NGAD: America's Masterstroke in Sixth-Gen Fighter Innovation (Reupload) 

love your ch dude

Good video. I've actually been thinking about how large carrier aircraft along with AWACs aircraft and some serious escorts (F-22s ) could move into an area and release swarms of remotely piloted drones. A C-17 could have a dozen operators setup at stations controlling the squadron dropped from the specially designed cargo area. These wouldn't even need radar - just a couple of IR missiles and a couple of AMRAAMs in internal bays and a gun. The AWACS could guide and lock them onto targets. The operators could set them to full autonomous mode once they're in theater to avoid coms giving away their positions. Others would be larger and set up for strike missions while afore mentioned take out any air threat. A third type could be even smaller drones with HARMs and possibly a suicide HARM mission built in once their missiles are expended. I'm babbling, but the possibilities are staggering - I won't even get into the idea of space planes since you could theoretically have dozens just sitting in orbit and ready to be "dropped" into action when needed.

Hope the ai does not become self aware

Simon how about a video on the AI system that there trying to make for the NGAF planes all I can think of is Skynet becoming real out of this NGAF Program

Is there video on Quantum computing?

You weren't the only one...

The US of Suck is doing the greatest thing by empowering BRICS, and convincing other nations to join them, in uniting 40+ plus to become BRICS members, in their desperation ignoring their 31.4 Trillion dollar debt naively believes they can print money, pride comes before the fall so thank you US OF SUCK, by setting the ground for the Multi Polar World Putin talked about, don't stop now! 😂

It's not nice to laugh at mother Russia comrad. 😂

Darn Russia and their lack of degeneracy! REEE

An Old Cold War Saying: An American shows a Soviet Russian a Transistor Radio. The Russian says "Oh, we have those". "What is it?"

Same here, a few days ago.

Oh thank you I thought I was trippin

The (reupload) on the title should have clued you in. The first version was taken down by someone making a copyright claim so they either changed one (or more) of the images or clips or negotiated a right to use whatever was complained about.

Me too! That's why I came to the comments. 😅

Yeh, I also got that Deja vu all over again

While it’s still the best fighter in the world, by far.

and how old the f16 is. though 6th gen will probly a multinational project that is super expensive. twin engine, twin pilot, stealth and drone platform

I was working at Harris Corporation in Palm Bay Florida when the F-22 was being designed. An entire floor of a building was dedicated to that aircraft. There were signs and reminders everywhere regarding "size & weight" considerations. It was very cool to be there at that time. Still a remarkable aircraft.

@@timmotel5804no nda about being on the project?

@@pinter123 No. That was years ago and was just a standard engineering process. Nothing was "given away". Regards.

😂

The marines will, of course, destroy it.

And Nick Fury will be the commander.

😂😂😂😂

@@LugborGmarines will try to lift a tank w it or sum

Usually the actual budget is more than the expected budget though.

Don't worry, Price is VERY flexible estimated.

That only speaks pretty badly of how bad inflation has been these last few years 😂

@@danielc9312 it's actually started to go down

Given that the F22 got canned, that ain't good.

And the B52 projected to be in service for nearly 100 years [all be it many iterations since the first]

@@andywright1634 The air force had to ask Lockheed/Boeing/Northrop for new wing spines because the older chassis are needing replacement :P

@@Frost640 None of them are 50 and still flying, but some do have a lot of hours on them - and the airframe design is 50 but now has more powerful engines.

Thats kinda sad tbh... they should really just scrap all 1st to 4th gen aircrafts and focus on Modern stuff. Things like F-15's won't do much these days anymore

@@cherrydragon3120 F-15s, 16s and 18s are hardly useless - they're more than a match for MOST other aircraft the world is still operating. The cost to replace them all with modern aircraft would be in the trillions and take years. Besides, strike aircraft are still needed and all 3 of those platforms make excellent attack aircraft and can also be converted to specialty missions such as ECM or Wild Weasel etc.

Then autonomous fighter escorts sound feasible.

