New Evidence Against the Big Bounce Origin of the Universe 

Some would say more boring ... you'd say more realistic ... I say more useful. Thanks for doing what you do.

Thank you for being realistic. It's not boring, it's refreshing.

Where have you been all my life?! I love this straightforward, non-hype science news with great explanations. You got a new loyal subscriber.

That quantum repeaters repetition joke, though. 🤣

I've never been bored. My friends will call you dry, but I've always found every single one of your videos almost mesmerizingly brilliant. Thank you for doing what you do. You are my favorite science educator/journalist

Sabina,You always help me understand the universe a little better with every video you produce thank you

Your reports are absolutly NOT boring. You're one of the best science reporters on youtub!!

😲 You're not boring, Sabine! You're smart and funny and we love you! ❤❤❤❤

Dr Sabine, I am NOT tired of you going on about Meta-materials.

I thought Penrose does not speak of a previous contracting universe. I think he says that once that universe loses all sense of time and distance it can conformally transform into a new expanding universe.

There seems to be an idea that corporations are singularities at which money pops into being, rather than obtaining money from elsewhere by providing goods or services, or cadging subsidies from governments. If corporations had to pay somebody (us? Governments? Animal sanctuaries?), the money would ultimately come from us.

Es freut mich sehr, so viel Neues mit Ihnen zu lernen, Frau Doktor! 😊

Love your sense of humor , Thank you for the realistic update

Love your conversations with Albert.

Excellent broadcast, love hearing the truth without the grift by people riding a train without knowing where they are going, or coming from. Thanks, Sabine🌷

Currently reading Existential Physics, which is absolutely fascinating, and now found this channel, so happy! Thank you for engaging with a wider audience without "dumbing down" the information. Absolute brain food and I'm so glad to be a new subscriber.

After seeing the part about using water as a computer I’m starting to wonder if you could perhaps make a video about various forms of non conventional computing and theoretical computers other than quantum computers. Like for example how powerful could a fully mechanical computer be if it was built with nanoscopic components? Or how different a DNA computer would function compared to a digital one? Then there’s things like Ternary computing, Reversible computing and Stochastic computing. Maybe others would like that as well? I don’t know but it could be interesting.

Thanks for all the awesome science news. 😊 I appreciate all your hard work and your thoughtful review.

So would we call hackers of water based computers "splashers"?

computing with water... we have done that, started with Lukyanov's "water integrator" (which was not a computer, more a calculator), until some time in the 80s when electronic computers became efficient enough.

Thanks for the news, Sabine! 😊 Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊

My neurons are experiencing entanglement right now. And they are threatening me with rebellion if I continue on this path of watching never ending speculation.

Your videos make me feel like I can have an, at least rudimentary, understanding of the topics.

Thanks a lot Sabine

I always love your reports, because it always presents things in a realistic way.

Thank you for another wonderful video! And yes, your skepticism is wonderful. It's extremely useful to balance out the general tone of starry eyed optimism that we get pretty everywhere else science is discussed.

Such a gentle, polite, and compassionate debunk. Great video as usual.

This isn't a criticism of past videos but you seem really on point in this video, makes it more engaging for some reason

Interesting news on using solitions to store and compute chaotic systems. I have just read through the paper and I am interested in when some practical work is done with optical and matter-wave solitons - it seems like liquid solitions are vastly easier to build and the results seem promising so far! The one timestep prediction on page 5 lines up amazingly with the experimental data (although I am not so sure how useful this information is - I don't have an understanding of the amount of error after just a cursory glance). Thanks for the share.

you got so much more comfortable vs old videos. Its like the confort level is correlated to the square of how many videos you make.

Many many thanks explaining things i don't understand in a way i can understand

Please review the density driven gravity hypothesis. You are amazing! ❤

“Somewhat of a stretch….” I love your knee slappers!!!

Sabine Hossenfelder, the Beauty of Science!

