Thank you for the comparison that was perfect. I wonder if there's any way to read the same arrow on the same shot so there can be no discrepancy. Awesome stuff. Ty
@@BowHunterPlanet I mean having both machines measure the same shot. Both of them running at the same time. I don't even know if it's possible if they would get in each other's way. I only say it because no two shots on an arrow are identical because you could be applying a quarter of a pound more pull on one than the other. Differences in friction upon release. The true test of their difference is to somehow get them to both read one single shot so we know the data is identical going in and whatever they put out reading wise is the true discrepancy. Sorry... I'm a scientist, All I do is test things lol.
@@BowHunterPlanet If you took six shots with the same arrow same bow you would probably have an MPH discrepancy of a few miles an hour. So the shot measured by the second machine simply could have just been that variable that would have normally happened. It needs to be one single shot measured by both simultaneously. That will show the true discrepancy and eliminate the random known variances shot to shot.