That's the X47B and not the Navy's new 6th gen fighter. Ironically, if Navy is following AF lead, these 6th generation stealth fighters will work in tandem with these unmanned aerial combat platforms as multi roll wingmen.

@@SemiDivineOne I have some "Stealth" thoughts right now. This "failed" film was not so far from reality, actually...

@@fridaycaliforniaa236 totally agree

So Australia MQ28A Ghost Bat is even more advanced and AI is the future especially for smaller population countries. 1 Ghost Bat can be built in 1 month now in peacetime. 1 pilot takes 5 years to train

Love you bro

For what! F22 was used once in its entire existence, took two missiles to kill a fkn baloon! Inspiring!?

Only a BALOON would be FOOLISH Enough to Mess With An F-22!

@timmotel5804 yeah,dumb baloon! Spy baloon from WA China ! They can lend a rover on Mars and the dark side of the Moon,but for spying, only baloon works!

@@pashapasovski5860 Inspiring, yeah. Ever seen one above you? Then you wouldn't, no couldn't, understand.

@oldpain7625 what a baloon, dude I live across a skydiving ranch,all kinds of shit flying over my head! F22 is another trillion project that made no sense whatsoever, except for the fan boys and Lockheed stock holders!

Media doesn't even begin to cover what could be possible. Not mainstream media anyways. What happens when you can manufacture a fleet of successively smaller and smaller slave drones whose terminal state is a swarm of miniature suicide drones capable of assassinating individual human targets ? Carrier launches drone. Drone launches drone swarm. Drone swarm launches swarm of even smaller drones. Smaller drones launch tiny, insect sized drones which seek and kill individual targets. What the hell do you need guns and artillery for ? You have a locust level swarm of hunter-killer drones with a payload sufficient to kill one human target. Oh, you're hiding in a trench ? Cool story bro. BANG.

Sounds like a pretty cool movie script!

Ace combat 7 has that if yoy are wondering.

I had always thought the way 6th gen would work was something like a F-15EX accompanying NGAD at a distance to ferry a load of munitions since 5th gen is kind of showing that as an area where it kind of lacks, this idea basically takes that to 11. And I don't know if the US version is going to be the same as the Aussie version but 'absorbing fire' is on the checklist for the RAAF. One of the good things is a lot of the groundwork for loyal wingman has already been laid with the Aussie program.

Top gun 2060. Old boy Rooster proves that human pilots are still alive and kicking. He doesn't trust AI fighters, but in the end grows partial to them, seeing one of them sacrifice itself without orders

Man now you're making me feel bad for a dead fictional character that hasn't even happened yet 😢 Anthropomorphism strikes again!

it's far worse than the growler. not to mention there's tons of versions of the 50yo F-15.

F-15s.

@@bobfg3130 The F15s weaponry fitted to the F15's is; amongest the bestest.

F-15SE look it up, there is no replacement for ground up design. Hence why no one wanted to pay 100m for it.

@@jakethompson5568 because there's much better and cheaper with a design that isn't 60 years old.

Potentially they could absorb shots for you aswell or at least confuse incoming missile sensors. You could initiate an incredibly accurate bombing run on a single or multiple targets using data taken from 1 pilot which is then passed onto the wingmen drones.

Clint Eastwood's movie "Firefox" was a good yarn . . .

We all know but it makes a great intro so leave it alone.

Science fiction writers have been predicting technological advancements since the 1800's. Before anything resembling something more complicated than steam powered direct drive machinery existed, authors have been envisioning modern day technology like space travel, touch screen and so on. As technology has evolved, the ability to imagine future technology has evolved with it. Nothing exists today, nor will exist in the future that hasn't already long since been dreamed of by a creative mind with a penchant for writing.

The military aircraft used in the beginning of Count Zero by William Gibson, released in 1986, was more advanced than the current envisioning of 6th gen aircraft. And the story implies that it was obsolete surplus at the time of the story plot.

They're 4.5 Gen, not true 5th Gen

@@Istandby666 I just wrote that. I did not deny they were not fourth GEN. I just pointed out that they were no way fifth GEN.

