People underestimate challengers so hard these days, i always prefer challenger mk 3 over leopard and abrams (second best apfsds at this br and reliable armor makes up for it) and its not as slow as people claim it is, it can maintain the speed on par with soviets and doesnt fall back too much, its role is a back liner and i know not many people like that role but challenger is best backliner in the game at that br.
@@jacobb-c7946 Ye it is a good improvement and all the Challengers are good tanks and I love them to death, but the 3 should be better and I want them to improve it just because it could be a God machine if they modelled it correctly. It’s annoying that the only fast Challenger is the 2E (not saying it’s bad)
There's been way more than just 5 prototypes that received DU inserts, and there have been multiple bugreports with a ton of sources on the matter. Gaijin is just refusing to fix NATO tanks. This isn't something new, Gaijin has nerfed tanks ahistorically, then presented with historical proof that the nerfs were wrong and still refuses to revert/fix them. @@arcadeians
its so nice to see the new Metal Beasts format. Things seems to be more fresh by that way instead of explaining above blueprint paper. Props to the editor team!
For anybody wondering, yes the Challenger 3 should be faster than it is in game, only the Challenger 2 TES has the 59kmph top speed, the rest without 15 tons of upgrades can go to 61 and the Challenger 3 is supposed to be faster (prob similar to the 2E) the armour across all versions should be thicker, and the mantlets should be tougher as well. It isn’t a bad tank but there are so many small problem areas that it really brings down the usefulness of any Challenger 2 when you’re trading speed for amour and that armour is modelled as average
Q: Will we ever see the french Leclerc XLR MBT in the game? I would love to, since it would bring the french top tier on par with the new top tier of Germany, USSR etc.
Oh my sweet summer child. The XLR is just going to be another Leclerc AZUR : a copy & paste, riddled with historical inaccuracies with as much armor as a light tank.
@@totolescargo Given its got a new round, the OFL 2, new thermals, reworked Modular composite armour inside the turret, and new Laser Warning Receivers, so no, if implemented as it is IRL it would be far from a direct copy of the AZUR
@@ExosphericalI think what he meant is that Gaijin will implement it horribly, so it likely won’t get any of the items you stated above. It will be identical to the S1 (just like the SXXI), with no spall liners, new armour, or round cuz “stats.” If the SXXI was implemented correctly it would be a great competitor to the 2A6 or BVM, but we’re just not gonna get the correct models I don’t think.
Someone already asked this during their stream, and i think they said it would do some dramatic changes to the graphic and stuff so they wont do that, atleast for now...
An armor upgrade for Challenguer 2 would be pretty good, it's the slowest MBT but has pretty bad hull armor. And TES and OES versions ERA on the sides is almost useless compared to russian vehicles.
Q. Will vehicles that recieved small modifications eventually be added into the game? Example: A M48 in vietnam that was modified to have a minigun mounted.
Will you make videos on how to use the camera on replay for us? It's quite a hard learning curve with little information out there about those camera shenanigans.
Can I get the name or the link for the songs that are playing during the shooting range? I find them pretty good and I want to listen to them more without the speech interrupting it.
2nd time asking :)).Question: I know you guys are adding a new Lithuanian vehicle ,,vilkas" but would there be more vehicles from Lithuania? a Lithuanian tech tree ??? and please add decal of Lithuanian armed forces and their battalions/brigade.
Are future Challenger tanks going to have identical suspensions, engines, cannons, etc - but also be 10-15t heavier? They'll have the same armor, but still be heavier.
So far all quotes for the speed are 60kph, aside from a typo on the original press release which quoted 60mph. The government articles have corrected the error but other videos and articles from the time of the announcement weren’t edited
Q: how should you use the Su25BMs R60 missiles? From my understanding (I maybe wrong) it doesn't have a radar lock so you have to just trust that the missile does it job.
when will j35xs get its ballistics computer lead indicator btw? its LITERALLY the reason it only has one gun, so they could fit the computer to make the lead indicator possible. PLEASEEE add it since we also dont get tracers for it
Question: If I take BOL pods, if I want to chaff radar misiles, should I spread the chaff evenly across my plane or should I make it as dense as possible?
