New Music Plugins That DON'T Suck, The Worst Apology & More (WNN) 

Y'all better give bro a affiliate link 😂

its... its so great. i love it lmaooo

based

👍

For some reason, I can't find the download using the link Weaver provided in the description. Any help? EDIT - I found it but no support for older macOS?! I and many of my friends would purchase this right now but it won't run on our systems! Many professionals stay behind an OS or 2 to ensure no issues with our hardware/software. If you can make it work on Ventura I'd gladly buy it as would a few of my colleagues!

yeah, I think my most expensive plugin is Infiltrator because Weaver Beats kept talking about it.. I had to try and was a short trial period or none can't remember.

@@josh_ari cost more to make that most of us will actually get back 🥲

It's such an absolutely braindead statement it's almost not worth thinking about. At least it would be if not for the fact it's coming from the CEO OF THE COMPANY AOE FARMING MUSICIANS! Anywhooo, yeah so Deadmau5 actually based as per usual...

Yeah, even you don't factor in the cost of equipment, the amount of time and skill it takes makes it valuable in and of itself, that's like the entire basis of intellectual property.

@@kidthorazine 💯💯💯💯💯💯

Yeah, I agree. Some song ideas take days to form:) That's money you're not getting from other work, especially for low-level producers.

😂

Spotify guy is such a piece of shit. Hope all the major artists will leave his platform at a point. Lets see how he will be doing without content.

@@Dipsiht I was pretty sure that one (and other options) only work on Windows, but it looks like this one also works on Mac. Hm, will see if I try it out! The websampler looks more convenient

You could grab audio via GeForce and other screen captures , like PicPick or even Voice Meter on Windows. Or meeting recorders like zoom loom OBS etc. but yeah web sampler is a nice price. I have a heap of trump crap I want to sample. Many ways to skin a goat:)

but what can you sample thats not copyright?

@@3DaveO Just transform the sounds so much that it's unrecognisable. Also, little vocal snippets from random (and small) youtube videos should be fine, I think

@@3DaveO I*ll just sample Weaver Beats

​@@3DaveOAlbanian sign language

@@aerrowqueing Yeah, it should be, but as soon as someone publishes it, it is copyrighted unless the sampler is for parody or education or research.

more like ass. i cant get it to run properly

in ableton , this is pretty easy to do . Not sure about other daws

the legality of what people sample is the responsibility of the person doing the sampling not the person making the plug-in. if people wanna illegally sample they’ll do it anyway and there’s an insane amount of people sampling that don’t try and clear it because it’s a hobby or they aren’t selling their music. your points kind of a non starter

​@@dxzzydxm5518 Yeah, but copyright laws can be pretty hard to understand, 95 years for published music or sheet music, 100 years for music/video before 1978. Then, there were the new laws +70 after all the original artists died. (corporations don't die - so they can hold music as copyright forever?). Everyone, including AI, learns from other people's music. It's a bit of a head-scratcher, isn't it? There are so many things that aren't copyrighted, and it's a bit of a mystery why. Is it fair use to use a 10-second sample from a movie? ( I say it should be because it doesn't affect the movie revenue if anything brings people to find it) EG 90s hardcore tech, I learnt of movies like Network 1978ish and THX1138 1974ish. Gangster movies etc You could always have to make your version, but then the movie gets not credited because small statements and sentences are not copyrightable. I find copyright too restrictive and too expensive to find out if you can use music, what record label owns it, and if it is still copyright or public domain. There are no authoritative sources to search I have looked at this a lot because I want to bring forth transformative works and attention to songs over 70 years old - songs I heard when growing up. Also, what is the situation with someone publishing sheet music of someone 200 years ago..., if I use that sheet music to make a new iteration and the publisher of the sheet music has a copyright on their page? Is it copyright? Note that there is no money to bring life to many old songs, but I'd like to do it. It takes a lot more effort than making a new song. Covers are not meant to be legal even. And if you're making techno, and there is no singing, just a new mix, is that considered a cover? As the laws and jurisdiction's are clear as mud. So I see this plugin as being helpful and dangerous:)

@@3DaveO you’re yapping, the law of copyright is a constant and this plug in hasn’t made it any harsher. people who want to illegally sample are going to do it and then they’ll most likely get caught. this plug in has nothing to do with that

@@3DaveO this is like trying to sue the company that makes a car because someone in that car tried running you off the road, the company is not at fault the person using the product is

Websampler is a ripoff, Google Vbcable. Route the digital cable so desktop audio goes to DAW. now you can even record any game audio as well as internet

Google vbcable, or digital audio cable. Route digital audio cable so that desktop audio goes to DAW input. Select the cable from the inputs on your DAW. Then you can record ANY SOUND on your PC for free. Not just internet but games and media players

old man yells at cloud

HUH?

get help

To see who rules the world, find who you aren't allowed to criticize...

Oy vey

The same person elaborated posting a video putting a basic prompt into chatgpt and it gave the same sentences used in the apology over and over again then they got blocked by vullgers manager

commenting as someone with industry experience working on LLM's for my occupation. your comment in itself is misinformation because there are indeed ways to check if text was AI generated. AI detection tools while not the most accurate can still be used initially, and if there is a high result then this is a prompt for further investigation. the studies on the accuracy of these tools have shown that they have a bias in classifying the output as being human-written rather than being AI-generated text. of course this doesn't mean they don't also get false positives and classify human-written text as being AI-generated, but as said these tools can be used as an initial check before investigating further.