New NATO Member Sweden's Armoured Troops Shine in Allied Military Exercise 

Marsch?

Our military is weak but we have good weapons.

@@DemonKnight94 Together we are strong.

@@unknownentity8256 Truly. Happy we joined NATO.

Lol. That's funny

But they should be.

Its Gothland, actually seems to be your style, consider moving there if you are truly a Goth

@@petergrandien1440 No....i guess he like goats.....hehehehe!

@@jakeem0 lol yeah! He is a Goth **** goats in Gotland

@@petergrandien1440 @jakeem0 - wtf are you 2 on about ? xD lol

@@petergrandien1440GOAT = Greatest Of All Time. GOATland. It’s a pun (ordlek). Pinsamt att ni inte fattar detta.

we're just built different

Our intelligence is stored elsewhere, probably among our readily available tactical fika and coffee

@@danielsvensson7174 I kinda skipped the video. Apparently they are from the Gotland Regiment. They are supposedly an Armored Regiment. So these guys without helmets are 100% playing as the mock ''enemy force'' in the exercise. Cause you first see the guys with helmets.

الدب الروسي قادم

@@mohannadshabeb8350 Den svenska älgen krossar björnen

That is how the autoloader is built to make sure the spent cartridges gets out of the way when rapid fire so they can't couse fire failure.

The 40 mm Bofors cannon on the CV90 is mounted upside down, so the empty shells fly up and away from the vehicle. I think the reason why it's mounted upside down is because of how the loading mechanism works.

@@samolofsson2401 Exactly, if you take a look on other Western modern APC's or IFV's they mostly have the shells eject downwards which leads the turret to be full off shells which can hinder and create turret malfunctions. So Swedish BOA designed it upside down to make the shells fly AWAY from the vehicle and not harm vehicle nor troops.

Google translate: こんにちは、申し訳ありませんが、なぜこれらのビデオに日本人のコメントが多いのか知りたいのですが？知りたいです、ありがとうございます！ Original text: Hi. Sorry, but I'm interested to know why there are so many Japanese comments on these videos? I'd love to know, thanks!

姉妹チャンネルで日本語が堪能なアンさんが日本語のナレーションしているからかと。

雑に返信したから補足する。 姉妹チャンネルのチャンネル2が完全に日本人向けで作成されていて、そこから皆んな来ているかな？ このチャンネル1もタイトルが日本語で日本人が見やすいし、字幕もあるしね。

@@user-ct2mm5zf2z ご説明ありがとうございました！ Thank you very much for the explanation!

Ops-Core Fast, maybe? Edit: Fuck me, I read WHAT are those helmets.

Thats a Jäger/demo team for sure, thats why.

Viking Helmets are expensive and only used in combat

No need for any helmets for trainings like this probably. its not like they are getting shrapnel flying everywhere or someone acculy using live ammo against u

I would guess the non helmet wearing units are a B-force in this excercise.

drones does not remove the fact that you should know how to fight against other targets too. drones itself are not really anything new as air threat has always been there, reason why drones are so much used on Ukraine is that either side can not use their planes freely. Drones are just one small part of bigger picture.

If you want's to move a vehicle on Gotland you will have to move in the open. Most of the green fluffy stuff you see on the map is less than 5 feet in height. Yes there are rather large parts with ordinary forests but you need to move between them.

