Тёмный

NIKON ACULON A211 ZOOM 10-22X50 REVIEW 

Ben Michael (Benny M)
Подписаться 1,9 тыс.
Просмотров 69 тыс.
50% 1

I bought a pair of Nikon Aculon A211 zoom 10-22x50 Binoculars as a gift and they're outstanding! amzn.to/2EqF5AA The 10-22x50 zoom is great for looking at the moon, landscape and wildlife. After owning the Nikon A211 binoculars for a while, I would recommend buying a tripod to ensure you get the most out of them because the zoom is so big it's hard to hold them steady. Hope you enjoy this simple review of these great Nikon binoculars.

Опубликовано:

 

21 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 38   
@adityashekhar7551
@adityashekhar7551 2 года назад
Hey Ben, I'm struck between 12*50 or 10-22 *50... Some reviews says 22x gets worse..so its useless to spend more money... Kindly guide me ..if it will be worth taking 10-22..with tripod???
@RideAlongside
@RideAlongside 8 лет назад
How do you like them after a couple months of use? Is the zoom only applied to the right eye? Thanks.
@BenMichael
@BenMichael 8 лет назад
Hey Ride Along! Yeah they're awesome! the zoom works on both sides. I'd definitely advise you to get a tripod though because it's a little unsteady at 22x. Cheers :)
@titisenegal
@titisenegal 7 лет назад
Hello, thanks for the review. Do you know which tripod would go with these?
@BenMichael
@BenMichael 7 лет назад
Hi there +titisenegal. Thanks for your comment! I just purchased one of these from eBay www.ebay.com.au/itm/261016769811 I've been really happy with it and the binoculars came with an adaptor. The feet on this tripod are really easy to adjust on uneven surfaces and it's really stable and easy to raise up and down. Hope that helps :)
@isharajayamanna
@isharajayamanna 5 лет назад
Will you recommend this for astronomy ? Bcos skymaster 20*80 seems too much heavy for handling for my 6Y kid. Waiting for a quick reply
@xxzenooniixx3199
@xxzenooniixx3199 3 года назад
is it accurate as depicted??? are you sure it is really 10-22 times zoom??? becuase for under 200$ that seems very suspicious
@driveitgreen2376
@driveitgreen2376 7 лет назад
Great review! Thank you!
@vijayinvites
@vijayinvites 2 года назад
How to adjust the eye cups on this one?
@Life_is_MATHS
@Life_is_MATHS 6 лет назад
Please tell me For this binoculars which tripod should I purchase
@BenMichael
@BenMichael 6 лет назад
It depends on what you're using it for. If you're just starting out, then I'd recommend something fairly basic to start off with. You should be able to find a decent tripod in the $20 - $50 price range. Good luck!
@santoshkiran_u
@santoshkiran_u 7 лет назад
What's the eye relief on these and now are they in low light
@BenMichael
@BenMichael 7 лет назад
Excellent in low light! Better than my Dobsonian Telescope because there's nothing to set up. For me, the eye relief is comfortable. I hold them about 15mm to 20mm maybe even 25mm from my eyes. So, If you have glasses, the eye relief should be fine.
@malsamalsa3576
@malsamalsa3576 6 лет назад
Digital Zoom as camera nikon p 900 x83 or canon s6 60 You mean that?
@pagladirector2222
@pagladirector2222 5 лет назад
Pls say me which binocula is good? Celestron 10× or 12×70 or 15×70? Which good?
@dhirendranathsingh4256
@dhirendranathsingh4256 3 года назад
I have bought aculon 10-22 -50 but it disappointed When you go on zoom there nothing clear It’s also bigger in size and heavy so not fit for travelers
@syedqamar199
@syedqamar199 4 года назад
Sir I live in Dubai and I need this how much .......drums ...
@BenMichael
@BenMichael 4 года назад
Probably about $100 - $150 USD
@doctordang3270
@doctordang3270 4 года назад
500 drums, and twenty trumpets..
@engotrr6041
@engotrr6041 7 лет назад
excellent review..
@BenMichael
@BenMichael 7 лет назад
Thanks again +!&Engin Otar
@Jbonn6141
@Jbonn6141 4 года назад
These would be a no brainer if they were waterproof and sealed
@PechnoyFlotVolgograd
@PechnoyFlotVolgograd 4 года назад
Спасибо
@patscanlan2678
@patscanlan2678 2 года назад
Stay clear of any zoom bins...waste of money,stick to fixed.
@elioantoniocandido5813
@elioantoniocandido5813 3 года назад
Traduzir para português
@malsamalsa3576
@malsamalsa3576 6 лет назад
this is optical zoom x8
@BenMichael
@BenMichael 6 лет назад
Saleem Malsa this model has variable zoom from 10 X up to 22 x.
@malsamalsa3576
@malsamalsa3576 6 лет назад
But you know that after x10, the image quality will be lessened.
@BenMichael
@BenMichael 6 лет назад
+Saleem Malsa the image quality at 10 x is exactly the same as it is at 22 x because it's optical zoom. I recommend using a tripod with these binoculars, because at 22 x zoom it is difficult to hold them steady. Only Digital Zoom will reduce image quality, but these binoculars do not have digital zoom.
@BenMichael
@BenMichael 6 лет назад
+Saleem Malsa you can adjust the focus on these Nikon binoculars to make sure it's 100% clear at 10x and 22x. I recommend using a tripod at anything higher than 10x because the binoculars are heavy and difficult to hold steady.
@malsamalsa3576
@malsamalsa3576 6 лет назад
Digital Zoom as camera nikon p 900 x83 or canon s6 60 You mean that?
@malsamalsa3576
@malsamalsa3576 6 лет назад
Ben Michael pleas help Read the comparison below Thanks. Very helpful. I am trying to decide between nikon 16x50 and 10-22x50. Any suggestions?Because the Amazon website itself admits that 10.22 is already 10 optical zoom Please check for me and I want to get closer www.amazon.com/Nikon-8250-ACULON-16x50-Binocular/dp/B00B9Z23NM/ref=sr_1_3?s=sporting-goods&ie=UTF8&qid=1516440463&sr=1-3&keywords=Nikon+16
@BenMichael
@BenMichael 6 лет назад
+Saleem Malsa I would definitely buy the 10-22x50. It's more versatile.
Далее
skibidi toilet multiverse 042
20:57
Просмотров 4,9 млн
Меня знают уже все соседи😅
00:34
I tricked MrBeast into giving me his channel
00:58
Просмотров 3,5 млн
Nikon Aculon A211 Binoculars Unboxing | 10 - 22x50
9:06
Astronomy binocular recommendations
11:41
Просмотров 53 тыс.
Nikon binocular zoom repair
26:18
Просмотров 58 тыс.
skibidi toilet multiverse 042
20:57
Просмотров 4,9 млн