempted mankind to follow his pride instead. Satan sets the agenda, the unbelieving world follows, and mankind continues to be deceived. It is no wonder that Scripture calls Satan a liar (John 8:44).
The word man is the Hebrew word Adam, this alone destroys your serpent seed nonsense. The offspring are called men thus descendants from Adam not Angels. Argument over.
I heard it referenced by Chuck Missler that the Sons of God are those beings that were directly created by God and not born of women. Adam and the Angels are in that category.
In addition to questions: with whom was God angry? Why was he angry? If perpetrators of evil were angels, shouldn't he deal with them? Did flooding the world solve the problems? Answers to these make sense if the sons are earth beings.
Something to think about: The Bible says that it is a special act of love for God to call anyone "the sons of God." 1 John 3:1 "Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not." If it is special to call us "the sons of God," does it make sense for God to reserve that term only for fallen angels? And Romans 8:14 says, "For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God." It doesn't sound like God uses the term for fallen angels, any more than unsaved humans.
+David Daniels The old testament uses sons of God for angels but new testament sons of God means believers (Job 38:6-7) "Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof; {7} When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?" I am pretty sure this isnt talking about us...adam and even werent even created yet. (Job 1:6) "¶ Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them." You think we humans came with Satan to talk with God? No...it was satan with his angels he took with down from heaven.
+David Daniels I would like to know who does actually say that the sons of God term is ONLY for the fallen angels. It clearly is for angels - especially in Job. Is this some sort of made up argument to build up some sort of false rhetoric and besmirch other's reputations? This is just getting thicker and thicker. Instead of answering false rhetoric why don't you answer some of the honest objections on here?
+David Daniels "It doesn't sound like God uses the term for fallen angels, any more than unsaved humans. " Yes, it convinces me. Why should God use or let to use the same name, denomination, for both the holy and devilish being/creatures?!! Show less "
The term Son of God is not something bestowed on this He loves but rather identifying them as His direct creation, ALL angels are sons of God as He created them, as he created Jesus, and as He created Adam, but no children after Adam are His sons but Adam's sons, and we by the new birth are His sons. When Genesis 6;4 speak of sons of God who came unto the daughters of men it is speaking of the angels Jude 6 speaks of.
It is easy (" my yoke is easy....") to understand, that the referenced "giants, and men of renown" would be equivalent to the 1% of the 1% of today men of "renown" like the Rockefellers etc. not necessarily renown in the sight of God.
Sons of God were mentioned in Job 38:4-7 KJV Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. [5] Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it? [6] Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof; [7] When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy? This is before the 6 days of creation, before Adam who was created on the 6th day. Hope this help clear up your confusion due to a wrong foundation Psalm 11:3 KJV If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?
Interesting question that arose after listening to you. If the offspring of men and women were structured the same as today (since there is no intermingling) then how did they create giants? I mean unless you change the term to mean something to a standard of one's view there is no reason to exclusively say giant for someone who is a little taller. There seems to be a DNA that was added to create 6 fingered and toed beings that were extraordinarily tall. Look at the book of numbers when "Gods people" say the giants who were not Gods people and they seemed like grasshoppers to them and reciprocally. These people were of Adam's lineage where as the giants were not. There was a difference in statue and blood line. The one of fleshly origin was obviously not God's. The true power comes through faith and hope in God not in mere physical strength and power which is Satan's lie and lineage. God made man perfect the way he was and to think that a 6 fingered giant is God's perfect will is flawed. Just something to think about. Also remember what Jude said about the Angel's being compared to Sodom and Gomorrah. It was a perverse SEXUAL sin they were compared too. God Bless and really read God's word. All of that being said, none of this should be something a Christian should focus on but instead be spreading the Gospel for those to hear salvation. We should not bicker about these things.
I must have missed something, did he ever address where the giants come from or why there were nephilim, or did he just defend the sons of Seth vs the Angels argument w/o giving the origin of the giants and nephilm, I'm not against what he taught , I think it has great teaching, but leaves the subject for which it is titled.
Son's of Seth theory not taught till the 5th century AD...means that everyone before that believed in the Angel theory. Also ask yourself what happens in 5th century? Christianity becomes blended with paganism and to not offend the pagans who worshiped these Nephilim gods...the Catholic church left it out.
The phrase "Sons of God" has a wider meaning than want to admit. We are all the Children of God through Christ Jesus our Lord. The Context of this text is limited to the life and experience of the human sons of God. The sons of God in this context are are all human beings.
You're making a fatal error here. It's not nephilm and giants it's nephilm or Giants Nephilm is the Hebrew word and giants is the English. Giants are not another species they are also Humans.