Then its a training ground, they are usually a lot more open because of the heavy usage. Plus that the drones would have to cross a sea that and the units that would land there won't have 1000's of drones with em so they would have recon ones probably plus that EVERY PLACE ON EARTH AINT FLAT AND OPEN LIKE UKRAINE! Like go fly a drone out on an island in the archipelago during 14m/s winds... Even worse winds out at sea so they need a calm day to cross but then again the boats they are coming with would be easyily spotted. So if you want realism then also move your brain to the area you are trying to make realistic. Bigger chance they would use the normal stuff than a darn drone, like shove those drones up your... The world is not like Ukraine... Yes drones have their uses but why even teach a team to drive and fire at a target "BECAUSE THERE ARE DRONES". Sorry but getting fed up on everyone being an armchairgeneral... My first training that I remember was crawling through forest ant paths reaching cover and if you were unlucky you got a anthill in the way, oddly the trainers never crawled even if the enemy was shooting at us so was probably not realistic enough for you. The lesson I took from it was that crawling aint fun but it can be worse and we got a candy bar because everyone made it. My point is that you start to crawl, then you stand up, then you walk and finally you start running so your drones had nothing to do with this training. Like they do probably still train hiding from imaginary planes and drones but you can't always only do that. Should the trainer next time at the shooting range randombly throw stuff on them shouting "drone" instead of teaching em to shoot?!?

Found the russian bot

Sweden uses lots of drones as well, it's just now shown in this video, possibly for security reasons.

中～大型規模の奴は普通に既存SAMや戦闘機で墜とせてるからいいとして 小型の奴はまぁジャミング装置や小火器での迎撃もやるけど（散弾銃の需要が急増してる） 最近だとレーザーやマイクロ波による迎撃装置が一部実用化配備が始まってるからそれれらに任せる感じになるな

The CV 9040 got 3p ammo that can use timed or proximity air burst to take out drones quickly. There is also the SPAAG version with radar, but even the regular variant will have the sensor tower.

Camo painted flyswatters.

You are joking right?

bot

We fight in subzero degrees, plastic does not hold up for long in those conditions.

They’re doing fine in Ukraine. What’s funny is how a superpower can’t beat a minor neighbouring nation in over two years..🤣🤣🤣

@@tobberino You answered the reason yourself even sweden is there so whole NATO plus ukrain is fighting russia xD

@@123fockewolf no they’re getting aid from the west, just like Russia is getting aid from the east.

First they have to do a contested beach landing on Gotland. Judging by how Russia is handling the war in Ukraine, and the history of the Russian navy, it will be a shitshow for the Russians. Or no, first the ships have to survive a gauntlet of submarines hunting for them in the gulf of Finland, then survive a gauntlet of 150 JAS Gripen.

Inte ens i närheten, svenskt stål biter. Dags att pröva med dig som övnings objekt kanske?

​​@@KamiKaZantAاعتقد ان العاصمة ستوكهولم قريية من مرمى النيران والصواريخ البالستية ، حين يتحد الروسي والصيني فلن تكون لاوروبا ولا النيتو ولا امريكيا قائمة .😑

@@mohannadshabeb8350 Clumsy Russians don't have a chance.

@@mohannadshabeb8350 Tyst din stenkastande apa

Don't know what weaposn you tslk sbout thst are 50 years old. The only ones I could sse was the MG and the Carl Gustsv. The MG is still one of the best in the world and the Carl Gustav is constantly having new munition bring developed. But most of the old gears and weapons are soon gone.. New weapons and new gear are beeing implemented over the next few years.

RU-vid warior🥴

Only 50 year old gun in the video is Ksp 58 (FN MAG) and it's still one of the best and most battle tested machine gun in the world, only "gear/equipment" outdated in this video is one of the vehicles that is beeing replaced but it has not been a priority to replace them for the support lines becuse they still do their job well back there they are not beeing used anywere near frontlines there vehicles like CV90, and patrol vehicles like RG-32M, AK5c (still a good rifle but heavy)will be replaced by a sako rifle in the next few years together whit the marksman(currently H&K G3 still a good weapon but heavy) and sniper rifles (currently L118A2 still a good rifle but small caliber in 7.62 nato), so im not realy sure what you mean whit your comment.

Most soldier gear doesn't really get obsolete making old gear work fine, not that there were much that were old enough to warrant complaining about.

The US military main .50cal machine gun is an antique that was designed more than 90 years ago, so fifty years ain't so bad.