Never Forget the Brilliance of Roger Federer 

...and will ever exist. Fed's game was tennis's fulfillment. The greatest of 'em all.

Wimbledon 08 (arguably should have been stopped due to low light) Wimbledon 15 (wasn’t as close as 19 but he was right there).

Truth. Roger Federer is the best player we see in this Sport.

@@TheTheguywithnovideo He lost Wimbledon 2015 fair and square. Maybe you meant 2014.

@@masters.1000 2014 definitely, he double broke Djokovic to take the 4th set and had ALL the momentum. If he'd broken early in the 5th he'd have probably taken it. But Djokovic is a rock. USO 2009 definitely should've been his but he wanted to dick measure with the Delpotro forehand. USO 2015 is the 2015 tourney that he should've won. Any match you generate 23 break points as he did against Djokovic you should win. Absolute throw-job.

@@anonymousLeroyuso 2015 had way too many unforced errors from Roger. If you watched the match, you’d see he didn’t really “deserve” to win. It was actually quite a sloppy match from both. There’s countless other major finals and semi finals he lost that were bigger disappointments. Wimbledon 2008, USO 2009, USO 2010, USO 2011, AO 2009, Wimbledon 2014, Wimbledon 2019 to name a few. All matches that he thought he should’ve won before the match or just completely choked.

You absolutely NAILED the point there....THAT is why I consider him to be the GOAT. In all these years I've been watching tennis, I've never seen anyone pulling of the shots that Federer did (on a regular bases as well!).

@@yuppys Yep - agree totally. I've seen more great shots from his racquet than anybody else's...

Not was Roger still Is the best tennis player and also Man 💞

@@yuppyswell, no offense but some of the most brilliant shot makers are not all time legends. Monfils is a player who has shots not even Roger, or any other player could do. The difference with Roger is he’s probably the most elegant “great” player. But to call him the GOAT based on how pretty his shots are rather than the ultimate effectiveness of his shots is silly IMHO. For me he’s a clear #2, behind Novak and ahead of Claydal.

​​@@Mark-ut5oq I think you're onto it there: No-one combined so much style with so much substance, even though there are players with more of one of those qualities. On the style side, there are quite a few players who at least add something significant to the table: Monfils, Brown, Santoro, Kyrgios, Cuevas, Paire, Shapo, Del Poteo, Dimitrov, De Minaur, Dolgopolov, ... they're all capable of putting your jaw at your feet.

goat ? does not have a negative balance with 3 players with TOP 10, open your eyes and perceive reality. There is no bigger stat than head-to-head matches, so check it out

N.O.A.T anymore

agree, no matter he win or loose, I still enjoy his dances on every match, great player of all time

I mean the man still has the second or third best numbers of ALL time lol…

Pete never had a 40-15 at Wimbledon!

The one obvious shot choice that isn't gone are the dropshots, with Alcaraz being the prime executor but for me lacks variety, it's almost always on the back of a power shot.... Federer had greater guts going for droppers in more unexpected situations.

@@shafikmahomad3214well alcaraz lacks variery ? Not at all

spin like nadal

Nadal Yes but I don't believe Djoker had a mental advantage over Federer overall. Djoker and Federer head to head is not that far off. Until 2014ish, Fed was actually leading their H2H. I honestly believe that Djoker really got much better as he aged and Federer was losing some of his ability in his 30s and Djoker started beating him more consistently after 2014. From 2007-2014, Fed. usually had Djoker's number. People only remember the more recent stuff like Wimbledon finals and some of his US open defeats to Djoker but even when he lost to Djoker, they were always very close matches. Nadal on the other hand brutalized him early on on Clay which stayed in his head. Federer recently admitted to that related to US Open 2008 where he said that the game was already lost when it started as he was just crushed in French open that season by Ndal.

@@codegeek-il5fm some things are incorrect. Firstly, he lost Wimbledon 2008. Not US open. Secondly: Federer lost the h2h to Djokovic in 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013. And their only matchup in a slam in 2010 and 2014 went to Djokovic. After 2010, Djokovic started to turn the tide on the h2h. Federer never “had Djokovic’s number until 2014.” If you said until 2010, that would make sense. But in terms of who was winning more often, after 2010 Djokovic clearly was winning the majority of the time. In fact, from 2010-2014, the GS h2h was 5-2 Djokovic.

@@Mark-ut5oq I meant losing US Open 2011, 2015 to Djoker.

@@Mark-ut5oq Federer won their only GS match in 2009.

@@mantaishere that is just.............absolutely painfully wrong

The speed is the same for every point?

​@@RazOls1:57 to 2:06 is in fast forward

@Giangpro95 Ah yes, that point it’s because of copyright :/ Otherwise video Would be Blocked