@@donbrunodelamancha1927 He was agreeing with you, and yes, they're definitely missing the most important aspect: a high level of stealth.

It's possible only four companies have ever built a stealth aircraft - Lockheed and Northrup-Grumman for the production planes and drones. Boeing built a prototype and the Japanese may have built a prototype. And that's it. In spite of the Russians having the remains of an F-117 and the Chinese hacking data from the American stealth program they haven't come close.

@@recoil53 Too true, and factual.

Love that movie. Saw it in the theater when I was a teen. "Think in Russian!"

Trust me when I tell you the novel it's based on is WAYYYYYY better than the movie. There was even a sequel: Firefox Down.

@@JeremyArchie I read that WAY back. Got me hooked on the techno-thrillers. Tom Clancy of course wrote a number of great ones, but before Clancy my favorite Author of such novels was Dennis Jones. He had a few beauties.

Thank you - another project on my list . . . @@JeremyArchie

That’s the F302 operated mostly by Stargate Command. It flies off the BC304 Carrier that can travel to the Pegasus Galaxy in a few weeks. Oh wait! We’re talking about reality, not SG1? Doh! 😁

.... A space shuttle?

Suck it other species!!!

I thought I was having deja vu!

It's more like a race (like the Space Race was in its era). Most of present wars are asymetrical. Billion dollars stealth drones against farmers and goat f.ckers fighting with sticks and stones in Africa or Afghanistan is totally overkill, I'd say. But NATO countries always have the desire to show Russians and Chinese "who has the biggest d!ck". It's always political, one way or an other... (sorry, I hope my english isn't crap).

True considering there are only 2 planes that are 5th gen the F-22 and F-35, while the SU-57 and J-20 both being 4.5 gen.

They're just having been major wars for the fifth generation fighters to be used in. We also don't really know if the chinese ones work at all and they basically just stole tech from the f35

They will be like Macross Robotech Valkyrie Fighters. 😄

The moment when we've gone so far ahead that we go backwards.

There is a trade off between stealth and maneuverability when it comes to the shape of a plane, any plane that leans into maneuverability would be less stealthy. Unless they come up with a way to change the plane's shape in mid flight (which would admittedly be a crazy level of high-tech) I think they'd probably try to come up with a new way to target enemies from a distance, and possibly make it capable of limited space flight.

@@TheSmileMile The F-22 is more stealthy than the F-35

It's a battle of your sensors vs their stealth against your stealth vs their sensors. For instance, from the RCS we know of, the SU-57 and J-20 aren't remotely as stealthy as any US stealth craft - fighter or bomber. But the US planes also have better radar too.

M5 Ripsaw tank. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ripsaw_(vehicle) =^x^=

Drone swarms. just bombard your enemies with wave after wave of massive swarms of small extremely fast and agile kamikaze explosive drones. just so you can imagine what a drone swarm attack on a large town would look like, it would cover every square inch of the town with a constant stream of explosions for like 20 minutes straight. its a kind of warfare that's absolutely terrifying as it very quickly overwhelms any air defense systems and annihilates them into oblivion. besides detonating a thermonuclear bomb within outer space over the battlefield to produce an EMP blast, there's no practical way to defend against massive drone swarm attacks.

@@nickhowatson4745 Except the US is already light years ahead of everyone else in development of Electronic countermeasures. As much as everyone like to believe that drones are completely autonomous, they are not. Jamming their control frequencies is going to make their ability to respond to physical countermeasures a much harder problem. Ukraine used small consumer drones effectively in the beginning of the war. These have become a lot less effective as the both sides learn how to deal with them as this conflict has dragged on. Is it a nice tool to use in certain situations - definitely. Is it a wuderwaffe that will win every conflict to from here to the end of time - hardly.

Basketball sized drones carrying 1-2 hand grenades worth of payload, used as networked isr and suicide/attack drone assets. Only question is if we accidentally end up with the $3000 simple, easy, world beater, or the $500000 raytheon version.

