Next Generation Bradley IFV Infantry Fighting Vehicle tracked armoured BAE Systems US army 

Same

Your profile pic reminds me of a Churchill gentleman.

Same but it didn’t start until I watched the whole movie on YT

Same here lol

Definitely

"We know it's not a tank - but will the enemy?"

In 50 Languages, Ne Pucaj, ja nisam Tenk. That's in Serbian.

ฉันไม่ใช่รถถัง อย่ายิงฉัน Thai Languages

לא לירות בי, אני לא טנק. in hebrew

In greek Μην μου ρίχνεται. Είμαι τεθωρακισμένω. Δεν είμαι άρμα μάχης. Dont shoot at me. I am a troop carrier I am not a battle tank

Haha me too

say what you like about it but one of the generals in the pentagon war was right during the gulf war more t72 was taken out by Bradley then the m1 abrams sure 3 of them were kill by the t72 but they were caught with pants down due to combat maneuver era by getting to close then intended so that more human era since no ifv at the time or even now can take a hit from mbt and survive in most situation the iraqi tank never had a chance the Bradley with its atgm and advance optics kill any t72 that came in to range before the t72 had any chance to shoot back. Like it or not all the hate we gave the Bradley for having reconnaissance capability and the punch to take out half of dc is what made the Bradley so successful in war it was in in fact Bradley that gave commander such a flexible platform to work with its the first apc that can actually defend itself against an enemy mbt since it can see the enemy before they see him and have enough punch to take them out and honestly if you wanted a simple apc that has good Armour protection from small arms fire the us military still have 5000 m113 and more then 8000 in storage there really no point in making apc with better protection then the m113 since modern tandem charge hand held anti tank solution require top end mbt level of protection and that just unrealistic level of protection that you can demand from apc/ifv the best you can do is have all round small arms/auto cannon fire protection and hard kill system like trophy in combat vehicle like this

Bin thher done that! Ya use wat ya got! Bitchin dont do dic? ACAVS 19DELTA🐴🔩🔧🔨🎆🎇🔫

Pentagon wars lol

This is redundant! If you look at other IFV like the BMP 3, Lynx, Puma and Ajax from other countries, they have completely immulated what has the Bradley had already done. The Bradley the a pioneer of modern IFV!

Expect that the BMP 3 was based on the Obyekt 685 light tank prototype with a 100mm gun 2A48-1 from 1975. This vehicle did not enter series production, but the chassis, with a new engine, was used for the next-generation infantry combat vehicle Obyekt 688[6] from A. Blagonravov's design bureau. The Ob. 688 weapons configuration-an externally mounted 30 mm gun and twin Konkurs ATGM launcher-was rejected; instead the new 2K23 armament system was selected. The resulting BMP-3 was developed in the early 1980s and entered service with the Soviet Army officially in 1987. Please end this bullshit about how ever country has been copying American equipment. The Soviets were the first in the regards to making and deploying IFVs with the BMP-1. They have their own philosophy when it comes to IFV's, mainly to cause as much destruction as possible while delivering troops. The Puma is far better then the Bradley will ever be, that is a fact. The Bradley is starting to slowly become inferior due to other nations developing better IFV's, like Russias Kurganets-25. The BMP-3 is better armed than the Bradley. It carries a 100mm cannon and a 30mm autocannons in it's turret. The 100mm gun fires a very effective HE she'll as well as very effective gun launched ATGMS. The Bradley just has a 25mm autocannon and a dual TOW launcher. The BMP is faster than the Bradley by a margin of around 20 kph. It is much lighter at around 18 tons compared to the 27 tons of the Bradley. So tell me how the Russians looked at the Bradley and decided to put a 100mm cannon on it?

Bradley was researched in the 60s and entered service in the year 1980. BMP 3 was made in responce to the armament that the Bradley carried, it was not the first but why is it that every country after the Bradley was intered service, they suddenly want to match or even exceed the Bradley's firepower With their own IFV? This configuration was pioneered by the Bradley even if you like it or not.

Thankyou for your service!

Respect.🇺🇸🦅

Eles eram insurgents no seu próprio país, estavam a defendê-lo. Vocês eram os invasores que invadiram um país mentindo dizendo que o Iraque tinha armas de destruição em massa. Não tinha, se as tivessem vocês nunca o teriam invadido. Outros países as têm realmente, e nem por isso vocês os invadiram. Pussys.

