Well.. Here we go again. Melbourne bounce has a shorter kick with an offbeat "plucky" bass, where as bigroom would have a longer, distorted kick. Melbourne bounce often has a vocal cut, where bigroom has a pluck. Bigroom usually uses alot of reverb, where bounce usually has none. Melbourne bounce usually has a clap on every second kick, where as in bigroom, you'll hear more rides on every kick, and percussions (like in dutch house) Bigroom tends to have a buildup including chords, where as melbourne bounce tends to have a single note or a melody.
isn't that the point of a remix? Also, most remixes are like this, idk what remixes you're listening to but they must be pretty shit. This is actually good and has rhythm.
No, because the original rhythm is completely gone, just the vocals stayed. And they are sped up, the rest is just a newly composed song. If you were to cut the vocals, you wouldn't even know its a remix of said song. A remix always just changes or modifies certain parts of the original, while keeping the baseline of the song. But this... piece.. here is just a different song with the sped vocals from "How you remind me" on top. Edit: A remix should "fit" the original I dont know how to describe this to you but this remix here has no similarities with the original song (except for the vocals)
JerryFunHouse I feel like most remixes are the same in that they cut most of the actual instruments and keep the vocals or remix the instruments with the vocals. I can see where you are coming from but I just think that Its a pretty decent remix.
@@Carzey Didnt say it was bad but its not a remix of How you remind me, at least it doesnt feel like that, like I said, new song with lyrics from yet another song