​@@ericepperson8409eh. Maybe. The US has done their best to ignore electronic warfare, with only grudging improvements made with CREW systems during the global war on terror. The war in Ukraine has probably been the wakeup call DARPA has needed to get the funding to make truly scary stuff.

Britain and Italy broke off years ago. I don't think this could have been written back then.

@@srdxxx i did think that happened a couple years ago but wasn’t too sure, and didn’t want to just be like ‘you are wrong and get your facts correct’ you know. Thank you bro

The confusion is likely coming from the original British 6th gen program, which is still the overall name for the RAF's future fighter strategy, being called Future Combat Air System (FCAS) as well. As a result, there have been two completely separate programs running in parallel with the exact same name. To avoid this confusion, the Franco-German-Spanish programme is often referred to by it's French acronym - SCAF. Not that that is necessarily needed anymore since the Anglo-Italian-Japanese programme becoming GCAP.

Because it would make it more viable of people actualy willing to make it happen then? Cuz obviously when something is super expensive its less likely ppl want to do it

​@@cherrydragon3120 No No my fellow human. "Reduced cost" is nothing more than a fantasy. If you know anything about military projects, innovation almost never is "reduced". Unless if we're talking about a reduction in banks' funds lmao 🤣. And by banks, I mean me and you. Taxes love touching its- I mean our- storage. Yeah, our.

I want it to look like some sort of F-15 Stealth Eagle, with internal bays only for AAMs. It relies entirely upon "loyal wingman" drones for bombs and other ground attack weapons. In other words, "not a pound for air to ground."

Northrop is presumed to be out of the contract competition unfortunately, or that would've been funny AND badass.

@@IsaacKuo You understand that’s a misnomer? NGAD would be going backwards if it was even slightly like a F-15 🤦‍♂️😆