That’s cool and all but America is the evil country going around the world toppling regimes and pressuring foreign people. Blowing up bridges and pipelines and everything else. Pushing for war everywhere. Are you blind man you’re the bad guy.

Billion. With a B.

what the hell. Riding in the back makes my ass vibrate to hell. literally makes every bone in my body vibrate XD. the sound is absolutely piercing too. cant sleep for shit. Lol. i could sleep in a tank any day cause of the whining of the engine but bradley, no sir ree.

hyunki0510 that's how much time i spent in one during deployment to iraq

Crunchy.

@@hyunki0510 Oh if you're talking about that vibration that goes from the bottom of your spine up that's one of the worst things there is to endure!

Did you ever have to have someone running alongside the thing with extra ammo?

Paul Br lol they still use 113s

@@sriracha3049 Not for infantry.

Did you get the specs for sheeps?

They put those sheeps on the incinerator again >:-(

You are the sheep, lol

@@wino0000006 Does it come in a submarine with sheeps inside?

I was wondering that too? Or maybe he thinks you're taller?

We carry a lot more gear now, front and back armor plates on every infantryman, more ammo, water and etc.

Yes and I'm sure the extra space he referenced is like 2" at the most

Oh Yea! Like the personal computer that was designed for every infantryman plus spare batteries that would add another 6 pounds to his carry weight. Millions were spent researching this stupid idea.

Oh Yea! Like the personal computer that was designed for every infantryman plus spare batteries that would add another 6 pounds to his carry weight. Millions were spent researching this stupid idea.

Can't. There's some dumb requirement about minimum main weapon ammo per vehicle,and they can pack more 20mm than 30mm.

Providence The A4 is rumored to have a 30mm gun, but the turret had to be retooled because of the larger gun, ammo, and associated equipment.

*****​ if the south Koreans and Swedes can fit a 40mm on their IFV/AFV with a few hundred rounds of ammunition then why can't we? Armor is getting better

Providence the 40 mm gun on the system 90 vehicles has to do dual Duty he is supposed to be able to engage armored vehicles and support Infantry whereas the 25mm gun on the Bradley is to support Infantry and the tow missile launchers are there to deal with armor. it's a design Theory and it cost theory on what works best for each Nation

Providence yvotgfvifgfvififigviv bbobvhogo

@@doorguner01 "we". Like when sportsfans say we won. Stahp.

Lynx is in the OMFV competition and frankly Puma is loaded with issues regarding troops

Pentagon wars 2 F35 edition

Wow. Great story. I was hoping for something a little better after you gave me two soldiers life stories.

Troops won't like reactive armour when it goes off near them!!!

ravener would defeat the purpose of the vehicle

The Bradley is an ifv a infantry fighting vehicle its is ment to deploy troops in combat while keeping them safe and providing fire support

This exists and is in production now, the M3A4 Bradley fire support vehicle. The Army will be receiving these with the new Mk.44 'Bushmaster II' 30mm cannon with proximity-fuze and APFSDS rounds plus extra ammunition storage in place of passenger seating. The M3A4 is replacing and supplementing the already-in-service M3A3 Bradley fire support vehicle. The vehicle in this video is the M2A4 *IFV* model, which is supposed to carry infantry in the back and then support them by defeating enemy IFV's, light vehicles, light armor, and infantry, a task which the 25mm cannon is well-suited for.

A tank is what you would want in this case, or an armored truck.

Over 30 years later they're still waiting for the sheep specs.

No, El Presidente spends his people's money on stuff they actually need, like an IFV with a hood that's more than an inch thick.

Hi, It's an IFV Infantry Fighting Vehicle. Thanks to follow Army Recognition Defense and Security Web TV News channel. Alain CEO Army Recognition Group

Yup, straight down.

The 85 ton one? That was funny because

@@tungstenwall474 and most european bridges have a max of 50 tons

Except it has that ability to engage structures and light vehicles with it's main gun and even take out main battle tanks with it's TOW launcher, you are comparing an APC to an IFV, obviously the APC is going to carry more troops as that is it's main purpose, an IFV is also supposed to be able to provide direct fire-support and it can against all ground targets reliably.

THEY BUILDING IT!?

{Seal of approuval}

Well, we hate India tech support in the USA. Indians think they speak great English, but nobody can understand the convenience store accent.