Angel..מֲלְאָךְ mălʼâk, mal-awk'; from an unused root meaning to despatch as a deputy; a messenger; specifically, of God, -- meaning i.e. an angel (also a prophet, priest or teacher):ambassador, angel, king, messenger. this is all pretty simple and some how was all corrupted to something it is not with the '' fallen angels'' nonsense. Nephilim is not in KJV or Geneva etc..but if we look at the Hebrew meaning we find using Strongs concordance giant means- נְפִיל nᵉphîyl, nef-eel'; or נְפִל nᵉphil; from H5307; properly, a feller, i.e. a bully or tyrant: meaning -giant. (which is why Geneva, KJV etc put it bluntly - GIANT and not Nephilim..) look up what a feller is gada` gaw-dah' a primitive root; to fell a tree; generally, to destroy anything:--cut (asunder, in sunder, down, off), hew down. I can't imagine who started this deception of fallen angels having sex with women but who ever did knew exactly what they were doing to cause confusion and discord in Gods word/people.
Very interesting POV. In fact, I would say that most of the people who reads the Bible at first have this impression. But I think the idea of "giants," "sons of God (Bene ha El-Ohim)," and "men of renown" fascinate us and gives to many "interpreters" the chance to mystify the Bible.
You're the guy who made all the cartoon tracts!? Dude, I LOVE YOU and your work! I remember reading them as a kid, which led me to the Bible, which led to my belief in Jesus! You have touched so many lives and I wanted to thank you! I know Nephilim means the fallen ones.That is why I only read the KJV, that voice bible is not translated correctly, and dumbed down ON PURPOSE!! I must disagree with you, The book of Jude says the angels left their 1st estate, they took the form of men, like those who visited Abraham and Lot, The book of Enoch tells the rest of the story (book 1), the giants were eating people, this went on for 1,000 years. This is the real reason for the Flood, The 200 angels who committed this sin were bound in chains and thrown into an abyss, I think this abyss is under the earth of Antartica-only because Buzz Aldrin before he passed(he was down there) said that a great Evil is down there.His words not mine what did he mean by that? Then a whole bunch of people including the pope and the Patriarch of the Orthodox church go there, WHY?
You quoted KJV as I will : 4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bore children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. This is all in one verse that sons of God with their wives had children. Seems extremely clear. So yeah if the Kjv says they did have children then I’m sure they had the body parts in some way shape and form to make this happen.
Mike Simpson im having having a hard time understanding weither you agree with me or not. But let me just add that more likely than not i tend to lean on the 40 scribes that translated the kjv. And i too agree that Sons of God, means that there were angles that slept with earthly women.
Mike Simpson so still dont know if you agree with my original point . So , can you be a little more direct. Not gonna add any new thoughts, so instead of pivoting , like Democrats do hahaha, just state your opinion, agree or disagree. Its ok to say ? Now i bet you are gonna address the Dem. statement and skip over or “pivot” from answering the opinion part.
Mike Simpson kjv says: and they bore children. And i didnt have to do research for that. Pretty straight forward. Bore is a old word but im pretty sure it still means that the child came from the “?” Angel that went in with them. So come on, unless your saying that in the hebrew that it says something different, which i do have a strongs concordance built into my kingjames. And its what i came up with.
The correct interpretation of Genesis 6: 4 There were tyrants in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the children of God came in unto pagan woman, and bare children unto them, the same became powerful men (the elite - think Rothschild), which were of old, men of renown. He went over this in the video.
(Jude 1:6-7) "And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. {7} Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire."
Allow me to interject, by quoting the answer found around the 10:00 minute mark. That is, where in the bible does it talk about other gods? Basically, right? And, who are they, these "gods" of the pagan nations? What is the influence of fallen angels upon humanity? The stories of Jupiter as a real god who gives birth to other gods, which then mate with women and give birth to demi-gods, is straight from the doctrine of devils. There's no secrete here: "But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to *devils*, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils." - 1st Corinthians ch10, v20. Cross-reference that, with these: Lev ch17 v7, Deut ch32 v17, Psalm 106 v37. The bible clearly states the relationship between pagan gods and Satan, then we clearly see why this message bothers followers of the occult. How? They incorporate it into their beliefs, because big deceptions are based on big lies. All *worldly* religion is a lie, a dangerous one at that. People are now suggesting that aliens are really just advanced life-forms, which abduct people, taking DNA samples from reproductive organs. The occult is heavily influenced, by UFO culture, and vice-versa. The link is clear, it is happening again. So were the days of Noah, so shall the end times be like it. But something else interesting about Genesis 6, (in verses 11 and 13), is that the people were violent. Why? Things are about to get violent. Are Christians prepared to die for their faith? Is our time come, for not being effective communicators, of the written word? If the bible is right, then some crazy stuff happened, and the book of Jude was almost left out, because they didn't understand how it would play out in prophecy. I think people over or under-estimate when Jesus will return, and all the failed prophecies of late breeds a certain level of distrust towards "Christianity". The beast overcomes the saints. We don't live, and we don't get raptured out. Fallen angels are the cause of religious wars, a difference in ideals so strong, that in many pagan cultures had live human sacrifices. The Mayan and Greek civilizations are perfect examples, though many are familiar with Molech from the KJV. Pagans don't know how in-danger they are, because they will suffer God's wrath. But so will we. We're all sinners, to be honest, and we kind of deserve it. No matter how righteous we think ourselves to be, we are living in a atheistic trans-human world, and it's our own fault. What is the alternate explanation to this?