People who think the 6th gen fighter jet would look like the simulated/cartoon here, 0:27, haven't seriously followed the evolution if fighter jets. They're into console games and other cartoon CGIs: There is a reason why ALL fighter jets ---- from the first one (the Nazi/German Messerschmitt Me-262)..... to the current, high-end 4th and 5th gen kinds like F-22, F-35, Su-35/Su-57, Typhoon/Eurofighter, Rafale, Super Hornet, Changdo J-20, Shenyang FC-31, etc. ---- have the TAIL-END designs they do: #1: it's either two vertical stabilizers like the SR-71, F-14, F-15, Super Hornet, the Su-35/Su-57, J-20, FC-31, F-22, F-35... Or #2: those with a slightly larger, single vertical stabilizer like the Rafael, the Typhoon/Eurofighter, the F-16, the Gripen, etc. Each second that goes by, when a fighter jet is flying say, at Mach 2 or so, ~30,000ft in altitude ... the air molecules passing through EACH SQUARE INCH of the area of its VERTICAL STABILIZER(S)... is roughly 40,000 psi. If you don't have a need for such a BIG, ROBUST STABILIZING PHYSICAL STRUCTURE, you are NOT going to put it/them there. The REASON fighter jets have THAT CONTRAPTION is not for their beautiful aesthetics; the reason is that fighter jets have an ENDLESS NEED to make very fast, very big/dangerous "instantaneous" SHARP TURNS. Our aircraft are not ANTI-GRAVITY machines ---- like those the US Navy recorded in some of their instruments over the years, from San Diego's Navy training areas off the coast of Coronado/La Jolla to the East Coast, on the Atlantic front. When pilots need to make drastic ANGLE CHANGES, they need those giant & powerful VERTICAL STABILIZERS to physically maneuver those TENS OF THOUSANDS OF POUNDS of air molecules that are passing through EACH SQUARE INCH of those giant structures (even the tilted ones like those on the F-22, Super Hornet, F-35, etc are still VERY VERTICAL). But these CGI cartoon ones shown to purport to be what the US 6th gen fighter jet may look like.... they are more in line with GLIDER AIRCRAFT like the B-2, up coming B-21, and taleless drones. Even tailess drones and "flying wings" like the B-2/B-21 can be MADE to fly very fast. But they are NOT going to be able to make instantaneous, sharp/high-angle turns. That is just the LAW OF PHYSICS and ENGINEERING we are currently stuck with, as a species.... We again are not Aliens from Andromeda, with anti-gravitational aircraft.... (..... For those interested but who haven't thought it through, because they confuse CGIs for real fighter jets...... the ENERGY needed to fit "puffing" air-ducts ---- controlled by, say, super computers --- to "fight" against those 40,000+ PSI force.... so you could pull very high G's... would be beyond what any fighter jet could muster.... So that is NOT the direction we are going with....) Again, flying a fighter jet at Mach 2, around 25,000 to 30,000ft and pulling 5 to 9-G's on it...... is NOT the same thing as docking a Space Shuttle or Elon's Space X... at the International Space Station... with tiny "puffing" jet streams, to slowly maneuver the space-craft to be align with doorways at the Space Station... IN OTHER WORDS, you either have the F-22/F-35/Rafale/Typhoon/Su-35/Su-57/SR-71/FC-31 design.... OR.... you have something like a greatly MODIFIED YF-23 design.... OR you have the B-2/B-21 design... and this third option is a GLIDER. Whether it goes really fast or really slow, it a GLIDER CANNOT make sharp angle turns! Again, all these Cartoon CGIs on these RU-vid videos are GLIDERS, not real usable fighter jets that could pull erratic 9-G's and be able to go on... If you flew the up-coming & smaller & faster B-21 at, say, Mach 1 and you tried to make a sharp angle turn --- it's computer WOULDNT ALLOW IT but let's say you put in on a "manual mode" and tried it ---- it WILL GO DOWN instantly! Winged bombers --- designed without vertical stabilizing contraptions --- are NOT ENGINEERED for sharp angle turns (again, whether you fly it at 345MPH or 900MPH; you should NOT try to make sharp angle turns).... BTW, one of the reasons why the Pentagon picked the MORE TRADITIONAL YF-22 over the more "futuristic" DIAMOND-SHAPED (parallelogram) YF-23 prototype... was indeed due to its more futuristic and "unproven" wing and tail designs. With the YF-23 also being some 6 feet longer, and with so many more "unproven" designs (such as the cooling technologies to disperse hot air coming out of the YF-23's exhausts).... the YF-23 would have cost, on a per unit basis, TENS OF MILLIONS of dollars more. And one of the REASONS why the units of the F-22 dropped form 500 units to 250 unites to finally 189 at the end.... was that it was costing between $300M to $500 per unit... NOT the "Oh, it's only $130M" as some silly folks have been saying.... If the F-22 had only "cost just $130M" --- or roughly the cost of a current F-35B ---- the US Pentagon would have allowed the US Air Force to order up to 250 or more units... before the program was terminated. But between $300M - $500M a unit, or roughly 1/4 of the prize of the B-2, even the US couldn't have afforded to buy & maintain more than 150 to 180 or so units...

@@kiabtoomlauj6249 budget now is also almost 900 billion total.. airforce and navy eat up probably nearly half that or more alone

truth

Actually they are building new tech to fight the stolen old tech used by China and Russia

Well, if you stop moving forward eventually you get left behind. As an Australian I’d love our government to purchase Americans hand me down F22’s.

@@troystaunton254I’d settle for f-15s

@@troystaunton254 never going to happen. When they are done, they will all be scraped to prevent loss of classified information.

Let's hope the program isn't named, "Skynet"

The 6th Gen will Not be a dogfighting machine. America has been moving away from the dogfight ever since the F22. New Fighter jet will most likely keep up with Stealth tecnology, I cant imagine a fighter built around stealth mindset to include dog fighting. Also many speculate that the 6th gen is going to be able to hyper sonic at high altitudes (80k ft) Which will require a diffrent type of frame that would not support dogfighting role. So it makes more sense for a Extremely High flying, Hyper Sonic, Stealth Jet with long ranger hyper sonic missle capablilites. Today's midset is to Kill before they even knew you were there.