What a great introduction and first few minutes! That summary of run of the mill science news articles and press releases was superb Burst out laughing at the first phonecall - spooky

Sabine, I love your channels. However anonymity is a good thing, at least a certain amount of it is. I really like watching your channel morph into other branches of science. Kudos to you and your staff 👏 👍

Kudos for mentioning Weinberg's book, still the best way to learn GR. I don't think the people who run their mouths even understand the basics of Riemannian geometry.

Love it that Albert called to Sabine's news broadcast.

Thank goodness for a "realistic" view. I appreciate it!

Oh but I want the universe to be a big bouncy castle.

Am I going crazy or does the sound sounds pitched up a bit? It is a rough contrast to all other videos. Everything else is great like always!

Thank you Sabine. I never knew there was so much to be confused about. Keep up the good work.

Absolutely not boring! I'm always glad about a new video!

Did you re-record the audio for this video? If so, much respect, your dubbing/editing skills are top notch. If not, then how did you manage to get that ultra dry, close mic-ed sound, without using a clip-on? Inquiring minds need to know...

15:36 Hazel Henderson the economist proposed something like 40 years ago. It would be like determining the costs of say damage cars and trucks do to roads and tax them accordingly. Like trucks do a lot of damage to roadbeds, road surfaces, and bridges than cars, and the real cost is never paid by them or the companies that use them. It's an actual means of fair taxation. Thanks for posting. Way cool.

Thank you

I don't think your content is boring, I actually quite enjoy how straightforward and matter of factly you are, it makes things easier to follow and understand without it being dumbed down

Will the phone ring?

Imagine if there really was a big bounce and the universe is fully deterministic. Infinite repeating loop 😳

Loved it all. Good work. Your brain = awesome as usual.

I had to do an exam essay today on the thought experiment of Laplaces demon; examining determinism and implications on free will; I cited your paper where you mention Superdeterminism and I’m grateful to you for all you’ve taught me as well as probably giving me some extra marks for originality

I love the consequences created by charging oil companies for climate change as this will likely cause gas prices to reach $100/gallon, and flights go to $5000 to fly from New York to Chicago. Do any of these climate people realize the climate has fluxgate from the origins of time, and that the only real problem is that politicians are only really focused on making sure THEY CAN PROFIT FROM IT while we pay the bill?

Please stop the climate alarmism… You seem too smart to fall for that.

8:25 "it's like you can retweet Elon without reading what he wrote" this got a chuckle out of me. Thank you Sabine! ^^

Oh yes, I completely trust when a group of sociologists come up with something related to the physical sciences... 😂. Reparations... 🤦 And where do the geniuses propose that the reparations are going to come from? More fossil fuel production? You think sociologists would be more interested in, I don't know, fixing problems in society? Funny thing that... Can't think of a single social problem so far that has actually been fixed by a sociologist... All studies, and no results. 🤨

Show me someone advocating reparations and I'll show you someone who wants a payday, not solutions.

I'm really grateful that i get to learn from you

Thank you very much for the news.

First

I love your sarcasm: hysterical! Very entertaining!

Another excellent distilled roundup :>

I was so happy there were helpful arrows with a nice caption to tell me that Sabine was not being dismissive. I might have been confused otherwise.

I liked your caveat emptor ending at 01:43 mm:ss. I need to balance my defecit budget before I can support you directly or Ground News financially. Please keep up the good work, it's helping to familiarize me with the process of cutting through the hype around scientific papers.

Second! Good topics to discuss! Thanks for another great video!

Thanks for Sharing Sabine ☕

Glad to see you back with the science

Super interesting.

Thanks for the news update. I like this very much. And to be realistic is the only way things to go further, because in the end everything else fails but took amounts of money before. But as a suggestion, maybe you can look into older science news and see, whats going on with that TODAY, if there is anything. Would be nice to see progress in things newly found.

😀 Really curious and informative !!!