It's called "paying it forward." We get to use fighter planes that our great grandparents built, so we should leave some to our own descendants.

I’m good. I’d rather have the NGAD than a high-speed rail network that only a few would use. Flying the friendly skies is easier and faster.

Ultimately the strategy of the NGAD program will be to drain the economies of the target. Think of the 1980s space race.

This is the way.

feels like comparing chicken nuggets to gold nuggets

twitter wasn't worth 44 billion though

Well the US spent about 16 trillion on convid. With naff all to show for it, other than an increase in power and wealth for Big Pharma. So I'd say 1tn for this would still represent excellent value by comparison

@@wizzotizzo no no it wasn't it wasn't worth much at all honestly but if it dies it dies and thats a ok and would probably be a good thing

It's the most dangerous, I think the F-35 is the most "advanced" in most areas, but point taken.

I'd say the F-35 is more advanced, with the most recent upgrades.

Up until *someone* *accidentally* leaves a certain type of virus in the coded files the Chinese steal which sets all of their power plants to self-detonate simultaneously, or something similar. Bet the Chinese dont touch any of our shit again after that.

if that was the case the j20 wouldnt be a gen 4.5...the 22 was never leaked and the 35s technology is so kept under wraps controlled that basically everyone but the us could be locked out of it whenever they wanted.. Considering no one is close to the 35 in stealth and technology or the superiority and stealth of the 22 my guess at best the latest 6th gens will be closer to the current 5th gens for the us

Tell him only 20 or so Su-57 has been made since it introduction lol

When was F22 used!? Over Atlantic, using 2 missiles against a weather baloon and I am not Russian,a poor American wondering, if we'll ever learn!

@@pashapasovski5860 The US is not in a war that requires overmatching an near peer opponent. F-15s, -16s, and -18s and B-52s were overkill to operate in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria. That was the US successfully conducting military operations half away across the world. The failures were not military, but political. Russia on the other hand can't exert air dominance in a space literally right next door. If they had the number of Felons that they were confident could wipe out the Ukrainian Air Force, why are they not using them? Why are Russian cities suddenly becoming the targets of drone strikes? Russia's capability is a massive overstatement.

Sooo if everyone in murica gave 200 dollar, you'd have 200 new fighter jets~ 😮 damn

Tempest? You mean gcap?

Agreed. It’s the first video I click on when I see the recommended videos.

Second upload for this video, someone made a copyright claim against the first upload.

Do you know why?

We're all gonna be shocked when it turns out they were building a Gundam this whole time

You'd be surprised at how a computer will fall into a fix pattern, make defending against a computer only attack more easy that you think......however, add in a little bit of Human Brilliance/Madness and that make it much harder to predict. I think you are right about the swarm of attack drones, but i do think that there will be a human adding unpredictability in the mix for a long time yet

Probably got a few numbers wrong or got some names mixed up 🤷‍♂️

Leaked confidential information that might get him sued, removed

Everything is a PsyOP

Maybe he accidentally hit the "Delete" button

Probably got the Tom Clancy treatment.

And allows to be more daring with turning active radar on on the drone without giving away the jet position to passive radars

the J20 has an additional pilot to control loyal wingman , and in even far better than any US versoin with 5G/6G , quantum communications, HYPESONIC DRONES (wingman?) ... a pilot full time to do the control .

@@hkfoo3333 Quantum communications? bwahahahahahahah

​@@timehaley Why you do not know? China already successfully invented Quantum communication when they launched a satelite communicating all the way to Europe . It cannot be hacked unlike current systems. It is already operational. Go and google or search U tube. Looks like you are from remote place of India or what.

@@hkfoo3333 the US disclosed that a couple US F-35s already had a stand off with Chinese J-20s, the only thing that got the USAF's attention was the Chinese AWACS plane in the area. In just one brief encounter the US determined that if they take out the AWACS, the J-20 is pretty much useless.

@@nickb2049 Ya there was an encounter as reported and the J20 performed far better than the F35 until the Americans were shocked. The J20 will have different upgrades and the latest version will put the F35 to shame. Dont believe ? Just wait for time when both meet. I dont see how F35 is even a match for the J20 with so many features inferior to the J20 . Believe me, F35 is useless when faced vs the J20 . Shorter range, Much slower shorter range missiles. 1 pilot only. 1000 still unfinished problems... Peer to peer .. with other planes , data communications , etc. Maybe you tell me ONE AREA F35 has that can beat the J20 as J20 can not only take on F35 head on , but can take on the AWACs far behind , and with second pilots will be able to control so many things leaving the pilot of fly ...

No, that is the future estimated lifetime cost for the F-35 program, which goes until 2070. Don't be misleading. Also this is a replacement for the raptor.

@kalik8354 Ok, granted, we've technically "only" spent half a trillion on it so far. Which means we'll still be spending a further 1.2 trillion (assuming the rest of the program doesn't go 80 percent over budget.) Plus, we'll no doubt be simultaneously spending hundreds of billions more at least on its successor. Where does our arms race against ourselves stop?

All developed on the secret US Mars base.

and his proof? "just trust me bro"

Most likely the hidden information and technology is more like 20-30 years above what we think and during the cold war yeah 50 years was about right.

stock market rally run is gone, but I'm not sure if equities will swiftly recover, keep falling, or fluctuate in a narrow range for a few weeks, or if things will quickly get worse. I'm under pressure to increase my $300k reserve.

Making touch with financial advisors like Julio Castillo he can assist you restructure your portfolio, would be a very creative option. Personal financial management will be crucial to navigating the next difficult times.

That's true. Its really needful for beginners not to settle for videos alone or they will see themselves losing all their money just like me when I newly started trading with this videos here on RU-vid

That's true. Its really needful for beginners not to settle for videos alone or they will see themselves losing all their money just like me when I newly started trading with this videos here on RU-vid

I agree with you, With his help, I diversified my 450k portfolio among different markets. During this bearish market period, I was able to produce a net profit of little over $1 million from high dividend yield stocks, ETFs and equity. However, the reality is that you cannot do it without a tried and true trading coach like Julio Castillo

The F-22 prototype first flew in 1997 (26 years ago) and entered service in 2006 (17 years ago). Correct about the Navy having different needs. Their plane needs to be able to take off from and land on carriers, stand up to salt water, and needs more range. The YF-23 actually would have been a very good naval fighter if the airframe could be made to handle the landings. But the F-22 was the right choice for the USAF.

@bluemarlin8138 yeah i was thinking about the abrams.

It's good this is science and not religion. I was at Edwards Air Force Base during the ATF fly off. My biological father worked on the YF-23 program.

I would imagine it was fairly easy to choose Northrup for the B-21, considering everything the Air Force was looking for requirement-wise, Northrup already had so much parallel experience with from designing and manufacturing the B-2 lol.

@@DarkTranqz yup but it means that they currently have more experience with 6th generation aircraft so they have an advantage.

The B-21 is not the only 6th Gen aircraft. The B-21 is the only 6th Gen known to the public. Don't mix the two up.

@@Istandby666 Well I mean yeah that's kind of what I was talking about because of course the NGAD is being developed as well as F/A-XX for the navy. Who knows what stage of development that they are in. Also the F22 raptor is being used as a test bed for a lot of sixth gen technologies making it now having some prototypes that are 5.5 gen. And the F35 will eventually become 5.5 gen according to the road map. So yeah

​@@SuperRandomNinja1To be fair F-35 is almost 5.5 Gen due to the new planned upgrade that is gonna make it 2 times more effective.

Good one 🤣

Rent free.

Lol😂😂

Just spare us the giant aliens attacking and turning Earth into a crater pockmarked wasteland. We have enough enemies already. But I wouldn't mind seeing Minmay in concert.

@@tempslip GLAD TO HAVE YOU AROUND, BROTHER! And, about your statement, AMEN, AMEN & AMEN!