Uttering the words "science" and "a group of sociologists" in the same sentence without bursting into laughter is a testament to your skills as an actress.

They explanation I gave my youngest son was simple. The universe expands but eventually collapses as black holes which also combine and eventually contain so much energy they react and expand/explode.

Brilliant, love your show.

Not boring at all! 🔥🔥

Nothing like being impartially realistic and grounded on proven facts! Ma goyal! Keep it up!

Wicked sense of humor. Love it!

💖Sabine, you are divine. 💖

I loved this format

I haven't done the numbers (I don't think It is even possible), but I have a quite strong intuitions about it. Fossil fuel companies may owe US for the damage in the environment several orders of magnitud LESS than what WE owe them for the construction of our civilization.

Wow! New microphone! Congratulations!

Thanks for the video :)

This episode was packed

I would like to hear more about emergent gravity. I heard there is an old feynman lecture about it, then verlinde theory and then the role of unruh effect and horizon for all particles

3:30 Pearlman YeC: The way to reconcile steady state oscillation with the empirical observations, basic science and math is we are on the first plateau after a hyper-dense start. Also there is an approximate center of the entire universe, which approximates the visible universe. Which became gravitationally bound 4/365.25 (SPIRAL LY radius i) a fraction into history. reference Pearlman YeC for the alignment of Torah testimony, science and ancient civ.

I prefer your "boring" and as I agree realistic view on science news over what is spewed out by other places.

I was a big sci-fi and science fan for a long time, but got really tired of mainstream science news, where they make it sound like there's a life-changing breakthrough every week, and then nothing actually happens. This channel is not boring, it's actually exciting, because it covers reality, not some fantasy world where everything can happen, but nothing does.

#1 Source of Information based on understandable Facts!

Great Video!

Keeping its real. Another great video.

The water computers sound cool!

The elastic and rebound (shockwaves) characteristics of atoms has been long known, so yeah, interpretation is a huge factor in this model. Thanks for being realistic.

Fantastic channel!

9:14 it took centuries to go from mysticism and astrology to Aristotle, then to Newton, then to Einstein, then to Hawking. The “spooky action” happens with qbits whether we understand it or not, so ultimately it’s as inaccessible as predicting the weather or climate change.

I appreciate your "grounded" explanations. In a future video would you please explain "2-D" objects? How can graphene be called 2-D when it is one atom thick?

1. No it's not more boring. 2. I am not tired at all about metamaterials. Please keep going.

Keep it up Sabine

Sabine, you are a gift. I have what is probably going to end up a stupid question, but since it indirectly talks about a big bang scenario, I thought I would propose it here. What if the universe’s zero point energy were an elastic solid with a viscoelastic liquid suspended in it due to ripping energy apart from the underlying solid and coalescing into quanta from a plank scale event (a big bang) - an elastic solid/viscous liquid colloidal suspension with gravity being the relationship between the analog energy of the elastic solid and the quantized viscoelastic liquid? That could make space-time the elastic solid, could account for the randomness of black hole evaporation, account for effects attributed to dark matter, account for wave-particle duality, account for the expansion of the universe, and could account for the redshift(?) as well as potentially be the source of another big bang as quanta become unstable and then critical due to energy dissipation. Could then gravity be just a matter of conservation of energy? Your video 1 year ago on Where Did the Big Bang Happen reminded me of this question every time you showed that elastic-like reference to the expanding universe. :) The picture of this view in my mind is so beautiful, but I'd rather not just believe in beautiful pictures. This question has been nagging me for years. Please relieve my stress!

You are the master of periodic table of interactions: helium three to some far away ff series. It seemed like the table kept growing in notable possible properties to explore as I left chemistry b praying for a C-

I think it applies to a lot of situations to say that working out who is to blame is not a productive use of anyone's time

We, the people, are lucky to have you, Sabine. Never take your foot off their throats...

Incogni not available for Australia or New Zealand 😪